On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:12 AM, 703designs wrote:
It's...getting...bigger. Compare the archive sizes from 1.1.x to 1.2
RC3. Sure, it's no Zend Framework, but let's try to keep the framework
light and simple if possible. A web framework and simplicity may seem
like oil and water at times, but
On Sep 27, 2008, at 2:50 AM, cronet wrote:
I would like to thank especially
John David Anderson aka _psychic_
who has the overview about the documentation, and received so much
indirect criticism in that era, where the book was not that what it is
nowadays...
Please don't stop
On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Brenton B wrote:
If anyone is still reading by this point (sorry it's so long),
hopefully you can shed some light.
PHP4 support. It's gotten us where we're at, and future versions of
Cake will be PHP5-based and more OOP-friendly.
-- John
On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Brenton B wrote:
Hmmm ... never thought of backwards compatibility to PHP4 as a reason.
I figured since PHP5 has been out for over 4 years (first beta was
over 5 yrs ago) worrying about PHP4's support would've waned ... like,
completely dropped off.
So I'm
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:41 AM, taokodr wrote:
Hi Gang!
Out of curiosity, whatever happened to the area that had the large
list of sites using CakePHP? I keep finding references to this link
(http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/web/cakephp-in-the-wild?
hl=en), but it goes to a site that
On Sep 10, 2008, at 1:35 AM, nayan wrote:
I am using cake 1.2 .When i use echo $html-input('FanType/
fantype_name') in my form.it give me the following error
Method HtmlHelper::input does not exist [CORE\cake\libs\view
\helper.php, line 148].can we use html helper in cake 1.2 ?
Yes, but
If you're connecting with Flex, I'd recommend the CakeAMF plugin.
https://trac.cakefoundation.org/amf
-- John
On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:15 AM, saumya wrote:
Hi,
I am pretty new here.I am going to work in Flex and PHP in my new
project. So thinking of using CakePHP and making webservices out of
This mailing list is not to be used as your own personal development
laundry list.
Read up on the topics under question–any PHP tutorial will do–and dive
in. When you run into problems implementing these ideas in CakePHP,
feel free to ask us more specific questions.
Regards,
John
On Sep
On Aug 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Alan wrote:
Hi, we're trying to set up Google Analytics tracking with our cakephp
site, and we're running into problems. Well, the marketing people are
running into problems.
Nice clarification.
They have files that they say usually go in
the root of the
On Jul 19, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Dave wrote:
If you published the book at lulu.com (or similar), I'd pay a few
bucks to have a printed version of the docs... Sounds like others
might too.
I'd love to have it on the plane while traveling...
It's in the works. We're making sure everything's
On Jul 19, 2008, at 4:38 PM, keymaster wrote:
John, are you referring to the CakePHP In Action book:
http://www.manning.com/obrien/
that is being billed as the first guide to CakePHP endorsed and
supported by the Cake Software Foundation?
Nope - I'm talking about a printed version of
On Jul 18, 2008, at 2:24 AM, keymaster wrote:
I am desperate need to have a working version of the book.
John Anderson and team, if you could ever have asked for a more
telling endorsement of your efforts, this thread is it.
Yeah we shut it down every so often so you guys will realize how
I'd use this instead:
https://trac.cakefoundation.org/amf/
-- John
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:15 AM, thomas wrote:
Hey Guys,
anyone ever used CakePHP together with WebORB for PHP?
To me it looks like I need a different object structure in weborb and
can't reuse my cakephp stuff, am I right?
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:15 AM, Ayaz Khan, Indore, India wrote:
HI,
My Name is Ayaz.
I am working as software developer on PHP from last 10 months but I
have to work on cake php.
I m doing installation of cake php. I have worked with cake php before
8 month. but Now I am facing some
http://book.cakephp.org/view/171/access-control-lists
-- John
On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:17 PM, puneetratan wrote:
Hello Group,
Can anyone let me know, the use of ACL in cakephp, and howz we can
implement that ?
