On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:39:41PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
You are only considering the case of /usr being on a plain hard disk
partition, what if it in on an LVM volume, or encrypted (or both)
of mounted over the
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:06:27 +0800
Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:39:41PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
You are only considering the case of /usr being on a plain hard
disk
On 2012-12-19, Dale wrote:
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:05:14PM -0600, Dale wrote:
[...]
Here is two links if you want to try my weird way of doing this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Innx3puNI
I use downloadhelper to grab
On 2012-12-19, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 19.12.2012 00:20, schrieb Walter Dnes:
1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
Intel GPU in my HTPC machine. I've applied the same fix to my desktop.
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-19, Dale wrote:
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:05:14PM -0600, Dale wrote:
[...]
Here is two links if you want to try my weird way of doing this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Innx3puNI
I use
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:03:25 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:22:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:08:53 -0500
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:03:25 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:22:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
[...]
What about just mounting /usr as soon
On 2012-12-23, »Q« wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:59:50 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
Hello,
Today, I got a bit curious, and wanted to get some sound from a
computer which does not have any speakers at the moment. Mostly for
fun, I thought about using arecord and then
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:03:25 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:22:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
[...]
What about just
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:38:15PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 19.12.2012 00:20, schrieb Walter Dnes:
1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
Intel GPU in my HTPC machine. I've applied
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:35AM -0800, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
snip, whack, d200d, cough, spit
Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff in an email. Have you heard of attachments?
pastebins?
Your dropbox postings lost me after reading:
Please enable browser-cookies to use the Dropbox website.
--
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:03:25 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:22:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva)
Hello!
I am trying to install gentoo on an old armada m700. The specs that I think is
relevant for this problem is the clocking speed of the cpu and the ram. It got
223mhz of clocking speed and 116mb ram. I have added 512mb of swap since I knew
the ram was going to be a problem.
The command
There is absolutely no reason why you can't use the vanilla kernel. Go
right ahead.
On Dec 24, 2012 10:08 AM, Teodor Spæren teodor.s...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to install gentoo on an old armada m700. The specs that I
think is relevant for this problem is the clocking speed of
It was in fact a weirdo corner case
since day 1.
Right, a weirdo corner case that is part of best practice and the
default suggestion on debian stable used on many many servers and for
good reason.
--
___
'Write programs
Are there any other cases, apart from emotional attachment based on
inertia, where a separate / and /usr are desirable? As I see it, there
is only the system, and it is an atomic unit.
You should really read the thread before posting.
--
You are only considering the case of /usr being on a plain hard disk
partition, what if it in on an LVM volume, or encrypted (or both)
of mounted over the network? All of these require something to be
run before they can be mounted, and if that cannot be run until udev
has started, we
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
[snip]
Well, so far I have stuck with the udev that works without a init
thingy. I do have a init thingy for when the udev that requires it is
marked stable. The devs are keeping the
On 2012-12-24, Teodor Spæren wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to install gentoo on an old armada m700. The specs that I
think is relevant for this problem is the clocking speed of the cpu
and the ram. It got 223mhz of clocking speed and 116mb ram. I have
added 512mb of swap since I knew the ram
Ohh! Thanks a lot :) Still it would have been useful to know what was causing
it to go out of memory.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 08:35:20AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff in an email. Have you heard of
attachments?
pastebins?
I was under the impression that gentoo strips attachments. At any
rate, I summarized as much as possible and only put the the full logs
at
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:03:25 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
On 2012-12-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:22:24 +0200
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Are there any other cases, apart from emotional attachment based on
inertia, where a separate / and /usr are desirable? As I see it, there
is only the system, and it is an atomic unit.
You should really read the thread before posting.
I suspect that Alan has. Alan is
From: nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Ram Problem!
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:32:54 +0200
No surprise here, from what I can see, what's happening is that *emerge*
is running out of memory, it's not a compilation, so -pipe or MAKEOPTS
won't make any difference here. Are you,
On 2012-12-24, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
[...]
From my understanding, if I upgrade my system to the later version of
udev and bypass the init system, my system will not boot. I have not
tested
fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 08:35:20AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff in an email. Have you heard of
attachments?
pastebins?
I was under the impression that gentoo strips attachments. At any
rate, I summarized as much as possible and only
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Nuno J. Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt
wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
[...]
From my understanding, if I upgrade my system to the later version
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:41:10AM -0800, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
I was under the impression that gentoo strips attachments. At any
rate, I summarized as much as possible and only put the the full logs
at the end.
As for the cookies, shrug so many sites require cookies and/or
javascript
Michael Mol wrote:
you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else* is a
terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are
good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on Gentoo.
(Those reasons are sprinkled through the thread, some spoken by me,
some
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:05:44PM +0100, Teodor Spæren wrote:
The possible work around I have thought of is just getting the vanilla kernel
from kernel.org, but the gentoo wiki advise against it, since gentoo-sources
is a patched kernel.
