On 14/5/04 3:20 am, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/04 6:07 PM, Entourage:mac Talk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the original MacWorld story stated that the file is cunningly
disguised as a Word 2004 for Mac demo so it's maybe a bit harsh to
attribute criminal intent to the
On 14/5/04 4:43 am, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But seriously folks, in what century can we expect nested logical
expressions in rules? Because maintaining 500 rules like this:
1. if sender is a and subject contains foo ...
2. if sender is b and subject contains foo
On 14/5/04 4:31 am, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/13/2004 08:03 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, with four options to choose from. I have thousands of sounds on my
computer that I would like to use, just like I could in OS9. I guess I just
expect programs to
On 5/13/04 10:25 PM, Dan Crevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a nice feaure for the AppleScript generator app. You could
use it for rules in addition to schedules. Entourage 2004 can run
multiple AppleScript related rules. You could even write this app in
AppleScript studio. Hey,
I just got E-rage 2004 up and running, I have a few questions :-)
Seems that this new view as groups is the default, I have been hitting up
every folder and turning it off, is there a way to do this in one go, I
really don't like it personally.
Fonts, I use moncao 9 as my plain text font, it
on 05/14/2004 01:39 AM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fonts, I use moncao 9 as my plain text font, it seems and feels a whole lot
smaller than it was previously, and is also now smoothed, how do I get it
back to how it used to be in my plain text way?
Even source view is in this
While I am in a group view mode, clicking on the header will select all the
messages in that group, for example, Today, I can not close the triangle.
I can use the command=left arrow to close a triangle, this state is not
remembered, going to another folder and then back will show me all groups
On 5/14/04 10:39 AM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems that this new view as groups is the default, I have been hitting up
every folder and turning it off, is there a way to do this in one go, I
really don't like it personally.
Yeah, I have to say I much preferred the old method of
Read the thread entire thread jerk. If you don't have something constructive
to say just put a cork in it.
on 5/13/04 10:35 PM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is not one specific thing that I want to do. I just know that if I had
this functionality it would open up more
John your just a troll looking for a fight. Go get a life!
on 5/13/04 10:32 PM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah sure, I can spend a couple of days learning just about anything, right
now my plate if very full. I am currently learning 3D modeling and
animation, Video Editing and
On 14/5/04 10:03 am, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I am in a group view mode, clicking on the header will select all the
messages in that group, for example, Today, I can not close the triangle.
Clicking on the triangle should toggle the collapsed/expanded state. Does it
not for
On 14/5/04 10:50 am, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the thread entire thread jerk. If you don't have something constructive
to say just put a cork in it.
Friendly.
You just lost my input for the rest of this thread.
--
Barry Wainwright
Microsoft MVP (see
On 5/14/04 4:50 AM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the thread entire thread jerk. If you don't have something constructive
to say just put a cork in it.
on 5/13/04 10:35 PM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is not one specific thing that I want to do. I just know
On 5/14/04 4:51 AM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John your just a troll looking for a fight. Go get a life!
There are a nigh-infinite amount of replies to that statement, none of which
are appropriate for this list.
If you wish to continue on this ill-advised course of action
Title: Re: Office 2004 first install questions
On 5/14/04 2:39 AM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fonts, I use moncao 9 as my plain text font, it seems and feels a whole lot
smaller than it was previously, and is also now smoothed, how do I get it
back to how it used to be in my
Thus spake John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED], circa 5/13/2004 11:43:
499. if sender is se and subject contains foo ...
500. if sender is sf and subject contains foo ...
gets really, really, really old...especially when the foo clause changes
John, if you're serious in using this as an
Thus spake tuqqer [EMAIL PROTECTED], circa 5/13/2004 5:01 PM:
What do you think? Will the above work? Perhaps I¹m overly cautious, but
a corrupted Entourage lies up there with automobile accidents and home fires.
I'm sure it will work, but you are being overly cautious. Why don't you just
On 5/14/04 2:33 AM, Barry Wainwright wrote:
On 14/5/04 4:43 am, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But seriously folks, in what century can we expect nested logical
expressions in rules? Because maintaining 500 rules like this:
1. if sender is a and subject contains foo ...
