RE: [NTSysADM] CBT Training

2014-09-18 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Thanks for the response 
I was erring to trainsignal or plurasight but wondered if there were any other 
options, the nuggets are sometimes too brief and in my mind miss out important 
items that trainsignal seem to cover :-)


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Cain, Steven
Sent: 16 September 2014 16:45
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] CBT Training

   We just bought a subscription to Pluralsight (which bought Trainsignal) a 
few months ago. It's been okay so far for the couple courses I found time to 
watch. Good news is in July 2014 they added Don Jones and Greg Shields who 
developed training for CBT Nuggets to their staff 


Steve Cain
Sr. System Administrator

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:18 AM
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [NTSysADM] CBT Training

Hi
In the past I have used CBT nuggets and trainsignal for CBT training I felt 
that trainsignal had the edge, its been some time since my last CBT training 
stint 2008 and I wondered what people recommend I noticed trainsignal have been 
bought out although they do offer a free trial 

At the moment due to issues I had with CBT nuggets I will discount these, Could 
anyone recommend anything else 

Thanks 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.








Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





[NTSysADM] CBT Training

2014-09-16 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
In the past I have used CBT nuggets and trainsignal for CBT training I felt 
that trainsignal had the edge, its been some time since my last CBT training 
stint 2008 and I wondered what people recommend I noticed trainsignal have been 
bought out although they do offer a free trial 

At the moment due to issues I had with CBT nuggets I will discount these,  
Could anyone recommend anything else 

Thanks 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





[NTSysADM] Microsoft Excahnge Upgrade

2014-04-02 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
We have exchange server 2003 with a front end server servicing webclients and 
phones
After acquiring another company we find ourselves with an exchange server 2007 
license and enough licenses to upgrade to 2007

We don't have the money at this time to move to another version and as 2003 
will soon be out of support wanted to move quickly on the project 

Question
If we install an exchange 2007 server within our existing setup (single domain 
one site, one exchange server 2003 servers)
Can we just install 2007 server and keep the other setup as is, then gradually 
migrate people over to 2007 as and when 

Ofter this could we then upgrade the front end server 

Would it all continue to function with 2007 server in our existing setup 

We have a server and 2003 server 64bit license spare 

From what I have read I am inclined to think it wont work!

Recommendations would be welcome 
Of course we don't have the funds to purchase anything (at this point in time)
And would like as little disruption as possible, hopefully to continue running 
24/7 during the upgrade (or as near to this as possible)
 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] RE: Microsoft Excahnge Upgrade

2014-04-02 Thread Nigel Parker
OK 

So given that at this time we don’t have any funding to purchase any newer 
technologies 

 

Will installing exchange 2007 into our existing 2003 site, be doable, will the 
front end still work as I migrate people to 2007, then finally as we expire 
exchange 2003 and I can add an edge transport server for 2007 

Would this work 

 

And is there anything I need to look out for?

 

Yes sure if money was no object we would upgrade everything, however , in the 
real world we have what we have  and from a management point of view really we 
have a 2003 exchange box that has worked without problems so why upgrade at all!

As funds are available we will migrate from 2003 server to 2012 and of course 
upgrade exchange, however at this time the funds are unavailable 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Richard Stovall
Sent: 02 April 2014 21:03
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Microsoft Excahnge Upgrade

 

Server 2003 R2 is July 2015.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/search/default.aspx?sort=PNalpha=Windows+Server+2003Filter=FilterNO

 

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:

Even 2007 is in extended support at this time, with 2003 officially dying next 
week, after a long useful lifetime.

Sure, you could make this work. I don't know that I would want to spend the 
time and effort to do so, just to end up on another dead OS (Server 2003 dies 
next week also, or perhaps it's in June -- very soon, regardless) and an 
Exchange version in extended support.

You are probably going to be looking at third party migration tools regardless, 
when it comes time to upgrade Exchange. Your technical debt is quite deep.


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 11:14 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Microsoft Excahnge Upgrade

Hi
We have exchange server 2003 with a front end server servicing webclients and 
phones After acquiring another company we find ourselves with an exchange 
server 2007 license and enough licenses to upgrade to 2007

We don't have the money at this time to move to another version and as 2003 
will soon be out of support wanted to move quickly on the project

Question
If we install an exchange 2007 server within our existing setup (single domain 
one site, one exchange server 2003 servers) Can we just install 2007 server and 
keep the other setup as is, then gradually migrate people over to 2007 as and 
when

Ofter this could we then upgrade the front end server

Would it all continue to function with 2007 server in our existing setup

We have a server and 2003 server 64bit license spare

From what I have read I am inclined to think it wont work!

