John, are any of your peer-reviewed papers online? I can't seem to find them...
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----
From: John LaMuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:35:10 AM
Subject: Re: Information theoretic approaches to AGI (was Re: [agi] The
Necessity of Embodiment)
Matt
Below is a sampling
of my peer reviewed conference presentations on my background ethical theory
...
This should elevate
me above the common "crackpot"
#############################################
Talks
* Presentation of a paper at ISSS 2000 (International Society for
Systems Sciences) Conference in Toronto, Canada on various aspects of the new
science of Powerplay Politics.
· Toward a Science of
Consciousness: TUCSON April 8–12, 2002 Tucson Convention Center, Tucson,
Arizona-sponsored by the Center for Consciousness
Studies-University of
Arizona (poster presentation).
· John presented a
poster at the 8th International Tsukaba Bioethics Conference at
Tsukaba,
Japan on Feb. 15 to 17, 2003.
· John has
presented his paper – “The Communicational Factors Underlying the Mental
Disorders” at the 2006 Annual Conf. of the Western Psychological
Association at Palm Springs, CA
Honors
* Honors Diploma for Research in Biological Sciences (June 1977) -
Univ. of Calif. Irvine.
* John is a member of the APA and the American Philosophical
Association.
LaMuth, J. E. (1977). The
Development of the Forebrain as an Elementary Function of
the Parameters of Input Specificity and Phylogenetic
Age.
J. U-grad Rsch: Bio. Sci. U. C. Irvine. (6):
274-294.
LaMuth, J. E. (2000). A Holistic
Model of Ethical Behavior Based Upon a Metaperspectival
Hierarchy of the Traditional Groupings of Virtue,
Values, & Ideals. Proceedings of the 44th Annual World Congress for
the Int.
Society for the Systems Sciences – Toronto.
LaMuth, J. E. (2003). Inductive
Inference Affective Language Analyzer
Simulating AI. - US Patent # 6,587,846.
LaMuth, J. E. (2004). Behavioral
Foundations for the Behaviourome / Mind Mapping
Project.
Proceedings for the Eighth
International Tsukuba Bioethics
Roundtable,Tsukuba, Japan.
LaMuth, J. E. (2005). A Diagnostic
Classification of the Emotions: A Three-Digit Coding
System for Affective Language. Lucerne Valley: Fairhaven.
LaMuth, J. E. (2007). Inductive
Inference Affective Language Analyzer
Simulating Transitional AI. - US Patent # 7,236,963.
******************************
Although I currently have no working
model, I am collaborating on a working prototype.
I was responding to your challenge
for ...an example of a mathematical, software,
biological, or physical example of RSI, or at least a plausible argument that
one could be created
I feel I
have proposed a plausible argument, and considering the great stakes
involved concerning ethical safeguards for AI, an avenue worthy of critique
...
More on this in the last half of )
www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/specs.html
John LaMuth
www.ethicalvalues.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Mahoney
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: Information theoretic approaches to AGI (was Re: [agi] The
Necessity of Embodiment)
John, I have looked at your patent and various web pages. You list a lot of
nice sounding ethical terms (honor, love, hope, peace, etc) but give no
details on how to implement them. You have already admitted that you have no
experimental results, haven't actually built anything, and have no other
results such as refereed conference or journal papers describing your system.
If I am wrong about this, please let me know.
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----
From: John LaMuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 11:21:30 PM
Subject: Re: Information theoretic approaches to AGI (was Re: [agi] The
Necessity of Embodiment)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Mahoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:46
PM
Subject: Re: Information theoretic approaches to AGI (was Re: [agi] The
Necessity of Embodiment)
I have challenged this list as well as the singularity and SL4 lists to come
up with an example of a mathematical, software, biological, or physical
example of RSI, or at least a plausible argument that one could be created,
and nobody has. To qualify, an agent has to modify itself or create a more
intelligent copy of itself according to an intelligence test chosen by the
original. The following are not examples of RSI:
>
> 1. Evolution of life, including humans.
> 2. Emergence of language, culture, writing, communication technology, and
> computers.
> -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
###########################################
*****************************************
Matt
Where have you been for the last 2 months ??
I had been talking then about my 2 US Patents for ethical/friendly AI
along lines of a recursive simulation targeting language (topic 2) above.
This language agent employs feedback loops and LTM to increase comprehension
and accuracy
(and BTW - resolves the ethical safeguard problems for AI) ...
No-one yet has proven me wrong ?? Howsabout YOU ???
More at
www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/specs.html
John LaMuth
www.ethicalvalues.com
________________________________
agi | Archives | Modify Your Subscription
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
