On Monday 08 May 2017 21:05:33 Sieghard wrote: > Hallo Marcos, > > Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300: > > >> 2. In this case: > > >> obj2: ^objty; //on heap > > >> > > >> Is it possible to remove the "^"? > > >> obj2.f1:= 123; > > > > > > No, obj2 is a pointer. > > > > > >> I think this distinction exists because "class" exists, right? > > How does that behave in case of _nested objects_, possibly with identically > named fields, which might even be of different types? Is that manageable, > or will the construct break down, at least on "pathological" casses? > Example?
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
