Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Jack

On 2022.02.21 14:55, Jack wrote:

On 2/21/22 14:35, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/614866
That is strange.  I just deleted the lpsolve file from my distfiles  
dir, and ran "ebuild path/to/ebuild fetch" and it downloaded just  
fine - but not from  
SRC_URI="http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~scarabeus/${P}.tar.xz;  
(from the ebuild) it actually fetched  
https://mirror.leaseweb.com/gentoo/distfiles/aa/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz.  
I can't figure out where it made the switch in servers.  It does also  
look like the dependency on lpserve in the libreoffice ebuild does  
NOT depend on the libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver setting.


I posted the above to that bug, and asturm pointed out that  
GENTOO_MIRRORS in make.conf is responsible.  So, if you're retrieval  
of  the tarball fails because it can't find the dead site  
dev.gentooexperimental.com, take a look at your GENTOO_MIRRORS settings.




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Am 21. Februar 2022 19:58:00 UTC schrieb Steven Lembark :
>On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:35:23 +0100
>Daniel Pielmeier  wrote:
>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/614866
>
>Bug doesn't address it, but shouldn't using the alternate
>lp library via "coinmp" sidestep the issue?  
>
If you read through the bug you will find that it is addressed, at least 
indirectly.  See comment #4.

If you take a look at the libreoffice ebuild you will  find that the 
sci-mathematics/lpsolve dependency is not controlled by the nlpsolver USE flag. 
This means it depends on it unconditionally.
Only coimp is controllable via flag.
Whether this is correct or not is another issue.

-- 
Best regards
Daniel



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Steven Lembark
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:35:23 +0100
Daniel Pielmeier  wrote:

> https://bugs.gentoo.org/614866

Bug doesn't address it, but shouldn't using the alternate
lp library via "coinmp" sidestep the issue?  


-- 
Steven Lembark
Workhorse Computing
lemb...@wrkhors.com
+1 888 359 3508



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Jack

On 2/21/22 14:35, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/614866
That is strange.  I just deleted the lpsolve file from my distfiles dir, 
and ran "ebuild path/to/ebuild fetch" and it downloaded just fine - but 
not from 
SRC_URI="http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~scarabeus/${P}.tar.xz; (from 
the ebuild) it actually fetched 
https://mirror.leaseweb.com/gentoo/distfiles/aa/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz. 
I can't figure out where it made the switch in servers.  It does also 
look like the dependency on lpserve in the libreoffice ebuild does NOT 
depend on the libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver setting.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Pielmeier