Thanks
puneet
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Jul 14, 2008, at 3:01 PM, aranworld wrote:
I prefer using the honor system to ACL myself. It is much easier to
set up.
In that case, can I get a login account to your production server? ;)
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, puneetratan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Group,
Can anyone let me know, the use of ACL in cakephp, and howz we can
implement that ?
http://book.cakephp.org/view/171/access-control-lists
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:29 AM, morris wrote:
I'm having a heck of a time trying to get CakeAMFPHP 0.6 working with
a cake 1.2 site. We had been working with cake 1.1 and CakeAMFPHP,
which was doing fine. I've spent the past week upgrading our site for
1.2 and everything is working extremely
.'app'.DS.CakeGateway.php);
?
I would certainly appreciate some help here if there is more to it
than this. Feel free to PM me.
Thanks!
On Jul 8, 12:06 pm, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:29 AM, morris wrote:
I'm having a heck of a time trying to get
I always remember it like this:
If a table contains a foreign key, it's like a little label that
another object has put on it... i.e. it belongsTo something else.
hth/fwiw,
John
On Jul 3, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Jonathan Snook wrote:
A priority hasMany tasks.
A task belongsTo a priority.
Two things to note:
1. He didn't use caching in any of the tests. This seems pretty silly,
since almost *every* production website should be doing that.
Essentially, if you're not planning on doing what you should be doing,
you should be interested in these numbers.
2. His admitted CI
If cake realizes that he user agent is different, it'll nix the
session due to security concerns.
There are some settings in core.php that turn that checking off - you
might play with them, realizing the security implications.
-- John
On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:26 AM, killerboy wrote:
Hi,
1. Rewrite ACL (parts of Auth) documentation from scratch.
2. Keep what's there and update it.
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to
Bakers,
How are we doing? What is the most confusing? What's most needed and
missing? I have a punchlist of my own, but I'm looking for input from
you guys, especially the new ones.
Thanks,
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Nate wrote:
I totally don't get ACL. Like, at all. Who the heck wrote that??
I'd have to agree - the INI stuff is especially bad.
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Bakers,
Check out a new Utah-based user group for CakePHP users:
http://groups.google.com/group/utahcakephp
We're just getting started, but we're hoping to get together for
meetings, lunch foosball.
Hope to see you there,
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Jun 13, 2008, at 4:03 PM, koko wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to know if anyone knows how to get cakeforge script ...
is it available for download or what??
because I wanted to start a website for small open source projects and
I want to see how cake programmers do it in cakeforg ...
I
On Jun 12, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Parro wrote:
Hello,
I would like to contribute to translate the manual in Italian. After
selecting it as the language, I edited a part of the manual in
book.cakephp.org, but I am not sure it is the right thing to do... I
have also searched the group and I
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:01 PM, GreyWolf wrote:
It's 1.2
Yes, i've looked.
The documentation for data validation isnt good, i didnt figure it how
to validate date.
;~~
Look in the date section:
http://book.cakephp.org/view/140/date
?
-- John
On 9 jun, 14:23, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL
On Jun 7, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Femi Taiwo wrote:
Hi,
Here a quick 4-step primer to get better performance in cake
1. Specify var $recursive = 0; in your app/app_model.php
This will cut off all automatic calls to hasMany haBtm
relationships by default. three-quarters of the time, I don't
On Jun 7, 2008, at 6:22 PM, . wrote:
i moved from cake 1.2.6 beta to 1.2.7 rc1.
I am trying to do a query Not Equals, but does not work anymore.
What is it replaced by?
It was mentioned in the release announcment:
rather than:
'field' = 'operator value'
it is:
'field operator' =
I agree with Chris' suggestion on creating tickets, but let me quickly
respond here as well to see what others think...
On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:20 AM, mustan9 wrote:
Hi,
I have a few improvement requests for the Cake online manual.
