On Tue Jul 11 2017 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> Just to mention that the code based on cl-progv which I have
> supplied does not work. I don't have any time to investigate why,
> so if you want to take my patch, please take the 1st one (that
> based on lambda).
I believe the purpose of cl-progv is
ent@hotmail.fr>
Envoyé : jeudi 29 juin 2017 15:05
À : Roland Winkler; BBDB info list
Objet : RE: bbdb-print.el lexical binding breaks bbdb-print-record
Ooops... there was some mistake in the code based on cl-progv which I supplied.
Just to be 100% clear about this alternative solution, it
if the
directory exists to provide a suitable error message.
V.
De : Bob Newell <bobnew...@bobnewell.net>
Envoyé : vendredi 30 juin 2017 06:51:40
À : BBDB info list
Objet : Re: bbdb-print.el lexical binding breaks bbdb-print-record
I also ran into this a while ago.
I also ran into this a while ago. I did a kludge fix in my initialization:
(setq bbdb-print-require t)
but of course this makes even blank records print, so it is not
exactly recommended for anything other than a quick and sloppy
workaround.
By the way I also had to do this as I was having a
I can't find this suggest-v3.x branch which you refer to here:
https://github.com/barak/BBDB/branches/all
V.
De : Barak A. Pearlmutter <ba...@pearlmutter.net>
Envoyé : jeudi 29 juin 2017 15:16
À : Roland Winkler
Cc : Vincent Belaïche; BBDB info list
Objet : Re: bbdb-print.el lexical b
Ooops... there was some mistake in the code based on cl-progv which I supplied.
Just to be 100% clear about this alternative solution, it would be as in the
attached patch bug-1.diff.
V.
De : Vincent Belaïche
Envoyé : jeudi 29 juin
> > On Thu Mar 2 2017 Greg Bognar wrote:
> > Hi, I'm trying to use BBDB with Wanderlust. I installed the latest melpa
> > version (20170129.2224), but couldn't get it to work. I noticed that the
> > README at https://github.com/dmj/bbdbv3 says BBDB must be built with
> >
> > `--with-wl-dir=DIR'
On Thu Mar 2 2017 Greg Bognar wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to use BBDB with Wanderlust. I installed the
> latest melpa version (20170129.2224), but couldn't get it to work.
> I noticed that the README at https://github.com/dmj/bbdbv3 says
> BBDB must be built with
>
> `--with-wl-dir=DIR' specifies
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Sat Jan 21 2017 Gijs Hillenius wrote:
>> When I create a new record M-x bbdb-create, I'm asked "name", and
>> then "organizations" (with s). I enter a name (test) but not an
>> organization, and answer the rest of the questions.
>>
>> Once this
On Sat Jan 21 2017 Gijs Hillenius wrote:
> When I create a new record M-x bbdb-create, I'm asked "name", and
> then "organizations" (with s). I enter a name (test) but not an
> organization, and answer the rest of the questions.
>
> Once this record is created, I can visit it, and in the
>
>> The first solution binds the variables lexically rather than
>> dynamically. That means that if those appear lexically inside
>> the things will work correctly, but if calls a function
>> which then refers to this reference will fail.
> Thank you for the clarification. The code in
On Fri Oct 7 2016 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> The first solution binds the variables lexically rather than
> dynamically. That means that if those appear lexically inside
> the things will work correctly, but if calls a function
> which then refers to this reference will fail.
Thank you for the
On Tue Oct 4 2016 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There are two ways to do that with lexical-binding:
> - use (eval `(( . ,) ( . ,) ...)
> which will not give the exact same behavior but works well in many
> cases (i.e. depends on the code put in diary-date-forms).
> - use
>
> (defvar ) (defvar
> This variable contains forms that are evaluated using `eval',
> assuming that the variables appearing in this form are bound
> dynamically. - I believe that old coding schemes like this one,
There are two ways to do that with lexical-binding:
- use (eval `(( . ,) ( . ,) ...)
which will not
On Sun Oct 2 2016 Sam Steingold wrote:
> I think if you add
>
> (defvar diary-date-forms)
>
> to bbdb-anniv.el, it will work with lexical-binding too.
