There all used up resting my Special Brew!!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
What's wrong with beermats? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
Title: Message
Hi EveryoneGreat way to start
Friday...Running Exchange2ksp1 on win2ksp2 - Completed migration from
Exchange 5.5 a few days ago and all seemed well. This morning several users have
complained and it has happened to me that Outlook hangs on you. I have left it
for some time
Hi Pat
1. I do this manually, but I am sure some people have ways and means,
you could also spend some money on some third party tools that will make
it easier for you.
2. for your failover if you create your primary system in the dns with
an mx cost of 10 then create one for your secondary
Sounds like it could be a GC problem, and maybe DSAccess is stalling.
Is this on a separate server? I'd start looking there.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 November 2001 10:19
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Server
This morning I had an email from CA wanting my phone number to address my
concerns. It appears that they are listening. However, it is too late for
them to win us back as a customer. Our purchase orders have been issued for
Backup Exec software for our new servers. My experience with CA has
I have been asked to look at a server that has been badly installed. It
was an SBS 2000 server and yet other packages (VPOP Proxy + vnc Office
2000) had been installed on the system. I was asked in after a couple of
my colleagues had used up a period of the time assigned for this task.
Is there some rule with Outlook Web Access that says you cannot change
usernames and still be able to access the account. We have moved to a new
username scheme and I have changed a user's username. Now, the only issue
he's having is that he cannot login to OWA. Any suggestions would be very
Use the alias or full smtp address for the user login...
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 7:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA login problems after changing username
Is there some rule with Outlook Web
Has anyone got a copy of a prf file for use with modprof as opposed to
newprof. I can't work out exactly where the new variables and syntax should
go in the file and would appreciate anyone else's verion to copy.
TIA
Paul
List Charter and FAQ at:
Can anyone tell me why, when I try to change to Native Mode on my
Exchange Server the button is greyed out. I have no other Exchange 5.5
Servers onsite at all, but still it will not let me changed modes.
Cheers
Jez.
List Charter and FAQ at:
You still have an SRS running somewhere I expect.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 November 2001 15:20
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Mixed and Native Mode
Subject: Mixed and Native Mode
Can anyone tell me why, when I
I'm reading on MS Website at the min. This is probably a really dumb
question but I can I just delete it?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 15:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mixed and Native Mode
You still have an SRS
Well, for what it is worth, I also got a call. Not from a techie or a VP,
someone in Marketing. I expressed similar concerns, non-English speaking
(writing) tech support, the fact that their solution to everything is
re-install, the wait time, etc. What Christina told me was that they are
I have an almost identical config here - with the exception of NT4 for the
OWA box (don't have much win2k expertise and currently don't run any
Exchange stuff on it). Otherwise I do use a 1-way trust from the DMZ, and
the port bindings for the DS and IS on the Exchange box are 1225 and 1226
LMAO!
Really, I'm speechless, and that doesn't happen to often.
-Original Message-
From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive
Well, for what it is worth, I also got a
We are eliminating one of our exchange servers (5.5, SP4) from our site.
Unfortunately, a lot of our distribution lists point to this server as the expansion
server. Is there a way to change this on all of our distribution lists at once
instead of going into each group to make the change?
I expect the expansion server attribute is exportablt to CSV, so you
could try massaging the data and re-importing.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 November 2001 16:07
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Expansion
LOL!
Me:
Hello, Tech Support? I installed ArcServe on my Exchange box and now it
has a Blue Screen of Death on it.
Chandler Vhing:
Could your box be any more f*cked?
-Original Message-
From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM
To:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
from: 6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email
If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the
receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This
notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the
Title: RE: Server causing Outlook to periodically crash
Also try taking a look at your 5 FSMO roles and see if you've overloaded that system(assuming all roles are on 1 server). Perhaps some of the roles may need to be broken out. Like GC. There are many white papers on this topic on TechNet
Is that a Friends reference?
Computer Associates is desperate. I predict layoffs.
William
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
How *YOU* doin?
None here...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.
Has anyone had any problems with running EX Admin on W2K Professional. I am
getting errors
It works very well.
What errors?
What are you logged in as?
William
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.
Has anyone had any problems with
What errors are you getting
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.
None here...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL
When I try to load the admin piece, (Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 W2k Prof.) I
get an error when it asks for the cd key. I am loading from the Exchange
CD. Is there a better way?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM
To:
No problems herewhat errors are you getting?
