Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, I've been reading this entire discussion for the past couple=20 of days, and I am wondering why there isn't a fork (or even a=20 completely alternative implementation) of cdrtools yet. I believe that it is easy to find an answer to this question:

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-13 Thread Lourens Veen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:09, Joerg Schilling wrote: Please be more polite to other people! Why did you choose to introduce these harsh words? I never used them! The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is that they

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
From: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Don, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: Please be more polite to other people! That was a joke and sarcastic, sorry, next time I put in a smiley so that everybody will understand! The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is that

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm wondering, why do you support Linux at all? If it's such a badly=20 coded and proprietary system, then why don't you just drop support=20 for it? That should save a lot of work since you can close most=20 bugreports with a simple sorry, Linux is

RE: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-13 Thread Eyermann Horst ICM Bocholt
It's amusing these discussions on this list here. The only reason for me to stay on it, as cdrtools work without problemce If you can give only the slightest idea on how to prove this completely wrong assumption, go on and do it! This is a result from discussions with several programmers.

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Finally a well said answer without flaming, completely opposed to Jörg unfriendly comments. Congratulations. Best wishes Norbert --- Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Technische Universität Wien gpg

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Look at the web page and judge yourself. The first thing that comes into mind is the 'pay' button. Actually the sole reason I placed it there is to show people you can ask users to contribute without violating the GPL. If people find it

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 10:50:54 2002 On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Dan Hollis wrote: joerg is calling you a thief... This is not true! I never used this word in my mail Thanks for notifying me. He should reconsider this, because the only theft in this whole mess wasn't what I did.

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 11:19:36 2002 And for the record joerg, if you had a paypal donate button for the open source cdrecord, I would donate for that too. If somebofy helps me to set up an account why not. The main difference between me and the RH Germany guy seems to be that I

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: Interesting to see that you are not completely unwilling to communicate I'm not - I just end up being unresponsive occasionally because I'm overworked (and receiving around 1500 mails a day doesn't help). For this reason I am the original

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: Look what is going on with ghostview What's going on? (i dont use ghostview) If you don't know this story, why then did you join this discussion? Because you brought up ghostview at the very end of the discussion. You're asking me why I joined

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 21:01:01 2002 On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: I will release a newer version once I either have some spare time, or once I find a serious problem in the current version. You name it! You are a person who did make useless changes on the build

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: He released his source code to the public. It doesn't have any license keys, it doesn't have any timebombs (June 17). Again: he did not contribute a single line of own code and the key expires on Jan 12th 2003 - just check before posting!

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 21:56:49 2002 Interesting to see that you are not completely unwilling to communicate I'm not - I just end up being unresponsive occasionally because I'm overworked (and receiving around 1500 mails a day doesn't help). Well I did expect that you start

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: and your only motivation was to have a private copy of cdrecord running for your A03. Wrong. If that had been my motivation, I would have built a copy for myself without putting it on the net. Yes, I wanted to have my A03 running without using

Re: cdrecord-ProDVD (fwd)

2002-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 13 01:24:15 2002 ??? Why then didn't you contribute to improve the code? So if people submit patches to add dvd writing support to cdrecord, you will accept them (even if it means opensource cdrecord will compete with closed source cdrecord-prodvd)? Why do you