Thus spake John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED], circa 5/14/2004 1:48 PM:
That gets a wee bit more tricky for non-toy-example rules like if ((a and
(b or c) or d) and (c or (e and f and ((g or h) and I or j or (x and y)
It would be nice if something like this were available as an advanced
On 5/13/2004 8:43 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But seriously folks, in what century can we expect nested logical
expressions in rules?
I'm with John here; I'd love to see nested rules.
I'd also like to have and/or options in the Advanced File dialog ;-)
--
To unsubscribe:
On 5/14/04 8:32 PM, Dan Frakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me that they went looking on the P2P for a pirate
copy of the new app suite, and got their come-uppance!
To be fair, the app claimed to be a *demo* installer, not warez. (Which
is kind of funny, actually;
On 5/13/04 7:22 PM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/04 6:07 PM, Entourage:mac Talk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the issue here is that the Rules construction interface is much
simpler than determining how to use AppleScript syntax for these tasks. A
schedule can trigger
On 5/13/04 8:43 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/04 10:46 PM, Dan Crevier wrote:
Someone could write a utility that has a rules like interface and
generates AppleScripts for this sort of purpose.
I thought the application that has a rules like interface was supposed to
be
So you quote my text as being the one that turned the conversation
unfriendly? I am not that one that started attacking people personally for
feature request.
You just lost my input for the rest of this thread.
Fine, no more soup for you!
on 5/14/04 6:15 AM, Barry Wainwright [EMAIL
on 5/14/04 7:02 AM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't work that way, not in the current laws of physics. The more
complex you make something, the more complex it is to use.
Yes, as you have done with this thread. No I get it, you are one of those
guys that likes the computer
On 14/5/04 4:31 am, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/13/2004 08:03 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, with four options to choose from. I have thousands of sounds on my
computer that I would like to use, just like I could in OS9. I guess I just
expect programs
The Icon Factory has released a free program to check your download folder
for trojans like the MP3 one.
http://www.macdailynews.com/comments.php?id=P2701_0_1_0
I doubt it would protect from a trojan that doesn't claim not to be an app,
but there is a way to protect yourself from inadvertently
Awesome, thanks Frederico! Sometimes I think that Microsoft does stuff like
this just to mess with us because we are using Macs instead of Windows. You
would think that with Microsoft's vast programming resources they could
dedicate at least one person to maintaining the same functionality that
Title: Eureka! ISP Caves (was something worse than spam)
A few days ago I wrote about my exasperation with my ISP, RCN. They were changing the subjects of messages that they thought were spam, but doing it badly enough that I had real problems. There were a number of helpful responses, and I
On 5/14/04 1:50 PM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally know tons of people that
are using Entourage and are comfortable creating their own rules. Heck, my
mother can even do it. When it comes to writing AppleScripts on the other
hand, it's a big step for most people.
Do you
First, I would like to start off saying that I think Entourage 2004 is great
in one area, in that is was a wonderful upgrade procedure. It somehow
managed to copy in all my settings from notes, calendars, email etc. There
was literally no problem with this whatsoever, great job! My main concern
Title: Re: Cleanest way to avoid problems with Entourage 2004?
Good advice, Peter. Ill do just that.
From: Peter C.S. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 11:45:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Cleanest way to avoid problems with Entourage 2004?
Thus spake tuqqer [EMAIL PROTECTED], circa
on 05/14/2004 04:01 PM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please tell me there is some way to make this behave how it used to, I would
be so happy. I am seriously about to revert to E-rage X because of it. I
know so many of you will never notice this as you use HTML email, or have
On 5/14/04 1:50 PM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally know tons of people that
are using Entourage and are comfortable creating their own rules. Heck, my
mother can even do it. When it comes to writing AppleScripts on the other
hand, it's a big step for most people.
Scott, it's not your vision. I have 20/20 vision and I also had to bump up
the font size so I could read it. 9 point anti-aliased type is just too
small to read on a 19 LCD display with a fixed resolution of 1280 x 1024.
on 5/14/04 6:01 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, the
on 05/14/2004 04:41 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, it's not your vision. I have 20/20 vision and I also had to bump up
the font size so I could read it. 9 point anti-aliased type is just too
small to read on a 19 LCD display with a fixed resolution of 1280 x 1024.
Well,
Title: Does Office 04 allow Services?
Mine hasnt come yet. Are services supported in Office 04?
--
Bruce
B R U C E K. klutch-at-erols.com
On 5/14/04 6:14 AM, Barry Wainwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/5/04 10:03 am, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I am in a group view mode, clicking on the header will select all the
messages in that group, for example, Today, I can not close the triangle.
Clicking on the
Bruce Klutchko wrote:
Mine hasnt come yet. Are services supported in Office 04?
They are in Entourage.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/
old-archive:
on 05/14/2004 05:40 PM, Mickey Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 6:14 AM, Barry Wainwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/5/04 10:03 am, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I am in a group view mode, clicking on the header will select all the
messages in that group,
Title: Re: Does Office 04 allow Services?
I havent seen services available, generally speaking. One of the features that I would like to see is the ability to mail selected text, from, say, a Readme file. Of course TextEdit supports the Mail service. But when its selected, it launched Mail, not
Scott Haneda wrote:
on 05/14/2004 04:41 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, it's not your vision. I have 20/20 vision and I also had to bump up
the font size so I could read it. 9 point anti-aliased type is just too
small to read on a 19 LCD display with a fixed resolution of
on 05/14/2004 05:54 PM, Dan Crevier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Haneda wrote:
on 05/14/2004 04:41 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, it's not your vision. I have 20/20 vision and I also had to bump up
the font size so I could read it. 9 point anti-aliased type is
Hi Scott,
Try Andale Mono but you'll have to bump it to at least 10 pt to get it to a
comparable size with Monaco 9.
Note: I can't try this in Entourage 2004 since I'm in Entourage 2001, but
at least it's a similar font.
Otherwise, do a Google search using monospace fonts macintosh for more
I stand corrected. There are services in Entourage. My example was looking
the wrong way, into Entourage from external applications.
On 5/14/04 6:42 PM, Dan Crevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine hasn¹t come yet. Are services supported in Office 04?
They are in Entourage.
Dan
On 5/14/04
On 5/14/2004 2:03 PM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome, thanks Frederico! Sometimes I think that Microsoft does stuff like
this just to mess with us because we are using Macs instead of Windows. You
would think that with Microsoft's vast programming resources they could
dedicate
On 5/14/04 4:01 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should also mention, I have tried going into System Pref and telling font
smoothing to not be on for fonts 9 point and below, this removed the
anti-aliasing, but it made the characters very chunky.
I don't understand. Do you want
On 5/14/04 4:17 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/14/2004 04:01 PM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please tell me there is some way to make this behave how it used to, I would
be so happy. I am seriously about to revert to E-rage X because of it. I
know so many of
on 05/14/2004 06:49 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 4:01 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should also mention, I have tried going into System Pref and telling font
smoothing to not be on for fonts 9 point and below, this removed the
anti-aliasing, but it
on 05/14/2004 06:50 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 4:17 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/14/2004 04:01 PM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please tell me there is some way to make this behave how it used to, I would
be so happy. I am
On 5/14/04 6:45 PM, Dan Frakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/2004 2:03 PM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome, thanks Frederico! Sometimes I think that Microsoft does stuff like
this just to mess with us because we are using Macs instead of Windows. You
would think that with
On 5/14/04 7:04 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't imagine anyone else will want go back to X after upgrading to 2004,
but yes, that's how to do it.
I really did not want to either, I thought it would be only a temp thing and
that this font display issue would be able to be
On 5/14/04 8:42 PM, Dan Crevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Klutchko wrote:
Mine hasn¹t come yet. Are services supported in Office 04?
They are in Entourage.
Dan
That will be very helpful. There are any number of useful services that I've
been hoping to use with Entourage for some
On 5/14/2004 5:42 PM, Dan Crevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine hasn?t come yet. Are services supported in Office ?04?
They are in Entourage.
Woohoo!!!
(Dan: Any chance of Entourage *providing* Services in the future? E.g.,
Services - Entourage - Send Selection)
On 5/14/2004 5:45 PM, James
On 5/14/04 6:01 PM, Entourage:mac Talk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dan Frakes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:13:20 -0700
Subject: Re: Office 2004 still can't execute scheduled scripts?
