On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to join the
ASF
Cool! I will try to make the time to help out a little; I'm interested
in this space :)
cheers,
Leo
Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
nlgal...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We
would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
The source release has a LICENSE and a NOTICE file that indicates it
contains a bunch of stuff it does not actually contain. AFAICS it
should simply have a LICENSE that is just the Apache License and a
NOTICE file that has
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
and see if
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:44, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the existing tags/branches of svn use a tweaked Apache Software
License, v1.1, and generally have a file header claims a copyright by
CollabNet.
trunk is
+1, nice work folks!
cheers,
Leo
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo
nickgalla...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Wink community has voted on and approved the release
of Wink 1.0 (RC-5). We would now like to request the
approval of the Incubator PMC for this release.
Details of the Wink
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
PS: +1 to start incubation obviously. The record is 2 weeks set for
MerlinDeveloper back in 2003...you have 9 days left to try and beat it
Hey, you
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Incubator is about EDUCATION. It is about TEACHING podlings
how to work here at Apache.
So what are you teaching with e-mails like this, Greg?
When you disagree with someone, SHOUT a bit and write a long rant?
Or
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one
more +1 to release
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and
necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole. The IPMC as a
whole has only two roles: approving a proposal and recommending
graduation
Also,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with
projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things
like
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
...
Not merit, just binding vote. I agree that it sucks, but it is not
something where the incubator has gone awry, it has _always_ been
messed up like
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Sponsors
* Champion: Greg Stein
Cool
* Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
Rall
Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
2) Apache rule: a release needs at least
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou matth...@offthelip.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and
how they use RTC.
Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two other issues to discuss for the Subversion podling:
* moving the mailing lists directly to @subversion.apache.org
* placing the source code at /subversion/ rather than /incubator/subversion/
We are hoping to
Hey hey,
I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent
activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be
happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The feeling among the
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
Hey hey,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this release.
The release artifact, sums, and
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
ross.gard...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
Hey hey,
I wasn't going to say anything but since this is dragging on...
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Would we permit someone to mirror other files from trunk on the website?
Yes, definitely. Most projects publish their websites by pushing files
into
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
Todd Volkert wrote:
Does anyone on this list know of an existing open source pure-Java Advanced
Audio Coding (AAC) library? If not, are there any audiophiles on this list
that would be interested in incubating such a project
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
this is also the case for Nightly Builds, accessible by the
public; Legally they are publishing to the public (i.e. opposite of
'for private use') and bound by licenses and agreements.
And finally, from Copyright law
On 12/11/09 1:14 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec
Heya OpenCMIS folks,
Since it looks like you aren't currently supported by a champion or
mentor [1], I thought I'd fill in a small part and inject some warm
fuzzies...
*Thanks* for open sourcing your project and *thanks* for considering
doing it at apache. Its always a lot of effort to go
Hey folks,
The incubator is here to help. It is about education. It is about
teaching podlings how to work here at apache, about showing people what
to be aware of.
The incubator is *not* here to assess or judge or dictate or lecture or
draft policy or go on long rants about The One True
On 1/14/10 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board.
+1!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 1/26/10 6:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept
+1
- Leo
On 2/12/10 4:08 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential
showstoppers, and would
On 4/22/10 10:21 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
I updated the proposal to reflect the objections regarding the
infrastructure. Our questions regarding the import of our SVN history
has been cleared.
Are there further comments, suggestions, objections?
Very nicely written proposal, well done! Looks
On 4/15/10 10:42 PM, Tom White wrote:
I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal.
Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as
Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code (for Hadoop) is hosted as a
Hadoop contrib module, but I believe it would flourish as its own
+1 obviously!
- Leo
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 binding
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Lacking a lot of binding votes...
+1 binding
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross Gardler
Hey folks,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software grant
plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on
Apache projects, whether on their own time or company
Hey hey,
I definitely understand the reasoning. Hmm. I think the way to look at it is,
it depends, but do whatever is needed to allow apache liberal rights to
sublicense all the IP to it's users.
The second way to look at it is that logic and legal stuff are not always as
closely connected as
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial
status page going?
On it.
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just remember, we haven't yet even voted on whether or not to accept
the podling.
These are decisions the podling should be making.
Are you ready to call for a vote? :)
Whoah! Please don't call for a vote -- I would much
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
30 downloads per day or per month?
52TB per month is still a lot...
per day.