1) Currently, CakePHP.org is using Google to perform
On May 28, 2008, at 10:57 AM, 703designs wrote:
I'm working with Cake right now, and I thought that ACL was my answer
to this question, but it seems that Cake's ACL (ACL in general, I
suppose) only deals with roles, etc:
It should be noted that ACL is *not* a system that is meant to
On May 27, 2008, at 8:50 PM, azlanms wrote:
I'm trying to create a model called 'Tree' based on the AclNode class
as:
class Tree extends AclNode {
var $name = 'Tree';
var $validate = array(
'title' = VALID_NOT_EMPTY
);
but I got this error message:
Fatal error: Class tree:
On May 20, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Renan Gonçalves wrote:
Why not Cake_*ClassName* convention? Like Zend.
BecauseZendHasReallyLongClassNames.
(imho)
-- John
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:51 PM, jonknee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 20, 3:36 am, Matt Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
On May 20, 2008, at 11:23 AM, eagerterrier wrote:
I work for a web design agency in NW London, UK.
We have been searching for a cakephp developer for 6 months now with
no joy. Even a sound php developer with limited MVC experience would
be good. We have spent around £2k on recruitment
On May 17, 2008, at 3:17 PM, the_woodsman wrote:
Are they any steps towards offical cake migrations features, I'd be
interested in taking a look, even if they're not very advanced...?
Check out the Cake schema console.
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On May 12, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Aaron Shafovaloff wrote:
I propose that the Cake team use MediaWiki with the FlaggedRevs
extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs)
instead of their homegrown wiki, which currently has a closed review
process. This extension, which will be
I think you're both right (except the part about horrendous
documentation - it's actually pretty good at this point).
Imho, the core team *and* the community has a lot to learn about being
more polite. I think everyone is to the point where we feel justified
in making each other mad. Some
On May 8, 2008, at 9:34 AM, AD7six wrote:
I'd like to build a forum. How can I do that with cake please?
What needs to be said:
- Don't ask vague questions
- Try to work on a solution a bit before asking
What they need:
- Help getting started with CakePHP
-
On May 8, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Sliv (Tim MacAleese) wrote:
I have to agree with Gwoo, I haven't seen any replies that weren't
appropriate to the post being replied to.
If you write a post that shows you haven't read the welcome blurb
posted on the group front page that tells you to search
On May 7, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Adam Royle wrote:
https://trac.cakefoundation.org/amf
I've used this for a project and it worked really well.
-- John
On May 7, 6:26 pm, bob0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am thinking about CakePHP and Flex interoperability. It would be
nice if the V
On May 7, 2008, at 9:24 AM, aranworld wrote:
I really enjoy contributing to the official Cake Book, however, it is
a very serious problem that the contribution and editing process is so
obscure. The black box model absolutely does not work and
significantly reduces the incentive to
on needless
parallel efforts as much as we can.
Thanks,
John
On May 7, 8:44 am, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 9:24 AM, aranworld wrote:
I really enjoy contributing to the official Cake Book, however, it
is
a very serious problem that the contribution
On May 6, 2008, at 2:39 AM, Marcin Domanski wrote:
Hey
The content is owned by the Cake Software Foundation (...)
Can you elaborate why is that ?
Why not use GPL ? GFDL ? Creative Commons ?
For me it's wierd that a community contributed documentation cannot be
used by the community
On May 6, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Sliv wrote:
Just a guess, but probably for forking wiki's.
That's exactly why we don't allow that. :)
I hope you can see why that'd be a problem.
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On May 6, 2008, at 7:50 AM, the_woodsman wrote:
I second the urgent need for more wiki like features in the Cook Book
- I've made a few alterations and comments on the content, but having
no idea if any of them were ever accepted, or indeed if the book has
even been updated in the last
On May 5, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Dardo Sordi Bogado wrote:
The linux kernel.
Sweet. I've been looking for a place to backup my funny videos
collection. Imagine being able to have them at my fingertips on *any*
linux machine I sit down to!!
Thanks for the tip.
-- John
On Mon, May 5, 2008
On May 5, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Dardo Sordi Bogado wrote:
Chris,
As you have a copy of full history, you can commit. You can't push to
Linus repository, as he didn't trust you. But he pulls directly from
the ones he trust, and examine the changes he thinks are worth
integrating. And there
On May 5, 2008, at 12:35 PM, bittersweet wrote:
Hi,
It's been a year since Cake 1.2 rolled out, and it's still in Beta. I
wonder if now it's a good time to upgrade. We are working on
internationalization of our site and facing the decision whether to
upgrade to use Cake's 1.2 and get it
On May 5, 2008, at 4:05 PM, b logica wrote:
You're suggesting i write the documentation for something i do not
understand?
I do.
It's the best way to learn, and it's the best way for us to get docs
that are targeted to new people.
If you need help reviewing it, I'm available. :)
--
I run some detection logic in bootstrap to see what server I'm on, and
set a constant that tells the system where I'm at.
In database.php I have a few class variables to specify each of my db
setups (staging, qa, production).
Then in AppModel, I specify $useDbConfig using my constant so
Use:
Configure::write('debug', '1');
That will show errors, but not SQL debugging output.
-- John
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:42 AM, MarcS wrote:
Hi,
How can I stop the SQL queries from being displayed at the bottom of
the page in AJAX calls.
Up until now I've always used
In order to help, we'll need to see what your model code, your HTML
form, and your controller action look like.
It's normal to spend some time learning how things work together: you
just have to be patient while you're learning the ropes. It's that way
with any technology, including plain
On Apr 29, 2008, at 10:15 AM, gstrock wrote:
thanks for the insight.
I think I'm just having a bad day.
I realize with everything there is
a learning curve. I guess I just thought
it would be next to nothing for cake. :-)
Actually, my project has 1 database with
4 tables, so it's a
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Nicolás Andrade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean I can separate tasks using a SiteAdmin folder, password
protected.
But in CakePHP, I don't know how to separate things. Any user which
registers himself
Run in debug mode so that the cached class paths will be overwritten.
I've run into something like this in the past and running in debug
mode (or deleting cache files) has helped.
-- John
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Quitos wrote:
Hi everyone, again requesting your help in CakePHP topic
On Apr 8, 2008, at 10:09 AM, John R wrote:
Just curious ..
The only features I really use in an editor are code highlighting and
FTP ... all of the crazy PHP IDEs are incredibly bloated for me. What
do you all use?
This topic has been covered a few times before - check the list
On Apr 7, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Caio Vitor wrote:
Does anyone know PHP Speedy? How to implement it on cakephp? More
information:
http://aciddrop.com/2008/01/21/boost-your-website-load-time-with-3-lines-of-code/
Might work by sticking his stuff in your vendors folder, including it,
and
On Mar 28, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Stephen Orr wrote:
I'm sure I won't be the first person to have seen this... or the last
to respond to it:
http://www.akbkhome.com/blog.php/View/161/CakePHP_taking_it_apart_and_the_better_written_world_of_sinners.html
Seems like this guy just doesn't like
On Mar 27, 2008, at 2:52 PM, jamest_amr wrote:
Works perfectly, thanks Stonez. Looks like the IMB tutorial is wrong.
That accursed International Maritime Bureau is always posting outdated
CakePHP tutes. :(
-- John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:39 AM, rachev.preslav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having some problems with this behavior, more specifically in
the
behavior's beforeSave() function.
If you expect some help, how about telling people the
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mech7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The API in pdf would be nice too :p
A pony to ride would be nice as well, but that's not happening either.
The API is likely to change before 1.2 is labeled as being final,
On Mar 8, 2008, at 9:04 PM, the_woodsman wrote:
I think it would be great if the big name contributors to the group
welcomed ideas more openly!
Resistance is usually a side effect of being over stressed. When you
already feel like you've dumped too much into something and people
On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Bob Mattax wrote:
I have a situation where I'm interacting w/ an API where I have to use
some webservices to access data from a User and Account table.
I've figured out for the most part how to handle the models just by
themselves, but am looking for
On Feb 23, 2008, at 8:34 AM, jim starboard wrote:
Please stop using the term automagically in the docs. It's an
embarrassment.
Please feel free to imagineer some actionable deliverable we can
replace it with. Once you've done so we may be incentivized to
leverage your value-add.
In
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:14 PM, jim starboard wrote:
I'm setting up my first cakePHP site. Let me explain what I have so
far. Am I off to the right start? Then there are some other questions
below.
I'm doing my home page first. I have the following
views\layouts\default.thtml
- this is
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:21 PM, jim starboard wrote:
In a view you have $content_for_layout but in the controller you set
it with $layout. What is the motivation behind this?
They're completely different uses from completely different
perspectives.
The stuff you want injected into a layout
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:26 PM, jim starboard wrote:
I'm trying to understand how to set up the homepage of my site. I
would like to have my home_controller access various tables in the
database, eg users, games, etc. The problem is, I'm required to have a
home model,
If you set $uses to
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:59 PM, jim starboard wrote:
As far as I know, there's no need for multiple-table models
Why? that seems overly simplistic.
It is. :)
ORM should allow a data
representation where setting a single property might update several
tables.
It does. Check into model
On Feb 20, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Samuel DeVore wrote:
Book is the planned new manual for cakephp 1.2 John wrote up a little
summary at
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/what-s-up-docs
Manual is for cakephp 1.1 and is does not have user added comments and
really doesn't support
On Feb 8, 2008, at 4:49 PM, johnnyice wrote:
looks like you put global constants in the bootstrap.php file.
--
This file is ideal for a number of common bootstrapping tasks:
1. Defining convenience functions
2. Registering global constants
3. Defining additional model,
On Feb 8, 2008, at 3:33 PM, johnnyice wrote:
this may be more of a design/convention question, but I was curious as
to when other bakers decide to add a configuration variable to Cake's
Configure over DEFINE (of course both would probably be done in /
config/core.php)
Depends on whether
Rajesh,
The new application is very wiki-like. It allows easy contributions
(hopefully). It's different in that it has more structure (data is in
tree form) and there's an approval/revision process built in.
We hope it'll make things easier - hopefully we can have something to
show really
On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:17 AM, MonkeyGirl wrote:
snip
find a better way of doing something and I'll update my guide to do it
that way instead.
If I was writing official documentation, I'd feel like I was saying
this is how it's *supposed* to be done, how it *should* be done. I
don't feel
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:25 AM, phpjoy wrote:
That attitude is the exact difference between ExtJS which is more
community-driven and Zend, which is cold and company-driven.
ExtJS succeeds because the community-force behind it drives it
forward, because people make tons of plugins. Because they
On Feb 6, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Baz wrote:
I can't help but feel that I'm not the only one who feels that way.
What would qualify one to be able to contribute to the Official
Cake documentation or the Bakery?
There is no qualification.
New people have the distinct advantage of being able
On Feb 4, 2008, at 10:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's a good start Zoe.
I disagree with Nate on one point, I think the more examples and
tutorials on Cake the better, regardless of where they exist. CakePHP
desperately needs better documentation and once it has it, it's
On Feb 4, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Keith wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:48 am, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John gets little to no help from outside contributors, and the only
way the
community has seen fit to contribute is with scattered, one-off
tutorials at various levels of currency, completeness
if I'm making this more complicated than it needs to be.
Based on what I've explained I'd like to achieve, can you see a
different (possibly simpler) way of doing it?
Thanks
On Jan 25, 2:20 pm, John David Anderson (_psychic_)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008, at 6:38 AM, grigri
On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:11 PM, judouk wrote:
///sorry, gmail let me post it first before I'd finished and now
that I've had the time to rethink what I was typing, I think I've
solved my own problem !
snip
CREATE TABLE jobs (
id int(10) not null auto_increment,
typeofjob
On Jan 25, 2008, at 6:38 AM, grigri wrote:
I'd like to hear some suggestions on cakeifying an existing system.
Cake's validation is wonderful, but it only allows yes this is good
and no it isn't. I've got an application I need to port that has
automated warnings built in for some fields.
(controllers
should be agnostic / double-check if the user really wants to do
this).