https://bugs.gentoo.org/614866



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Dale
Steven Lembark wrote:
> Need to install libreoffice (welcome to Tax Time!). 
>
> Building either libreoffice or libreoffice-bin failes with
> the same error downloading lpsolve from an
> apparently non-exitant "dev.gentooexperimental.org".
>
> Disabling lpsolve or switching to coinmp, or disabling both, don't
> avoid the issue: lpsolve seems both required and unavailable. 
>
> Q: Any known workaround?
>
> Thanks
>
> (1) Current status of libreoffice
>
> *  app-office/libreoffice
>   Latest version available: 7.2.5.2
>   Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
>   Size of files: 367,553 KiB
>   Homepage:  https://www.libreoffice.org
>   Description:   A full office productivity suite
>   License:   || ( LGPL-3 MPL-1.1 )
>
>
>
> (2) libreoffice use flags should be ignoring lpsolve, I think?
>
> lpsolver is turned off and I've picked coinmp in any case.
> turning off coinmp gets the same result: failure downloading
> lpsolve (see #3, below).
>
> From /etc/portage/pacakge.use/local (whitespace added):
>
> app-office/libreoffice
> pdfimport
> postgres
>  *  coinmp
>  *  -libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver
> -accessibility
> -bluetooth
> -clang
> -firebird
> -googledrive
> -java
> -kde
> -ldap
> -mariadb
>
> # equery uses app-office/libreoffice;
> [ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation]
> [: I - package is installed with flag ]
> [ Colors : set, unset ]
>  * Found these USE flags for app-office/libreoffice-7.2.5.2:
>  U I
>  - - accessibility   : Add support for 
> accessibility (eg 'at-spi' library)
>  - - base: Enable full support 
> for LibreOffice Base databases (involves additional bundled libs) 
>  - - bluetooth   : Enable Bluetooth 
> Support
>  + - branding: Enable Gentoo specific 
> branding
>  - - clang   : Use Clang compiler 
> instead of GCC 
>  *   + - coinmp  : Use sci-libs/coinor-mp 
> as alternative solver 
>  + + cups: Add support for CUPS 
> (Common Unix Printing System)
>  - - custom-cflags   : Build with 
> user-specified CFLAGS (unsupported)
>  + + dbus: Enable dbus support 
> for anything that needs it (gpsd, gnomemeeting, etc)
>  - - debug   : Enable extra debug 
> codepaths, like asserts and extra output. If you want to get meaningful
>backtraces see 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Backtraces
>  - - eds : Enable support for 
> Evolution-Data-Server (EDS)
>  - - firebird: Add support for the 
> Firebird relational database
>  - - googledrive : Enable support for 
> remote files on Google Drive 
>  - - gstreamer   : Add support for 
> media-libs/gstreamer (Streaming media)
>  + + gtk : Add support for 
> x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)
>  - + java: Add support for Java
>  - - kde : Add support for 
> software made by KDE, a free software community
>  - - ldap: Add LDAP support 
> (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol)
>  *   - - libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver: LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
> option to build non-linear solver for calc
>  - - libreoffice_extensions_scripting-beanshell  : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
> option to build beanshell scripts parser
>  - - libreoffice_extensions_scripting-javascript : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
> option to build javascript scripts parser
>  - - libreoffice_extensions_wiki-publisher   : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
> option to build mediawiki integration
>  - - mariadb : Prefer mariadb 
> connector over mysql connector 
>  - - odk : Build the Office 
> Development Kit 
>  + - pdfimport   : Enable PDF import via 
> the Poppler library 
>  + - postgres: Add support for the 
> postgresql database
>  - - python_single_target_python3_10 : Build for Python 3.10 
> only
>  - - python_single_target_python3_8  : Build for Python 3.8 
> only
>  + + python_single_target_python3_9  : Build for Python 3.9 
> 

Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice fails to build, cannot download non-existant ~scarabeus/lpsolve-5.5.2.0.tar.xz ???

2022-02-21 Thread Jack
I'm not sure where experimental anything is coming from.  Do you have 
some overlay set up? How recently have you synced?


I see libreoffice-7.2.5.2-r1 and lpsolve-5.5.2.0 as the only stable 
versions in the main portage tree, and both were re-installed within the 
past three days.


On 2/21/22 13:07, Steven Lembark wrote:

Need to install libreoffice (welcome to Tax Time!).

Building either libreoffice or libreoffice-bin failes with
the same error downloading lpsolve from an
apparently non-exitant "dev.gentooexperimental.org".

Disabling lpsolve or switching to coinmp, or disabling both, don't
avoid the issue: lpsolve seems both required and unavailable.

Q: Any known workaround?

Thanks

(1) Current status of libreoffice

 *  app-office/libreoffice
   Latest version available: 7.2.5.2
   Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
   Size of files: 367,553 KiB
   Homepage:  https://www.libreoffice.org
   Description:   A full office productivity suite
   License:   || ( LGPL-3 MPL-1.1 )



(2) libreoffice use flags should be ignoring lpsolve, I think?

 lpsolver is turned off and I've picked coinmp in any case.
 turning off coinmp gets the same result: failure downloading
 lpsolve (see #3, below).

