Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: muse] Odd QT problem

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:42, Austin wrote: Maybe some cooker QT expert can help me. I assure you, there is no .MusE file. Thanks, i had the same problem with psi. i just upgraded kdebase yesterday, and now, it work fine. i didn't see i was not running the latest version because of space

Re: [Cooker] kernel source requires libgpm1-devel ?

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:33, Brad Felmey wrote: This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or kernel-source? kernel-source need libncurses-devel libncurses requires libgpm1-devel . -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] kernel source requires libgpm1-devel ?

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:38, Brad Felmey wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:33, Brad Felmey wrote: This is not necessary, methinks. Is this an issue in urpmi or kernel-source? And requires libncurses5-devel? yes, for make menuconfig. In a perfect world, it should be possible to have one

Re: [Cooker] jigdo cannot be installed on mdk92

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 31 October 2003 14:44, Pascal Cavy wrote: # urpmi jigdo Some package requested cannot be installed: jigdo-0.7.0-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied libwwwftp.so.0) (Y/n) n something is wrong on the mirror, because it work fines on other 9.2 libwwwftp.so.0 is provided by w3c-libwww can you

Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 30 October 2003 16:00, Jan Ciger wrote: | Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 14:20, Buchan Milne a écrit : |Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console |program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake | ... | |And what if the user had never used Redhat

Re: [Cooker] Setting up a virtual provides to all console apps

2003-10-28 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:05, Olivier Thauvin wrote: It would be nice to add a provides like 'console' or 'terminal' to console apps, xvt is link to some console apps but all those rpms haven't a common provides: while we are on it , something for pdf reader. it may be useful for

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:14, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: Hi, Recently there were some articles on Slashdot proposing alternative boot procedures. Most of them advocate parallelizing of SysV-init tasks. Motivated by these I've decided to make a detailed analysis of boot procedure and see

Re: [Cooker] urpmi basesystem

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 26 October 2003 01:58, Greg Meyer wrote: On Saturday 25 October 2003 06:39 pm, Michael Scherer wrote: On Sunday 26 October 2003 00:12, Greg Meyer wrote: This appears to be an undocumented feature. Are there any others that are interesting? a lot. but since

Re: [Cooker] Re: LG Drives

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 26 October 2003 09:51, Jos wrote: On Sunday 26 Oct 2003 01:03, Greg Meyer wrote: On Saturday 25 October 2003 07:20 pm, Juan Quintela wrote: marc == Marc Guise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: marc I read the post about Mdk 9.2 and LG on mandrakeusers.org. I have cd-rw drive,

Re: [Cooker] frozen-bubble competition?

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 26 October 2003 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wondering if gc has seen this: http://monkey-bubble.tuxfamily.org/screenshots.html yes, a news already passed on a french linux website 2 month ago. -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] urpmi basesystem

2003-10-25 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 26 October 2003 00:12, Greg Meyer wrote: On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:32 pm, Pascal Terjan wrote: I just tryied urpmi --root /tmp/mdk basesytem, it worked really nicer than the first time I did it months ago. Only got 2 errors (except for kernel but that's not a problem) :

Re: [Cooker] Broken KDE in Cooker

2003-10-23 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:10, Quel Qun wrote: On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:57, Han Boetes wrote: David Kobler wrote: Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading ^^ them. It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake uses Photoshop... What a pity!

2003-10-22 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 18:03, Pierre Jarillon wrote: But some people have found that photoshop was used in Mandrake. Olivier Thauvin has a quick way to solve the problem and avoid any remark. But the problem will be hidden only. I do not see any problem with that, as long they have a

Re: [Cooker] Mescalero

2003-10-21 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 20:39, Sascha Noyes wrote: On Tuesday 21 October 2003 02:20 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote: are you asking why does mandrake do not let me steal this album? lol Please look up the word steal in the dictionary. lol means lot of laugh in english, so i guess it was a

Re: [Cooker] How to package plugins?

