navigationMenuItem (and panelNavigation/panelNavigation2/jsCookMenu)

2006-04-27 Thread Mike Kienenberger
My apologies for being ignorant about these four classes (navigationMenuItem, panelNavigation, panelNavigation2, jsCookMenu), but what's the relationship between them, if any? The reason I ask is that I see a lot of navigationMenuItem issues in the tracker, but I don't know how to classify them.

FYI: recategorized unknown/no component tomahawk issues

2006-04-27 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Just as an FYI, I went in and recategorized all but 9 of the unknown/no component tomahawk issues, creating new components as relevent. The remaining few either affect Tomahawk as a whole, deal with obscure sandbox components, or were too weird to categorize (like installing tomahawk changes JSF

Re: navigationMenuItem (and panelNavigation/panelNavigation2/jsCookMenu)

2006-04-27 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/27/06, sharath reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PanelNavigation2 and jsCookMenu have the ability to pull their menu options off a backing bean. They both use NavigationMenuItem for that. Each instance of NavigationMenuItem represents a node in the menu, and contains information like action

Re: navigationMenuItem (and panelNavigation/panelNavigation2/jsCookMenu)

2006-04-27 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/27/06, sharath reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can go ahead and do that if you think that it is the best solution, but I just wanted to point out that NavigationMenuItem is a single class, not a component. And it is only getters/setters. Well, there's 7 issues reported against

Re: navigationMenuItem (and panelNavigation/panelNavigation2/jsCookMenu)

2006-04-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/28/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, in a way we should have the concept of navigationComponent, like with selectMany or selectOne, for instance, where you have selectManyListBox, selectManyCheckbox, selectManyPicklist... so that family of component englobes the different

Re: svn commit: r397999 [1/2] - in /myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/sandbox: core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/collapsiblemenu/ core/src/main/resources-facesconfig/META-INF/ core/src/main/resources/

2006-04-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: imario Date: Fri Apr 28 13:38:01 2006 New Revision: 397999 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397999view=rev Log: TOMAHAWK-250: collapsible menu (like the left handed menu you know from outlook) great stuff, thanks to Sharath

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox

2006-04-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/28/06, Mario Ivankovits (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote: BTW: Why is it me, that I always get the complicated stuff :-( Because you do all the work :)

Re: Change Management/JIRA

2006-05-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/2/06, me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After having used the 1.1.1 release for a while, I attempted to use the 1.1.3 Snapshot with very disappointing results at compile time. Public classes and methods had moved and vanished wholesale. I looked back at the 1.1.1 code and did not see deprecation

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Core 1.1.3

2006-05-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I'm not doing the work, but I think this is a blocker issue for anyone using server-side state saving. Fortunately, that's not the case for me. I don't think telling people to switch to client-side state saving is realistic, nor is expecting them to guess a number big enough to avoid the bug

Re: ADF component with Facelets problem

2006-05-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/3/06, sdfreetiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use oracle ADF with Facelets, almost every components work well, except two problem. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list is for discussing the development of the MyFaces JSF implementation. General JSF questions should be posted to [EMAIL

Patch-Available to Open [Was: [jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-142) New Component Sortlist]

2006-05-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/3/06, sean schofield (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-142?page=all ] sean schofield updated TOMAHAWK-142: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Hey Sean. When you mark these from PA to

fishEyeNavigationMenu

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Kienenberger
You know, I finally took a look at the fishEyeNavigationMenu demo for this today. One thing that's immediately wrong with it is that it makes everything else on the page look unprofessional. If I put a component like this on my page, the end users are going to want everything to look this nice

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-47) Tree2 component does not provide getters/setters for some properties

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FQN? Sorry. Fully qualified name ... org.apache.myfaces.tree2.showLines vs showLines And, yeah, I already know you disagree :)

Re: Confirm JSF button click

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I've been using the following. onclick=if (!confirm('Are you sure you want to ignore changes to this record?')) return false On 5/9/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following *should* work: onclick=return confirm('You sure?') ... if chaining of JS handlers is implemented

Re: helper text (like 'Search' on Wiki search input) for inputText

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/10/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean something like the t:inputTextHelp, already in tomahawk [1]? I have just seen that it is not documented in the tomahawk pages [1] http://www.irian.at/myfaces/inputTextHelp.jsf Ok. I'm looking at this in depth, and it seems

Re: helper text (like 'Search' on Wiki search input) for inputText

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/11/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean something like the t:inputTextHelp, already in tomahawk [1]? I have just seen that it is not documented in the tomahawk pages [1] http://www.irian.at/myfaces

Is replaceIdWithLabel supposed to work with table columns?