With all due respect, Gentoo is the only distro
Dale wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else* is a
terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are
good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on Gentoo.
(Those reasons are sprinkled through the thread, some spoken by
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:52:27PM +0100, Teodor Spæren wrote:
That is my concern. If I get it working with a vanilla kernel, and then
booting into the system,
emerge do not work, it was all wasted.
You may want to consider a swap file:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:07:04AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
Would you consider our own pastebin from portage?
Sure, in progress. I'll have to read up on this pastebin stuff.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman rocket
On Dec 24, 2012 10:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not
tested the theory but that is what people have been saying. Not only is
my /usr separate but it is on LVM partitons too.
If I recall correctly, easy repartitioning was supposed to be one of the
main reasons wy LVM was made
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some
time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details.
So, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what is in the new udev
that actually
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else* is a
terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are
good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:25:02AM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Dec 24, 2012 10:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not
tested the theory but that is what people have been saying. Not only is
my /usr separate but it is on LVM partitons too.
If I recall correctly, easy
content omitted from reply
This time it has 4 attachments; afaik there were zero attachments the first
time (deleted email here so can't check now). No worries, files here now.
Do you have a /var/log/messages (might be in rotated, gzipped one even) that
includes the 3.6.10 *and* 3.7.1 boot?
--
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:07:04AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
emerge -av app-text/wgetpaste wgetpaste /path/to/3.6/.config
/path/to/3.7/.config
3.6.10 .config -- http://bpaste.net/show/66307/
3.7.1 .config -- http://bpaste.net/show/66309/
Also can you dmesg | wgetpaste and note the uname
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:41:10AM -0800, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
I was under the impression that gentoo strips attachments. At any
rate, I summarized as much as possible and only put the the full logs
at the end.
Looks like the attachments got thru. I will try to remember that.
--
On Dec 24, 2012 11:46 PM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some
time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details.
So, if
Michael Mol wrote:
Lay off the eggnog, Dale. Too early yet. :P -- :wq
For me it is NyQuil. I'm still battling the flu. I'm kicking butt but
getting mine kicked at the same time. Other than NyQuil, no alcohol here.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what
Bruce Hill wrote:
SNIP
No initrd...
YET!!! ROFL
When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Bruce Hill wrote:
SNIP
No initrd...
YET!!! ROFL
When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-)
Dale
devfs still works wonderfully ... for principle, if no other reason, that file
server will *NEVER* have an
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:53:34AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
This time it has 4 attachments; afaik there were zero attachments the first
time (deleted email here so can't check now). No worries, files here now.
Yes, I originally sent no attachments, since I thought the mailing list
stripped
I'm on ~amd64. Updated portage in the morning.
But it seems the .38 version has a nasty bug.
It freezes the system every single time I try to compile a cross tool
chain.
I tried with various options, like reducing make jobs, etc, but didn't
help.
Back to .31 and things seem to be moving better.
On 2012-12-24, Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2012 09:24:16 AM IST, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-12-23, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
on 2012-12-22 at 17:13 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Now, imagine you are the guy at Samsung deciding what features the S2
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:35AM -0800, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
snip, whack, d200d, cough, spit
Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff in an email. Have you heard of
attachments?
pastebins?
Felix,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:35AM -0800, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
snip, whack, d200d, cough, spit
Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-12-24, Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2012 09:24:16 AM IST, Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm glad they chose MTP: I want my phone to continue to work while I'm
transferring files.
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 06:58:15 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Nuno, everything was fine until they started moving things to a
place where it shouldn't be.
No Dale, that is just flat out wrong.
There is no such thing as place where stuff should be. There are only
conventions, and
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Bruce Hill wrote:
SNIP
No initrd...
YET!!! ROFL
When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-)
Dale
devfs still works wonderfully
You may want to consider a swap file:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-add-a-swap-file-howto/
I have already done this. I had some problems trying to compile gcc, so I
learned it then.
NB: I don't know how well it's going to help with Gentoo. It's been close to a
decade, if not longer,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 06:58:15 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Nuno, everything was fine until they started moving things to a
place where it shouldn't be.
No Dale, that is just flat out wrong.
There is no such thing as place where stuff should be. There are
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
The problems with that is these: It worked ALL these years, why should
it not now? I have / on a traditional partition which is not going to
resize easily. If I put / on LVM, I need a init
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 09:27:13PM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 05:40:05AM -0500, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote
Hi. Today on one of my test kernels where I am using git bisect to find
a bug, I got the following when
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
The problems with that is these: It worked ALL these years, why should
it not now? I have / on a traditional partition which is not going to
resize easily. If I put / on LVM, I need a init thingy. I don't want a
init
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I put / on LVM, I need a init thingy.
