DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31393.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Maybe one little quick example:
- currently, jelly-swing's ComponentTag calls, somewhere down in its
doTag() findAncestorWithClass(ContainerTag.class) to which they call
addComponent... At least one major drawback: putting such in a defined
tag does not work unless you go till the top-level
How does this differ from writing to XMLOutput.
It seems XMLOutput is being confused with the context...?
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:54:11 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe one little quick example:
- currently, jelly-swing's ComponentTag calls, somewhere down in its
doTag()
dflorey 2004/10/06 01:38:29
Modified:i18n project.properties
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +24 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.properties
Index: project.properties
===
RCS
dflorey 2004/10/06 01:44:01
Modified:i18n project.xml
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +5 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file:
dflorey 2004/10/06 01:48:08
Modified:i18n project.properties project.xml
Log:
Makes them look like in sandbox-transaction
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.properties
Index: project.properties
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your help, but this didn't help much as with your changes the
layout is broken and I cannot upload the website as some ssh-infos are
missing.
I wonder why the maven scripts for the transaction component (that I used as
a blueprint) are working perfectly?
I've no clue.
Maybe
It does differ only by the fact that you write an Object and not
XML-nodes!
Only, this tiny change to be able to invoke the sacred functional word.
paul
Le 6 oct. 04, à 10:12, Dion Gillard a écrit :
How does this differ from writing to XMLOutput.
It seems XMLOutput is being confused with the
Hi All,
I'm currently developing a sub-class of the AbstractConfiguration
classthat uses Hibernate to access configuration properties
(unimaginatively called Hibernate Configuration). I'm slightly concerned
about the way sub-classes are suposed to handle exceptions:
All the abstract method are
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-resources has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi,
this is the Call for Votes (CfV) for the release of Commons
Configuration 1.0.
I was volunteered as release manager so I will do this release, build
release jars and send out announcements.
Please vote now:
[ ] +1 - Yes
[ ] 0 - I don't care
[ ] -1 - No
My vote is (obviously) +1
So what's the advantage over this versus the context. XMLOutput is for
producing output, not storing data. The context is for storing data.
Paul, I must be missing something obvious here.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:37:21 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does differ only by the fact
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Ricardo.. Sounds like you are working on something I've been wanting for
a long time! At any rate.. I believe there is a
ConfigurationRuntimeException that you could throw, even though it's not
part of the API.
I think the reason that most of the gets don't throw an exception is because
99%
Please vote now:
[X] +1 - Yes
[ ] 0 - I don't care
[ ] -1 - No
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 4:58 AM
Body:
Any comments on my patch?
It seems to resolve the concerns we have about adding jstl to the dependencies, and it
works.
Eric Pugh wrote:
Hi Ricardo.. Sounds like you are working on something I've been wanting for
a long time!
Of course, I was going to release it anyway so please find the
source-code attached. Not sure it belongs in commons-configration API;
probably better contributed to the hibernate project.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ben Anderson
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 5:12 AM
Body:
Well, that certainly will work. Off course that's getting away from standards for no
legitimate reason. Just to add the discussion - the jstl.jar IS on ibiblio's
Problem with having Hibernate implementations is that the license is
incompatible with the ASL. So you'll need to keep any incompatible code
somewhere elselike I do with commons-resources at sf.net.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 5:39 AM
Body:
Off course that's getting away from standards for no legitimate reason.
The reason, so far, has been licensing and details about jstl.jar.
If it's part of the standard
Hi,
Please vote now:
[ X ] +1 - Yes
[ ] 0 - I don't care
[ ] -1 - No
Yes, definitely, it's about time ;) Thanks for making this happen,
Yoav
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 5:46 AM
Body:
Differences from memory:
- You are creating a new LoopTagStatus class each time through the loop, I was reusing
a single instance.
- You only handled one branch in the
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ben Anderson
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 5:56 AM
Body:
snip
If I replace the custom LoopStatus in ForEachTag with the JSTL one, and keep the rest,
what is the difference between our patches?
/snip
Are there any good tools
I tried hitting commons-resources.sf.net but no joy.. I think this
licensing thing is going to bite a lot of projects.. I was thinking of
settingup a sf project called hibernatecodethatiwantedatapache.sf.net
where I could toss all these bits and pieces.
Has Jakarta-Commons actually set up a
Gee... I was really thinking this was obvious... hence the relatively
undetailed descriptions.
- XMLoutput objects are exchanged as part of the doTag nested calls.
Therefore it is easy for something aimed at receiving data to create
an XMLOutput object that does something just for the
I don't know about a parallel site, but I put my code under
sf.net/projects/struts (just because I already use that repos)
I'm not one of those letter-of-the-law types, but I don't want anything I
work on to be accused of said infractions (Gawd!! I sound like one now ;)
--
James Mitchell
P.S. Please find the JUnit test code attached.
