On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Hi Dan,
> My first impression, it's Github only.
No, not at all. It's a way of generating HTML from static templates, which
can be augmented with CSS and extra HTML where necessary. It just so happens
that what Github hosting offers, is Jekyll support out-of-the-box.
> I lean toward writing plain HTML/CSS with a little JavaScript for
> maximum portability and familiarity.
I'm afraid I lean in the opposite direction. We are by no means a special
snowflake such that we need to do this from scratch. One of the aims here is
to be able to take away the need for writing HTML/CSS, not make it an upfront
requirement.
Jaimos Skriletz has also expressed an interest in this (I'ev Cced him), and
he'll post here soon about what his thoughts are, etc. Hopefully you and he
can work together on this.
> Meanwhile, I committed fvwm-web changes yesterday, but those
> changes have not shown up at fvwm.org.
>
> Jason, what's up?
Probably the same problem with the main FVWM repo; it's wedged.
-- Thomas Adam
--
"Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am
not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