 From /etc/portage/pacakge.use/local (whitespace added):

 app-office/libreoffice
 pdfimport
 postgres
  *  coinmp
  *  -libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver
 -accessibility
 -bluetooth
 -clang
 -firebird
 -googledrive
 -java
 -kde
 -ldap
 -mariadb

 # equery uses app-office/libreoffice;
 [ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation]
 [: I - package is installed with flag ]
 [ Colors : set, unset ]
  * Found these USE flags for app-office/libreoffice-7.2.5.2:
  U I
  - - accessibility   : Add support for 
accessibility (eg 'at-spi' library)
  - - base: Enable full support for 
LibreOffice Base databases (involves additional bundled libs)
  - - bluetooth   : Enable Bluetooth Support
  + - branding: Enable Gentoo specific 
branding
  - - clang   : Use Clang compiler 
instead of GCC
  *   + - coinmp  : Use sci-libs/coinor-mp 
as alternative solver
  + + cups: Add support for CUPS 
(Common Unix Printing System)
  - - custom-cflags   : Build with 
user-specified CFLAGS (unsupported)
  + + dbus: Enable dbus support for 
anything that needs it (gpsd, gnomemeeting, etc)
  - - debug   : Enable extra debug 
codepaths, like asserts and extra output. If you want to get meaningful
backtraces see 
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Backtraces
  - - eds : Enable support for 
Evolution-Data-Server (EDS)
  - - firebird: Add support for the 
Firebird relational database
  - - googledrive : Enable support for 
remote files on Google Drive
  - - gstreamer   : Add support for 
media-libs/gstreamer (Streaming media)
  + + gtk : Add support for 
x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)
  - + java: Add support for Java
  - - kde : Add support for 
software made by KDE, a free software community
  - - ldap: Add LDAP support 
(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol)
  *   - - libreoffice_extensions_nlpsolver: LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
option to build non-linear solver for calc
  - - libreoffice_extensions_scripting-beanshell  : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
option to build beanshell scripts parser
  - - libreoffice_extensions_scripting-javascript : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
option to build javascript scripts parser
  - - libreoffice_extensions_wiki-publisher   : LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS 
option to build mediawiki integration
  - - mariadb : Prefer mariadb 
connector over mysql connector
  - - odk : Build the Office 
Development Kit
  + - pdfimport   : Enable PDF import via 
the Poppler library
  + - postgres: Add support for the 
postgresql database
  - - python_single_target_python3_10 : Build for Python 3.10 
only
  - - 

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-12 Thread Wols Lists
On 03/03/20 09:36, Michael wrote:
> As a rule I do not have java on my systems.  Before you go recompiling LO to 
> take USE=java out, note that LO uses java for a number of plugins and without 
> it they won't work.  For example, some of database plugins used in LO Base to 
> open and edit SQL databases rely on java.  It's been years since I edited 
> database tables with LO, so I have no use for it at present and this is why 
> I've taken it out.  YMMV.

Java in LO is deprecated. Unfortunately, the old database they are
trying to upgrade from was written in Java, so actually moving forward
and dropping the Java dependency has turned out to be a rather bigger
job than planned ...

Cheers,
Wol



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-04 Thread james

On 3/2/20 6:07 PM, Dale wrote:

Howdy,

I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
problem.� Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
circuits and how something works.� Those pages usually contain text,
pics and such.� I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard.� I then go to
LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is.� Once pasted, I remove
things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
things.� I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
well.� When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
document.� That's how I did it in the past.� When I would paste the
contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
well under a minute for sure.

When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics.� The boxes is
there and text for the link to the image but no image.� It also locks
LOo up for minutes.� If I try to scroll up or down, it locks up again.
Even with all that, it never loads the images.� I end up killing the
process.� I think this started when the 6.3.* versions came out.� I
would normally go back to a older version but those are no longer in the
tree. I'm wondering if a USE flag could make it work again.� I used euse
-i to see what each flag does but I'm not seeing anything that would
change it.� What I think the problem could be, LOo can't reach the
network anymore.� In the past when I pasted content, I could see
activity on the network.� I think LOo was fetching the pics and maybe
even some other info as well.� Thing is, I don't see why it can't now.
Again, USE flag maybe???