Ricardo Gladwell wrote:
Eric Pugh wrote:
Hi Ricardo.. Sounds like you are working on something I've been
wanting for
a long time!
Of course, I was going to release it anyway so please find the
source-code attached. Not sure it belongs in
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ben Anderson
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 6:54 AM
Body:
- You are creating a new LoopTagStatus class each time through the loop, I was reusing
a single instance.
agreed - good catch!
- You only handled one branch in the
Wow, how did I miss this? I wonder what we can do with this and
commons-resources and/or Apache Struts.
In my current gig we are using a home grown solution in combination with
ActionErrors/ActionMessages provided by Struts. This project would have
been nice to have about 8 months ago.
My
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
[ ] +1 - Yes
[ ] 0 - I don't care
[ +1 ] -1 - No
I probably don't get a vote, but I would advise that there are still
some changes, for example, to the way that commons-configuration defines
exception handling before it is ready for prime-time.
As I stated in
I am trying to write some test cases for some commons code. A ways back
I had a problem because I was using a newer version of JUnit than what
was in the server build. What version of JUnit is acceptable?
I am writing the test cases for commons-chain if that makes a difference.
Thanks,
sean
+1 ! There is still a lot to do but I'm really satisfied with the
current state of [configuration]. I can't wait to start implementing the
new features :)
Emmanuel Bourg
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
this is the Call for Votes (CfV) for the release of Commons
Configuration 1.0.
I was
Ricardo Gladwell wrote:
I probably don't get a vote, but I would advise that there are still
some changes, for example, to the way that commons-configuration defines
exception handling before it is ready for prime-time.
As I stated in my previous emails, we should at least make it clear in
the
I don't want to sound harsh, but what is the added value of using
Hibernate here for such a simple data structure ? A direct JDBC
implementation is good enough and spare a 1.5MB dependency.
Emmanuel Bourg
Ricardo Gladwell wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently developing a sub-class of the
James Mitchell wrote:
Problem with having Hibernate implementations is that the license is
incompatible with the ASL. So you'll need to keep any incompatible code
somewhere elselike I do with commons-resources at sf.net.
AKAIK Hibernate is licensed under the LGPL and is perfectly compatible
Well what about the latest ? (3.8.1)
Emmanuel Bourg
Sean Schofield wrote:
I am trying to write some test cases for some commons code. A ways back
I had a problem because I was using a newer version of JUnit than what
was in the server build. What version of JUnit is acceptable?
I am writing
Well what about the latest ? (3.8.1)
Emmanuel Bourg
That's what I'm going with. It's probably less of a concern now that
the API is more stable. I think it was an issue when they had
introduced some new test methods in the newest release and commons
wasn't using it.
That is good to know. I am not a licensing expert. I'm just going off of a
prior conversation Stefan Bodewig whom I assume is more knowledgeable than I
wrt this issue.
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:02 AM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
One advantage for me is having the ability to reuse your existing
application's configuration. I created a Hibernate, iBatis, Torque,
DBUtils, and straight JDBC implementations for commons-resource for this
very purpose.
I moved the Hibernate impl over to sf.net because of license conflicts.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I don't want to sound harsh, but what is the added value of using
Hibernate here for such a simple data structure ? A direct JDBC
implementation is good enough and spare a 1.5MB dependency.
Nothing, AFAIK: the only reason I developed it was because I was using
Hibernate in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rsitze 2004/10/06 11:40:57
Modified:discovery/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery
ResourceNameIterator.java
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +12 -0
This is really driving me crazy.. I have tracked threads on general and
jakarta-pmc mailing lists about this.. And everytime it comes down to I am
not a lawyer and a bunch of FUD. We really need someone from the top of
Apache to provide direction. I work a lot with hibernate code and can think
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rdonkin 2004/10/06 13:39:13
Modified:betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read
ReadContext.java
Log:
Fixed some of my sloppy coding :( Fix for issue #30990
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +12 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 2:18 PM
Body:
Ok, so general consensus is to add JSTL.jar and use an anonymous implementation of it
instead of the LoopStatus class.