This variable contains forms that are evaluated using `eval',
assuming that the variables appearing in this form are bound
dynamically. - I
> * Roland Winkler [2016-10-02 00:20:17 -0500]:
>
> I switched to lexical binding for all elisp files of BBDB except
> for bbdb-anniv.el (which relies on `diary-date-forms' that is not
> compatible with lexical binding).
I think if you add
(defvar diary-date-forms)
to
On 22 Jul 2016, Roland Winkler wrote:
> On Fri Jul 22 2016 Gijs Hillenius wrote:
>> My Emacs (24.5) bring CPU to 100% for minutes (until C-g) when I try
>> to read `bbdb-hashtable', following the link from reading about
>> bbdb-gethash...
>
> What is it you want to do? Under normal circumstances
On Fri Jul 22 2016 Gijs Hillenius wrote:
> My Emacs (24.5) bring CPU to 100% for minutes (until C-g) when I try to
> read `bbdb-hashtable', following the link from reading about
> bbdb-gethash...
What is it you want to do? Under normal circumstances there should
never be a need to inspect
On 21 Jul 2016, Roland Winkler wrote:
[...]
> 2016-07-20 Roland Winkler
> Make bbdb-hashtable a proper hash table.
> * lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-hashtable): Use make-hash-table.
> (bbdb-puthash, bbdb-gethash, bbdb-remhash, bbdb-buffer)
> * lisp/bbdb-com.el
On Mon Dec 21 2015 Michael Strey wrote:
> ((vm vm-mode vm-virtual-mode vm-summary-mode vm-presentation-mode)
> (gnus gnus-summary-mode gnus-article-mode gnus-tree-mode)
> (rmail rmail-mode rmail-summary-mode)
> (mh mhe-mode mhe-summary-mode mh-folder-mode)
> (message notmuch-message-mode
On 2015-12-23 13:41, "Roland Winkler" writes:
> The error means that you try to run some BBDB function or command in
> a buffer using mu4e-compose-mode, yet BBDB doesn't know this mode.
>
> I don't know mu4e, but it looks like mu4e-compose-mode is derived
> from message-mode
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Mon Dec 21 2015 Michael Strey wrote:
>> ((vm vm-mode vm-virtual-mode vm-summary-mode vm-presentation-mode)
>> (gnus gnus-summary-mode gnus-article-mode gnus-tree-mode)
>> (rmail rmail-mode rmail-summary-mode)
>> (mh mhe-mode mhe-summary-mode
Hello Eric,
On 2015-12-21 21:37, Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> BBDB checks current modes against the bbdb-muda-mode-alist variable,
> which you should be able to add to. It comes with (mu4e mu4e-view-mode)
> in there, maybe you can add something like (mu4e-message-mode
>
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 2015-12-21 21:37, Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> BBDB checks current modes against the bbdb-muda-mode-alist variable,
>> which you should be able to add to. It comes with (mu4e mu4e-view-mode)
>> in
Hi Alan,
On Mo, 2015-12-21 at 09:14, Alan Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> I tried adding the 'mu4e symbol to both lines and it's not changing
> anything. I don't necessarily want BBDB to work with mu4e: I want to be
> able to send messages with mu4e while still using BBDB with gnus. Is
> this possible?
Michael Strey writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Mo, 2015-12-21 at 09:14, Alan Schmitt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I tried adding the 'mu4e symbol to both lines and it's not changing
>> anything. I don't necessarily want BBDB to work with mu4e: I want to be
>> able to send messages with mu4e
On Mo, 2015-12-21 at 14:37, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Michael Strey writes:
[...]
>> I finally gave up trying to use mu4e in parallel to gnus for the same reason.
>
> BBDB checks current modes against the bbdb-muda-mode-alist variable,
> which you should be able to add to. It
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> Also, I added a new snarfing rule `eu' following a suggestion by
> Marco Wahl sent to this list. I am sorry, Marco, my final code
> has turned out rather different from your original suggestion.