2003-10-20 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 20 October 2003 20:22, Buchan Milne wrote: I am packaging some amateur radio software, a number of the packages depend on hamlib, so I have packaged that too. However, hamlib ships with some plugins, and I don't seem to find a solution that rpmlint agrees with. So, I have these

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 19 October 2003 02:05, Ron Stodden wrote: Michael Scherer wrote: On Saturday 18 October 2003 20:56, Ron Stodden wrote: Michael Scherer wrote: ok, this maybe a coredump. can you place it on the web somewhere, so someone with enough skill to run file core.5465 can enlighten us

Re: [Cooker] !! 9.2 issues -- help

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 19 October 2003 19:59, Adrian Rodriguez wrote: Hi I just installed 9.2 and I have a few problems. 3. My Linksys WPC11 v3 wireless card does not get configured properly. It does recognize the orinoco_cs module that it needs and even make the ifcfg-eth1 script but I still had to do

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 18 October 2003 09:39, Ron Stodden wrote: Simon Oosthoek wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:04:01AM +1000, Ron Stodden wrote: Another 9.2 showstopper! Post it at: bugs.mandrakelinux.com No. I have legally carried out my only duty - to notify MandrakeSoft, the owner of the

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 18 October 2003 16:27, Ron Stodden wrote: I noticed today the presence of a new file under the cleaned up /root directory: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ls -l total 7608 -rw---1 root root 7827456 Oct 18 23:35 core.5465 drwx--3 root root 4096 Oct

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 18 October 2003 20:56, Ron Stodden wrote: Michael Scherer wrote: ok, this maybe a coredump. can you place it on the web somewhere, so someone with enough skill to run file core.5465 can enlighten us with the name of the crashed program ? http://members.optusnet.com.au/ronst

Re: [Cooker] IDN (3)

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 18 October 2003 00:18, Oden Eriksson wrote: fredagen den 17 oktober 2003 15.43 skrev John Keller: Oden Eriksson wrote: There could be patents regarding this... http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/ebusiness/story/0,108 01,59043 ,00.html

Re: [Cooker] IDN (in KDE)

2003-10-13 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 13 October 2003 20:29, Oden Eriksson wrote: http://dot.kde.org/1057799730/ this sound interesting, this could be good for the next mandrake, but right now, i think that concerned peoples are on holiday, you should fill a bug report on bugzilla for this enhancement. -- Mickaël

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 18:10, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: Le mer 08/10/2003 à 14:02, Eric Fernandez a écrit : Yes, your message below had been delayed on my box :))) For the work that it would take, why not asking Club members ? Let's decide a format, resolution and compression level,

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 21:42, Pierre Jarillon wrote: Le Mercredi 8 Octobre 2003 20:27, FACORAT Fabrice a écrit : Le mer 08/10/2003 à 15:05, Pierre Jarillon a écrit : I like evolution instead of revolution. I don't know how is made the rpm database. I suggest to improve this management

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.2 update policy

2003-10-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 02:59, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 14:46, Eric Fernandez wrote: Very soon MSN is no option at all for non Windows users anyway (15th October). And Yahoo is going to block 3rd party softwares too. Then I Heh... they're going to TRY. I think

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.2 update policy (was: gaim 0.69 and 0.70 are out )

2003-10-05 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 05 October 2003 16:42, Austin wrote: 2. jabber is not an option for most people since their friends don't use it Wrong. Jabber is the best option because, they can talk to people on others network., by using a gateway on the server. they will not need to upgrade, because this will

Re: [Cooker] alsaconf won't start?

2003-10-01 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 21:59, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: Trying to start alsaconf gives: [EMAIL PROTECTED] meyerv]# alsaconf device_mode int, description Device file permission mask for devfs. which: no dialog in (/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/loc

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Replacing proftpd by pureftpd ?

