Maiko, good to see you here. MultiPSK already has a KISS interface. It has been used for APRS successfully so far.
73, Jose, CO2JA -- maiko4 escribió: > Good day to everyone, > > I am new to this group - could not help but notice JNOS mentioned. > > Jose stated earlier : > > >> I believe that the simplest is not reinventing the wheel, and >> using MultiPSK as a modem, using traditional BBS programs as >> the mail application. >> > > Believe it or not, using MultiPSK as a modem for JNOS has been on > my mind for quite some time now. It's on my TODO list, I just have > not gotten to it yet. I have chatted with the author of MultiPSK > about doing this as well. > > I'm not sure what mode I would want to use it for though. I even > considered using JNOS as an IP bridge using the MultiPSK modem to > transport RAW IP (more or less) frames over HF, as one example > of what was on my mind. > > >> The store and forward part could mean a *LOT* of work ... >> > > Not really. JNOS has a S&F ability already, it would just be a > matter of writing a new INTERFACE (PORT) for JNOS to communicate > over. JNOS could use FBB, FBB compressed, or B2F (recently added > in my attempt to keep uptodate with WinLink interoperability. > > >> I feel that a lot of the old packet legacy programs have a lot >> to offer if the classic TNC is replaced for a better modem. >> > > I agree. That's why I spent the last few years writing hostmode > drivers for a few types of pactor modems. Unfortunately, I seem > to have stumbled across these needs long after the fact. In a way, > the work has been a bit of a waste of time - maybe 3 users world > wide that I know of, that are possibly playing with the code. > > >> net2kiss ... >> > > I wrote a kernel interface for the Linux version of JNOS, allowing > you to directly attach JNOS to baycom boards via the linux kernel > modules - WITHOUT the need for 'net2kiss' and 'pseudo-tty' devs. > > >> Could that be extended to ALE ? >> > > I'm sure it could be. > > Anyways, I just thought i would jump in. > > I don't think using MultiPSK as a modem will be difficult. > > BUT, this time to better make sure I don't waste precious time > working on something no one will use, I need to know from more > than just one person, what should I concentrate my efforts on > then. That's the big dilemna for me. What do I focus on ? > > Too many protocols to choose from now, and lots of division > between their camps. That frustrates the development part. > > But having something like MultiPSK would actually solve that > for me, since all I'm doing is interfacing to a modem, so in > a way I would not have to worry about the different modes, > considering they all do the same thing in the long run. > > Regards, > > Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM > > * http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2 > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- MSc. Ing. José Angel Amador Fundora Profesor Auxiliar Departamento de Telecomunicaciones Facultad de Ing. Eléctrica, CUJAE Calle 114 # 11901 e/119 y 127 Marianao 19390 Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba Tel: (53 7) 266-3445 Mail: amador at electrica.cujae.edu.cu VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación Energética 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones ...Por una cultura energética sustentable www.ciercuba.com
