If you don't want to continue on jclouds (I fully understand this), fair enough. But if people still want to maintain it, I don't see any issue there.
Is a fork better ? I don't think so. Because, it might happen if we retire the project. As I proposed earlier, if the current PMC members don't want to continue on jclouds, but we have potential volunteers to take over, I think it's fair to try. Apache is community driven, if we have new people in the jclouds community, willing to help, we could be "welcoming". After some months, we will definitely see if the project is still alive or not. If you absolutely want to retire the project, I'm with you, and then pulsar or brooklyn (or another project) will do a fork probably. Regards JB On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 3:38 PM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > I agree with Gaul's comments. > > If people wants to help, worth to see if it actually happens ;) > > > > It's been 2 months since the proposal of retiring the project and to date, > nothing real happened beyond "I'm in" comments. > If at the time of discussing the project retirement, this is all the energy > that is around to maintain it, I don't think it is a setup for success and > agree with Gaul that we will better serve users by retiring the project. > > > > P.S. Geoff, really appreciate your honesty in accounting for your bandwidth!
