On May 24, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Michel Schinz wrote:
Alan Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
My goal is to be able to compile the OS GUI version of Unison on a
single machine. Right now, using my intel-based notebook, I'm able to
compile a version that runs both on 10.4 and 10.5, but only
Hello Jean,
There is no 64-bit native OCaml compiler for Mac OS X intel. I have a
patch that works in Leopard, but did not compile opt.opt in Tiger,
meaning that something is not OK, so I did not offer it to the
community. The bootstrap went fine, findlib and godi compiled OK too.
I
can, then do the same!).
Andres
Thanks a lot Andres.
Jean
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jean Krivine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great thanks!
J
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Andres Varon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Jean Krivine wrote:
I'd be glad to try
Hello Everyone,
I am getting every now and then a user having troubles compiling my
applications because the file camlp4fulllib.cmxa is missing in their
OCaml install. It seems like the ocaml distro's Makefile only build
and install the camlp4 native tools and libraries if make opt.opt is
On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Damien Doligez wrote:
Dear OCaml Users,
We are pleased to celebrate the birthday of Friedrich Nietzsche
by releasing OCaml version 3.11.0+beta1. We need YOU to test
it thoroughly and report any problems you might have. Does
your favorite software work with it?
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:
Andres Varon wrote:
Thanks for the good work. I would like to know exactly what
architectures support the native Dynlink? I did not see this
information in the release notes.
The native Dynlink is known to work under Linux x86, Linux
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
The native Dynlink is known to work under Linux x86, Linux AMD64,
Win32 (mingw/msvc ports). It has been lightly tested under Win64,
some flavors of BSDs and also the Cygwin port.
And on macosx ? It seems here on 10.5.5 that only
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:
Andres Varon wrote:
One more question: is it always compiled? or is dynlink.cmxa simply
not available in some architectures? if yes, what are those?
As far as I can tell, dynlink.cmxa is always compiled. You will get
error when ocamlopt
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Alain Frisch wrote:
Daniel Bünzli wrote:
And on macosx ? It seems here on 10.5.5 that only dynlink.cma and
dynlink.cmi for bytecode get installed. So I guess there's no
support. What about the future ?
Native dynlink used to work on Mac OS X 10.5 (x86
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib is commented out.
Changing the Makefile to link against
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
Changing the Makefile to link against tk84.dll and tcl84.dll seems
to fix
the problem.
Did you manage to do it with *.dll or *.lib? I don't have those
dll's and have been unable to compile the MinGW port with a setup
that succeeded
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:59 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Pleased to say that I've got my 3 current projects compiled and
running
under 3.11+beta1
Unfortunately for one of the projects, its reference run (a
computationally intensive, repeatable operation the speed of which
interests
me) has gone
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Mark Shinwell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:19:40AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
I have questions to the kind folks at Jane Street,
and others who use OCaml for commercial/non-research
development: what do you guys use for your development
environment?
vim in an
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Xavier Leroy wrote:
So far our tests have compiled and run successfully in most
platforms
[1] excepting Windows 64 bits (but it's the first time I attempt to
compile in this architecture). I am getting
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Xavier Leroy wrote:
So far our tests have compiled and run successfully in most platforms
[1] excepting Windows 64 bits (but it's the first time I attempt to
compile in this architecture). I am getting this error message:
There are two problems with Windows 64
Hello,
On Nov 25, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Damien Doligez wrote:
Dear OCaml users,
We are closing in on version 3.11.0. A Release Candidate is now
available.
If there are no show-stoppers in this RC, then 3.11.0 will be
officially
released next week.
The release candidate is available here:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On 28-01-2009, Dmitry Bely dmitry.b...@gmail.com wrote:
There are numerous environments/libraries that support process-based
Ocaml multiprocessing: jocaml, OCamlP3l, OcamlMPI (and probably
others). Do I get it right that all of them are
I don't think that it compiles the way it is now. It seems to me that
there was a version merge error and asmcomp/amd64/emit.mlp has
repeated definitions of emit_call and emit_jump.
Andres
On Mar 5, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Joel Reymont wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:10 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Peng Zang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, camlp4 seems to break parsing of object duplication on 3.11.
Can anyone
replicate this problem? Is this an known issue? A quick google
search did
not reveal anything..
Yeah. I reported
On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:32 PM, John Whitington wrote:
Hi Folks,
Has anyone managed this? Bytecode seems fine, native not so.
I've tried just ./configure and ./configure -cc gcc -m64 with the
source bzip of 3.11.1 as suggested in INSTALL. Both compile fine,
but give:
feast:trunk john$
21 matches
Mail list logo