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver
We need specifics. What is the exact error you are receiving?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.
When I try to load the admin piece,
Make sure you are using the run as command to run the admin program with a
user that has rights to admin the Exchange server.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
None here either.
Shane Scales, MCSE CCNA
SPC, Network Engineer/System Analyst, US Army
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001
Buy a TV.
Joey, from friends. Typical greeting to female types.
How *YOU* doin'?
sigh
J
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
Is that a
Title: Message
"power" makes me
think of those He-Man cartoons. " HAVE THE
PWERRR!!!"
-MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our
new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Please note: the RFC only says SHOULD NOT -- this means it's not a
requirement. There *are* some mail servers that DO show the BCC info in the
headers, but don't count on it being there.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:
What is the file version for your machine's MFC42.dll?
On a Win2K machine, it should be 6.0.8665.0 or later.
-Scott
- Original Message -
From: Scott Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: Loading
LMAO
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
What is this TV of which you speak? Seriously, if it had something
resembling acting or maybe
I have a question,
First here is the environment: 3 Exchange 5.5-SP3 Servers(Win2k SP2), this
is the main e-mail environment. A sendmail server relays outgoing and
incoming mail. Incoming mail is distributed to the appropriate exchange
server by e-mail aliases for every address, pointing to the
That's their problem - once a customer becomes disenchanted and moves to a
competitive product, and it works for them, and they get good support, it's
hard to get them back. CA's underinvestment in support staff (and probably
SW development) cost them a huge fraction of market share. I think it
Simon:
Thanks for the info. Looks like NTDSNoMatch will do what I want
then. I did some research for articles about the DN issue, but haven't
found anything relevant. I agree that I think it will pick up a new DN--it
doesn't look like the AD and EX5.5 DS even use the same attributes to
Nope, but they have had one on Just shoot me which is what I'll request
if I ever have to use the product again... ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA
Was that Michael Duncan?
Yup. Contacted you too, I presume.
Seems like a step in the right direction.
:o) Bob
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more
Anyone with an idea?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: pbailer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: OWA Scroll button
Sorry we are running EX 2000 Ent, SP1. OWA has
all default options. I have noted
I send a derogatory email to everyone on CA's website every couple of
months.
They responded a couple of weeks ago.
I invited them to join the lists and peruse the archives.
William
-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:02
Then they'd have to take you to the ER ...where of course another copy is
sitting on the counter.
W
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
Nope, but
Anyone ideas on this.
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: pbailer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: OWA Scroll button
Sorry we are running EX 2000 Ent, SP1. OWA has
all default options. I have noted
so no one told you that your backups would be gray (clap-clap-clap-clap)...
no files, no apps, no mail, your server's DOA
seems all your DLT's have been stripped clear,
well they've been that way today, this week, all month, and most of the
year...
but...
no one's there for you (when the mob
Have you given user permissions to this user to the additional mailbox?
In Exchange Administrator go to the mailbox properties and select the
permission tab.
-Original Message-
From: Bob ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
also available here:
http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:
And as I told Mr Duncan: they're three years too late.
William
-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
Actually, Mr. Duncan told me they are working
Apparently, the admin of that mail server is only accepting mail from
domains that are on a List of Approved RCPThosts. It seems as if your
domain name is not on that list.
Do a whois on their domain name speak to the admin.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new
Q197094
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
There's probably a great big flaw in this theory, but asking myself What
Recently one of my users forwarded me a couple of NDR messages she got,
containing stuff like recipient name is not recognized, 550, Relaying
denied, user unknown. Our Exchange 5.5/SP3 server is not an open relay,
and we are cool with all the ORDB ~ databases, FWIW.
This got me wondering about
The DATA is toast. I'm going through the very same thing, but with 2 years
worth of appoints for a VP. Chapura uses it's own interface and that
bypases the MTA completely. DumpsterAlwaysOn, item retention, etc will
*not* work here. The stuff is gone forever.
Can you say disaster recovery
Right next to the only Gateway machines sold to business in months.
running for cover
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
Then they'd
Non open Relaying requires a user to login to the server, have an
account on the server and have rights to that account. So only Joe can
send email from Joe, when Joe is logged in as Joe. The other method is
to restrict based on Ip so Joe can only send email if he lives on a
10.0.0.x ip range
53 matches
Mail list logo
