> > >The page in question was updated with following two paragraphs:

Updated write-up is online and reads now as following:

What does plus in DVD+RW/+R stand for? Originally this paragraph started
as following:

  The key feature of DVD+RW/+R media is high [spatial] frequency wobbled
  [pre-]groove with addressing information modulated into it. This makes
  it possible to resume interrupted [or deliberately suspended] burning
  process with accuracy high enough for DVD[-ROM] player not to "notice"
  anything at playback time. Recovery from buffer underrun condition in
  DVD-RW/-R case in turn is way less accurate procedure, and the problem
  is that the provided accuracy is very much what average player can
  tolerate. Now given that both provided and tolerated inaccuracies are
  proportional to respectively writing and reading velocities there
  basically no guarantee that DVD-RW/-R recording that suffered from
  buffer underrun will be universally playable. 

Well, it turned out that I was wrong about one thing. Even though
DVD-RW/-R groove is wobbling at [apparently] 6 times lower spatial
frequency, it does provide for equally accurate recovery from buffer
underrun condition/loss-less linking. However! You apparently have to
choose between buffer underrun protection and DVD-ROM/-Video
compatibility. The catch is that the latter is achieved only in
Disk-at-once Recording mode which requires: a. prior knowledge of
data-set size, b. uninterrupted data-stream [buffer underruns are not
tolerated]. While the former is defined only in Incremental Recording
mode which implies explicit support by player unit(*). DVD+RW/+R are
free from this limitation and provide both DVD-ROM/-Video compatibility
and [unconditional] buffer underrun protection/loss-less linking. 

As already mentioned, DVD+RW(**) [pre-]groove has "addressing
information modulated into it." This gives you an advantage of writing
in truly arbitrary order [even to virgin surface and practically
instantly, after ~40 seconds long initial format procedure]. In addition
DVD+RW can be conveniently [over-]written with 2KB granularity(***).
DVD-RW in turn can only be overwritten in arbitrary order. Meaning that
it either has to be completely formatted first [takes 1/2 hour or so] or
initially written to in sequential manner. And it should also be noted
that arbitrary overwrite is never an option if DVD-RW media was recorded
in [compatible] Disc-at-once mode, disc blanking is. 

Sometimes DVD+RW/+R recording strategy is erroneously referred to as
packet writing. I write "erroneously" for following reason. Despite the
fact that DVD-RW/-R provide for loss-less linking [within the packet
only?], packets are still denoted with certain linking information which
distinguishes it [recording mode in question] from e.g. Disk-at-once.
Now the point is that written DVD+RW/+R media [well, its Data Zone] does
not contain any linking information and is logically indistinguishable
from one written in DVD-RW/-R Disc-at-once mode [or DVD-ROM for that
matter]. Which is why I'm reluctant to call DVD+RW/+R recording method
for packet writing. Or TAO/SAO/DAO for that matter...

(*) I'm no longer 100% sure that it's absolutely required... At least
linking sectors [if any] are assigned with LBA so that address space
remains contiguous... If anybody can clarify, I would definitely
appreciate a note... At least it looks like if explicit support is not
actually required, it's not necessarily trivial to master compatible
filesystem layout. On the other hand most DVD-ROM units support it
nowadays. 

(**) DVD+R also has address in pre-groove [ADIP], but it's not clear
what is it used for, as DVD+R provides for sequential recording only. 

(***) DVD "native" blocksize is 32KB, so that 2KB granularity is just a
trick, but you're excused from playing it, i.e. reading 32KB, replacing
corresponding 2KB and writing 32KB back. 

A.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to