2003-10-01 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 21:40, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Even if no wiki is currently available, i really think we should better use domain name urpmi.org, and make it the mdk equivalent of apt-get.org. apt-get.org is an aberation. having to search on a webpage each time people want a

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 05:38, Brad Felmey wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 03:19, Warly wrote: - What was wrong in 9.2 development process? The same thing wrong with them all - too little QA/freeze, although this is somewhat better now. Also ludicrous changelogs like fixed something or

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 29 September 2003 23:14, Vincent Danen wrote: c On Mon Sep 29, 2003 at 10:50:48PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: - How to have more contributors? while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show

Re: [Cooker] gideon from cvs, linmodems, linmodems + seti stuff

2003-09-30 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 29 September 2003 23:50, Diego Iastrubni wrote: , 30 2003, 00:34,Buchan Milne: dosemu (compiled in 9.0, runs in 9.1, 9.2), please run first time in a console, then you can use the menu item: http://iglu.org.il/pub/Hebrew/diego/dosemu/ dosbox is in contrib to replace

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 19:08, jokerman64 wrote: On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19 am, Warly wrote: It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to have some brainstorm. May you give your opinion on : - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 29 September 2003 00:26, Diego Iastrubni wrote: , 28 2003, 21:44,Michael Scherer: * use also apt-get (with the same repositories, IMHO this can be done no?), let the user which app use to install rpms. IMHO it just wastes mirror space ... how many use apt

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 29 September 2003 13:38, Eddie wrote: Do not split KDE into so many silly packages. No distro does this and it is ridiculous and too confusing. debian does it, suse too. Some one will say that you can install what you want and leave out other stuff, but if you use urpmi and/or

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 28 September 2003 10:19, Warly wrote: - How to have more contributors? while browsing the web, i have seen that gentoo and netbsd announce their new developpers. this may be a good idea,in order to show that new contributers comes. And, even if this sound a little childish, having

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-28 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 28 September 2003 13:17, Michael Reinsch wrote: Hi! - some packages have a maintainer who is not really the maintainer of this package (i.e. most changes are done by someone else), so a bug report isn't assigned to the correct person. we all receive bugreport for all packages, but,

Re: [Cooker] And next ?

2003-09-28 Thread Michael Scherer
* use also apt-get (with the same repositories, IMHO this can be done no?), let the user which app use to install rpms. IMHO it just wastes mirror space ... how many use apt? it doesn't matter, apt is patched to use hdlist in mdk :) -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Replacing proftpd by pureftpd ?

2003-09-27 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 26 September 2003 22:10, Vincent Danen wrote: On Fri Sep 26, 2003 at 08:23:24PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: can you put exim in contribs at least ? There's never been an interest before. I've been maintining exim packages for about 1.5-2 years now, and I never even knew anyone

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Replacing proftpd by pureftpd ?

2003-09-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 26 September 2003 18:28, Vincent Danen wrote: On Fri Sep 26, 2003 at 03:29:28AM -0400, Brook Humphrey wrote: Heck, I'm all for it and agree with all your reasons. But the example is a touch out... wu-ftpd hasn't been in main since 8.2 (last version it shipped in main).

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Replacing proftpd by pureftpd ?

2003-09-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 26 September 2003 18:11, Vincent Danen wrote: Very true. But every openssh vuln hasn't been a crash or DoS. Mind you, with openssh a DoS is bad enough. Need to remote admin servers? What happens if the server goes down and you're stuck driving a long time to get to the machine?

Re: [Cooker] Cooperation with RedHat Linux project?

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 01:06, Pierre Jarillon wrote: Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 16:41, David Walser a écrit : http://rhl.redhat.com/ From reading this, it sounds like the possibility of some cooperation between Cooker and

Re: [Cooker] So, which is broken?

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 22 September 2003 19:36, Felix Miata wrote: Three candidates: 1-grep 2-rpm -qa 3-pipe filtering On Redhat 9: # rpm -qa | grep gpm gpm-... libgpm1-... # On mdk cooker: # rpm -qa | grep gpm gpm-... # /home/misc $ rpm -qa | grep gpm libgpm1-1.20.1-9mdk gpm-1.20.1-9mdk

Re: [Cooker] Make xconfig fails on kernel-source-2.4.22-10

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 22 September 2003 19:46, Gary Walsh wrote: I get an error when running make xconfig on kernel-source-2.4.22-10mdk. ~ Am I missing something? cat header.tk ./kconfig.tk ./tkparse ../arch/i386/config.in kconfig.tk 3rdparty/lufs/Config.in: 2: unknown command make[1]: ***