Recommendations would be welcome
Of course we don't have the funds to purchase anything (at this point in time) 
And would like as little disruption as possible, hopefully to continue running 
24/7 during the upgrade (or as near to this as possible)


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.






 


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


RE: [NTSysADM] RE: Windows server 2012 training books

2014-03-13 Thread Nigel Parker
Thank to everyone for the recommendations 

I presume then Microsoft hasn't released a training pack like they did with 
2003 and 2008 I quite liked these they worked at my level 
slow :-)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ziots, Edward
Sent: 12 March 2014 15:36
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Windows server 2012 training books

Stanek is the man when it comes to a quick fast good guides. 

http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Server-2012-Pocket-Consultant/dp/0735666334

Z

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
Work:401-255-2497


This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and confidential 
and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this message, but are not the 
intended recipient, nor an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are 
strictly prohibited from copying, printing, forwarding or otherwise 
disseminating this communication. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to the message. Then, 
delete the message from your computer. Thank you.




-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:43 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Windows server 2012 training books

Sorry this maybe a little off topic
I was looking for book recommendations for server 2012 

I used these for 2008 server I found them quite a good guide Windows Server 
2008 Server Administrator: Training Kit

Is something like this available for windows 2012? 

Although I have googled up a few books nothing like the training kit has 
Microsoft not released the training as a kit 

Or does anyone have any personal recommendations Thanks 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.







Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





[NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Looking for option for Disater recovery 
We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work faultlessly 

Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!

The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re licensing, from 
the test we have completed they work ok for a day However is there a way to 
transfer the licence (I don't want to break any licensing agreements) so if it 
means we have to buy another x number of 2008 server licenses then that's what 
we will do, it would be just to run the machine as a virtual machine for as 
long as it needs to repair the hardware and have the machine back up and 
running physically. 

Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are windows 2000 
these come back no problem 

Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to a virtual 
machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements with Microsoft 

Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do this 
cheaply
The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works fine, they 
restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just the licensing 

OR 
How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30 days? If so 
this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up, 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Thanks for the responses 

Just reading up on the options, looks like I have a solution now thanks 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of James Hill
Sent: 28 January 2014 00:11
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

 

I recommend you use the wpad method.  The contents of a wpad.dat are the
same as .pac file.

 

If the browser is set to Automatically Discover then wpad works.  There
is no need to modify the connection settings and specify pac files which
is nice if you have non domain joined computers/guests on the network.

 

James.

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Saturday, 25 January 2014 1:59 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

 

Thanks 

Might take some reading but it looks like an option for us

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: 24 January 2014 08:29
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

 

Proxy auto-config (PAC) files are ideal for this situation

http://www.proxypacfiles.com/proxypac/

 

On 24 January 2014 08:26, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
wrote:

We have some issue here were
Reps will take a machine and use Free WIFI spots, the company permit
this but...

When they connect, they complain they cant use the internet and even
there vpn clients refuse connection even though they are connected to
the Free wifi, after further investigation its seems this happen

They connect to a free hotel wifi
However this is a connection that permits them to connect to a holding
page via a browser and they then have to enter further information,
sometimes the wifi connection prompts that further information ios
required to use the wifi spot.

Now there internet clients are set to use a proxy server for internet
access and of course this blocked them from being able to access even
the holding or landing page to enter further information

(same happens if they use there phones to connect from a remote location
(mix of android and apple devices)

What I would like to do is find a way when they are OFF our network to
disable the proxy settings in internet explorer

Details
Servers 2003 server
Clients mix of Windows XP (yes I know but we are still testing software
to permit them to move to windows 7)
AND
Windows 7

Internet explorer is there browser versions are from 8 upwards

I was going to go in with a lowtech approach and maybe run a batch file
that mapps a drive and looks for a file
If it fails the assumption is that they are off the network and disables
proxy settings

I have already found a setting in AD to turn on or off the firewall if
they are on or off our network and this seems to work well

However I need to find a way to ensure if they are on standby that when
the machine wakes it knows if it is on or off the company network, is
there a way to do this, without user intervention?

