Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
b) It is exactly the opposite of what we've been trying to do for the
last couple of months: convergence, not divergence!
I think that differentiating Zope 3 from Zope 2 is a good thing.
If we want Zope 3 and its Component Architecture to be recognized by
people, it needs to be a first class citizen on zope.org, not some
Nothing says that zope3.org can't be prominently displayed on zope.org.
Why? Because Zope 2 will soon incorporate lots of Zope 3 technology
(it already does incorporate some),
I would posit that there are *many* non-Zope 2 users, and that is a
group we need to attract. Too closely associating Zope 2 and Zope 3
will only inhibit that.
making it all look like two separate worlds is far from reality.
I'm more interested in promoting Zope 3 than having web site structure
Senior Software Engineer
Zope3-dev mailing list