Re: [Cooker] Anti-VeriSign patch for BIND

2003-09-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 18 September 2003 03:48, Leon Brooks wrote: Since it's small and by default doesn't do anything, is there room for ISC's anti-wildcarding BIND patch at this late date? If BIND has to be rebuilt for anything else...? I do not think so, because it still need to be tested. And, if

Re: [Cooker] [9.3/10.0 THOUGHTS] Drakconnect and network configuration

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 16:29, Simon Oosthoek wrote: Wow! That's a very detailed description and it looks like it would improve network configuration (at least for experts) by unmeasurable amounts! It would be much better on the wiki. Because, keeping track of email is not good. The wiki

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] zope-2.7.0b1-2mdk

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 20:09, Luca Olivetti wrote: Lenny Cartier wrote: Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.7.0b1-2mdk - requires python not python2.2 Considering that each zope release is tested and requires a specific python version (2.2.3 for 2.7.0b1) is this a good idea? (not

Re: [Cooker] New SSH bug ?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 22:15, Jan Ciger wrote: Han Boetes wrote: | Always fun in the #openbsd channel. Always some people who want to | make it seems like the end of the world and the next worldwar. Ehm, there are reports that it lead to root compromise already, so I would execute

Re: [Cooker] um.

2003-09-13 Thread Michael Scherer
So what's made Mandrake not open? The fact that there will be one ad in the installer or the fact that I spoke? the installer is just a step, like the bookmarks, the question is what will follow well, the same kind of reproch were made to the club, and now what ? well nothing special

Re: [Cooker] mod_python applications?

2003-09-13 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 13 September 2003 17:19, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I'm trying to find web applications for apache2-mod_python, but the only thing I've found is http://pywm.org/, and it's the only one I have been using while testing the module. Surely there must be others out there, but I just

Re: [Cooker] mod_python applications?

2003-09-13 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 13 September 2003 18:10, Oden Eriksson wrote: lördagen den 13 september 2003 17.48 skrev Michael Scherer: On Saturday 13 September 2003 17:19, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I'm trying to find web applications for apache2-mod_python, but the only thing I've found is http

Re: [Cooker] urpmi / apt4rpm - not for 9.2

2003-09-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 12 September 2003 13:02, vbnh fdgfd wrote: Hi, Apt4rpm (http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/) have the same fonctionality as URPMI. URPMI is a greet tool but why reinvent the wheel ? yes. so, can you tell to people who ported apt that urpmi was here before apt-rpm, and then, they

Re: [Cooker] urpmi / apt4rpm - not for 9.2

2003-09-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 12 September 2003 16:19, Pierre Jarillon wrote: Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 15:11, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit : Le ven 12/09/2003 à 14:49, Pierre Jarillon a écrit : Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 13:27, Teletchéa Stéphane a écrit : urpmi is THE killer feature of Mandrake above

Re: [Cooker] urpmi / apt4rpm - not for 9.2

2003-09-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 12 September 2003 22:09, Christiaan Welvaart wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote: or you can use synaptics. it reminds me that it is not packaged for contribs :/ I packaged it months ago, after I fixed apt to work with cooker mirrors directly. But it looks like I

Re: [Cooker] um.

2003-09-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 12 September 2003 22:07, Jan Ciger wrote: Ok, breaking my own wow not to reply to this thread anymore, *sic*. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I think this may help: | | http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3 | | it clears up some misconceptions and definitely eases my mind

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5465] [gcompris] New: Additional package is chosen during install

2003-09-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 20:52, Bruno Coudoin wrote: I confirm that gcompris needs gnuchess. There is a chess training board in gcompris. On the other hand, what happen if it doesn't found it ? Is there a simple way to split the board from the the main program ? I wanted to split for

Re: [Cooker] Final in Septembre???

