Hi Torsten
What are the plans now for apt.dat.gz and nav.dat.gz ? Will this prehistorical
data files still be shipped with flightgear base package 2.8.0 ? As far as I
understand flightgear is ready to read the newer formats and also the airport
scenery tools are ready to use the newer formats.
As I mentioned some weeks ago I think we should leave path of creating world
scenery in one task. I made a proposal how to create world scenery in chunks
all day and nights with jenkins on different machines for different regions.
The sources for this creation process can remain on one master,
a note. You can get access to this jenkins
immediately, I would also help to install all tools and setup the jobs to be
done ;-)
Cheers, Yves
Am 07.06.2012 um 17:35 schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
As I mentioned some weeks ago I think we should leave path of creating world
scenery
Hi Thorsten
Right, it doesn't look like it is worth to have a discussion about this and it
was only me pointing this out. At the end I prefer to have your nice work in
the repo and it's really not up to me to block anything. I'm just interested in
this discussion and I remembered a lot of post
Hi Martin
Did you pull, compile and test, any real feedback?
Cheers, Yves
Ps. We are aware of the next monster, thanks. Fgcom 1.2ff is working and still
a nice piece. I guess you will find a lot of latest development from Holger
Wirtz and Charles Ingels at sourceforge. I don't know if Holger
Am 21.07.2012 um 11:56 schrieb Harald Johnsen hjohn...@evc.net:
Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
...
But that means we could at the point where the warning happens compute the
mipmap levels on the cpu in the loader thread. osg::gluScaleImage could be
used to do this I think (or
Hi Thomas, Hi James
This looks promising in a technical/coding perspective of having this and that
common GUI feature available also for flightgear. But for me personally one of
the big problems of the FlightGear GUI is that it is inside the only and one
main window. There is no possibility to
Hey Martin, you can get mine and I take (all) yours when FlightGear keeps that
all in one window approach for the next ten years. But maybe the width is not
that exact, I didn't measure my screen size for this 5 sec. scribble, sorry for
that. Just wanted to keep file size small and clipped
Hi Erik
First of all the various custom scenery contributors have to start to
communicate with each other and making a list of custom scenery available. This
list should contain sources for custom scenery development, so GPL license
incompatible scenery (i.e. scenery created with cgiar or osm
Am 05.08.2012 um 19:07 schrieb Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net:
Hi YVes,
ys wrote:
A lot of scenery will come with 850 airport data either, and this is
still refused by the core developers [...]
Personally I don't like this sort of claims.
After reading the above statement
Can the snowlevel with this also go above 3000 meter ?
-Yves
Am 11.08.2012 um 19:58 schrieb Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com:
Hi Stuart,
I've just committed a new dialog - Environment Settings, which is
intended to contain environment settings that aren't part of the
weather
Hi Gijs
Just for my understanding, does this still mean when you start in La Paz and
you have no snow in metar the snow-level is set to 3000 meters by default? Or
is there no snow at all?
-Yves
Am 11.08.2012 um 22:39 schrieb Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com:
Hi Stuart,
That might be
Hi James
Am 12.08.2012 um 17:48 schrieb James Turner zakal...@mac.com:
On 11 Aug 2012, at 22:52, Martin Spott wrote:
3) Scenery. Terrasync is now built into FG, and we have nice UI to
configure it in-sim. However, it still requires users to set up a
separate directory and configure
Hi Curt
Maybe these are two types of conferences now. One could be the WIFGH, the
Weekly International FlightGear Hangout ;-) Or monthly ?
Another option I see now is probably a smaller european conference when I read
about this idea at the forums. Maybe spring or summer 2013 is a possible
Hi Clement
Yes it is really sad to see such commit messages.
But maybe the PAF team also thinks too concurrently in headers, gpl and
copyright notice and file descriptions here. Maybe the PAF team has to take
into account that Helijah spent half of his life contributing to flightgear
models
Hi Clement
Am 21.12.2012 um 09:40 schrieb Clement de l'Hamaide clem...@hotmail.fr:
Hi Yves,
Maybe the PAF team has to take into account that Helijah spent half of his
life contributing to flightgear models and this needs some personal respect
and not only respecting gpl terms.
Hi James
I guess there are a lot of SIL or other open source fonts out there which fit
fg license and probably also your needs. You can choose one you prefer or which
comes close to what you need, monospaced or not, and I can make the ttf for
you, when it is not there already. I know this
Hi
Sorry for that and I don't want to shout loud about anything (mostly), but
after some months ... is it possible to get the images back somehow on the
official CI server? I mean, with all respect for whatever console, but I need
to note that this server is some kind of a flag for some less
Hi Mathias
Does this also solve the NSZP problem, the south-pole-crossing-runway-problem
now? Good news ... A lot of contemporary geodesic software has problems with
this, good to hear that flightgear is walking through the last two degrees. I
do not ask how this is done, this is far from
that work here for http and
https.
-Yves
Am 21.01.2013 um 15:29 schrieb geneb ge...@deltasoft.com:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, ys wrote:
Hi
Sorry for that and I don't want to shout loud about anything (mostly),
but after some months ... is it possible to get the images back somehow
on the official
Hi
I know, it's annoying with 10.5, but I realised tonight that an older cocoa
pasteboard commit broke flightgear osx cocoa 10.5 support and I kindly ask you
to verify the patch below. With this code it is still possible to compile
flightgear with target 10.5 and sdk 10.5. I will use this for
Hi Olivier
I guess many parts of nav.dat updates are related to updates in apt.dat (i.e.
ILS, VOR-DME freqs etc.). For me personally it only makes sense to update to
current navaids when apt.dat can be updated too, otherwise I guess the project
will get much more reports immediately than you
Hi James
Maybe this leads here to extend the current liberation font set to provide some
additional glyphs, i.e. key pictures etc. for tutorials or the tooltips
bubbles, or some special aviation glyphs? And this for the sans and mono, and
to get better readable screen fonts at all. Or is there
Hi all
While there is absolutely no problem to compile OSG and other deps against osx
sdk 10.5 there has been some bits introduced in simgear/flightgear now to not
compile against sdk 10.5 anymore. The cocoa code I already mentioned requires
only a small directive (sorry about the dyslexia in
James Turner zakal...@mac.com:
On 9 Feb 2013, at 20:49, ys flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
But with some small directives I tested today I see that it would be
possible to still port fg 2.8 and 2.10 for osx sdk 10.5. I don't want to
offend anyone for this = 10.6 decision or the code
, a new simgear/flightgear build guru bity I don't get.
Thanks, Yves
Am 12.02.2013 um 15:23 schrieb James Turner zakal...@mac.com:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 03:05 PM, ys flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
Hi James
I guess this forking would be possible with the cocoa and the svn patch, but
I'm
Feb 2013, at 10:05, ys flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
Are you using a flag on jenkins shell or rb script I couldn't see and I need
to take into account? should I try on another machine first ... Or is there
some mystic endianess I should take into account for this first generation
intel
Hi James
Thanks, yes, am aware of this kind of separation. But I thought: Why does
cmake configuration make it possible to link against an osg include and lib dir
for every part, while simgear has only a an option for headers and not the libs
?. And then when you set the simgear include dir,
Hi Torsten
What does mean no public answer in this list for this decision ?
-Yves
Am 15.02.2013 um 16:16 schrieb Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
Hi all,
at one point during every ILS approach you reach the decision altitude
with two options: continue approach or go around. Being the
schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
Hi James
Thanks a lot for all your replies, gave me some hope ;-) But I guess I'm not
able to make FGx possible for mac users with built-in osg/sg/fg the next
days, because of this strange sound problem. Ok, this doesn't matter that
much, because FGx is only
Am 16.02.2013 um 00:56 schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
so I really have no idea what might be going.
Hi James
Me too. But it is still here. SimGear throws the same issue with all
combinations I tried, and now after goinf for 2.10 also with SDK 10.6. Meantime
I guess it is more
on
the slave ?
Thanks, Yves
Am 18.02.2013 um 03:01 schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
Am 16.02.2013 um 00:56 schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
so I really have no idea what might be going.
Hi James
Me too. But it is still here. SimGear throws the same issue with all
combinations
will publish a version with FGx asap.
Now I see that the small cocoa change for flightgear making compiling possible
for 10.5 has already been merged by James, thanks, the patch for the simgear
sdk 10.5 svn problem will follow asap.
Thanks, Yves
Am 18.02.2013 um 14:41 schrieb ys flightg
Hi Curt
I would not recommend to get 10.5 support back with current official jenkins
build. AFAIK current mac build for 10.6/7/8 works very well, supporting 10.5
would need heavy changes, or better, downgrading of slaves, and it is
definitely not worth to break things this way. I'm free to do
, but for me
personally atlas is still one of the best maps we have, even this is a very old
and a bit outdated project).
-Yves
Am 19.02.2013 um 02:07 schrieb ys flightg...@sablonier.ch:
Hi Curt
I would not recommend to get 10.5 support back with current official jenkins
build. AFAIK current mac
35 matches
Mail list logo