Unless someone disagrees in the next few days,
rdonkin 2004/10/06 14:38:06
Modified:betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt
XMLIntrospector.java
betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/digester
AddDefaultsRule.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
scolebourne2004/10/06 14:40:09
Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang CharEncoding.java
Log:
Javadoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +16 -30
jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/CharEncoding.java
Index: CharEncoding.java
On 6 Oct 2004, at 00:19, Christoph Gaffga ((triplemind.com)) wrote:
i think that the code i've just committed should allow you to solve
your problem. unfortunately, it's not as well documented as i would
have liked (it's getting late for me and i need to finished off the
0.6
release). basically,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31569.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31571.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is really driving me crazy.. I have tracked threads on general and
jakarta-pmc mailing lists about this.. And everytime it comes down to I am
not a lawyer and a bunch of FUD. We really need someone from the top of
Apache to provide direction. I work a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31572.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
scolebourne2004/10/06 15:29:25
Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text package.html
lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/text
TextTestSuite.java
Added: lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text StrTokenizer.java
rsitze 2004/10/06 15:29:51
Modified:discovery/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/jdk
JDK11Hooks.java JDK12Hooks.java
Log:
In newer JVM/compilers, runtime complains when we try to invoke setLog on a
non-public class.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5
rsitze 2004/10/06 15:31:01
Modified:discovery/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/resource
ResourceDiscoverImpl.java
Log:
Defer creation of ClassLoaders until we need them,
and create a useful default [non-null].
Revision ChangesPath
1.5
rsitze 2004/10/06 15:31:34
Modified:discovery/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/tools
ManagedProperties.java
Log:
Instrument logging to help identify source of properties.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +18 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31572.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eric Pugh wrote:
This is really driving me crazy.. I have tracked threads on general and
jakarta-pmc mailing lists about this.. And everytime it comes down to I am
not a lawyer and a bunch of FUD. We really need someone from the top of
Apache to provide direction. I work a lot with hibernate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31572.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi James,
Any contributions are welcome!
As I still don't get the site generated with maven completely (layout is
somehow broken and javadocs are missing) this is very high on my todo...
Maybe you can help me out?
Would be nice to get a link from the commons page to the i18n in the
sandbox. Do you
Richard,
Are u planning any more updates? Can we try and make a
commons-discovery release before Axis gets finalized?
thanks,
dims
On 6 Oct 2004 22:31:34 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsitze 2004/10/06 15:31:34
Modified:
If people really want this stuff I would be glad to create a new
sandbox component for the XML import and export stuff.
Importer is mainly SAX plus all that I ever wanted to have
additonally, i.e. have the path of the generated event, more than one
listener, element, attribute and conent data at
I added a patch for that case, including some samples for the xdocs.
see: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31553
committed. many thanks.
the pleasure is mine.
this breaks compatibility with code i committed earlier this week but
(in this case) given the short time
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:18:50 +0200, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee... I was really thinking this was obvious... hence the relatively
undetailed descriptions.
Obviously it isn't for me. It seems to me that you want to use
XMLOutput to pass data around, even though it's currently a
mbecke 2004/10/06 17:36:25
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient
HttpHost.java
Log:
Removed unnecessary synchronized keywords.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31572.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Correct.
I'll work to resolve the lack of published information. It's more than
just LGPL really, we need a page that lists all acceptable
OSI-accepted licences. LGPL is just the biggest issue as it's probably
the 2nd most common open-source Java licence behind BSD-like.
As far as the FUD/IANAL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:46:52 +0200, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
Any contributions are welcome!
As I still don't get the site generated with maven completely (layout is
somehow broken and javadocs are missing) this is very high on my todo...
Maybe you can help me out?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'll work to resolve the lack of published information. It's more than
just LGPL really, we need a page that lists all acceptable
OSI-accepted licences. LGPL is just the biggest issue as it's probably
the 2nd most common open-source Java licence behind BSD-like.
Thanks, Wolfgang. This is a pretty easy case for us - as it sits today,
especially with this email note from Wolfgang (which should be included in
a NOTES file sitting near colt.jar when imported) it looks perfectly fine
to incorporate this into Apache, preserving CERN's copyright notice.
I feel your pain. After spending time shuffling code up and down from a
contrib folder so that gump would, then would not compile those sources, I
finally moved the code over to sf.net and updated the docs to mention the
additional impls.
I would like a straight answer on this too. I wish I
Hi Brian,
After being reminded by Wolfgang that he had previously given me a
contact at CERN to discuss these issues with, I emailed that contact. He
forwarded me to the Technology Transfer officer for CERN. I just
finished emailing a request to that individual to comment on the
position CERN
Date: 2004-10-06T22:48:12
Editor: AlChou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: MathWishList
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MathWishList
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -21,3
+1
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 03:48, Michael Becke wrote:
After a little delay... I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS
HTTPCLIENT_2_0 as 2.0.2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as
follows:
--
Vote:
Hi,
Thanks for your help.
I found the samples specified by you very much useful.
I got it working with my JSP by sending user credential parameters which were required
at my server.
Now the problem is making the same with an applet as it is not working from remote
client accessing the
Hello Srinivas,
I think some people have succeeded in using HttpClient from
an applet. Remember you will have to sign the applet in order
to access the client file system. But you could run into problems
accessing the user credentials in the applet.
You could also try to write JavaScript code
+0
-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 7:48 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: [VOTE] 2.0.2 release
After a little delay... I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS
HTTPCLIENT_2_0 as 2.0.2 and proceed with a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31471.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