2003-09-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 11 September 2003 18:09, Pierre Jarillon wrote: Le Jeudi 11 Septembre 2003 10:56, Simon Oosthoek a écrit : On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:10:51AM +0100, Emmanuel wrote: Hi all, Quick question for all of you guys: will Mandrakesoft release 9.2 even if it is not ready??? i.e.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5566] [kdebase] New: use of proprietary menu location defeats the purpose of a standard Linux desktop

2003-09-11 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 11 September 2003 23:01, Alex Chudnovsky wrote: On Thursday 11 September 2003 23:31, Buchan Milne wrote: Until then, it is impossible to satisfy everyone completely. It is. Switch to the exact Debian way - add entries to KDE menu, don't substitute it. Mandrake already use Debian

Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 07 September 2003 12:20, Luca Berra wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: Well, if am-utils is better, it should replace autofs in main (autofs can go to contrib). But, AFAIK, there is no alternative for uucp, and packages in main (postfix) contain

Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:37, Vincent Danen wrote: So, by your point above, we should have one of everything in main? Well, where's my better implementation of gkrellm-plugins (in contribs). Oh, well, just for kicks, let's throw a few others out there. Where's my alternative to zssh

Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:27, Buchan Milne wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote: we should first think what does having a package in main implies : Package in main are on cds. This is important, because it means that they can be installed without internet connection

Re: [Cooker] Re: synchroning ftp

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 07 September 2003 17:25, Thierry Vignaud wrote: Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Question really is who set the 6 month limit? If the mad rush to keep up with the cycle causes the problems that are occurring at the moment then it must be questioned. If the problem isn't

Re: [Cooker] packager email?

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 07 September 2003 20:54, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. Since when did this change? W: libdspam3-devel invalid-packager Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] The packager email must finish with @mandrakesoft.com or must be [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmlint complains about this, what should I do?

Re: [Cooker] adiusbadsl should be a real kernel module

2003-09-06 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 06 September 2003 20:10, cpjc wrote: Hi Thomas, I mean that when you install a kernel package (like kernel-2.4.22.5mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm), adiusbadsl.o.gz is not included as a pre-compiled module in the /lib/modules/etc and one's have to install the kernel sources, build a new

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 5195] [subversion-client-local] subversion repository format had changed

2003-09-05 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 05 September 2003 06:10, [ben] wrote: I was talking about the sever/client interoperability. For that they as a matter of policy only guarantee compatability between one major revision back (e.g. .27 will be compatable with .26 but .28 will not necessarily be guaranteed). ye, and

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 04 September 2003 00:32, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : i suggest the last solution, but, maybe someone see a problem ? Yes, coherency with other development tools. How many packages really requires autoconf/automake ? I guess less than 1%. However

Re: [Cooker] [RC1 bug] apache-conf and esperanto

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 04 September 2003 16:09, Grgoire Colbert wrote: Saluton! There is an internationalisation problem with apache-conf-2.0.47-3mdk, which is very easy to fix. In /etc/httpd/conf/commonhttpd.conf, you cannot find the line : AddLanguage eo .eo which would allow to use content

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-media-2.3.90-2mdk

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 04 September 2003 19:59, Olivier Blin wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -=-=-=- Name: gnome-media Version : 2.3.90 Release : 2mdk Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.3.90-1mdk - Release 2.3.90

Re: [Cooker] Suggestion for improved user experience

2003-09-03 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 00:14, Adam Williamson wrote: I ran urpmi.setup the other day and I didn't see the opportunity to setup a plf source anywhere... it is a secret trick. you should run it from the command line, and use --allsources. -- Mickaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:42, Michael Scherer wrote: The patch is not perfect. If applied right now,linphone would requires pkgconfig, which is useless. So, what i propose is to add pkgconfig as a requires if : - a file is dropped in /usr/lib/pkgconfig and if - a file is dropped

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 21:16, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. But some package use pkgconfig in their autoconf macro, as a grep pkg /usr/share/aclocal *

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 23:31, Abel Cheung wrote: On 2003-09-01(Mon) 22:29:52 +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. So..., what do you all suggest? File a bugreport or

Re: [Cooker] pam_console_apply Segmentation fault during rc.sysinit

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Scherer
Hi. On Tuesday 02 September 2003 21:08, Tony Rick wrote: Just joined, first post: is it a bug? Yes, it seems I downloaded and installed 9.2RC1 on 28 August. During startup, the trace reports that getgrname failed to find group video, and then pam_console_apply reports a segmentation fault.

