On Wednesday 16 August 2006 08:58, Benji York wrote:
> This is technically true, but there are a couple of issues. First,
> because this code depends on a GPLed component, so it not useful to
> people who require their projects to be ZPL.
Huh? You can build on top of lovely.rating without making the code GPL.
> Second, it is a departure
> from the status quo, such decisions should be made by the ZF.
This is not true at all. The status quo is: You can only check in ZPL code.
Anything you build on top of lovely.rating can be ZPL, since
schooltool.requirement is used as a library that is not extended.
In fact, the repository has many components checked in that have other
licenses including the GPL. As long as it is clearly marked and documented,
there is no problem.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list