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Is replaceIdWithLabel supposed to work with table columns? The client id of my component which fails validation (inside a newspaper table) is inputClientId= _id2:_id15:0:documentNumberInput at org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.ext.HtmlMessageRenderer.findInputLabel() However, the

Re: Is replaceIdWithLabel supposed to work with table columns?

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is replaceIdWithLabel supposed to work with table columns? The client id of my component which fails validation (inside a newspaper table) is inputClientId= _id2:_id15:0:documentNumberInput

First pass integration of t:newspaperTable functionality into t:dataTable

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Kienenberger
If anyone would like to test it out, I've made a first pass attempt at integrating t:newspaperTable functionality into t:dataTable. See this issue for details: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-5 This was a fairly major change so I wouldn't mind a little review of the code,

Re: DummyForm stuff

2006-05-16 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/16/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To still have the same functionality I installed the custom renderers (for commandLink/commandButton) in tomahawks faces-config.xml Now it turns out that this will break a installation if one simply would like to use tomahawk with JSF-RI.

Re: Attention AJAX Gurus ...

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Well, we are going to fix the problem by replacing prototype with dojo, so I reopened it. It's certainly not clear to me when this is going to happen, but I doubt it's going to happen today. On 5/17/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what I thought. We are using dojo now

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-123) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/16/06, L Frohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No problem. Should I just wait until TOMAHAWK-5 is committed and rework my patch to the new code? (can you let me know when it's committed?) It's now committed. Do you want me to do anything else beforehand? P.S. I also have patch TOMAHAWK-178,

Re: Make DummyForm RI compatible

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/17/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to lookup the h:form renderer (through context.getRenderKit().getRenderer) and the original link/button renderer using reflection (configurable through web.xml for sure) and call its encodeBegin/encodeEnd to render all the stuff. You

Re: Problem with SelectOneMenu and Converter

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/17/06, Joachim Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using SelectOneMenu with a converter. Now I tried the new version of myfaces and I've a Problem: on submit the converter will be invoked and returns the correct object. But the setter of my bean is never called, to the value stored in the

Re: DummyForm stuff

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/17/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good point but you're talking about an awful lot of existing applications that would immediately break. Well, is it better for existing badly-written applications to break, or for well-written applications to break? :) Right now, the only

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-123) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
on the new version is wrong. Did I do something wrong in the build, or do you see the same thing? See attachment (basic.css was included directly). -Original Message- From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:25 AM To: MyFaces Development Cc: [EMAIL

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-123) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Looks like the extra newspaper columns were not included in the tr for the thead, but instead dumped afterward. On 5/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We should keep this on the myfaces dev list. Weird. I see that too. It didn't happen before. I wonder what got changed

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-123) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Ok. Found the problem and committed a fix. Thanks! On 5/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like the extra newspaper columns were not included in the tr for the thead, but instead dumped afterward. On 5/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We should keep

Re: Make DummyForm RI compatible

2006-05-18 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, one more thing: when searching for a parent form, we should utilize the component-family, and not instanceof'ing UIForm, cause that won't work with ADF Faces then... Hey, that's good! There's another bug where this is an issue.

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-440) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-18 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/18/06, L Frohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quick question, I have the following line in HtmlTableRendererBase.java. boolean newspaperVerticalOrientation = !horizontal.equals(getNewspaperOrientation(component)); horizontal should be a constant somewhere (private static final String), but it

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-440) Add orientation parameter to NewspaperTable

2006-05-18 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/18/06, L Frohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I originally had the attribute be orientation with values horizontal and vertical, but I figured since there were only two values, it was better to make it boolean. But I can change it back. Yes, it only affects newspaperColumn tables. I was going

Re: myfaces performance

2006-05-19 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Slightly off topic for the body but not the subject: What about a MyFaces Core option to compress the jsf_state field value when using client-side state saving? Seems like the cost of larger network traffic would be greater than the cost of compressing and uncompressing.