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 07:54, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: Michael, Would you consider making this into a find-requires script? In that case the dependencies won't need to be added manually. done. -- Mickaël Scherer --- find-requires.bak 2003-09-01 09:49:23.0 +0200 +++

[Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-08-31 Thread Michael Scherer
Hi. will trying to fix buildrequires, i have come on this one http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/contrib/i586/problem/ices-0.3-2mdk the compilation stopped when configure tried to detect libshout3-devel, listed as buildrequires. It stopped because pkgconfig was not found. libshout3-devel should

Re: [Cooker] [PATCH] torrentsniff spec file

2003-08-29 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 29 August 2003 08:00, Todd Lyons wrote: It works well, but it failed at first because it was missing a perl file Digest/SHA1.pm, provided by perl-digest-SHA1. Add a simple Requires. since perl-Requires should be automatically discovered, there is a bug somewhere, no ? maybe a

Re: [Cooker] Main mirror BROKEN AGAIN!!!!!

2003-08-29 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 28 August 2003 22:57, dave wrote: The main mirror sunsite.uio.no is not current again. It has not received an update in over 2 days!!! if the main mirror is broken, can you explain why I have yesterday update on the one i am using ( sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de ) how do

Re: [Cooker] More mirror madness

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 28 August 2003 19:24, BLINDAUER Emmanuel wrote: For my part, I must be in the mountain, because, since 3 ou 4 weeks, I don't have access to a mirror which is complete. How ca we want to help at cooker, if we even can get the packages ? The original unstable side of cooker is on

Re: [Cooker] More mirror madness

2003-08-27 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:32, Dave Cotton wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2003 22:48, Paul Dorman wrote: but I'm peeved You are not alone. This happens too often (like, every day). Can the maintainers **pah-lease** sort out the mirror situation. That gets my vote. I have posted on

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla down?

2003-08-27 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 14:38, Steffen Barszus wrote: Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Götz Waschk wrote: Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly: Gettting forbidden error on

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] wmtv-0.6.5-4mdk

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 25 August 2003 19:19, andre wrote: On Monday 25 August 2003 18:10, Michael Scherer wrote: [Contrib-RPM] -=-=-=- Name: wmtv Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.6.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 4mdk

Re: [Cooker] non-builders

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 02:28, Austin wrote: I have several packages that either don't build or don't run with the current cooker. I've contacted most of the authors, but they're either clueless (like me), or non-existent. So if anyone is interested, they are welcome to help me fix these

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] OpenOffice.org 1.1 RCx inclusion

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 11:27, Buchan Milne wrote: Austin wrote: On 08/25/03 17:34:00, Buchan Milne wrote: So we have a 1.1 coming? Any chance at SDK also (or OpenOffice.org-devel package or similar)? There have been requests for cuckoo[1] (kpart embedding OO.o) on MandrakeClub, and it

Re: [Cooker] /proc/cpufreq/

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:39, Laurent Culioli wrote: Le Samedi 23 Août 2003 16:46, Helge Hielscher a écrit : Hello, are there any additional steps to get /proc/cpufreq (or the same in the /sys/ filesystem) to work? Hi , 1/ use acpi ( if not , delete acpi=off in your lilo.conf ) 2/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] amaya-7.0-2mdk

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 25 August 2003 12:23, Thierry Vignaud wrote: Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Name: amayaRelocations: (not relocateable) Version : 7.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk

Re: [Cooker] gdm eats 100% CPU

2003-08-24 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 22 August 2003 16:23, J.A. Magallon wrote: Hi. After latest update, gdm eats 100% CPU when I am loged in (not when nobody is logged). Anybody else suffers this ? same problem here. gdm-2.4.2.101-1mdk -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] Software submission for the Mandrake distribution

2003-08-21 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 21 August 2003 14:12, Duncan wrote: On Wed 20 Aug 2003 07:25, Buchan Milne posted as excerpted below: Well, the first question I have is, can this software be compiled from source using only free software available in Mandrake (main + contrib)? If not, then it can't really be

Re: [Cooker] [HELP WANTED] model name of your /proc/cpuinfo

2003-08-20 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 16:01, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Hi, Could you please copy the model name line of the /proc/cpuinfo of your laptop computer(s)? sony pcg-fx702 : model name : mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1400+ sony pcg-fx707 : model name : Pentium III (Coppermine) sony

Re: [Cooker] Software submission for the Mandrake distribution

2003-08-20 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:54, Olivier Blin wrote: 2. Microsoft's DDK which is _free_. Free as in free beer or free speech ? i never understood the difference between the two, it should be free as youpaynothing. -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 beta 2 Konqueror Bookmark Bar bug/freeze

2003-08-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 18 August 2003 11:47, Mark Watts wrote: Steps to reproduce: 1) Install 9.2b2 2) Start Konqueror from the Kicker. 3) Browse to a selection of sites and add each site as a bookmark. Add enough to make the bookmark bar fill and display the icon. (If the bookmark bar isnt visable,

Re: [Cooker] ProPolice stack protection for next Mandrake release?

2003-08-18 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 17 August 2003 17:47, Aleksander Adamowski wrote: How about adding ProPolice stack protection to stock Mandrake GCC? For discussion, see this Mandrake Wiki topic: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/ProPolice OpenBSD already did that. having the patch would be nice, but

Re: [Cooker] dynamic DNS and /etc/ppp/ip-up (need to be rethinked ?)

2003-08-17 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 17 August 2003 00:44, Steffen Barszus wrote: Am Sonntag, 17. August 2003 00:23 schrieb Steffen Barszus: [:snip a lot:] else unset PPP_TEMP_ENTRY fi Are there cases there a dynamic DNS don't want to be used ? which ? From what I have read on the net, if the option

Re: [Cooker] dynamic DNS and /etc/ppp/ip-up (need to be rethinked ?)

2003-08-16 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 16 August 2003 18:35, Olivier Blin wrote: Hi, I've found some weird things in /etc/ppp/ip-up 1) what's this trick for PPP_TEMP_ENTRY ? # for dynamic DNS support with gnome-ppp and kppp and draknet if grep -i '#.*ppp temp entry' /etc/resolv.conf /dev/null ; then

Re: [Cooker] kppp and suid

2003-08-16 Thread Michael Scherer
On Saturday 16 August 2003 19:51, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Hi kppp has root suid, is it really necessary ? pppd has already root suid, shouldn't it be be enough ? no, since kppp needs to write into /etc/ppp/* what about using a group for this ? /etc/ppp/ could be group writeable, and kppp

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-String-ShellQuote-1.00-7mdk

2003-08-15 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 15 August 2003 02:58, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: On Friday 15 August 2003 02:45, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : - fix DIRM: file ShellQuote.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.1/String/ Not sure it is really a good idea however: they are many perl

Re: [Cooker] OT - can someone pass this on to Andrey?

2003-08-15 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 15 August 2003 15:49, Dave Cotton wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:10, John Keller wrote: If you or anyone else figures out the basics of the form, please let me know. My ISP's SMTP is also blacklisted (on an on-and-off basis), and it'd be nice to address it when it happens. Too

Re: [Cooker] makewhatis can't find man pages

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Scherer
On Sunday 10 August 2003 13:28, guran wrote: Hi From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] guran]# /usr/sbin/makewhatis /usr/sbin/makewhatis: line 157: cd: /usr/man: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] guran]# line 157 should contain /usr/share/man or from: /usr/share/man/man8/makewhatis.8.bz2

Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:47, Robert Fox wrote: Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) beta 2, not rc2 this is not the same. -- Mickaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 Req. Laptop Support

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 13:26, Emmanuel Moll wrote: Features that would be interesting in a laptop installation class though are: -enable cpufreqd by default and make it easy to configure it ok, packaged, and uploaded. can you please test it ? I was unable to load the powernow modules on

[Cooker] Re: [Maintainers] rpmlint: perl5-naming-policy-not-applied

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 08 August 2003 17:17, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : if this is not a pure perl module, you can ignore it.is we or, if you really want to be clean, just split the package, in linuxdoc-tools and perl-Text, or something like that. Many perl script have

Re: [Cooker] Packaging errors as of today

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 11 August 2003 22:15, Frank Griffin wrote: The following occur in today's cooker: thanks for your report, but we have distriblint, made by olivier thauvin to check this kind of error. eveything is detailed on the wiki, and each maintener is mailed by a bot when a error is found. --

  1   2   3   >