Perhaps a rethink is in order...
On Jan 25, 4:04 pm, John David Anderson (_psychic_)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you tell us more about why you need warnings? The simplest
alternative might be a completely
On Jan 24, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Doug @ Straw Dogs wrote:
translate language=management
In answer (devils advocate) to the sites sales pitch:
No Configuration - Way too vague.
== less maintenance cost (= less $ in the long run)
Extremely Simple - One developer doesn't know how to use it.
On Jan 24, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Doug @ Straw Dogs wrote:
snip
Best Practices - We've not used best practices before and its
worked. So why change now?
OO - As above. Nothing more than a buzzword. Whats the point.
Yada yada yada.
I'd have to agree with Chris at some level. Any place that
On Jan 24, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Dave wrote:
Hello all,
Just wanted to share some great news... Apress has picked up my
manuscript for a CakePHP book which will come out in July. Things are
moving along nicely and I'm excited to contribute some documentation
to the Cake community.
The book
On Jan 12, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Tim wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to CakePHP, and a relative newbie to php. CakePHP looks
like just what I was looking for :)
The issue is with business objects that end with the character 's'. I
have a model that i'd like to call lens. That would make the
How can you recruit maintainers and editors when the current docs team
can't do that? I have some great help from great people, but no one
seems to have the time to commit on a regular basis. A wiki represents
a much higher maintenance cost, something I doubt you can muster. The
core team
On Dec 29, 2007, at 6:51 AM, gobblez wrote:
Perhaps the official tutorial should be un-deprecated? Maybe add
comments where people can chime in, php.net or Bakery style?
It's in the works. I'm moving manual content to the new system already.
Would it
really take more than 20 minutes to
On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I did a little site using cakephp.
When I was on my computer, it was working.
Then I did send to this server hostsys.com.br.
The database is ok, because it shows the data, but the css and the
rest doesn't appear.
On Dec 16, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Action wrote:
I've always used Cake as my primary framework, but the Zend Framework
seems to be shaping up nicely. Most of its published criticisms have
been dealt with since 1.0 and it has some very impressive features
(webservices, etc.).
The problem with ZF
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Jon Miller wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 3:30 PM, John David Anderson (_psychic_)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also tiring of people crying about the docs. Right now, we have
170 completely rewritten printed pages of documentation for code that
isn't even BETA
On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:44 PM, joeradical wrote:
I am looking for the best place to find seasoned cakephp guru's. I am
rewriting our entire site for cake and may need additional help to
speed up development. I need someone to make the template, someone to
look at the old php code and
, 12:07 am, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:44 PM, joeradical wrote:
I am looking for the best place to find seasoned cakephp guru's. I
am
rewriting our entire site for cake and may need additional help to
speed up development. I need someone to make
On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 5:33 PM, MrG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris, I was looking for those two tutorials in your blog but
can't
find none.
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Chris Hartjes wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 3:00 PM, Pillow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've website which has about 3 uniq visits per day (up to 1500
online). The problem is that CMS written on CakePHP consumes too much
of CPUs power.
Almost everything is
On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Gwoo wrote:
I have not been working too much on the CakeAMFPHP mainly because I
wanted something simple and easy to move around. Plus, with the new
AMFEXT, it made sense to write something new. So, we put together the
AMF plugin. AMFPHP is not required and
On Nov 16, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Christopher E. Franklin, Sr. wrote:
I have been working with CakePHP for about a year now and have written
a company website in that year that totals in about 150MB of combined
PHP code. This whole time, I have been using MySQL, Linux, and Apache
to do my
On Nov 3, 2007, at 6:20 AM, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
On Nov 3, 4:30 pm, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:14 pm, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think, the Cake Project Manager could open access to another open
svn branch for 1.2.
By this way, I think
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Chris Thompson wrote:
Where I work, we are testing out CakePHP to replace our existing
codebase.
I have two questions.
1. Do all primary keys for tables have to be 'id'?
By convention, yes. By configuration, no. See $primaryKey in the Model.
snip
For
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
