yuppie wrote:
> Hi Chris!
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> I consider the self-contained scenario still as experimental.
>> You might, I don't. I've deployed this happily in production with a few
>> customer now.
>> Just because you don't happen to like it yourself, please don't belittle
>> it...
> I didn't mean to belittle it. 'experimental' is nothing negative. I'm 
> happy people like you are working on and with this approach.

There's no "working on", it's done, dusted and in production...

> But IMHO some details like the role of the annotated config file or if a 
> paster template would make things easier are not yet fleshed out enough 
> to make it *the* recommended scenario.

Bull. It's fine as it is, this 'death by feature request' is rediculous...


Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
             - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to