This is perfectly fine for me. Thanks for remembering
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Wed Sep 9 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> "Roland Winkler" writes:
>> > You mean having two newline characters for the new `record' rule in
>> > bbdb-separator-alist? Yes, I think that makes sense.
>>
>> Yup. Obviously it's a very
On Tue Sep 8 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I'd still personally prefer two newlines between records, but
> that's not a big deal.
You mean having two newline characters for the new `record' rule in
bbdb-separator-alist? Yes, I think that makes sense.
Roland
"Roland Winkler" writes:
> On Sun Sep 6 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> Okay, here's a new version of the patch that does that.
>
> Please check my slightly different version of bbdb-copy-fields-as-kill.
> I tried to avoid hard-coded formatting rules, but instead I added new
>
Didier Verna did...@xemacs.org writes:
Hi,
I know this is a recurrent topic, but what is your advice for exporting
BBDB to google contacts and Mac Contacts ? I don't even need full
synchronization, I usually only modify BBDB and propagate.
I was using Asynk until recently, but it has
[Sending to list]
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Didier Verna did...@xemacs.org wrote:
I was using Asynk until recently, but it has never really worked, and
now it doesn't work at all (when from 404 on some google page to no
module named atom in the latest version). Back in the days, I was
On Tue Jun 16 2015 Feng Shu wrote:
bbdb-handy is a BBDB tool, when in headers (TO: and CC:) of
message-mode buffer, Type TAB key will will pop up a BBDB window
as email-address chooser.
Why not use bbdb-complete-mail?
@lists.sourceforge.net;Feng Shutuma...@163.com
:Re: bbdb-handy --- BBDB window as email-address chooser when write anemail
On Tue Jun 16 2015 Feng Shu wrote:
bbdb-handy is a BBDB tool, when in headers (TO: and CC:) of
message-mode buffer, Type TAB key will will pop up a BBDB window
as email-address
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org writes:
On Apr 27 2015, Glyn Millington glyn.milling...@gmail.com wrote:
(setq bbdb-message-all-addresses t)
Can you explain what this setting does?
The help says
,
| If t `bbdb-update-records' returns all mail addresses of a message.
| Otherwise
On Sun, Apr 26 2015, Roland Winkler wrote:
[...]
But bbdb-completing-read-mails does not use something like
REQUIRE-MATCH.
Thanks for your explanation, Roland. Now I understand.
In my situation, it doesn't matter, because I know, that an
email-address is required in the end, so I would always
On Sun, Apr 26 2015, Roland Winkler wrote:
I am sorry, the code is broken. A bad hack to make it work
*somehow* is to use a prompt for bbdb-completing-read-mails that
looks like a mail header, for example
(bbdb-completing-read-mails Resend-message(s)-to: )
This is not a *bad* hack, this
On Sun Apr 26 2015 Peter Münster wrote:
gnus-summary-resend-message asks in the minibuffer for the destination
address, and that's the place, where I want to use the bbdb-tab-completion.
With your hack, it works just fine, no need to fix anything.
I am glad you are satisfied. Still I believe
On Sun, Apr 26 2015, Roland Winkler wrote:
Still I believe that partially completed email addresses are not very
meaningful return values in such a context.
Sorry, I don't understand... Why partially? After completion, gnus
gets the right address.
--
Peter
On Sun Apr 26 2015 Peter Münster wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26 2015, Roland Winkler wrote:
Still I believe that partially completed email addresses are not very
meaningful return values in such a context.
Sorry, I don't understand... Why partially? After completion, gnus
gets the right
On Sat Apr 25 2015 Peter Münster wrote:
When using bbdb-completing-read-mails like this:
--8---cut here---start-8---
(defadvice gnus-summary-resend-message (before pm/resend-with-bbdb act)
Resend message with bbdb address completion.
(interactive
On Wed Mar 11 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
For this issue, this patch ought to do it.
The optional arg COMPARE-FN of add-to-list defaults to equal.
Roland
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Tue Mar 10 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
When `bbdb-record-set-field' is setting a phone or address field, it
adds the new label to the list of existing labels like this:
(add-to-list
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Wed Mar 11 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
For this issue, this patch ought to do it.
The optional arg COMPARE-FN of add-to-list defaults to equal.