Look at this chart:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html
TL;DR: these bandwidth numbers are not actually that
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Since this is a large download, I wonder whether the quoted numbers are
impacted at all by timeouts, abandoned downloads attempts, etc. In other
words, is it counting the HTTP GET's? Or the successful downloads? That
may
+1 and welcome on board.
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Flume for incubation
...
= Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System =
== Abstract ==
+1!
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Pasted inline:
= Apache Flex Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Flex is an
*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
the review?
thanks!
Leo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following as
Apache Jena
Hey folks,
I had to think about this a bunch. We don't have anything like this at
apache today.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30, Raju Bitter rajubit...@googlemail.com wrote:
(..) Adobe Flex is quite different from most Apache
Hey hey,
(Pff. I like replying in-line but this is a hard e-mail to reply to
in-line so I will top post.)
If I understand your policy question: will apache allow an incubating
community to show up and start a project when they are forking another
project?
I'd say, in general, yes, probably, if
Hey folks,
I felt I had to take a look at this. Like Ralph I was very concerned
when I saw Ethan's e-mail. Thanks a lot for writing it Ethan, and
thanks for writing it with so much detail.
I just read all the e-mail about bloodhound I could find (that I had
pretty much ignored when I saw other
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
If there is a community
and that community doesn't want Apache to fork the code that they created,
then we will not fork that code at Apache. If the original developers of the
code do not want their license changed,
Hey folks,
I started writing this e-mail in November or so. My normal approach
with stuff like this is wait for a non-contentious quiet period before
starting a new thread, to maximize the chance the words will be read
for what they say rather than interpreted in the context of some
heated
Hey Don,
Thanks for your reply. You are quite right, of course. I hope I am
also right at the same time :-). Maybe I can clarify...
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Like Apache, But Sexier...LABS? I can totally see that. Anyone want
to start an Apache
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
snip/
We may also have semantic gaps. Leo's [RT] may be presuming that a
podling's board report[sic] is merely a bureaucratic requirement.
snip/
Hmm :-)
And so the threads collide...
...I guess I'll allow it. But since
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Hey folks,
I just wanted to chime in with a +1 for the general direction. I think
there's actually a lot of work to do to iron out how to reorganize
things. Before digging in, I suggest we abstract out a little bit to
see if we have consensus on the overall goals and desired end state
before
+1
- Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
In the interest of moving the current discussion matters forward, please VOTE
on this recommendation to the board by the IPMC. I'll leave the VOTE open
for at least the next 72 hours:
[ ]
+1
I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's
questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should
probably go in our report.
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam
(back from holiday, still catching up, just replied on jena-dev, but
for the record since this is a [VOTE]...)
On 8 February 2012 13:03, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC
Hey folks,
TL;DR
Small steps! Less friction! Lazy consensus! Reversible change!
Meritocracy! YAY :-D
History
Use small reversible steps is a powerful idea when evolving things,
like when evolving a software architecture. It's an idea that was made
popular @ apache by
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
+1 from me.
(justification:
1) I do not consider unintuitive
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo, are you out there?
Hmm? Oh, this again...
Having company names or trademarks in java namespaces is a pretty
stupid convention. It gets us mess like this...
There is no policy that incubating java projects must
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
+1 from me.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on recommending the graduation of
Apache Accumulo with the following resolution to
the ASF Board.
+1 from me.
Well done, that was pretty fast :)
Is it right that your PMC roster doesn't have apache
Hey hey,
Jukka this is sounding so timid :). You know, I think I'll break rank
and tell you what I really think. You may want to sit down first.
You [1] did a *kick ass* job on the last report. Kick. Ass. [2]. Kapow!
As well as spending the time to look through and digest it all
beforehand
+1 from me.
Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
(Checked KEYS, signatures, LICENSEs, NOTICEs, license headers. Built
source release, watched maven download the internet. Ran compiled
source and binary distribution and played with web interface. Almost
remembered how to write SPARQL. Etc. All looks
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page
[1] doesn't show.
The Jena team page [2
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF
release. There's a long tradition of Apache releases like the ones
ManifoldCF is producing, so turning this suddenly into a blocker is
IMHO bad
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
Incubator to be a top level project.
+1, binding, mentor
cheers!
- Leo (doing a little celebration dance)
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
...
Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
(dropped infra@)
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm exceedingly sorry here that the IPMC as a whole let you down by
not turning into these issues and dealing with them at the outset.
Me too.
Personally, I have no objection to including mutant
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like I wasn't clear enough.