No you don't. You could use a boot partition. Or grub2.
So, worked for ages, then it breaks when people change where they put
things. Answer is, don't change where you put things. Then
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:00:39 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 06:58:15 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Nuno, everything was fine until they started moving things to a
place where it shouldn't be.
No Dale, that is just flat
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I put / on LVM, I need a init thingy.
No you don't. You could use a boot partition. Or grub2.
I don't remember reading /boot as a suggested
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
The problems with that is these: It worked ALL these years, why should
it not now? I have / on a traditional partition which is not going to
resize easily. If I put / on LVM, I need a init thingy. I
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I put / on LVM, I need a init thingy.
No you don't. You could use a boot partition. Or grub2.
So, worked for ages, then it breaks when people change where they put
things. Answer is, don't change
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 01:23:16PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
The problems with that is these: It worked ALL these years, why should
it not now? I have / on a traditional partition which is not going to
resize easily.
On 24/12/12 23:52, Dale wrote:
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Are there any other cases, apart from emotional attachment based on
inertia, where a separate / and /usr are desirable? As I see it, there
is only the system, and it is an atomic unit.
You should really read the thread before posting.
I
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:36:06PM -0600, Dale wrote:
One of the reasons I left Mandriva was because of the init thingy. If I
wanted one and liked having one, I would have never switched to Gentoo.
The init thingy was not the only reason but it was one of them. The
reason I do not want
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:23:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
Then came the decision to move udev inside /usr, forcing the issue.
Now, it'd been long understood that udev *itself* hadn't been broken.
The explanation given as much as a year earlier was that udev couldn't
control what *other*
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:23:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
Then came the decision to move udev inside /usr, forcing the issue.
Now, it'd been long understood that udev *itself* hadn't been broken.
The explanation given as much as a year earlier was that udev couldn't
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime, for some reason, initramfs (inital ram
filesystem) became vogue for the Gentoo camp, rather than initrd
(initial ram disk
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
One of the reasons I left Mandriva was because of the init thingy. If I
wanted one and liked having one, I would have never switched to Gentoo.
The init thingy was not the only reason but it was one of them. The
reason I
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:23:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
Then came the decision to move udev inside /usr, forcing the issue.
Now, it'd been long understood that udev *itself* hadn't been broken.
The
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:29 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime, for some reason, initramfs (inital ram
filesystem) became vogue
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:29 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime, for some reason, initramfs (inital ram
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Bruce Hill wrote:
SNIP
No initrd...
YET!!! ROFL
When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-)
Dale
devfs
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:34:00PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm also interested in Bruce's history about initrd. Sounds like if
that worked today I'd just use it to make an initrd and be done with
it. Unlike you, I guess, I don't have any political position on these
images that get used
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 06:29:07PM -0600, »Q« wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime, for some reason, initramfs (inital ram
filesystem) became vogue for
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:54:08PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:29 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime,
Mark Knecht wrote:
Fair enough. I don't agree that leaving Gentoo because you chose to
put all of /usr on LVM and then chose not to deal with the
implications of that over time, but it's your choice and I certainly
support choice. And I appreciate you communicating your POV. I'm also
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 06:29:07PM -0600, »Q« wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:04:13 -0600
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Gentoo had mkinitrd once upon a time, but it's now in attic.
Somewhere, sometime, for some reason, initramfs (inital ram
filesystem)
I'm asking questions here before filing a bug/reature-request, to make
sure I have my ducks in a row. I did a big update a couple of days ago.
As per the user in... http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7168984.html
I too ran into a situation where I couldn't open any xterms because
/dev/pts
On 25/12/12 11:21, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm asking questions here before filing a bug/reature-request, to make
sure I have my ducks in a row. I did a big update a couple of days ago.
As per the user in... http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7168984.html
I too ran into a situation where I
On 25/12/12 11:21, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm asking questions here before filing a bug/reature-request, to make
sure I have my ducks in a row. I did a big update a couple of days ago.
As per the user in... http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7168984.html
I too ran into a situation where I
On Dec 25, 2012 1:55 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 06:58:15 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
The truth is simply this (derived from empirical observation):
Long ago we had established conventions about / and /usr; mostly
because the few
On 12/23/2012 03:22 PM, luis jure wrote:
well, it seems i have been very lucky indeed. i just emerged jmtpfs as per
mark's suggestion, and it just worked. i just created a /media/galaxy
directory, and an entry in fstab (like yours, but with jmtpfs instead of
mtpfs) and that was it. now i can
On 12/24/2012 10:56 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Even back when hard disks are a mote in the eyes of today's mammoths,
you *can* make /usr part of /, there's no stopping you. Sure, other
SysAdmins may scoff and/or question your sanity, but the choice is
yours. YOU know what's best for your
84 matches
Mail list logo