So it does! Here's another.
From 49be4b2f1e22075eb41c29a6e9e3e37fe23dc255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Tue Mar 10 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
When `bbdb-record-set-field' is setting a phone or address field, it
adds the new label to the list of existing labels like this:
(add-to-list 'bbdb-phone-label-list (bbdb-phone-label phone) nil 'eq)
The
On Tue Mar 10 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
When `bbdb-record-set-field' is setting a phone or address field, it
adds the new label to the list of existing labels like this:
(add-to-list 'bbdb-phone-label-list (bbdb-phone-label phone) nil 'eq)
The labels are strings, and 'eq comparison means
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net writes:
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with
Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes:
I am not sure I fully understand what you want. But it seems your
rule needs to go into bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p (some suitable
function).
Is it more appropriate to use bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p or
bbdb-mua-auto-update-p? What is exactly
Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes:
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use the prefix `*', see the
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
Is it more appropriate to use bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p or
bbdb-mua-auto-update-p? What is exactly the difference between these two
variables?
One is for interactive commands, the other for noninteractive
functions running in the background (see the README
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
Hello list,
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with the situation?
I've never
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with the situation?
How are you creating the
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I've never even gotten bbdb-print to work, it's always complained about
undefined control sequences or something. The tex code is very old, and
I had this error trying to run the file through pdflatex, but it worked
fine with pdftex.
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use the prefix `*', see the docstring of bbdb-print.
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
In BBDB2 I used to set bbdb-always-add-addresses so that I could ignore new
addresses in all folders except the `vm-primary-inbox'. In order to do so I
would make use of `rf-bbdb/vm-ignore-old-addresses' found in bbdb-rf.el.
I can I get this same behavior with
On Sat Aug 2 2014 Roland Winkler wrote:
Possible scenarios for such things are too diverse to define
multiple commands to cover all possible cases. In your case, it
seems to me you want something like (untested!)
(defun my-bbdb-add-mail-alias (records alias)
Add same ALIAS to RECORDS.
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Mon Jul 28 2014 H. Dieter Wilhelm wrote:
is it normal that bbdb-do-all-records is *not* working for all entries
in conjunction with mail-aliases *a, only the entry where the cursor
is sitting?
I'm using emacs 24.3.92.2 and bbdb 3.1.2...
The patch
On Sat Aug 2 2014 H. Dieter Wilhelm wrote:
Yes, with above change it is possible to create mail-aliases with
bbdb-do-all-records in a *sequential* way for all entries. Thanks
Would it also be possible to do this for all selected entries with the
same value of a mail-alias *at once*. Can I
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
Hello,
is it normal that bbdb-do-all-records is *not* working for all entries
in conjunction with mail-aliases *a, only the entry where the cursor
is sitting?
I'm using emacs 24.3.92.2 and bbdb 3.1.2...
Thanks
Dieter
Steven Arntson ste...@stevenarntson.com writes:
Emacs 24.3.1 BBDB 20140515.806
I've been using BBDB with great success for a few months, but tonight it
has stopped working. I was changing with some settings for org-agenda,
trying to get BBDB to send info on anniversaries. I'm not sure if it
I've been having similar issues. When it happens I delete the .bbdb and
*BBDB* buffers and they get reloaded and everything seems okay again.
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
On Mon Jun 23 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
I've been having similar issues. When it happens I delete the
.bbdb and *BBDB* buffers and they get reloaded and everything
seems okay again.
I have never encountered this. Could you possibly try to provide a
reproducible recipe for this or look
Here's the strangest thing I've encountered in emacs for awhile. I just
started a new session, and BBDB still wasn't working. I hit C-x C-b to
list the buffers and it informed me of this buffer:
bbdb 20446 Emacs-Lisp ~/.emacs.d/bbdb
As far as I know, I have no file named bbdb---mine is .bbdb. So
I've been having similar issues. When it happens I delete the
.bbdb and *BBDB* buffers and they get reloaded and everything
seems okay again.