Here is the info for libreoffice.


root@fireball / # emerge -av libreoffice

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild�� R�� ~] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2::gentoo� USE="cups 
dbus
gtk java kde mariadb pdfimport -accessibility -bluetooth -branding
-coinmp -debug -eds -firebird -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk2 -ldap -odk
-postgres -test" LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS="-nlpsolver -scripting-beanshell
-scripting-javascript -wiki-publisher" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_6
-python3_7 -python3_8" 233,805 KiB

Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 233,805 KiB

Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] n

Quitting.

root@fireball / # equery list -po libreoffice
 �* Searching for libreoffice ...
[-P-] [� ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.4.2-r1:0
[IP-] [� ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2:0
[-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.:0
[-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-:0
root@fireball / #


Anyone have a clue how to fix this?


I use LO quite a lot; but it is a beast and they are constantly 
'tweaking' small details


SO, you are not alone. If you'll post and example download and a brief 
example guide to what use to work and what does not work now, I'll see 
if I can duplicate the problem. Here is my current LO setup:


 Installed versions:  6.3.4.2-r1^t(02:24:34 AM 02/11/2020)(branding 
cups dbus gstreamer gtk java ldap mariadb odk pdfimport postgres


and

app-office/libreoffice-l10n
 Installed versions:  6.3.4.2... en

I'm interested in more advanced viewing of any and all sorts of 
electrical/electronic file viewing.


curiously,
James



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-03 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 3 March 2020 08:17:27 GMT Dale wrote:
> madscientistatlarge wrote:
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > 
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > 
> > On Monday, March 2, 2020 5:35 PM, Dale  wrote:
> >> Michael wrote:
> >>> On Monday, 2 March 2020 23:07:03 GMT Dale wrote:
>  Howdy,
>  I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
>  problem. Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
>  circuits and how something works. Those pages usually contain text,
>  pics and such. I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
>  include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard. I then go to
>  LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is. Once pasted, I remove
>  things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
>  things. I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
>  well. When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
>  document. That's how I did it in the past. When I would paste the
>  contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
>  well under a minute for sure.
>  When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics. The boxes is
>  there and text for the link to the image but no image. It also locks
> > 
> > 
> > 
>  Thanks.
>  Dale
>  
>  :-) :-)
>  
>  I haven't looked into how LO works, but it may have something to do
>  with the tonne of JavaScript HTML pages contain these days and how
>  this is processed/ filtered. When I try it here it works for small
>  amounts of text/pics, but unlike your LO, I do not have java installed
>  as a dependency.
> >>> 
> >>> An alternative you could try is to save the page as HTML - File/Save
> >>> Page As. Then select one of the options to save it as below, which when
> >>> you open with LO does not take long to process. If you select 'HTML
> >>> page complete' it will save all JS and images in a separate folder,
> >>> which you could delete thereafter, or repurpose as you see fit.
> >> 
> >> Now that helps a LOT.  It works just like it used to work.  Very fast
> >> too.  It took maybe one to two seconds and it was done.  Everything is
> >> there too.
> >> 
> >> It takes a long while to compile LOo but I'm going to try disabling java
> >> just to see if that helps.  I'm not sure what all the page contains but
> >> here's a link to the page I just tested this with.  It's not like it is
> >> some super secret site or anything.
> >> 
> >> https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/waveforms/555-circuits-part-1.html
> >> 
> >> It looks like plain stuff to me but I have no idea what is going on
> >> behind the scene.  Maybe some others will enjoy that site.  It has some
> >> good info and they add stuff pretty regular. 
> >> 
> >> Thanks much.  It's a workaround but at least I can get them copied and
> >> printed now.  ;-)
> >> 
> >> Dale
> >> 
> >> :-)  :-)
> > 
> > One caveat when using print to pdf, you should immediately check the pdf,
> > sometimes it only saves part of the page, not sure why, trying it again
> > seems to usually work.
> Very true.  I always check when printing to pdf.  I've noticed in the
> past that it sometimes leaves out things as well.  One thing about copy
> and pasting it into LOo, if it's there in LOo then it's there when I
> print.  I have had printing from a web browser leave out things tho. 
> 
> It's good info to have tho. 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-) 

