Liber(ator)/OCaml FCP/OCaml High Level Freenet Interface 1.1.0 has
been released. While there have been some significant internal
changes, in particular the factoring of a significant quantity of
code, the most significant changes in this version are in building,
distribution, and installation, i
and
mtoseland at blueyonder.co.uk
amphibian at sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/0c05dbd2/attachment.pgp>
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/17bb9e3c/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 19:19, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> > > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
> > > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead?
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Robbe
> > >
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 17:51, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Travis Bemann writes:
> > > I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
> > > where the user has to
software), regardless of their license.
--
Robbe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/14981036/attachment.pgp>
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/56b66225/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 19:19, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> > > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
> > > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead?
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Robbe
> > >
> > >
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 17:51, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Travis Bemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
> > > w
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/a59e8531/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
> fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
> gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
> gateway page to app
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> >-Original Message-
>
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
>
> >[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
> >Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
> >T
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
> > > some modifications to the announcement code.
> > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial expl
ature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/c79db29a/attachment.pgp>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/c0f7a720/attachment.pgp>
> > >
> > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
> > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Robbe
> >
> > As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file
> > download box it will try to interpret any HTML l
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:24:02AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
<>
> With KEEP_HISTORY set to false (it isn't changed anywhere in the code as far
> as i can see) nothing is ever done with the history vector, but stores a
> pretty large amount of data anyway, making StateChain objects much large
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:30:50PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< >
> > I think desired behavior would be something like the way browsers treat
> > SSL pages - warning whenever it is loads a page besides the current. This
> > woul
Hi. I have committed changes that allow external (in-freenet)
stylesheets in freenet. Previously this was possible only by exploiting
bugs in Microsoft Internet Explorer, or adding text/css to the safe
types list (I strongly recommend against either path). The text/css
MIME type will now be allowe
> > >
> > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
> > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Robbe
> >
> > As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file
> > download box it will try to interpret any HTML
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> > >-Original Message-
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> >-Original Message-
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
> >Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subje
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Travis Bemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
> > where the user has to type "I do know that Micro$oft Internet
> > Explorer is an insecure piece of shit" as spec
(I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/15aa9d85/attachment.pgp>
--- next part ------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/32e99100/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
< >
> > We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
> > plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
> > realistic. But most users probably don't give a hoot about complicated
> > atta
>-Original Message-
>From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
>[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
>Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
>To: devl at freenetproject.org
>Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues
>As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficie
r $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/0d9235c1/attachment.pgp>
Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
(the proxy) rather than in a place where it could be both easy, safe,
and more use f
lman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Matthew Toseland
mtoseland at blueyonder.co.uk
amphibian at sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/d7b702eb/attachment.pgp>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
>Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues
>As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
>that? What happens if you
Gianni Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:11, you wrote:
> > The FEC code in freenet-ext.jar is not GPL compatible.
>
> I hadn't turned it on by default yet because the fproxy UI code still has
> some bugs in it. Maybe it's time to turn it on bugs and all.
Travis Bemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
> where the user has to type "I do know that Micro$oft Internet
> Explorer is an insecure piece of shit" as specified by the page into
> a text item in a form (the $ would be mandatory) an
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/c825c89e/attachment.pgp>
ication/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/ce5a0e97/attachment.pgp>
ldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/aa16f131/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > While looking into making the various error and information pages
> > that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
> > completely ugly the FPro
In local.freenet, you wrote:
> Those who try the current snapshot will now notice that the=20
> gateway.html page is now replaced by an Infolet.
Yeah, great, it's broken. Why do you hardcode the node's IP into
the page? Now you can't easily use [ssh] port-frowarding to connect
to a remote fproxy.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:27:22PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> Ok, let it be said I love the new UI. However, since : is just redirecting
> to :8890, can't we just merge the two interfaces?
>
> It screws up my setup of using squid to redirect freenet requests, but I think I
> can work ar
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > While looking into making the various error and information pages
> > that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
> > completely ugly the FPr
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:31AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:37:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
> > having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
> > idea.
>
> Wei
c. http://www.uprizer.com/
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/1968386d/attachment.pgp>
grade or
prevents other nodes from contacting it is the policy decision that
should be made.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/f7f40a2e/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/8e2f71bf/attachment.pgp>
uprizer.com/
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/2e45a528/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:58:13AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This is good, but we really can't up the build number that frequently
> > for our users - it will really piss them off.
> >
> > As a guideline - we should try not to increment the build number more
> > than once a week.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
> > > some modifications to the announcement code.
> > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial exp
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
> > > some modifications to the announcement code.
> > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial exp
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:37:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
> having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
> idea.
Weird - try now.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
>From Ian Clarke
>java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
As expected, the memory used when a 498 node blows up is mostly storing the
announcement events for the hopefully fixed announcement bug, but I also
noticed that in StateChain.java:
L19:
public static boolean
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
> > some modifications to the announcement code.
> Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion of announcements (within
> the node). Build 501 largely fixed
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:24:02AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
<>
> With KEEP_HISTORY set to false (it isn't changed anywhere in the code as far
> as i can see) nothing is ever done with the history vector, but stores a
> pretty large amount of data anyway, making StateChain objects much larg
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:30:50PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< >
> > I think desired behavior would be something like the way browsers treat
> > SSL pages - warning whenever it is loads a page besides the current. This
> > wou
Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
idea.
--
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
msg03841/pgp0.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Simon G wrote:
> > > I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the
> > > ticker contents display
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> < >
> > > We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
> > > plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
> > > real
>From Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
As expected, the memory used when a 498 node blows up is mostly storing the
announcement events for the hopefully fixed announcement bug, but I also
noticed that in StateChain.java:
L19:
pu
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
< >
> > We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
> > plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
> > realistic. But most users probably don't give a hoot about complicated
> > att
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:18:26PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
> Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
> seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
> doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
> (the prox
Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
(the proxy) rather than in a place where it could be both easy, safe,
and more use
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> While looking into making the various error and information pages
> that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
> completely ugly the FProxy code is. If someone is considering
> some significant work to improv
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote:
> I was looking at the Freenet project page and I
> noticed that there hasn't been a release until
> December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable
> (I haven't had a problem) and has a nice interface
> (although I dislike the In
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Simon G wrote:
> > I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the
> > ticker contents display is filling up with megabytes of:
> > freenet.node.states.announcing.Announ
In local.freenet, you wrote:
> Those who try the current snapshot will now notice that the=20
> gateway.html page is now replaced by an Infolet.
Yeah, great, it's broken. Why do you hardcode the node's IP into
the page? Now you can't easily use [ssh] port-frowarding to connect
to a remote fproxy.
sonal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/cab4492a/attachment.pgp>
While looking into making the various error and information pages
that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
completely ugly the FProxy code is. If someone is considering
some significant work to improve filtering, they might consider
starting with a clean slate and co
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:21:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use
> > of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even
> > ALLOWING users to view fprox
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:54:07PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
<>
> So - question - do OutputStreams/Writers to Servlets (as obtained from
> HttpServletResponse objects) need to be closed before the doGet() method
> of the servlet terminates?
resp.flushBuffer() should be called.
--
Oskar Sandbe
70 matches
Mail list logo
