On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 3:21:12 AM EST Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > Louis-Philippe (just quoting below in case you might have missed it) is > repeating the importance that anyone who thinks my suggestion (MR[1]) is > a bad idea make themselves heard. I'm hereby adding those maintainers > who have more than 5 packages that are affected and did not yet raised > their opinion in To: field. > > udd=> SELECT * FROM (select maintainer, count(*) from sources where > uploaders like '%team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org%' and release = 'sid' group > by maintainer order by maintainer) tmp WHERE count > 5; maintainer > | count > -------------------------------------------------------------------------+- > ------ Debian PaN Maintainers > <debian-pan-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net> | 7 > Jeroen Ploemen <j...@debian.org> | 16 > Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> | 23 > Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> | 82 > Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> | 7 > Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> | 15 > (6 rows) > > Debian PaN is another team which might need extra discussion but I think > the intention is clear and Scott has raised his opinion before[2]. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/ > 20 [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00060.html
I used to use this a lot more than I do now. Currently I only use it for packages where I'm also the or a upstream developer, so it generally makes more sense to do non-packaging changes there. This did cause me to go back and check and I found one I had missed when I was changing this previously. I've just uploaded vrfydmn with DPT as maintainer. Looking at your list, I note that it includes team members that have been very active in team wide work, not just on their own packages. I think it would be contrary to the spirit of Debian and working together if we changed the rules and they felt they had to leave the team. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