As a rule I do not have java on my systems.  Before you go recompiling LO to 
take USE=java out, note that LO uses java for a number of plugins and without 
it they won't work.  For example, some of database plugins used in LO Base to 
open and edit SQL databases rely on java.  It's been years since I edited 
database tables with LO, so I have no use for it at present and this is why 
I've taken it out.  YMMV.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-03 Thread Dale
madscientistatlarge wrote:
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, March 2, 2020 5:35 PM, Dale  wrote:
>
>> Michael wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, 2 March 2020 23:07:03 GMT Dale wrote:
>>>
 Howdy,
 I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
 problem. Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
 circuits and how something works. Those pages usually contain text,
 pics and such. I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
 include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard. I then go to
 LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is. Once pasted, I remove
 things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
 things. I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
 well. When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
 document. That's how I did it in the past. When I would paste the
 contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
 well under a minute for sure.
 When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics. The boxes is
 there and text for the link to the image but no image. It also locks
> 
>
 Thanks.
 Dale
 :-) :-)
 I haven't looked into how LO works, but it may have something to do with 
 the
 tonne of JavaScript HTML pages contain these days and how this is 
 processed/
 filtered. When I try it here it works for small amounts of text/pics, but
 unlike your LO, I do not have java installed as a dependency.
>>> An alternative you could try is to save the page as HTML - File/Save Page 
>>> As.
>>> Then select one of the options to save it as below, which when you open with
>>> LO does not take long to process. If you select 'HTML page complete' it will
>>> save all JS and images in a separate folder, which you could delete
>>> thereafter, or repurpose as you see fit.
>> Now that helps a LOT.  It works just like it used to work.  Very fast
>> too.  It took maybe one to two seconds and it was done.  Everything is
>> there too.
>>
>> It takes a long while to compile LOo but I'm going to try disabling java
>> just to see if that helps.  I'm not sure what all the page contains but
>> here's a link to the page I just tested this with.  It's not like it is
>> some super secret site or anything.
>>
>> https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/waveforms/555-circuits-part-1.html
>>
>> It looks like plain stuff to me but I have no idea what is going on
>> behind the scene.  Maybe some others will enjoy that site.  It has some
>> good info and they add stuff pretty regular. 
>>
>> Thanks much.  It's a workaround but at least I can get them copied and
>> printed now.  ;-)
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
> One caveat when using print to pdf, you should immediately check the pdf, 
> sometimes it only saves part of the page, not sure why, trying it again seems 
> to usually work.
>
>


Very true.  I always check when printing to pdf.  I've noticed in the
past that it sometimes leaves out things as well.  One thing about copy
and pasting it into LOo, if it's there in LOo then it's there when I
print.  I have had printing from a web browser leave out things tho. 

It's good info to have tho. 

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-02 Thread madscientistatlarge




Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, March 2, 2020 5:35 PM, Dale  wrote:

> Michael wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 2 March 2020 23:07:03 GMT Dale wrote:
> >
> > > Howdy,
> > > I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
> > > problem. Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
> > > circuits and how something works. Those pages usually contain text,
> > > pics and such. I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
> > > include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard. I then go to
> > > LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is. Once pasted, I remove
> > > things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
> > > things. I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
> > > well. When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
> > > document. That's how I did it in the past. When I would paste the
> > > contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
> > > well under a minute for sure.
> > > When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics. The boxes is
> > > there and text for the link to the image but no image. It also locks



> > > Thanks.
> > > Dale
> > > :-) :-)
> > > I haven't looked into how LO works, but it may have something to do with 
> > > the
> > > tonne of JavaScript HTML pages contain these days and how this is 
> > > processed/
> > > filtered. When I try it here it works for small amounts of text/pics, but
> > > unlike your LO, I do not have java installed as a dependency.
> >
> > An alternative you could try is to save the page as HTML - File/Save Page 
> > As.
> > Then select one of the options to save it as below, which when you open with
> > LO does not take long to process. If you select 'HTML page complete' it will
> > save all JS and images in a separate folder, which you could delete
> > thereafter, or repurpose as you see fit.
>
> Now that helps a LOT.  It works just like it used to work.  Very fast
> too.  It took maybe one to two seconds and it was done.  Everything is
> there too.
>
> It takes a long while to compile LOo but I'm going to try disabling java
> just to see if that helps.  I'm not sure what all the page contains but
> here's a link to the page I just tested this with.  It's not like it is
> some super secret site or anything.
>
> https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/waveforms/555-circuits-part-1.html
>
> It looks like plain stuff to me but I have no idea what is going on
> behind the scene.  Maybe some others will enjoy that site.  It has some
> good info and they add stuff pretty regular. 
>
> Thanks much.  It's a workaround but at least I can get them copied and
> printed now.  ;-)
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)