I have never encountered this. Could you possibly try to provide a
reproducible recipe for this or look at this in the debugger to see
what might
On Mon Jun 23 2014 Steven Arntson wrote:
Here's the strangest thing I've encountered in emacs for awhile. I
just started a new session, and BBDB still wasn't working. I hit
C-x C-b to list the buffers and it informed me of this buffer:
bbdb 20446 Emacs-Lisp ~/.emacs.d/bbdb
As far as I
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Mon Jun 23 2014 Steven Arntson wrote:
Here's the strangest thing I've encountered in emacs for awhile. I
just started a new session, and BBDB still wasn't working. I hit
C-x C-b to list the buffers and it informed me of this buffer:
bbdb 20446
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Mon Jun 23 2014 Steven Arntson wrote:
Here's the strangest thing I've encountered in emacs for awhile. I
just started a new session, and BBDB still wasn't working. I hit
C-x C-b to list the buffers and it informed me of this buffer:
bbdb 20446
Glyn Millington glyn.milling...@gmail.com writes:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Mon Jun 23 2014 Steven Arntson wrote:
Here's the strangest thing I've encountered in emacs for awhile. I
just started a new session, and BBDB still wasn't working. I hit
C-x C-b to list the buffers
I'd check for the function. Seems more robust. (E.g., if someone forks
an older version and updates the date string, or if the function is
renamed or removed in the future.) If there's a bug you need to check
for you can always complicate the guard later.
--Barak.
Barak A. Pearlmutter ba...@cs.nuim.ie writes:
I'd check for the function. Seems more robust. (E.g., if someone forks
an older version and updates the date string, or if the function is
renamed or removed in the future.) If there's a bug you need to check
for you can always complicate the
On Thu Jun 12 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
I'd check for the function. Seems more robust.
Agreed.
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
(1) BBDB now allows arbitrary lisp expressions as values of
xfields. Interactively, you can call bbdb-insert-field or
bbdb-edit-field with a prefix arg for this. If the value of an
xfield is not a string, it is displayed using the same
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2014-04-28 20:36:29 -0500]:
The more I think about it the more I am convinced that there is no
reason bbdb-notice-mail-hook and bbdb-notice-record-hook should
treat bbdb-change-hook specially (by suppressing calls of
bbdb-change-hook).
does this imply that
On Tue Apr 29 2014 Sam Steingold wrote:
does this imply that whenever I read a message from a known sender
the sender's record's timestamp will be updated?
If you have set up one of the notice hooks to modify the record
whenever you read a message from a known sender, then yes, this will
update
On Tue Apr 29 2014 Aric Gregson wrote:
What is the setting to shut this off? I continue to have odd errors with
the bbdb file and would prefer it not be touched if not necessary.
What is your problem? - Here we are talking about situations where a
user has customized bbdb-notice-mail-hook
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
What is your problem? - Here we are talking about situations where a
user has customized bbdb-notice-mail-hook and/or bbdb-notice-record-hook.
If for you these hooks are bound to nil (their default) the current
discussion should be irrelevant for you.
On Tue Apr 29 2014 Aric Gregson wrote:
I sporadically get errors that certain records are presenting problems
and then they will go away. Just thought maybe that preventing writing
when not necessary would help.
Whatever your problem is, it would be best if you could post here a
reproducible
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
If you have set up one of the notice hooks to modify the record
whenever you read a message from a known sender, then yes, this will
update the timestamp.
What is the setting to shut this off? I continue to have odd errors with
the bbdb file and would
On Mon Apr 28 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
PS bbdb-fix-record updates the timestamp even if it hasn't changed
anything else.
Barak, I post this on the list for everyone.
There are two issues here:
- Quite generally, BBDB could be smarter about making changes to
bbdb-file. If an editing
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
On Tue Apr 8 2014 i...@iankelling.org wrote:
I found a bug: Using (first . last) name arg to
bbdb-create-internal fails.
An example of the error::
(error type mismatch: expect (or nil (cons string string)), got
`(Bob . Dole)')
Thanks, that was
Roland Winkler writes:
I can't stand the widget system, but that's just one opinion,
obviously...
I have never used it for anything more frequently (I do not use
customize for customizing emacs).