Re: New release

2006-05-22 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For a real solution for the dummyForm problem I need to half implement a very good feature of JSF 1.2. I've finally looked into that, but I need one new method in the API they have added in 1.2. If you'll let me, I'll fix this on a branch.

Re: FW: MyFacesHack.js bug...

2006-07-05 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/5/06, Barbalace, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent this to the list last week, but think it may have been lost as I was not currently subscribed. Your posting made it to the list. However, it was lost in the sense that nothing occurred as a result of your posting it to the mailing

Re: Understanding phases and UIInput inside of UIData

2006-07-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
. :-) On 7/8/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, I'm hitting the same problem. I spent half of Friday trying to track it down, but I haven't solved it yet. So far, I've determined that it affects all UIData components (h:dataTable, t:dataTable, and t:dataList). I've also figured

Re: Tomahawk, Tobago, and Trinidad are not listed in projects.apache.org. MyFaces info out of date in projects.apache.org

2006-07-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Paul, I noticed that as well. Could you open a JIRA issue on it? I don't know how to fix it myself. On 7/10/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apache's home page references a catalog of Apache project. I noticed the following relative to MyFaces: 1) Tomahawk, Tobago, and Trinidad

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

2006-07-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
One thing I'd like to point out -- all of the validators in MyFaces Tomahawk are intended to be subclassing ValidatorBase. Otherwise, they're not going to pick up the common validator functionality that we're putting in there. I'm not really certain why having an interface adds any value if

Re: SelectItems Component vs Resolver

2006-07-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I think it's better as a component. It's easier to integrate into existing projects, and easier to extend. It's also the expected way that end-users would thing such a thing would work. On 7/13/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was browsing through the JIRA and see the

Re: Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

2006-07-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As discussed earlier in this thread, I should be able to take a validator someone else wrote and add Tomahawk validation without subclassing ValidatorBase. Adding the interface is far more flexible; there's no reason not to do it. Ok :) I

Re: [jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1364) ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom component

2006-07-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Someone else want to review this? My take on this is Invalid -- JSF doesn't let you build composite components in the constructor http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1364?page=comments#action_12420657 ] ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom component

Re: Relative to Nagivation, which component shoud be used for new development?

2006-07-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Hey Paul, Take a look at this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg13757.html It'd be great if you'd create a wiki entry on this. Also, my personal thanks for all of the wiki work you've been doing up to this point. On 7/12/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Move s:form to tomahawk

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: moving s:form has nothing to do with RI compatibility - we remain as compatible as before. So let me reopen the vote, s:form is well documented (example wouldn't help much), and it should be ok to move it to tomahawk. Has s:form been

Re: [VOTE] Move s:form to tomahawk

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking about the requirements last days, when worked with Shale-Test and JMock. I noticed that there are only some tests for components in Tomahawk. Wouldn't it be great to have a test-case as a requirement for promoting a

Re: [VOTE] Move s:form to tomahawk

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_RenderKit_test_framework Right, and from what I've glanced over, this is similar in function to what I proposed a year ago. It was pointed out at the time that this didn't really let you test ajax/javascript, though. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mike

Re: [VOTE] Move s:form to tomahawk

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Deliberately releasing components that don't work with the RI does not seem like something that will increase the market acceptance of MyFaces components. Well, let's not make this more sinister than it is. There have been cases in the

Re: MyFaces zone used for Shale

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I'm ok with it. On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey folks, any issue in beeing host for Shale's continuum build? I'd like to add Shale to our zone -- Forwarded message -- From: Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 14, 2006 10:14 AM Subject: Re:

Fwd: [Issue 359] FactoryFinder may not work as expected in certain configurations

2006-07-14 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Ryan was gracious enough to point out that this will probably affect MyFaces as well. Does someone familiar with the configuration code want to enter this into the JIRA tracker and comment on it? If no one else does so by Monday, I'll go ahead and put it in verbatim. -Mike --

Re: Next Step ( was Re: Testing for CoreRelease114 )

2006-07-27 Thread Mike Kienenberger
No, at the time, I didn't know if it was a bug or user error. I'm only now getting back to reading this thread. After reading the open issue, it's clear that I had no idea what the problem was, and if I'd opened an issue, it would have been totally wrong :) On 7/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf

Re: ValidateCompareToTag

2006-07-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Thanks. That looks like the correct fix to me. I never used the comparator attribute myself, and I created the accessors by copying the String accessors. Can you open a JIRA issue in Tomahawk for this and attach your patch? Feel free to assign the issue to me. On 7/28/06, MT3 MTCube [EMAIL

Re: ValidateCompareToTag

2006-07-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 7/28/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks like the correct fix to me. I never used the comparator attribute myself, and I created the accessors by copying the String accessors. Can you open a JIRA issue in Tomahawk for this and attach your patch? Feel free

Re: ValidateCompareToTag

2006-07-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
assign task to devs ;) you to me. me to you On 7/28/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks like the correct fix to me. I never used the comparator attribute myself, and I created the accessors by copying the String

Martin's July 16h change to HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter broke Jenia4Faces again

2006-07-31 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Hey all, Just remember that every time you change HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter's method signature, you break compatibility with Jenia4Faces. It looks like this particular problem might have been avoidable by deprecating the old method signature and having the old signature

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/1/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Mike's problem was w/ trunk. http://www.nabble.com/org.apache.myfaces.secret.CACHE-t1977021.html Looking back at the conversations that took place both here and the user place, I have to say that at this point it appears as though I blew

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Ok. That's kind of what my understanding of the behavior was, but it wasn't matching reality :) Thanks for clarifying it -- so it's definitely a bug. On 8/1/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't said much because I don't really understand the problem. One thing that is

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/1/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike, can you please confirm that you do not get the NPE when using core 1.1.4 ? If the core is a prebuilt binary somewhere I can quickly download and drop in, sure. What's the URL? This is the only thing I see that looks applicable.

Re: Core 1.1.4

2006-08-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/1/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike, can you please confirm that you do not get the NPE when using core 1.1.4 ? Sorry. I got a phone call just as I was about to test this :) Running with

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you give an example of a class that is a problem and how you propose to fix it? I'm not terribly familiar with facelets but I was able to get tree2 working without adding special facelets packages. There were just some differences in

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we design our MyFaces components right, the only component classes that will need facelets tag handlers are those with method bindings. The method binding method signature for an attribute has be specified in a facelets component tag

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For most of the remaining problem components, it's simply a matter of taking care of the generic attributes and making them explicit html attributes like you did for tree2. OK so there's not much of a need for this new package directory but

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I remember seeing that Manfred had resurrected the code generator before I left on vacation. Just stumbled across the JIRA issue while looking at another. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1284

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are majorly bogged down on the Core 1.1.4 release. We need *everyone* to do what they can to help get this release out the door. Please see the wiki[1] and test the release candidate there. A good start is to build the simple examples in

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
to be dealt with. Sean On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are majorly bogged down on the Core 1.1.4 release. We need *everyone* to do what they can to help get this release out the door. Please see the wiki[1] and test

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this issue might also affect h:dataTable since it's in the shared package: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467 I'll try testing and seeing if this is true. If so, the patch there needs to be applied, and I'll try

MyFaces-1377 Minor 1.1.4 issue - [Was: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers]

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Kienenberger
if it's worth backporting at this point. On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/2/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this issue might also affect h:dataTable since it's in the shared package: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467 I'll try

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for the getScrolling issue, I could've sworn this worked in the latest simple examples *before* I switched in the rc core api jars. Maybe I'm wrong though ... I will try to investigate further. with 1.1.5 yes; the getScrolling is now

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have written an autogenerator for the facelets-taglib. Maybe we can use this one. It seems like extra work to maintain two generators when they both generate the same kind of information. What about adding new MyFaces examples using

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not apply it to 1.1.4 branch and merge it down? Eventually we need to merge everything down. My vote is to fix it once merge it the second time. But I don't know the nature of the fix so maybe I'm way off here. It's already in trunk,

Re: when jsf start up, how it reads the configuration file?

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, bin z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For struts, it uses Digester to process the configuration file. I tried to find something like this in FacesServlet, but cannot find any similar code. So, my question is how jsf web application implement this kind of work? Yep. Same deal. Take a look

Re: when jsf start up, how it reads the configuration file?

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
cannot find the some package like myfaces' config. How does it parse the configuration file? On 8/3/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, bin z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For struts, it uses Digester to process the configuration file. I tried to find something like

Re: when jsf start up, how it reads the configuration file?

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, bin z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I checked the myfaces' FacesServlet src, which is almost the same like jsf1.2 specification, and I cannot found any code using Digester liked class. Then how jsf application read configuration file? On 8/3/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's already in trunk, And then on 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tell me what revision the check in was so I can revert it. Then just apply to the trunk ok

Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe we should remove the *renamed* JS function and add it the the 1.2 branch ? My vote would be for reverting this renaming and going back to the old name. It's too bad that Martin isn't around to comment, though.

Re: [jira] Closed: (TOMAHAWK-545) Tomahawk doesn't work without internet connection. Security issue.

2006-08-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Well, the internet connection part of the dtd is solved, then. I'm not aware of any other parts of MyFaces that might require an internet connection. The following stack track is for a null pointer exception -- you need to investigate a little more and figure out why that's happening. One easy

Re: Facelets Tomahawk

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's that unit test vs integration test thing again. Your example will show that facelets works as an integration test, but isn't really as comprehensive as having a facelets example for every component. Yes a facelets example for every

Re: Please test, committers ... (was Re: IMPORTANT: Calling all committers)

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: should we ask on the user list for some *testing* help? Since it's summer/vacation time, I guess not much will happen here :) It never hurts to ask. It's a public project, and I don't see why the public wouldn't help.

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
What about the possiblity of naming these snapshot jars differently? As things stand, it's hard to know when a snapshot is different or what version to report against. We could do something simple like myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc1-bin.zip myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc2-bin.zip or something more clever like

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/4/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc1-bin.zip myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc2-bin.zip The other nice thing about this is that people feel more secure using something officially called a release candidate, and we might get more people testing it :)

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-04 Thread Mike Kienenberger
means to me. On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/4/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/4/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc1-bin.zip myfaces-core-1.1.4-rc2-bin.zip The other nice thing about this is that people feel more

tree2 documentation: value, var, varNodeToggler missing

2006-08-07 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I'm taking a look at tree2 for the first time. One thing I've noticed right off is the documentation, or lack thereof :) Most of the documentation is in the wiki, except for the tld. However, three attributes aren't documented at all: value, var, and varNodeToggler. I'm guessing var and

Re: tree2 documentation: value, var, varNodeToggler missing

2006-08-07 Thread Mike Kienenberger
shouldn't have tried replacing these with h:outputTexts] On 8/7/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm taking a look at tree2 for the first time. One thing I've noticed right off is the documentation, or lack thereof :) Most of the documentation is in the wiki, except for the tld

Re: tree2 documentation: value, var, varNodeToggler missing

2006-08-07 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/7/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/7/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm throwing all the documentation issues I encounter into this thread for now. Hopefully, I'll have time to update the docs at a later point. Thanks, and so we don't lose track of your

Re: The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-08 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Since my opinion on the matter has been misinterpreted previously, let me try to restate it here. After a branch, all changes should be made to the trunk. If a branch has a major-priority error that has been fixed in trunk, it should be merged back to the branch (and ideally, a new minor branch

Re: The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/8/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There may be times when a major branch bug cannot be fixed on trunk, at which point applying the fix solely to the branch would be appropriate. Agreed, though it should be rare. At least, I'm having trouble thinking up a reason that doesn't

Re: The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/8/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The branch already exists. Changing the version number to (for example) 1.1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, fixing a single important bug, and releasing it quickly would be much better than starting over from the trunk, getting distracted by other changes, and

Re: Site of Other Modules

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
More specifically, there's the following template. Improve it if it doesn't cover all of the documentation issues. :-) tomahawk/sandbox/core/src/site/xdoc/component-template.xml Not sure about the building task. I'm pretty sure that doing a mvn site built everything for me in the past, but

Re: Site of Other Modules

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
to an online example deployed at irian should be useful. WDYT? Cagatay On 8/9/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More specifically, there's the following template. Improve it if it doesn't cover all of the documentation issues. :-) tomahawk/sandbox/core/src/site/xdoc/component

Re: Tomahawk Latest Jar

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/9/06, Kumar, Girish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please tell me where can I download latest tomahawk Jar file. http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/

Re: Tomahawk Latest Jar

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/9/06, Kumar, Girish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Sorry for confusion. Of course, even though you've now asked for this instead, you'd still be better off grabbing the latest snapshot. MyFaces core 1.1.3 has at least one critical bug. Fortunately, you should be able to use the

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of LocalSpellingWords by MikeKienenberger

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Apparently, it's a poor-man's spell checker for a wiki. If you chose spell check while ending a page, it compares all words in the document with all words on that page and lists out the ones found in your document that aren't in that page. At this point, you can determine if it's a valid word

state-saving encryption: Did we fail to follow the proper procedures?

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
This page just came to my attention. http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html My understanding is that any software that calls encryption APIs is affected by this, so this affects MyFaces due to our client-side state saving encryption code. Is anyone who is currently subscribed to the

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of FrontPage by LanceFrohman

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/10/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + * [Parameters_In_EL] - Howto pass parameters in an EL expression. Hey Lance. You might want to call this Parameters_In_EL_Functions - How to pass parameters in an EL expression function. Otherwise it might get confused with other parameter

Re: state-saving encryption: Did we fail to follow the proper procedures?

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/10/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take a look into this. Fortunately MyFaces does not actually use an algorithm like AES ( very strong ) per se, it simply passes any parameter, which might be AES, to the javax.crypto.* API. I read the the following section to mean that

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of FrontPage by LanceFrohman

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
There's a Rename Page under the More Actions pulldown, but I think you have to manually change any links pointing to that page afterward. On 8/10/06, L Frohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there a way to rename a wiki page? -Message d'origine- De : Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: past problems w/ externals ?

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/10/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did MyFaces have a few problems w/ externals in the past? If so, can someone shoot me a link or a short description on why? I think so, but I don't remember the reasons. Sean is probably the person to talk to on this. Here's what I found

Re: past problems w/ externals ?

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
While there was a lot of talk about disliking externals, here is the only thing I found that gave any reasons: -- Forwarded message -- From: Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jan 1, 2006 10:35 PM Subject: Re: Maven Build (Ongoing Work Thread) To: MyFaces Development

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-194) Wrong entry in AddRessource.properties causes Error-message

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/10/06, Veit Guna (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-194?page=comments#action_12427324 ] Veit Guna commented on TOMAHAWK-194: No matter if this will be fixed, it's annoying that it is logged as an ERROR. I use the log4j SmtpAppender to notify

Re: DataTable - RowOnclick other options ?

2006-08-10 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/10/06, sunil m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my DataTable i want the user to click anywhere on the Row and execute the JSF action. So for that I am using the attribute, 'rowOnClick' in the Datatable and using the Javascript below to submit the Form,

Re: [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-194) Wrong entry in AddRessource.properties causes Error-message

2006-08-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/11/06, Schaal, Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you could write your comment to the open issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-15 so that somebody tries to fix it :) As it seems to be a maven-issue (http://www.mail-archive.com/users@myfaces.apache.org/msg20394.html) I

Re: Heads Up on Shale Test Framework API Change

2006-08-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Speaking of breakage, there's a Java 1.5 method dependency in the 1.0.3-snapshot, which is causing MyFaces to fail to build with testing enabled (the default) under Java 1.4. https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-251 It'd be great if we could get this fixed at the same time. It'd

Re: Heads Up on Shale Test Framework API Change

2006-08-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
to enforce this in local development as well? Mike, Did you mean 1.1.3 snap ? Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 07:46 PM To: 'MyFaces Development' Cc: 'Craig McClanahan' Subject: Re: Heads Up on Shale Test Framework API

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >