Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, the gentoo people say that cdrkit does it without
root, why can't cdrtools?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
Well, imaging there is a road that ends in an abyss and there is a sign beware
of the abyss and some people remove that
Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg believes that cdrkit is not as good as cdrtools (I have used only
cdrtools and it works well for me).
Believes is less that knows. I know that if you take a very old source
and add new bugs that the result cannot be better than the maintained
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 16:46:54 Alex Schuster wrote:
Andrew Gaydenko writes:
Is there a way to predict which dependecies will be unsatisfied at case
of unmerging some package without real unmerging?
emerge --depclean -pv XYZ
Wonko
Thanks!
At Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:00:39 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg believes that cdrkit is not as good as cdrtools (I have used only
cdrtools and it works well for me).
Believes is less that knows.
I was/am trying to sound neutral
On Wednesday 10 Dec 2008, AJ Spagnoletti wrote:
Anyone ever reply to this? If you're using Gnome, then HAL + Gnome will
take care of it. I am using HAL + ivman in my servers. It works well
for fixing mount points.
Thanks, I got several replies but all pointed to just using hal +
Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just follow my advise...
Jörg
Unfortunately, the gentoo people say that cdrkit does it without
root, why can't cdrtools?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116026
Let me append a proof for the incorrectness of the claim that wodim does
not need
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
Indeed :)
(Sorry, couldn't resist :P)
Dale wrote:
Justin wrote:
Nicolas Sebrecht schrieb:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:45:16PM +, Stroller wrote:
I find a flow of
quoting that is interrupted FAR less
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:15:14 -0600
Paul Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul Hartman writes:
I accidentally sent this from the wrong email address the first
time, not sure if it went through to the list so I'm sending
I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
through which I must jump...
I found this:
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Steve wrote:
I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
through which I must jump...
I
I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt of
mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram) has
failed with the boot routine failing to recognize my /dev/sdb3 as root.
Its a gentoo vmappliance running on windows xp pro.
I'm not asking about
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
of mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram)
has failed with the boot routine failing to recognize my /dev/sdb3 as root.
What is
Summary:
How can I tie a module name (tg3) to a kernel config line?
Details:
Usually its kind of obvious if you dig around in .config a bit, but
now always.
I find the module at /lib/modules/2.6.24*/:
../kernel/drivers/net/tg3.ko
But I haven't been able to nail that to a kernel config line.
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 22:56:30 Harry Putnam wrote:
Summary:
How can I tie a module name (tg3) to a kernel config line?
Details:
Usually its kind of obvious if you dig around in .config a bit, but
now always.
I find the module at /lib/modules/2.6.24*/:
../kernel/drivers/net/tg3.ko
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
of mine to build a new kernel not using an initram (Or even with initram)
has failed with the boot routine failing
On Thursday 11 December 2008 00:34:24 Harry Putnam wrote:
Why do you think you need an initramfs at all? It's usually only
needed in very rare cases where either a driver for storage hardware
is needed which is not part of the kernel itself or some user space
things need to be done to even
Its a tigon 3 broadcom nic if that helps, I can get the .config line once I
beat traffic
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:56:30
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] How to tie
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But help is at hand!
The .config option you are looking for is CONFIG_TIGON3 My last
notebook had one of those and I searched for ages before spotting
one day that t, g and 3 all appeared in TIGON3.
Sorry that I couldn't help with the more general
Steve wrote:
I am interested in the possibility of running a small-scale oracle
server for some experimental development work. Ideally, I'd install on
gentoo - as this is my server box... though I guess there may be hoops
through which I must jump...
I found this:
Neil Walker neil at ep.mine.nu writes:
James wrote:
http://www.mpja.com/prodinfo.asp?number=17669+CP
My question is has anyone every got one of these working on gentoo,
or a similar product from another vendor?
Errm ... quite honestly, why would you want to?
Lots of reasons. Turn a
Chris Thomas sruchris at gmail.com writes:
I have one similar to yours. IIRC, mine is a Realtek 8139 chipset
which works fine with the driver in the kernel.
-Chris
Thanks to all that answered.
Oh, one more cool use,
On embedded (linux) systems where there is no hardware
ethernet, seems
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are running it in vmware right?
Your disk type, disk adapters type and chipset in a vmware vm are
NOT the same as these device on the physical hardware. vmware
emulates a BX440 chipset, SCSI drives and LSI or BusLogic
adapter. You must use those
Hi,
a generic way is:
1) Go to /usr/src/linux
2) grep tg3 $(find -name Makefile)
of course you can replace tg3 with every other module name (but don't
add the .ko extension!)
Geralt.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Huysmans wrote:
Hi All,
Don't know if it's appropriate to post this on this list, sorry if it's
not. Anyway, this is serious: we are currently looking for a junior IT
with some Gentoo experience and with a special interest in media
Dale wrote:
This is interesting. I am starting a new install on my backup drive.
I'm part way through the install, fetching all the KDE stuff right now.
This is what I got from the little frag script:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # /root/fragck.pl /backup/
0.953336175120985% non contiguous files,
I've started a new thread on my kernel troubles. I thought the thread
subject should be more indicative of the semi OT nature of the query.
Also thought it might make the information that accrues here more
findable for any future searchers.
Here is the general setup and the general problem:
Geralt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
a generic way is:
1) Go to /usr/src/linux
2) grep tg3 $(find -name Makefile)
Nice... I had come up with an even more shotgun approache.
grep -r tg3 kernel-name
I didn't have enough sense to know it would be in Makefiles
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your screenshot, you don't even have an sdb. All the
kernel sees is one hard
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your screenshot, you don't even
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine. But none of my attempts to bring the kernel up
to date have worked. All failing with a error message something like:
`/dev/sdb3 is not a valid device'.
According to your screenshot, you don't even
My guess is tha while inside the initrd a kenrel module was loaded and it was
something that you needed to read the boot volume. Are you statically or
modulely including your sata drivers?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
About sdb3. In the following dmesg output (when booting with a
working kernel-2.6.24-r8 I wondered if anyone can determine what
driver is involved there. I couldn't really tell much from it other
than the kernel sees it with no problem:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
That's an LSI Fusion-MPT controller. Enable:
Device Drivers-[*] Fusion MPT device
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My guess is tha while inside the initrd a kenrel module was loaded
and it was something that you needed to read the boot volume. Are
you statically or modulely including your sata drivers? Sent via
BlackBerry from T-Mobile
kyle, how can I discover what is in the
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
That's an LSI Fusion-MPT controller. Enable:
Device Drivers-[*]
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
That's an LSI
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0: Capabilities={Initiator}
scsi4 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B0, FwRev=h, Ports=1, MaxQ=128, IRQ=16
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 16:34 -0600 schrieb ext Harry Putnam:
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2008 19:53:10 schrieb Harry Putnam:
I happen to be stuck with a machine using an initramfs. Every of attempt
of mine to build a new kernel not using an
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 08:05 +0100 schrieb ext Heinrichs, Dirk
(EXT-Capgemini - DE/Dusseldorf):
I'll extract `exact' messages if you are willing to spend some time
on
this. But I suspect we should begin another thread with a subject
that makes it clear this is about building a
2008/12/8 Kacper Kopczyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
How about you replace the = symbols by '~', such that revision
updates are also alwowed?
I'll try as soon as I fix my laptop. It survived journey across the country,
daily trips by bus...
You probably need scsi and scsi disk support compiled in as well. Everything
associated with accessing the device and the filesystem it contains has to be
compiled in to the kernel and not be a module. The initrd is loaded into
memory and loads the kernel modules (the ones you need to
42 matches
Mail list logo