On 5/13/2004 8:43 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But seriously folks, in what
Title: Are there functional Palm conduits in E'rage?
Ive been synching to a Palm since Entourage 01. Does Office 04 come with functioning Palm Entourage conduits?
Hope so
--
Bruce
B R U C E K. klutch-at-erols.com
On 5/14/04 6:01 PM, Entourage:mac Talk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/14/04 7:02 AM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't work that way, not in the current laws of physics. The more
complex you make something, the more complex it is to use.
Yes, as you have done with this thread.
Bruce Klutchko wrote:
Ive been synching to a Palm since Entourage 01. Does Office 04 come
with functioning Palm Entourage conduits?
Yes, it does.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/
old-archive:
Dan Frakes wrote:
On 5/14/2004 5:42 PM, Dan Crevier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine hasn?t come yet. Are services supported in Office ?04?
They are in Entourage.
Woohoo!!!
(Dan: Any chance of Entourage *providing* Services in the future? E.g.,
Services - Entourage - Send Selection)
I can't
Scott Haneda wrote:
on 05/14/2004 05:54 PM, Dan Crevier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Haneda wrote:
on 05/14/2004 04:41 PM, Mark Goodman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, good to know it is not my vision going :-)
I just went and tried out a few other email apps to see how they all dealt
on 05/14/2004 07:16 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 7:04 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't imagine anyone else will want go back to X after upgrading to 2004,
but yes, that's how to do it.
I really did not want to either, I thought it would be
Scott Haneda wrote:
on 05/14/2004 07:16 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 7:04 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't imagine anyone else will want go back to X after upgrading to 2004,
but yes, that's how to do it.
I really did not want to either, I thought it
On 5/14/04 12:13 PM, Dan Frakes deftly typed out:
But seriously folks, in what century can we expect nested logical
expressions in rules?
I'm with John here; I'd love to see nested rules.
I'd also like to have and/or options in the Advanced File dialog ;-)
And by extension, Custom
On 5/14/04 9:31 PM, Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try a few other fonts and hopefully come to some semi-happy medium.
However, I know there are some who will feel as strong about this as I, I
even think that Dan Crevier, whom I assume is a developer feels almost
similar, since
On 5/14/04 7:35 PM, Remo Del Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/04 12:13 PM, Dan Frakes deftly typed out:
But seriously folks, in what century can we expect nested logical
expressions in rules?
I'm with John here; I'd love to see nested rules.
I'd also like to have and/or options
On 5/14/04 7:01 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
First, the major show stopper for me. In Outlook and Entourage, all
previous versions, the display font of Monaco 9 was not anti-aliased, in
E-rage 2004, it now is. At 9 point, which is what I want to use, it is
unreadable.
Gah! Good thing I read
On 5/15/04 12:57 AM, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
Dan (who in fact contributed to earlier versions
of WASTE and is credited as such in the copyright) devised a modification to
WASTE, especially for Entourage 2004, that does implement ATSUI. This is the
text engine that has the problem with Monaco.
On 5/14/04 10:00 PM, Paul Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been asking for combined and/or options since OE 5, and repeated in
every Entourage development cycle. ;-) Believe it or not, Claris Emailer
could do it for rules (filters), but the options were a lot more back basic
then.
I
on 5/14/04 10:31 PM, John C. Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh please, get off your soapbox. You're asking for rules with the same
capabilities as AppleScript, but no more complex to use than they are right
now. Why not ask for a telepathic interface, and have it transmit email via
tachyons.
On 5/14/04 10:20 PM, Mark Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh please, get off your soapbox. You're asking for rules with the same
capabilities as AppleScript, but no more complex to use than they are right
now. Why not ask for a telepathic interface, and have it transmit email via
tachyons.
John Siracusa wrote:
On 5/14/04 7:01 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
First, the major show stopper for me. In Outlook and Entourage, all
previous versions, the display font of Monaco 9 was not anti-aliased, in
E-rage 2004, it now is. At 9 point, which is what I want to use, it is
unreadable.
Gah! Good
71 matches
Mail list logo