Per Cederqvist's ewoc may be a lighter-weight alternative to Per
Abrahamsen's widgets.
On Sun Apr 13 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
bbdb-separator-alist defines the separator for almost all fields
to be , . Only for AKAs it is ; . I do not know anymore
how this came about. But I find it confusing, and I am thinking
about changing the default to , for all
John Smith; John Smith, Jr; J. Smith, Esquire
I guess we have no shortage in such examples requiring something
like `;' instead of `,'. Besides AKAs / names, we may also have
organization: HAL, Inc.; Smith, Miller Davis; Company 17
Yet worse
mail: sm...@example.com; Smith,
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
John Smith; John Smith, Jr; J. Smith, Esquire
I guess we have no shortage in such examples requiring something
like `;' instead of `,'. Besides AKAs / names, we may also have
organization: HAL, Inc.; Smith, Miller Davis; Company 17
Yet worse
On Mon Apr 14 2014 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Or to store the value as a list of strings,
That's what BBDB does anyway, and that's what bbdb-seperator-alist
is about: how to split the string which the user edits into what
gets actually stored in the database (see split-string).
and make users
Check it out at
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/bbdb
The lisp code in BBDB 3.1.1 is identical to the lisp code
in BBDB 3.1. Only the autoconf and automake scripts have
been updated.
--
Learn Graph Databases -
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:47:48 +0100
Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
The main documentation source for org-mode is its manual:
http://orgmode.org/#docs
I know about it and there is info manual within Emacs itself.
and the tutorials we have on Worg: http://orgmode.org/worg/
Yeah, many useful
On Mon Mar 10 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
Fixed. (Replaced with @xxx@ for clarity.)
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@]
instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems
to be working, too.
(I also saw you have several minor unrelated suggestions
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@]
instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems
to be working, too.
To shield the regex from autoconf!
--Barak.
--
Learn Graph Databases
On Mon Mar 10 2014 Gour wrote:
I see that org-mode can use org-contacts, but I'm also curious to try
BBDB-3.x hearing it's more flexible than 2.x and possibly more
suitable as contacts' add-on for org-mode and Gnus' address book.
I don't know to what extent org-mode has been fully updated to
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@]
instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems
to be working, too.
To shield the regex from autoconf!
But I guess this would be really needed only if
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@]
instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems
to be working, too.
To shield the regex from autoconf!
But I guess this would be really needed only if bbdb-site.el.in was
actually processed by autoconf.
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The regex appears in Makefile.am which begets Makefile.in which is
processed by the ./configure produced by autoconf, rendering the
regex susceptible to @@ substitution.
You are right, never mind. My testcase was too simple to reveal
this
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The dependency on ../config.something should cause it to be
regenerated when the configuration changes. This is the mechanism
automake uses for .in files processed by ./configure.
One can imagine regenerating it when variables passed to make
... I think it would be
good to have a pre-built bbdb-site.el included in the distribution
tarball. But ideally `make' should rebuild this file whenever the
user re-runs make with a new value for pkgdatadir.
The dependency on ../config.something should cause it to be regenerated
when the
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
Great, thank you, your new approach should work for everyone.
Two minor things:
- In bbdb-site.el.in, you kept the value of bbdb-print-tex-path
'(/usr/local/share). This seems to be a typo that has been
there for some time and should probably be
Okay, I've reworked it again to satisfy, I believe, all criteria!
The pathway is simply bbdb-site.el.in to bbdb-site.el.
This is accomplished solely at make time, not ./configure time.
(Using sed to replace the @foo@ things as well as the path.)
A pre-built bbdb-site.el can be included in the
On Sun Mar 9 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
Okay, I've reworked it again to satisfy, I believe, all criteria!
Great, thank you, your new approach should work for everyone.
Two minor things:
- In bbdb-site.el.in, you kept the value of bbdb-print-tex-path
'(/usr/local/share). This seems to
On Tue Mar 4 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The difficulties I see with having bbdb-site grovel around to try
to find the right place, or to find a file containing a string
which gives the right place (which itself is a bit of a
chicken-and-egg issue), are three fold.
I see your points.
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo