On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/06/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
At the moment a question:
Would there be problems if we did our work, mainly in German, coordinate?
This wouldn't be particularly problematic (we already have German-only
lists),
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:54 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@apache.org wrote
On 23/06/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
At the moment a question:
Would there be problems if we did our work, mainly in German, coordinate?
This wouldn't be particularly problematic (we already have German-only
lists), provided that there is regular interaction with this list too,
since in that
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-mail, and it
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or
whether you disagree with what was said. Or maybe a combination of
both?
My question is whether the outcome of the vote (Dave wrote: Do we all
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or
whether you disagree with what was said. Or maybe a combination of
both?
My
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
If it was developed, approved and released as an Apache OpenOffice
product, then many things are possible. For example, we could
transfer the domain name prooo-box.org to Apache and host the website
here. We could
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Dr. Michael Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:01 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Contributing Existing Works [Was: Re: Can
somebody please commit the update of the de-websites]
On Jun 21, 2013, at 7
Hallo,
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Thank you for this clear next steps.
So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-mail,
Hallo,
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Thank you for this clear next steps.
So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-mail,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Detlef Nannen
detlef.nan...@prooo-box.org wrote:
Hallo,
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Thank you for this clear next steps.
So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English)
Hello Rob,
And something optional, if you think this would be useful. I can
write up a blog post interview with the creators of PrOOoBox, where
you can tell the story of this software collection. I'd do the
interview in English, of course, but we could also include a German
translation in
Am 22.06.2013 00:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
So one solution discussed was to do similar to what we do with the
main English pages with winPenPack. We have a general page for 3rd
party ports and distributions:
http://www.openoffice.org/porting/
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
[...]
yes, that's right. I had read that.
That was true then. That is true now.
This is not quite correct.
The point is that Dave has suggested that there should be language-specific
pages.
In
2013/6/22 Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
[...]
yes, that's right. I had read that.
That was true then. That is true now.
This is not quite correct.
The point is that Dave has suggested
From: RGB ES [mailto:rgb.m...@gmail.com]
I think that that was suggested since the beginning by Rob...
so yes, an
oo.o/de/porting site or similar is possible.
All right, then I had not understood correctly.
But please specifically, because *I* do not know exactly what to do currently:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand
On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a
On 22/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
It might help if you stated, in your own words, what you think should
be done. Make a mini-proposal: what pages will be added, etc.
I think Dave's proposal in http://markmail.org/thread/6ozfpfo5xcigyw6j
is now moving things forward in the most reasonable way.
Hello Rob,
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt
joe
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
Hello Rob,
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
The website says it is from Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..:
No,
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V...
But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't
any old third
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org wrote:
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V...
2013/6/21 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed
From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
product of the
ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V...
No, that's not right!
The
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the
Am 21.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
product of the
ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your
From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's
not the ASF.
So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box
(even it's a gift).
The legal entity is, in this case, formally an group
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
My recollection of the discussion was.
(1) Have a 3rd party page.
(2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page.
(3) Each language can have their own news feed.
(4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page.
Conclusion.
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
directly. That is my understanding, at least.
It could say, for example, PrOOo Box now released with
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
directly. That is my
38 matches
Mail list logo