One caveat when using print to pdf, you should immediately check the pdf, 
sometimes it only saves part of the page, not sure why, trying it again seems 
to usually work.



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-02 Thread Dale
Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 2 March 2020 23:07:03 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
>> problem.  Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
>> circuits and how something works.  Those pages usually contain text,
>> pics and such.  I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
>> include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard.  I then go to
>> LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is.  Once pasted, I remove
>> things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
>> things.  I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
>> well.  When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
>> document.  That's how I did it in the past.  When I would paste the
>> contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
>> well under a minute for sure. 
>>
>> When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics.  The boxes is
>> there and text for the link to the image but no image.  It also locks
>> LOo up for minutes.  If I try to scroll up or down, it locks up again. 
>> Even with all that, it never loads the images.  I end up killing the
>> process.  I think this started when the 6.3.* versions came out.  I
>> would normally go back to a older version but those are no longer in the
>> tree. I'm wondering if a USE flag could make it work again.  I used euse
>> -i to see what each flag does but I'm not seeing anything that would
>> change it.  What I think the problem could be, LOo can't reach the
>> network anymore.  In the past when I pasted content, I could see
>> activity on the network.  I think LOo was fetching the pics and maybe
>> even some other info as well.  Thing is, I don't see why it can't now. 
>> Again, USE flag maybe???
>>
>> Here is the info for libreoffice.
>>
>>
>> root@fireball / # emerge -av libreoffice
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild   R   ~] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2::gentoo  USE="cups dbus
>> gtk java kde mariadb pdfimport -accessibility -bluetooth -branding
>> -coinmp -debug -eds -firebird -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk2 -ldap -odk
>> -postgres -test" LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS="-nlpsolver -scripting-beanshell
>> -scripting-javascript -wiki-publisher" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_6
>> -python3_7 -python3_8" 233,805 KiB
>>
>> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 233,805 KiB
>>
>> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] n
>>
>> Quitting.
>>
>> root@fireball / # equery list -po libreoffice
>>  * Searching for libreoffice ...
>> [-P-] [  ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.4.2-r1:0
>> [IP-] [  ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2:0
>> [-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.:0
>> [-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-:0
>> root@fireball / #
>>
>>
>> Anyone have a clue how to fix this? 
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-) 
> I haven't looked into how LO works, but it may have something to do with the 
> tonne of JavaScript HTML pages contain these days and how this is processed/
> filtered.  When I try it here it works for small amounts of text/pics, but 
> unlike your LO, I do not have java installed as a dependency.
>
> An alternative you could try is to save the page as HTML - File/Save Page As. 
>  
> Then select one of the options to save it as below, which when you open with 
> LO does not take long to process.  If you select 'HTML page complete' it will 
> save all JS and images in a separate folder, which you could delete 
> thereafter, or repurpose as you see fit.

Now that helps a LOT.  It works just like it used to work.  Very fast
too.  It took maybe one to two seconds and it was done.  Everything is
there too.

It takes a long while to compile LOo but I'm going to try disabling java
just to see if that helps.  I'm not sure what all the page contains but
here's a link to the page I just tested this with.  It's not like it is
some super secret site or anything.

https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/waveforms/555-circuits-part-1.html

It looks like plain stuff to me but I have no idea what is going on
behind the scene.  Maybe some others will enjoy that site.  It has some
good info and they add stuff pretty regular. 

