> > > I guess I'll try #3 and see what happens. Recently, I've decided to > use Lisp as the procedural language, so that makes my approach even > more similar to OCP's. One remaining big difference is that my KB is > sentential but OCP's is graphical. Maybe we should spend some time > discussing the merits of each... > > YKY >
I don't think that's a major difference conceptually, as there's a constant-time conversion between the two representations. On the implementation level, our hypergraph representation comes down to a bunch of trees and linked lists (hidden behind a hypergraph-type API) We could wrap up a sentential DB inside our Atomspace API, and if you design a flexible sentential-DB API, we could wrap our Atomspace inside of it... So, this is really a convenience/taste/computational-overhead issue more so than a fundamental issue, IMO ben g ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
