yuppie wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
>
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> I consider the self-contained scenario still as experimental.
>> You might, I don't. I've deployed this happily in production with a few
>> customer now.
>>
>> Just because you don't happen to like it yourself, please don't belittle
>> it...
>
> I didn't mean to belittle it. 'experimental' is nothing negative. I'm
> happy people like you are working on and with this approach.
There's no "working on", it's done, dusted and in production...
> But IMHO some details like the role of the annotated config file or if a
> paster template would make things easier are not yet fleshed out enough
> to make it *the* recommended scenario.
Bull. It's fine as it is, this 'death by feature request' is rediculous...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
