Hi all,
On 07/11/2022 10:53, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi *,
just a few thoughts, since I seem to be mentioned in the email. ;)
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
On 05/11/2022 00:04, Stephan Ficht wrote:
Sorry, Simon, but IMHO I don't think this is the right wording.
PI and, if there are, resulting CoI's
Hi *,
just a few thoughts, since I seem to be mentioned in the email. ;)
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> On 05/11/2022 00:04, Stephan Ficht wrote:
> > Sorry, Simon, but IMHO I don't think this is the right wording.
> > PI and, if there are, resulting CoI's are clearly defined and written
> > down in all
Hi Stephan,
thank you for your comments.
It's good to see that we have staff members that are actively
participating in discussion to help improving processes within TDF.
On 05/11/2022 00:04, Stephan Ficht wrote:
Hi Simon,
Am 31.10.22 um 01:38 schrieb Simon Phipps:
I would suggest you
Hi Simon,
Am 31.10.22 um 01:38 schrieb Simon Phipps:
I would suggest you "look down the telescope the other way" and ask what
the Board's actions (or rather the lack of them) tell us about the
existence of a CoI.
With regard to PI/CoI (personal interest / conflict of interest) it's an
Hi Simon,
Le 31/10/2022 à 12:21, Simon Phipps a écrit :
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:06 AM sophi wrote:
Plus, not all TDF members are on tdf-internal.
Are all TDF Trustees on board-discuss then? Do you have statistics to
clarify this please?
Did I say that all TDF members are on
Hi Michael, all,
Am 31.10.22 um 12:07 schrieb Michael Stahl:
hi Andreas,
On 29.10.22 22:07, Andreas Mantke wrote:
In additon: I reviewed the whole process about sending a project to the
attic again. The proposal for the process seemed to neutral text, but it
was only written and voted on for
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:06 AM sophi wrote:
> Plus, not all TDF members are on tdf-internal.
>
Are all TDF Trustees on board-discuss then? Do you have statistics to
clarify this please?
Forcing divisive discussions to be held in public chills contributions from
people whose employers
hi Andreas,
On 29.10.22 22:07, Andreas Mantke wrote:
In additon: I reviewed the whole process about sending a project to the
attic again. The proposal for the process seemed to neutral text, but it
was only written and voted on for one subproject: LOOL.
The only four members, which participated
Hi all,
Le 31/10/2022 à 11:33, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
Hi,
Am 31.10.22 um 01:18 schrieb Cor Nouws:
Hi,
Andreas Mantke wrote on 29/10/2022 22:07:
[...]>
Then, some details really deserve attention on tdf-internal@, that is
open to all members. I'll continue there.
It would be great to
Hi,
Am 31.10.22 um 01:18 schrieb Cor Nouws:
Hi,
Andreas Mantke wrote on 29/10/2022 22:07:
7. Status Report, Discuss: Atticization of Online (tdf-board, 10 mins)
...
because there are four board members with a direct link to the product
Collabora Online (staff of Collabora Productivity or
Hi Thorsten,
Am 31.10.22 um 10:48 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Stephan Ficht wrote:
Regarding the email below, is there a need for any updates or information
that needs to be shared publicly prior to the board meeting? on Oct 31?
I believe Italo answered meanwhile?
Ok. So the information was
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Ficht wrote:
> Regarding the email below, is there a need for any updates or information
> that needs to be shared publicly prior to the board meeting? on Oct 31?
>
I believe Italo answered meanwhile?
Best,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Thorsten,
My answer to the first part below of your email (2022-10-30/14:57)
related to my post on board-discuss@ ((2022-10-30/12:24):
Am 30.10.22 um 14:57 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Am 30.10.22 um 12:24 Stephan Ficht wrote:
@Andreas: I think your point of view is an interesting and
Good morning Thorsten,
Regarding the email below, is there a need for any updates or
information that needs to be shared publicly prior to the board meeting?
on Oct 31?
Cheers
Stephan
Am 28.10.22 um 18:57 schrieb Simon Phipps:
Is the paper from Italo mentioned for discussion in Item 6
Hi Stephan!
OK, one more reply (against my better judgement!)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 7:52 PM Stephan Ficht <
stephan.fi...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.22 um 18:51 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> > In particular the wording of section 2 could lead a reader to the wrong
> > conclusions.
Hi,
Andreas Mantke wrote on 29/10/2022 22:07:
7. Status Report, Discuss: Atticization of Online (tdf-board, 10 mins)
...
because there are four board members with a direct link to the product
Collabora Online (staff of Collabora Productivity or staff/owner of
Allotropia, which has a contract
Hi Simon,
Am 30.10.22 um 18:51 schrieb Simon Phipps:
In particular the wording of section 2 could lead a reader to the wrong
conclusions.
Everyone can read there [1]:
"A personal interest is not identical to, but tends to qualify as a
Conflict of Interest when it *can* result in improper
Hi all, hi Simon,
and also sorry for another post to correct misleading statements.
Am 30.10.22 um 18:51 schrieb Simon Phipps:
Hi Andreas, (and sorry for a second post here today all)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:40 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
sorry for beeing a bit undiplomatic on this
Hi Andreas, (and sorry for a second post here today all)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:40 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
> sorry for beeing a bit undiplomatic on this topic. But your statements
> are not in accordance with the CoI policy of TDF.
>
The TDF policy
Hi all, hi Simon,
Am 30.10.22 um 13:16 schrieb Simon Phipps:
(...)
If you have a look into the statutes of TDF you'll find out that
it is
necessary that at least the half of the board could attend the
meeting.
The half of the board are four members. Thus the board is not
Hi Andreas, all.
So sorry to have to keep repeating this, but the error it relates to is
still being repeated without regard to my earlier explanations.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 9:07 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
> If board members (with a CoI themselves on this topic) think, another
> board member
Hi Andreas, all,
dear board members,
@Andreas: I think your point of view is an interesting and logical way
to look at this point.
I am asking to know each director's opinion on this. Then we can discuss
it and everyone can form an informed opinion.
Am 29.10.22 um 22:07 schrieb Andreas
Hi Andreas,
thank you for you valuable feedback.
As I've been under investigation for potential personal interests on
LOOL, by potentially conflicted members of the board, for a few months I
will refrain from influencing the discussion and until the investigation
is over to vote on any
Hi all,
Am 28.10.22 um 17:05 schrieb Stephan Ficht:
Dear Community,
find below the agenda for our
TDF board meeting with a public part, and followed by a private part
on Monday, October 31 at 1800 Berlin time at
https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/TDFBoard
For time zone conversion, see e.g.
Is the paper from Italo mentioned for discussion in Item 6 available for
trustees to review as well please?
Thanks
Simon
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:05 PM Stephan Ficht <
stephan.fi...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> find below the agenda for our
>
> TDF board meeting with a
Dear Community,
find below the agenda for our
TDF board meeting with a public part, and followed by a private part
on Monday, October 31 at 1800 Berlin time at
https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/TDFBoard
For time zone conversion, see e.g.
26 matches
Mail list logo