OR
Does anyone have a better idea
Total spend on this project of course would be ZERO, :-(



Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.




-- 

James Rankin
-
RCL - Senior Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS) | The Virtualization
Practice Analyst - Desktop Virtualization
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

 



  http://www.ultraframe-conservatories.co.uk/realroof 




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd. 
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you

RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 

At the moment we have nothing in place, So am just looking at options
available, 

The hope was we could restore the faulty machine to Hyperv host that
will have 2008 server on and run them for upto 3 days, until the old
hardware was fixed, or a replacement ordered we have a DR contract that
could run the machine for longer but this will be a short term 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 10:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Then how are you licensing your DR machine?
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:07 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

Your first Option is correct 

The Dr machine will only be live when the Physical machine is down; due
to hardware failure Of course because we are buying the license as an
oem with the server I believe if the motherboard fails then the license
also is dead! And not transferable

 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 09:28
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Licensing is something to take up with Microsoft but it sounds like
maybe the original will be offline due to failure when the DR is live
but if you are talking about a Hot DR you will need separate licensing
for the host machines and possibly the virtual machines as well.
 
Jon
 

 Subject: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:10:30 +
 From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 
 Hi 
 Looking for option for Disater recovery 
 We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work
faultlessly 
 
 Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!
 
 The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re
licensing, from the test we have completed they work ok for a day
However is there a way to transfer the licence (I don't want to break
any licensing agreements) so if it means we have to buy another x number
of 2008 server licenses then that's what we will do, it would be just to
run the machine as a virtual machine for as long as it needs to repair
the hardware and have the machine back up and running physically. 
 
 Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
 All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
 Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are
windows 2000 these come back no problem 
 
 Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to
a virtual machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements
with Microsoft 
 
 Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do
this cheaply
 The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works
fine, they restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just
the licensing 
 
 OR 
 How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30
days? If so this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up,

 
 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 
 
 
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 
 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.
 
 
 

 



  http://www.ultraframe-conservatories.co.uk/realroof 




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd. 
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful

RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
If 

We bought a server with Datacenter that has unlimited virtual machines,
could the virtualised machine be moved to this server and when the
activation pops up could the datacenter license be used?

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 10:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Then how are you licensing your DR machine?
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:07 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

Your first Option is correct 

The Dr machine will only be live when the Physical machine is down; due
to hardware failure Of course because we are buying the license as an
oem with the server I believe if the motherboard fails then the license
also is dead! And not transferable

 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 09:28
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Licensing is something to take up with Microsoft but it sounds like
maybe the original will be offline due to failure when the DR is live
but if you are talking about a Hot DR you will need separate licensing
for the host machines and possibly the virtual machines as well.
 
Jon
 

 Subject: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:10:30 +
 From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 
 Hi 
 Looking for option for Disater recovery 
 We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work
faultlessly 
 
 Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!
 
 The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re
licensing, from the test we have completed they work ok for a day
However is there a way to transfer the licence (I don't want to break
any licensing agreements) so if it means we have to buy another x number
of 2008 server licenses then that's what we will do, it would be just to
run the machine as a virtual machine for as long as it needs to repair
the hardware and have the machine back up and running physically. 
 
 Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
 All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
 Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are
windows 2000 these come back no problem 
 
 Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to
a virtual machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements
with Microsoft 
 
 Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do
this cheaply
 The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works
fine, they restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just
the licensing 
 
 OR 
 How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30
days? If so this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up,

 
 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 
 
 
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 
 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.
 
 
 

 



  http://www.ultraframe-conservatories.co.uk/realroof 




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd. 
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful. 

 


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those

RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Just to add

We have backup exec that can create the virtual images we think we may
use this once per week, then any missing files etc can be restored from
the nightly backup 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 11:19
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Okay what you are talking about is taking a physical machine that
crashes.  You take your backup restore to a Virtual machine correct???
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:12:59 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

At the moment we have nothing in place, So am just looking at options
available, 

The hope was we could restore the faulty machine to Hyperv host that
will have 2008 server on and run them for upto 3 days, until the old
hardware was fixed, or a replacement ordered we have a DR contract that
could run the machine for longer but this will be a short term 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 10:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Then how are you licensing your DR machine?
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:07 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

Your first Option is correct 

The Dr machine will only be live when the Physical machine is down; due
to hardware failure Of course because we are buying the license as an
oem with the server I believe if the motherboard fails then the license
also is dead! And not transferable

 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 09:28
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Licensing is something to take up with Microsoft but it sounds like
maybe the original will be offline due to failure when the DR is live
but if you are talking about a Hot DR you will need separate licensing
for the host machines and possibly the virtual machines as well.
 
