Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password
text upon log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text
upon log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four
On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I
On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password text upon
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any username / password
text upon log in; now
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes
BRM wrote:
From: Paul Hartmanpaul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
# Old
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org
Yeap there is a version for windows and it works fine. :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
#
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and
on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds
On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:27:34 Mick wrote:
It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
very last minute!
It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS=-j1 but just
in case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
Mick wrote:
It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
very last minute!
It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS=-j1 but just in
case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
SNIP
Before I start again, shall I switch to
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
build hangs.
Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
I google isnt showing me any similar
Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
build hangs.
Anyone seen this
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:23:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged. Curiously,
nothing changed. There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11). Am I
missing something obvious? I'm on AMD64.
OOo has been emerged with following USE flags:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged. Curiously,
nothing changed. There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11). Am I
missing something obvious? I'm on AMD64.
OOo has been emerged with
Jim Cunning schrieb:
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
other windows, but the dead key combinations in
Jim Cunning wrote on 08/05/09 06:49:
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
kmail and other windows, but the dead key
On Monday 04 May 2009 18:10:50 Saphirus Sage wrote:
Jim Cunning wrote:
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
kmail
Jim Cunning wrote:
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
other windows, but the dead key combinations in
Jim Cunning wrote:
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
other windows, but the dead key combinations in
On Monday 01 Dec 2008, Fernando Antunes wrote:
2008/12/1 James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any ideas how to fix?
ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
all installed.
James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
James
2008/12/1 James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any ideas how to fix?
ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
all installed.
James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
James
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
So, I killed firefox to free
ha ha ! :)
Ok thanks for the GWB citations
there is one I love too :
I beleive that fish and human being can coexist !
GWB
At Some Conference where he had random access.
Ok by the way the RAM doesn't seem to be a problem
since Micheal(?) has 1GB and I hope 256 MB were at least free during the
On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
completed successfully. Perhaps
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Daniel Pielmeier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/21 Paul Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
So what do you think are the following SRC_URI's
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
So, I killed firefox to free up
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:39, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Anyone see this before?
Thanks,
Mike
To quote the error message:
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
*
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
To quote the error message:
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
* '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
To quote the error message:
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
* '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:48, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
Running processes: 0
deliver -- version: 1.130
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged
1 module(s):
chart2
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
Bye...
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
your otherwise self-compiled
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
on the hardware you are doing this on using a binary package that
most likely doesn't fit into
On 20/11/08 deface said:
Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
Mind you, I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using
Gentoo. I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL
081120 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 20/11/08 deface said:
Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using Gentoo.
I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Don't feed trolls,
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
I had the same problem, I could not compile openoffice.
I just had the same warning message and the merge stopped.
I only had 512 of RAM from which 128 are used by my graphic card,
and with the system running
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
actual error in build.log, or attach it.
http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
I've had issues in the past with Gentoo on small memory systems, but if that's
the problem here, it's the first time it's happened since install.
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 15:51:54 schrieb ext Michael P. Soulier:
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
actual error in build.log, or attach it.
http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
So you should add this part of it to
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
on the hardware you are doing this on using a binary package that
Florian Philipp wrote:
..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/
oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
BOFH Excuse #414:
tachyon emissions overloading the system
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian Philipp wrote:
..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/
oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
This only applies to OOo 2.x
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
so we overestimated it then?
They misunderestimated me.
George W. Bush
November 6, 2000
Comment made in Bentonville, Arkansas.
Those who think that they can say we're only going
Am Freitag 21 November 2008 01:26:28 schrieb ext Paul Hartman:
This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
You should read the ebuild, then. It has all the facts.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs |
2008/11/21 Paul Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
So what do you think are the following SRC_URI's from the current
openoffice-3 for?
MY_PV=3.0.0.3.5
PATCHLEVEL=OOO300
The result: a clean compile, as near as I can tell, but useless. Now it
quits
silently a second or so into any startup, with or without a filename on the
command line. No message on the terminal where
I start it, and no clue I can see about what's wrong.
I'm back to MSOffice. I hate it
081103 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
After reading some of the comments here, I re-synced,
unmerged Ooo, and emerged openoffice and hunspell.
I already had the myspell-en build.
The result: a clean compile, but useless.
Now it quits silently a second or so into any startup,
with or without a
On November 4, 2008, Philip Webb wrote:
I'm back to MSOffice. I hate it but it works.
Sorry, might be coming late to this discussion and offering something that was
already offered, but how about openoffice-bin ? It works for me 100% of the
time on several workstations without a glitch (both
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it
Hi
I have am new to Gentoo. My previous experience is with slackware . I
Downloaded the Live CD and installed Gentoo twice .. but the problem is
Grub is not installed. I have a dual boot with Widowz and Grub for dos
... So I tried it using the grub console
root (hd0,4)
kernel (hd0,4)/ -- and
Hi
I have am new to Gentoo.
Ok, first thing to do is resubmit this post with a useful subject title :-)
Many people like to file things away or ignore stuff that they're not
interested in, so the subject is important.
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file
gets it wedged right
away: the console that started it says:
error - missing word count in dictionary file
Hash Manager Error : 4
So I'm guessing there's a problem in
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged
right away: the console that started it says:
error - missing word count in
On 11/2/08, Markos Chandras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it
wedged
right away: the console
Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged
right away: the console that started it says:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged right
away: the console that started it says:
error - missing word count in dictionary file
Hash Manager Error : 4
So I'm guessing
Open OpenOffice.org, go to Tools - Options - Java and select an installed JDK.
Presto.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Open Office seems to run ok, but at start-up, I get the following message:
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I tried
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:43:09 -0400
Denis wrote:
Open OpenOffice.org, go to Tools - Options - Java and select an
installed JDK.
I tried selecting /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.16/jre/bin but it will not take
it! Where is JRE installed then?
My machine has it at /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.07/jre/bin
HTH,
Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yourself is
always the better idea.
Not so obviously better when it fails. Here's the
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yourself is
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
Florian Philipp schrieb:
Hi list!
Somehow I think I'm missing something:
As it seems, app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going
away real soon and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher which is
emerged with app-office/openoffice.
So far, so good, but I'm unable to find it!
Justin schrieb:
Florian Philipp schrieb:
Hi list!
Somehow I think I'm missing something:
As it seems, app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going
away real soon and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher which is
emerged with app-office/openoffice.
So far, so good, but I'm
080921 Florian Philipp wrote:
app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going away soon
and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher
emerged with app-office/openoffice but I'm unable to find it!
As help to others who need it, here is my own note to myself :
OO Quickstarter :
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:01:17 Grant Edwards wrote:
After my last emerge -auvND world, openoffice stopped working
for non-root users. When I run
strace /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice -writer
I observe that the program hangs doing a waitpid() call on a
child that was forked to
Philip Webb wrote:
080221 Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I emerged OpenOffice 2.3.1 on my amd64 install running gentoo-2.6.23-r5.
I can start OpenOffice as root but not as a regular user.
How are you starting it ? Do you enter eg 'oocalc' from a CLI
or do you click on an icon in a start menu
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:52:39AM -0800, Penguin Lover Drew Tomlinson squawked:
There are no error messages. When starting as a user, the splash
graphic just sits there and the CPU usage is basically 100% for both X
and oosplash.bin. When starting as root, the splash graphic starts and
Willie Wong wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:52:39AM -0800, Penguin Lover Drew Tomlinson squawked:
There are no error messages. When starting as a user, the splash
graphic just sits there and the CPU usage is basically 100% for both X
and oosplash.bin. When starting as root, the splash
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:34:54PM -0800, Penguin Lover Drew Tomlinson squawked:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib32/xorg:/usr/lib64/xorg
If I unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH in a user terminal, then OpenOffice starts.
So what is LD_LIBRARY_PATH and why am I seeing this behavior?
See
OpenOffice or OpenOffice-bin?
I'm running 2.3.1 here on my AMD64. No problems that I've seen so far.
- Mark
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I emerged OpenOffice 2.3.1 on my amd64 install running gentoo-2.6.23-r5
kernel. I can start OpenOffice as root
Mark Knecht wrote:
OpenOffice or OpenOffice-bin?
I'm running 2.3.1 here on my AMD64. No problems that I've seen so far.
- Mark
The actual OpenOffice that took many hours to compile on my AMD Turion
TL-50 1.6ghz laptop. :)
Thanks,
Drew
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Drew Tomlinson
080221 Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I emerged OpenOffice 2.3.1 on my amd64 install running gentoo-2.6.23-r5.
I can start OpenOffice as root but not as a regular user.
How are you starting it ? Do you enter eg 'oocalc' from a CLI
or do you click on an icon in a start menu ? If the latter,
check that
Bo Ørsted Andresen skrev:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:50:33 Erik wrote:
On one system it is impossible to write certain letters, such as üéè.
The output of `locale` and the output of `locale -a` ?
Thanks! That was the problem! It was wrong. I executed locale-gen and
rebooted.
Erik skrev:
Bo Ørsted Andresen skrev:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:50:33 Erik wrote:
On one system it is impossible to write certain letters, such as üéè.
The output of `locale` and the output of `locale -a` ?
Thanks! That was the problem! It was
On Nov 28, 2007 11:56 AM, Pongracz Istvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I decided to compile openoffice 2.3.0 but I run into an error.
The compilation error is this:
checking whether to enable build of Mozilla/Mozilla NSS-using
components... yes
checking whether to build Mozilla
2007. 12. 6, csütörtök keltezéssel 00.02-kor Julian Simioni ezt írta:
Are you by chance using Firefox beta 3?
Hi,
Thank you for your interesting!
No, I use normal firefox, at this moment the version is 2.0.0.11.
+ My openoffice cannot detect any java environment.
Yesterday I spent
On Monday 11 June 2007, James wrote:
Hello,
When I start up open office (amd64)
I get these error messages:
ooffice ./CCPS-fiber-co.doc
QSettings: failed to open file '/usr/qt/3/etc/settings/qtrc'
(process:9443): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_screen_get_font_options:
assertion `GDK_IS_SCREEN
correct, though I think its hunspell. For some reason gentoos install
disables OO's native spell checker and wants to use an external one -
Its performance (finding errors) sucks compared to the original but I
havent had time find how to restore the original behaviour. Yesterday I
found that
The spell check is based on the language setting for the text in the
document. Format-Character-Font Make sure the language is set correctly
you probably want English (USA) .
On 5/16/07, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64.
both do not
On 5/16/07, Rob Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64.
both do not have spell check working. Now on the compiled
version, I get this message when it fires up, repeated about
14 times to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James wrote:
It seems to work, but no spell checking?
I think you want to emerge app-dicts/aspell-en for English spell
checking in OpenOffice. At least, I seem to remember that being the case...
R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Randy Barlow wrote:
James wrote:
It seems to work, but no spell checking?
I think you want to emerge app-dicts/aspell-en for English spell
checking in OpenOffice. At least, I seem to remember that being the
case...
R
This may have changed, everything else does, but I THINK I read
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