The proposal is for the following release artifacts:
(1) A source-only tar
(2) A source+binary dependencies convenience tar
(3) A binary tar
This is instead of:
(1) A source-only
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:34:18PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The Apache Jackrabbit committers have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
...
So, I am asking for a vote of the Incubator on graduation of Jackrabbit
that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:10:32AM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm curious, how does one get into the Incubator PMC?
You ask for it, or people ask you.
* If you're an ASF member and you
step up to mentor a new project, Noel (VP) tells you this means you
should subscribe to the incubator PMC
Can people *please* get into the habit of changing subject lines to
match subject matter around here? Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:03:27AM -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
Alan wrote:
Not providing commit karma seems to be a bit like forced retirement
because of inactivity. Something that
...this is a fine example
of something which IMHO should not be private discussion...
On 3/17/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:10:50PM +, James Strachan wrote:
On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we could include the incubating ActiveMQ
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 09:51:40PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:01:18AM -0800, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Just poking around the incubator site and I see a responsibilities page
for Mentors which is good but I don't see any criteria for being a
mentor.
I think we don't have very general ones for those, probably since its hard
to
Sorry, can't resist...
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:36:27AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
Simple example:
When the IPMC decides that you are a mentor for X then you don't have
How cool is that?
What's Erik doing on the iPMC? More than he's ever done on a PC!
The new iMentor Core Duo can wear
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:20:00PM +0800, Gav wrote:
I know *I* decided a few weeks ago not to spend any more time at any
intersection between the wider geronimo community and the incubation stuff
because its become obvious that my opinion on a variety of stuff doesn't
mesh well with
(please drop harmony-dev from the CC list on replies. Thanks!)
Hi Noel,
Sorry for the lack of report for harmony so far (BTW, we should probably
get Marvin to send out automated reminders to relevant (P)PMCs too, it should
save you some nagging effort). The wiki is currently down, so I can't see
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The
fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release
adheres to Incubator
Hey Dan,
I wrote a long-ish e-mail about all this, but I don't think its going to
help anyone. So I apologize for any and all confusion.
Concretely...
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:05:33AM -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote:
I am really confused by the reaction to this. I don't see any reason to
be
James, dude,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:15:48AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
On 4/20/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:59:30PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:32:50AM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
When a PPMC decides to vote, it should post a note to the
Incubator PMC to let the PMC as a whole know about the vote.
You mean before the vote, after the vote, before results
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. -- justin
*cheer*! Go, Paul, go!
:-)
LSD, who
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon
It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x.
both would
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:15:57PM -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd
probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday
(can you please fix your mailer to
* not break email threading
* wrap lines
thanks!)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:44:36PM -0400, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
? The one JSR mentioned above is 181 which I believe is part of Java
EE and not the JDK, right?
I belive JSR 181 is part of EE.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:04:27PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new
committers page that Jean sent out.--
Hmm, I certainly didn't really miss them. Because...
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:43:22PM -0700, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Incubator web site navigation no longer has a learn category with
links to these pages:
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/
Hey all,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 19:19, Leo Simons wrote:
What I'm missing is an idea of the interaction between jini.org and this
proposed new apache project, and an idea of the interaction between
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:53:04PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
^^^
This file is not maintained
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:55:54PM -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
What do you *want* to do? What makes most sense?
well, MyFaces PMC is faster; but adffaces-ppmc has it's charme too.
But... after adf is a subproject we'll need to delete this list.
Hani,
(I'm a big BileBlog fan. I'm ever so upset that Geir always gets named
when it comes to Harmony while I and more importantly quite a few others
also pour lots of effort in too.
I did a lightning talk at ApacheCon Las Vegas titled The ASF sucks.
I had 5 minutes, I could've gone on for 30.
Hi Andy,
Thanks for being frank and open. Changing your mind can
be such a hard thing to do, and changing the minds of
lots of people is even harder.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:55:56PM -0700, Andy Clark wrote:
Thanks for your extreme patience in the matter of
the proposed Kabuki contribution
(Hurray! Hurray! Hurray!)
Heya gang,
just went to read through a bunch of the new incubator site. I think y'all did
an amazing job this week; things are so much clearer now. Many thanks! (I'm
sure that's on behalf of everyone 'round here as well as future podlings)
cheers,
Leo
PS: now
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 07:08:48PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
Huh what? Exactly what semantics attach to a +1 is always a muddy
discussion, but IMNSHO they really ought not be thanks for something
unrelated. Its utterly confusing.
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