Jon
 

 Subject: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:10:30 +
 From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 
 Hi 
 Looking for option for Disater recovery 
 We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work
faultlessly 
 
 Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!
 
 The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re
licensing, from the test we have completed they work ok for a day
However is there a way to transfer the licence (I don't want to break
any licensing agreements) so if it means we have to buy another x number
of 2008 server licenses then that's what we will do, it would be just to
run the machine as a virtual machine for as long as it needs to repair
the hardware and have the machine back up and running physically. 
 
 Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
 All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
 Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are
windows 2000 these come back no problem 
 
 Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to
a virtual machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements
with Microsoft 
 
 Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do
this cheaply
 The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works
fine, they restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just
the licensing 
 
 OR 
 How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30
days? If so this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up,

 
 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 
 
 
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 
 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you

RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Correct 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 11:19
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Okay what you are talking about is taking a physical machine that
crashes.  You take your backup restore to a Virtual machine correct???
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:12:59 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

At the moment we have nothing in place, So am just looking at options
available, 

The hope was we could restore the faulty machine to Hyperv host that
will have 2008 server on and run them for upto 3 days, until the old
hardware was fixed, or a replacement ordered we have a DR contract that
could run the machine for longer but this will be a short term 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 10:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Then how are you licensing your DR machine?
 
Jon
 



Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:07 +
From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com

Hi 

Your first Option is correct 

The Dr machine will only be live when the Physical machine is down; due
to hardware failure Of course because we are buying the license as an
oem with the server I believe if the motherboard fails then the license
also is dead! And not transferable

 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: 28 January 2014 09:28
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

Licensing is something to take up with Microsoft but it sounds like
maybe the original will be offline due to failure when the DR is live
but if you are talking about a Hot DR you will need separate licensing
for the host machines and possibly the virtual machines as well.
 
Jon
 

 Subject: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines
 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:10:30 +
 From: nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 
 Hi 
 Looking for option for Disater recovery 
 We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work
faultlessly 
 
 Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!
 
 The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re
licensing, from the test we have completed they work ok for a day
However is there a way to transfer the licence (I don't want to break
any licensing agreements) so if it means we have to buy another x number
of 2008 server licenses then that's what we will do, it would be just to
run the machine as a virtual machine for as long as it needs to repair
the hardware and have the machine back up and running physically. 
 
 Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
 All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
 Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are
windows 2000 these come back no problem 
 
 Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to
a virtual machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements
with Microsoft 
 
 Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do
this cheaply
 The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works
fine, they restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just
the licensing 
 
 OR 
 How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30
days? If so this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up,

 
 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
 
 
 
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
 
 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful

RE: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

2014-01-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 


When hardware failure occurs, backup software restores to a VM. 
When new hardware is in place, you backup the VM and restore to new
physical hardware?



 

Correct 

It would be a total of 5 machines 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Bodnar
Sent: 28 January 2014 14:44
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Virtual machines

 

How big is the environment, how many server licenses are you talking
about here? 

Just so I get this right, this is your process? 

When hardware failure occurs, backup software restores to a VM. 
When new hardware is in place, you backup the VM and restore to new
physical hardware? 

My first thought would be to get volume licenses and setup KMS. I
believe this would solve the whole problem. 

Christopher Bodnar 
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services 

Tel 610-807-6459  
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017 
christopher_bod...@glic.com mailto:  

 

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com http://www.guardianlife.com/  








From:Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk 
To:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com 
Date:01/28/2014 04:12 AM 
Subject:[NTSysADM] Virtual machines 
Sent by:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 






Hi 
Looking for option for Disater recovery 
We use backupexec that can create hyperv machines and they work
faultlessly 

Also thinking about not spending money unless we have to!

The hyper v machines with 2008 comeback however they need re licensing,
from the test we have completed they work ok for a day However is there
a way to transfer the licence (I don't want to break any licensing
agreements) so if it means we have to buy another x number of 2008
server licenses then that's what we will do, it would be just to run the
machine as a virtual machine for as long as it needs to repair the
hardware and have the machine back up and running physically. 

Having mirrored servers would be out as the cost would be to high 
All servers have a 24 hour 4 hour response 
Some are older servers running proprietary software so they are windows
2000 these come back no problem 

Would something like veam be able to transfer the physical license to a
virtual machine and then back or is this breaking licensing agreements
with Microsoft 

Again I don't want to break any licensing agreements but have to do this
cheaply
The backup software we have creates the virtual machines and works fine,
they restore to physical or virtual servers without problems, just the
licensing 

OR 
How long can I legally run a transferred 2008 server, do you get 30
days? If so this would be more than enough to have the hardware back up,


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk 



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.




- This message, and any
attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.

image001.jpg

[NTSysADM] Wireless access points

2014-01-24 Thread Nigel Parker
We have some issue here were 
Reps will take a machine and use Free WIFI spots, the company permit this but...

When they connect, they complain they cant use the internet and even there vpn 
clients refuse connection even though they are connected to the Free wifi, 
after further investigation its seems this happen 

They connect to a free hotel wifi
However this is a connection that permits them to connect to a holding page via 
a browser and they then have to enter further information, sometimes the wifi 
connection prompts that further information ios required to use the wifi spot.

Now there internet clients are set to use a proxy server for internet access 
and of course this blocked them from being able to access even the holding or 
landing page to enter further information 

(same happens if they use there phones to connect from a remote location (mix 
of android and apple devices)

What I would like to do is find a way when they are OFF our network to disable 
the proxy settings in internet explorer

Details 
Servers 2003 server
Clients mix of Windows XP (yes I know but we are still testing software to 
permit them to move to windows 7)
AND 
Windows 7

Internet explorer is there browser versions are from 8 upwards

I was going to go in with a lowtech approach and maybe run a batch file that 
mapps a drive and looks for a file 
If it fails the assumption is that they are off the network and disables proxy 
settings

I have already found a setting in AD to turn on or off the firewall if they are 
on or off our network and this seems to work well 

However I need to find a way to ensure if they are on standby that when the 
machine wakes it knows if it is on or off the company network, is there a way 
to do this, without user intervention?

OR
Does anyone have a better idea 
Total spend on this project of course would be ZERO, :-(

  

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

2014-01-24 Thread Nigel Parker
Thanks 

Might take some reading but it looks like an option for us

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: 24 January 2014 08:29
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Wireless access points

 

Proxy auto-config (PAC) files are ideal for this situation

http://www.proxypacfiles.com/proxypac/

 

On 24 January 2014 08:26, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
wrote:

We have some issue here were
Reps will take a machine and use Free WIFI spots, the company permit
this but...

When they connect, they complain they cant use the internet and even
there vpn clients refuse connection even though they are connected to
the Free wifi, after further investigation its seems this happen

They connect to a free hotel wifi
However this is a connection that permits them to connect to a holding
page via a browser and they then have to enter further information,
sometimes the wifi connection prompts that further information ios
required to use the wifi spot.

Now there internet clients are set to use a proxy server for internet
access and of course this blocked them from being able to access even
the holding or landing page to enter further information

(same happens if they use there phones to connect from a remote location
(mix of android and apple devices)

What I would like to do is find a way when they are OFF our network to
disable the proxy settings in internet explorer

Details
Servers 2003 server
Clients mix of Windows XP (yes I know but we are still testing software
to permit them to move to windows 7)
AND
Windows 7

Internet explorer is there browser versions are from 8 upwards

I was going to go in with a lowtech approach and maybe run a batch file
that mapps a drive and looks for a file
If it fails the assumption is that they are off the network and disables
proxy settings

I have already found a setting in AD to turn on or off the firewall if
they are on or off our network and this seems to work well

However I need to find a way to ensure if they are on standby that when
the machine wakes it knows if it is on or off the company network, is
there a way to do this, without user intervention?

OR
Does anyone have a better idea
Total spend on this project of course would be ZERO, :-(



Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.







-- 

James Rankin
-
RCL - Senior Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS) | The Virtualization
Practice Analyst - Desktop Virtualization
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.



RE: [NTSysADM] Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 file transfer latency

2014-01-06 Thread Nigel Parker
I may be on the wrong track 

However we had issues with 64bit windows 7 clients we run an ip4 network
internally and found this solved our problem 

 

 

1) Run the following commands through a CMD prompt with Admin rights. 

 

netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled

netsh interface tcp set global rss=disabled

 

2) Turn off Remote Differential Compression - RDC

 

Go to Control Panel = Programs = Turn Windows features on or off =
Deselect Remote Differential Compression

 

3) Set Link Speed and Duplex in network card properties from Auto
Negotiate to match your line speed of your switch. In my case this was
100 MB Full Duplex

 

4) Deselect IPv6 and QoS in network card protocols  

 

Reboot your PC

 

 

Nigel Parker

Systems Engineer

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd

Tel:   01200 452329

Fax:   01200 452201

Web:   www.ultraframe.com http://www.ultraframe.com 

Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk 

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Tran
Sent: 03 January 2014 15:42
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 file transfer
latency

 

Hi All,

 

I previously posted a message about slow file opening and saving in
office 2010 between W7 and Server 2k8r2 but had no replies.  I did
further testing and it seems to occur more than just office files.  It
occurs with any opening or closing/saving of files on the server.
Once it is opened, it works fine.

 

There was a hotfix that was supposed to resolve this issue,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981711, but I couldn't even get that
installed.  I follow some other posts and disabled SMB 2.0 of my W7
client.  The latency went away.

 

Ideally, I'd like to have SMB 2.0 enabled.  I'm sure someone here on
this board has had this issue?  Can anyone shed some light on what they
did to resolve this?  I'm about ready to open a support case with MS but
I thought I'd try this team one more time.

 

Thanks,

 

Jimmy

 

 


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.



RE: [NTSysADM] Free ebook: Introducing Windows Server 2012 R2 Preview Release

2013-09-06 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Nice thanks for the link


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk





-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Cook
Sent: 12 August 2013 15:17
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Free ebook: Introducing Windows Server 2012 R2
Preview Release

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2013/08/01/free-ebook-in
troducing-windows-server-2012-r2-preview-release.aspx

 John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352)-244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS,
CompTIA A+, N+, Security+
 VSP4, VTSP4








CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] RE: Hyperv windows 2008 keys

2013-07-15 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Its a dell so it activates with the Dell media, looking at dells website
it just says to use the Dell media for the virtual server install and
put the key in from the supplied coa it actually says Virtual key 

I thought at first it was something to do with the machine not being
able to access the internet so I bypassed our fire wall and although it
takes longer to fail it still fails :-(


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk




-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Tran
Sent: 12 July 2013 18:22
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Hyperv windows 2008 keys

Im leaning towards wrong install media.  OEM, Retail, VL media all use
different keys in my experience.  

With that said, it should work since you are using the dell server 2008
disk with this the OEM key.  Did the Host activate ok?

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:34 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Hyperv windows 2008 keys

Hi
Ok we have our windows 2008 server setup and I am installing the first
virtual machine (another 2008 server) Now on the Dell server we have 2
product keys One is the 2008 product key the other says Virtual machine
key 

However after installing the virtual machine and inputting the Virtual
key from the server I get an error That the product key is invalid 

After checking for typos a number of times 

What am I doing wrong, Is thins not the key or am I using the wrong
install media (supplied Dell badge windows 2008 install disk)

Thanks 


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.







Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





[NTSysADM] Hyperv windows 2008 keys

2013-07-12 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Ok we have our windows 2008 server setup and I am installing the first
virtual machine (another 2008 server)
Now on the Dell server we have 2 product keys 
One is the 2008 product key the other says 
Virtual machine key 

However after installing the virtual machine and inputting the Virtual
key from the server I get an error That the product key is invalid 

After checking for typos a number of times 

What am I doing wrong, Is thins not the key or am I using the wrong
install media (supplied Dell badge windows 2008 install disk)

Thanks 


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk




Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

2013-07-01 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
I like the idea 
But Just to add to the puzzle we also run MS DOS, Windows 95 and NT4, and 
windows 7 we are moving to windows 7 but this will take at least a year and the 
cutting machines in the factory do not have the option of an upgrade unless the 
hardware is replaced and we do not have the budget for that as it runs into 
millions of pounds 

