Hi,
I tried to do what Chris told me, and FOP started working, but the warnings
did not disappear. Decided to take a deep breath and wait for the new stable
FOP version %-|
Vincent Hennebert-2 wrote:
Best regards,
Nancy
Hi Nancy,
Don’t put the new files in system-wide directories
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 07 Jun 2009, at 12:45, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Hi Nancy,
Could I ask the last question in this long thread please?
Why are the Symbol and Zapfdiongbat fonts unavailable in italic/bold
version?
Hmm... To be honest, I don't know the precise reason. On the
Hi dear Andreas!
Sorry, you are right.. I just couldn't identify your message among piles of
messages I've got.
So first of all, thanks a lot for your prompt help! I unzipped fop.jar to
/usr/bin/build/ and /usr/share/java (how do I check which is a symlink ?),
and
Hi Andreas,
Thank you a lot for your valuable help!!! I really appreciate that!
I decided not to use workarounds, and wait for the next FOP build. I can
live with these warnings for a while - the main thing is to understand why
they are generated. Could I ask the last question in this long
On 07 Jun 2009, at 12:45, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy,
Could I ask the last question in this long thread please?
Why are the Symbol and Zapfdiongbat fonts unavailable in italic/bold
version?
Hmm... To be honest, I don't know the precise reason. On the other
hand, I just played with some other
Thank you again, dear Andreas!!!
Looking forward to getting the all new fop.jar.:jumping: By the way, I have
two instances of it:
/usr/bin/build/fop.jar (where fop is installed) and
/usr/share/java/fop.jar
Where should I put the new one?
Best regards,
Nancy
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
On
On 07 Jun 2009, at 14:05, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
Looking forward to getting the all new fop.jar.:jumping:
You mean you haven't received it? I sent it out last Thursday...
By the way, I have
two instances of it:
/usr/bin/build/fop.jar (where fop is installed) and
/usr/share/java/fop.jar
Hi Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
Hi Andreas,
It seems that getting FOP from the trunk is too complicated for me. When is
the next binary FOP version due to?
Regarding what you said about fo:block linefeed-treatment=preserve - I
have no idea how to translate this into XSL/XML.
Meantime, I did
Hi dear Andreas,
Thanks for your explanations. I think my version of FOP 0.95 does insert
Symbol and Zapfdingbats into the font-family parameter - along with
sans-serif. Apparently, my repository points to the trunk. Look:
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
On 04 Jun 2009, at 10:15, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
Thanks for your explanations. I think my version of FOP 0.95 does
insert
Symbol and Zapfdingbats into the font-family parameter - along with
sans-serif. Apparently, my repository points to the trunk. Look:
fo:root
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your response! So if I install FOP 0.95 from trunk, will it still
issue the warnings?
I don't understand what you mean by :
... is specified as the first font (depending on which character/codepoint
you want to
render. In my XML file, I just specify the code of the
On 04 Jun 2009, at 13:17, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
Thanks for your response! So if I install FOP 0.95 from trunk, will
it still
issue the warnings?
Just so we are clear: you either use 0.95 or you use the trunk
version. I'm puzzled as to what you mean by 'installing 0.95 from
trunk'.
Hi Andreas,
I thought that it's enough to put the ZapfDingBat's hexadecimal code for the
symbol in my XML file (#x206E) -and that's it - FOP will understand that it
has to pick up the Zapfdingbats font and draw the telephone symbol. That's
what I did. After compiling the PDF, I opened the .fo
On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:33, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
So you mean that if Symbol is the first font, FOP will pick it up,
fail to
produce the phone symbol, and won't fall back to ZapfDingbats?
For FOP 0.95 or earlier, the answer is unfortunately: Yes.
As mentioned, FOP Trunk will effectively
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your patience! :-)
Taking into account what you said, I did the following test:
1) In my customization area, I added:
xsl:param name=symbol.font.familyZapfDingbats/xsl:param
2) Installed ZapfDingbats font on my system and registered it in fop conf:
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi Andreas,
I thought that it's enough to put the ZapfDingBat's hexadecimal code for the
symbol in my XML file (#x206E) -and that's it - FOP will understand that it
has to pick up the Zapfdingbats font and draw the telephone symbol. That's
what I did. After compiling the PDF,
On 04 Jun 2009, at 15:07, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
Thanks for your patience! :-)
No problem.
1) In my customization area, I added:
xsl:param name=symbol.font.familyZapfDingbats/xsl:param
This should be enough, but IIC, it will also mean that characters that
are available in the Symbol
Hi Pascal,
I indeed used #x260E; - just made a mistake when writing this message -
sorry for that! :-)
Regards,
nancy
Pascal Sancho wrote:
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi Andreas,
I thought that it's enough to put the ZapfDingBat's hexadecimal code for
the
symbol in my XML file (#x206E) -and
Hi Andreas,
Entering font triplets soothes FOP's pain - no warnings are generated :-) By
the way, if you don't specify embed-url, how FOP knows where this file is
located? It's not in the standard /fonts folder.
I removed the font registration from the conf file and recompiled. Nothing
has
On 04 Jun 2009, at 15:30, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
Entering font triplets soothes FOP's pain - no warnings are
generated :-) By
the way, if you don't specify embed-url, how FOP knows where this
file is
located? It's not in the standard /fonts folder.
That's what I'm wondering as well...
Hi Andreas,
It seems that getting FOP from the trunk is too complicated for me. When is
the next binary FOP version due to?
Regarding what you said about fo:block linefeed-treatment=preserve - I
have no idea how to translate this into XSL/XML.
Meantime, I did some other tests. Bob Stayton
On 04 Jun 2009, at 17:01, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy
It seems that getting FOP from the trunk is too complicated for me.
When is
the next binary FOP version due to?
Well, it was initially planned for early this year, but we didn't
quite get around to it yet.
Regarding what you said about
Hi,
Thanks a lot for suggestions. It seems that I have increased JAVA heap
space, by specifying -Xmx1000m (I have 2Gb) , although I am not sure how
much I should really allocate for running compilation of large docs.
The question that remained unclear is that while FOP 0.94 doesn't complain
on
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi,
Thanks a lot for suggestions. It seems that I have increased JAVA heap
space, by specifying -Xmx1000m (I have 2Gb) , although I am not sure how
much I should really allocate for running compilation of large docs.
The question that remained unclear is that while FOP 0.94
Thanks for suggestions!
Kindaian wrote:
In my case, i had to change it to the max that the machine would
accept... somewhere around 1024m...
[but it was on windows and on a 32bit environment... on 64 bits - both
os and java - this issues are largelly overcome by the ability to
Hi Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for suggestions. It seems that I have increased JAVA heap
space, by specifying -Xmx1000m (I have 2Gb) , although I am not sure how
much I should really allocate for running compilation of large docs.
If that works with -Xmx1000m, then go for it.
Hi dear Vincent!
First of all, thank you a lot for your explanations!!!
...the reason was to make the Jeuclid plug-in work more out of the box...
I checked on my system - I don't have the Jeuclid plug-in on my system
(should be in /lib directory, right?).
Does it come by default with FOP or
On 03 Jun 2009, at 15:29, nancy_b wrote:
Hi Nancy, Vincent,
First of all, thank you a lot for your explanations!!!
...the reason was to make the Jeuclid plug-in work more out of the
box...
Well, actually, the change mentioned by Vincent is not yet in 0.95.
The FOPropertyMapping in that
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi folks,
I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling a
large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs:
FOP Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
What is really frustrating and annoying is that FOP
Hi dear Pascal,
Thank you for your response. I can't see any improvement in handling fonts.
For example, while FOP 0.94 hasn't complained, FOP 0.95 generates the
following error message:
WARNING: Font 'Symbol,normal,700' not found. Substituting with
'Symbol,normal,400'.
Jun 2, 2009 2:14:25 PM
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi dear Pascal,
Thank you for your response. I can't see any improvement in handling fonts.
See:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/changes_0.95beta.html#Changes+to+the+Font+Subsystem
Hi Pascal,
thanks for your suggestions. I am using Debian Linux, so I don't have
FOP.BAT on my system. Do you have any ideas where I should enter it on
Linux?
Thanks in advance!
Nancy
Pascal Sancho wrote:
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi dear Pascal,
Thank you for your response. I can't see any
Hi Nancy,
I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling a
large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs:
FOP Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Is the content of your PDF wrapped in one single fo:page-sequence (in
nancy_b a écrit :
Hi Pascal,
thanks for your suggestions. I am using Debian Linux, so I don't have
FOP.BAT on my system. Do you have any ideas where I should enter it on
Linux?
Thanks in advance!
Nancy
Unfortunately, I'm not familiarized with shell script under Linux.
I just know that the
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for your valuable input. How can I split the file? Yes, I create a
.fo file first.
Thanks in advance!
Nancy
Tobias Anstett [k15t.com] wrote:
Hi Nancy,
I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling
a
large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the
thanks for your suggestions. I am using Debian Linux, so I don't have
FOP.BAT on my system. Do you have any ideas where I should enter it on
Linux?
Did you install fop through apt-get install?
If so: without having tried this myself, but by looking at the Debian
package, perhaps the following
In my case, i had to change it to the max that the machine would
accept... somewhere around 1024m...
[but it was on windows and on a 32bit environment... on 64 bits - both
os and java - this issues are largelly overcome by the ability to
address much more]
;)
On 02-06-2009 16:23, Remko
37 matches
Mail list logo