In the factory we have about 60 machines they all print to different label 
printers as these are at the end of each users bench sp they don’t have to walk 
far, 

The other problem is although we have enough windows licenses in the factory 
they all logon as the same person, this is so the managers always know the 
logons and password so I wouldn't be able to ties the printers down to a user 
only a machine, 

In the office people print to the nearest printer this is more manageable 
however every user has different software mostly custom that we setup to print 
to another printer that could be in a remote office in most cases, the software 
stores the settings in the registry so thats easy to find ok maybe we have 
groups of 5 users with similar needs, it would take some work to set these ip 
(i know once there done they're done) 

At this moment I don’t have the time or patience to set this up 
We need a 64 bit server as some users have moved to 64 bit versions of windows 
because the software dictates this 

So I am going to try
I have already virtualised the print server for testing 
Will upgrade it to windows 2008
Export the printers as was suggested 
Install a clean windows 2008 64 bit version 
Import the printers 
TEST so I know what to expect and the disruption 
Then go live :-)

Thanks for all the suggestions I know setting up scripts and AD settings is the 
way to go but ...


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk




-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Aakash Shah
Sent: 28 June 2013 17:08
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Not knowing the specifics of your environment, this could still work.  I would 
suggest the following:
1. If the custom software makes the user select a specific printer, i.e. it 
does not respect the default printer, and if this printer is different than the 
printer the users would use for standard word docs, etc, you can find out where 
the custom program records the printer to use.  It may be in the registry 
(likely), or a custom file.  With this information, you can pre-populate either 
the reg key/custom file with the printer information.  

2. And then for the rest of Windows, you can deploy (and set as a default if 
needed) specific printers based on some pattern (assuming this pattern exists - 
either physical location, IP address, security group, part of a name, etc).

-Aakash Shah

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 8:35 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Hi
The main problem is that we have a lot of custom written software, this needs 
the users to go into the options and select the printer within the software it 
doesn’t pick up default printer settings Even if it did this would be of no use 
to our users as they will have a default printer set to one machine for 
standard word docs etc and another machine to print out from within the 
application

I can see your logic but for most of our users this will not work 


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk






-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Aakash Shah
Sent: 28 June 2013 16:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Is there any pattern/logic as to what printers each person will get?  If so, 
you could use GP to deploy the printers, and if the pattern is complex, you 
could consider creating a script (still deployed via GP) that contains the 
detection logic and then adds the printer depending on the logic. 

You mentioned below that no two users has the same printers.  Not knowing how 
that will look, I will create a sample use case: let's say that each of the 50 
label printers is used by one person only.  If this is the case, then you can 
consider creating the new print queue with a standardized printer name like 
Dept Username Dymo 400, where username is the username of the person who 
uses this printer.  Then, you can build a script that checks for this and adds 
this specific printer.  

And then let's say that the other printers are shared by a specific set of 
users - by either

RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

2013-06-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
That wont work here
Also some of the software the users has to then specifically go to the settings 
and pick the printer, just getting them to click on the link could be 
problematic 

Regards

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk





-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: 28 June 2013 15:24
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Perhaps, but what we did for this very situation recently was to

o- Build the new server with a new name
o- Populate it with all of the printer definitions with the same share names 
(making sure to add in the x86 printer definitions)
o- Send an email to folks telling them to note their current printer 
definitions and then delete them, and also provide them with a link to the new 
server (\\newserver), and tell them to doubleclick on each of the printers they 
needed to install the drivers.

Worked like a champ.

Kurt

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk 
wrote:
 Hi
 We are currently thinking of upgrading our print server from a 2003 
 box to 2008 we also need to move from a 32bit version of windows to a 
 64 bit version

 In the past we used printmig to move all the printers to another 
 machine but this doesn't seem to like our 64 bit machine

 The machine need to have the same name so its a seamless process
 otherwise we will have to manually setup printers for users as we have
 21 MFD`s 50 label printers and about 30 other associated machines

 Some people will need
 A MFD
 A Colour printer
 And a couple of label printers setup

 No 2 people have the same setup

 Is it possible to migrate users to another print server like this?

 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
 represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
 confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
 recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
 not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
 or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited 
 and unlawful.







Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

2013-06-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
Ah this looks like what I am after 
Many thanks

Have already virtualised our print server so I can play with the virtual
copy (offline) and see what happens

Thanks 

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk





-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Leone
Sent: 28 June 2013 15:32
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

We did this a couple times.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd379488(WS.10).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc722360.aspx

We were able to import most of our existing printer definitions. About
1/3 didn't work, due to 32bit-to-64bit problems (mostly, the print
processor name changed). Those we manually re-installed.


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk wrote:
 Hi
 We are currently thinking of upgrading our print server from a 2003 
 box to 2008 we also need to move from a 32bit version of windows to a 
 64 bit version

 In the past we used printmig to move all the printers to another 
 machine but this doesn't seem to like our 64 bit machine

 The machine need to have the same name so its a seamless process
 otherwise we will have to manually setup printers for users as we have
 21 MFD`s 50 label printers and about 30 other associated machines

 Some people will need
 A MFD
 A Colour printer
 And a couple of label printers setup

 No 2 people have the same setup

 Is it possible to migrate users to another print server like this?

 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised. If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or other use or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and unlawful.







Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.





RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

2013-06-28 Thread Nigel Parker
Hi 
The main problem is that we have a lot of custom written software, this needs 
the users to go into the options and select the printer within the software it 
doesn’t pick up default printer settings Even if it did this would be of no use 
to our users as they will have a default printer set to one machine for 
standard word docs etc and another machine to print out from within the 
application

I can see your logic but for most of our users this will not work 


Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk






-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Aakash Shah
Sent: 28 June 2013 16:21
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Is there any pattern/logic as to what printers each person will get?  If so, 
you could use GP to deploy the printers, and if the pattern is complex, you 
could consider creating a script (still deployed via GP) that contains the 
detection logic and then adds the printer depending on the logic. 

You mentioned below that no two users has the same printers.  Not knowing how 
that will look, I will create a sample use case: let's say that each of the 50 
label printers is used by one person only.  If this is the case, then you can 
consider creating the new print queue with a standardized printer name like 
Dept Username Dymo 400, where username is the username of the person who 
uses this printer.  Then, you can build a script that checks for this and adds 
this specific printer.  

And then let's say that the other printers are shared by a specific set of 
users - by either physical location of security group.  You could then use GP 
to automate this setup for everyone.  Basically, if there is a pattern to it, 
then you can build something appropriate to account for it.

This would be more work up front, but it will pay off in the end (assuming you 
can find a pattern to it).  This will also help you when replacing/refreshing 
people's computers since you won't have to do anything in terms of printers 
when you deliver a new computer.

To answer your main question - when we transitioned from Windows 2003 to 
2008r2, we rebuilt our servers since there was a lot we wanted to clean up 
(standardize printer names and port names, use Universal drivers, etc).  

Good luck!

-Aakash Shah

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nigel Parker
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:50 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Hi
That wont work here
Also some of the software the users has to then specifically go to the settings 
and pick the printer, just getting them to click on the link could be 
problematic 

Regards

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk





-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: 28 June 2013 15:24
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Print server Upgrade

Perhaps, but what we did for this very situation recently was to

o- Build the new server with a new name
o- Populate it with all of the printer definitions with the same share names 
(making sure to add in the x86 printer definitions)
o- Send an email to folks telling them to note their current printer 
definitions and then delete them, and also provide them with a link to the new 
server (\\newserver), and tell them to doubleclick on each of the printers they 
needed to install the drivers.

Worked like a champ.

Kurt

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk 
wrote:
 Hi
 We are currently thinking of upgrading our print server from a 2003 
 box to 2008 we also need to move from a 32bit version of windows to a
 64 bit version

 In the past we used printmig to move all the printers to another 
 machine but this doesn't seem to like our 64 bit machine

 The machine need to have the same name so its a seamless process
 otherwise we will have to manually setup printers for users as we have
 21 MFD`s 50 label printers and about 30 other associated machines

 Some people will need
 A MFD
 A Colour printer
 And a couple of label printers setup

 No 2 people have the same setup

 Is it possible to migrate users to another print server like this?

 Nigel Parker
 Systems Engineer
 Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
 Tel:   01200 452329
 Fax:   01200 452201
 Web:   www.ultraframe.com
 Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
 represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
 This email is subject