Thanks much.  It's a workaround but at least I can get them copied and
printed now.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and pasting HTML from web pages.

2020-03-02 Thread Michael
On Monday, 2 March 2020 23:07:03 GMT Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> I don't use LOo a whole lot but several months ago, I noticed a
> problem.  Sometimes I go to a electronic type website that has info on
> circuits and how something works.  Those pages usually contain text,
> pics and such.  I highlight what contains the info I want, which may
> include some things I don't, then copy it to my clipboard.  I then go to
> LOo and paste it as HTML since that's what it is.  Once pasted, I remove
> things I don't want, such as social media icons and other unwanted
> things.  I also make some images larger, make text larger and such as
> well.  When I get it right, I print it as a pdf file or save it as a LOo
> document.  That's how I did it in the past.  When I would paste the
> contents, it would include images and all and would be done in seconds,
> well under a minute for sure. 
> 
> When I paste the content now, it doesn't include pics.  The boxes is
> there and text for the link to the image but no image.  It also locks
> LOo up for minutes.  If I try to scroll up or down, it locks up again. 
> Even with all that, it never loads the images.  I end up killing the
> process.  I think this started when the 6.3.* versions came out.  I
> would normally go back to a older version but those are no longer in the
> tree. I'm wondering if a USE flag could make it work again.  I used euse
> -i to see what each flag does but I'm not seeing anything that would
> change it.  What I think the problem could be, LOo can't reach the
> network anymore.  In the past when I pasted content, I could see
> activity on the network.  I think LOo was fetching the pics and maybe
> even some other info as well.  Thing is, I don't see why it can't now. 
> Again, USE flag maybe???
> 
> Here is the info for libreoffice.
> 
> 
> root@fireball / # emerge -av libreoffice
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild   R   ~] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2::gentoo  USE="cups dbus
> gtk java kde mariadb pdfimport -accessibility -bluetooth -branding
> -coinmp -debug -eds -firebird -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk2 -ldap -odk
> -postgres -test" LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS="-nlpsolver -scripting-beanshell
> -scripting-javascript -wiki-publisher" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_6
> -python3_7 -python3_8" 233,805 KiB
> 
> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 233,805 KiB
> 
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] n
> 
> Quitting.
> 
> root@fireball / # equery list -po libreoffice
>  * Searching for libreoffice ...
> [-P-] [  ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.4.2-r1:0
> [IP-] [  ] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.5.2:0
> [-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-6.3.:0
> [-P-] [ -] app-office/libreoffice-:0
> root@fireball / #
> 
> 
> Anyone have a clue how to fix this? 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-) 

I haven't looked into how LO works, but it may have something to do with the 
tonne of JavaScript HTML pages contain these days and how this is processed/
filtered.  When I try it here it works for small amounts of text/pics, but 
unlike your LO, I do not have java installed as a dependency.

An alternative you could try is to save the page as HTML - File/Save Page As.  
Then select one of the options to save it as below, which when you open with 
LO does not take long to process.  If you select 'HTML page complete' it will 
save all JS and images in a separate folder, which you could delete 
thereafter, or repurpose as you see fit.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and copying web pages

2019-04-30 Thread Dale
Jack wrote:
> On 2019.04.30 18:12, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> As some know, I got a printer.  Now I'm trying to get some info and
>> print it using LOo for the most part.  This is the way I do this.  I go
>> to a web page, sites will vary, and I highlight what I want and copy it
>> to the clipboard.  I then go to LOo and paste it as HTML, since that is
>> what it is.  At that point, LOo fetches things like pics and such to
>> place on the document.  It takes a little time and I avoid copying
>> videos since it can't print a video.  For the most part, this works
>> great.  It takes a minute or so to fetch the pics and such and
>> everything looks fine.  I remove anything I don't want such as ads and
>> such.  Basically, it looks like the web page but I can edit it to make
>> fonts larger etc.  However, sometimes it doesn't work.
>
> [snip ..]
>
> One important thing to remember is that when you copy/paste part of a
> web page, it is not a complete HTML document, but only part of one. 
> There are lots of things you probably didn't copy, many of which are
> not actually visible, such as css definitions, for example.  You may
> also end up with invalid HTML if what you copied does not have
> correctly matched opening and closing tags for all the parts you
> copied.  When I do this type of thing to get a good print, I do a
> "Save as..." in the browser, and then open the HTML doc in LO and
> delete what I don't want.  I also sometimes try saving as a plain LO
> doc, instead of HTML, but always saving a copy before I make that
> change, as I've found it has an inconsistent effect - depending
> (probably) on how the original HTML was created.  A lot of web pages
> seem to have been created by tools which create very convoluted HTML,
> often with lots of javascript assisting in the layout, and I don't
> believe that LO can do anything with js (although I'm not absolutely
> certain about that.)
>
> I'm sure others will have more concrete suggestions.
>
> Jack
>


That may explain why a lot of pages work and others don't.  Some pages
may not contain things that LOo has trouble figuring out while other
pages have things that just plain doesn't work.  I'm trying to save a
page and opening it locally, assuming it will store the pics and such
locally as well.  Maybe that will also help LOo to load things up
correctly. 

I noticed something on a page I tried since I started this thread.  When
I scroll to something that isn't loaded, it starts to downloading
whatever is missing and freezes up.  Thing is, it downloads for a long
time but never actually fetches the pic that is missing.  If things are
broken from LOo's point of view as you point out, that may explain why
it is having trouble rendering the doc since it can't fetch some info on
certain pages. 

Let me try this and see if that helps.  You gave me a couple different
ways to test out.  I hadn't thought of doing it those ways.  It's extra
steps but once I get it, I got it for good. 

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice and copying web pages

2019-04-30 Thread Jack

On 2019.04.30 18:12, Dale wrote:

Howdy,

As some know, I got a printer.  Now I'm trying to get some info and
print it using LOo for the most part.  This is the way I do this.  I  
go
to a web page, sites will vary, and I highlight what I want and copy  
it
to the clipboard.  I then go to LOo and paste it as HTML, since that  
is

what it is.  At that point, LOo fetches things like pics and such to
place on the document.  It takes a little time and I avoid copying
videos since it can't print a video.  For the most part, this works
great.  It takes a minute or so to fetch the pics and such and
everything looks fine.  I remove anything I don't want such as ads and
such.  Basically, it looks like the web page but I can edit it to make
fonts larger etc.  However, sometimes it doesn't work.


[snip ..]

One important thing to remember is that when you copy/paste part of a  
web page, it is not a complete HTML document, but only part of one.   
There are lots of things you probably didn't copy, many of which are  
not actually visible, such as css definitions, for example.  You may  
also end up with invalid HTML if what you copied does not have  
correctly matched opening and closing tags for all the parts you  
copied.  When I do this type of thing to get a good print, I do a "Save  
as..." in the browser, and then open the HTML doc in LO and delete what  
I don't want.  I also sometimes try saving as a plain LO doc, instead  
of HTML, but always saving a copy before I make that change, as I've  
found it has an inconsistent effect - depending (probably) on how the  
original HTML was created.  A lot of web pages seem to have been  
created by tools which create very convoluted HTML, often with lots of  
javascript assisting in the layout, and I don't believe that LO can do  
anything with js (although I'm not absolutely certain about that.)


I'm sure others will have more concrete suggestions.

Jack


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-6.1.5.2 compile fails with 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)'

2019-02-18 Thread Mick
On Monday, 18 February 2019 14:25:21 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello again, Mick.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 14:21:05 +, Mick wrote:

> > Thank you Alan, I assume you do not have USE="mysql" enabled?  Other
> > systems without this flag compile fine.
> 
> I've just checked.  Indeed, I don't have mysql enabled.

Right, I've discovered it's the stable dev-db/mysql-connector-c++-1.1.9 which 
makes the difference, so without USE="mysql" or with a more recent version of 
mysql-connector-c++ the compilation succeeds.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-6.1.5.2 compile fails with 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)'

2019-02-18 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hello again, Mick.

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 14:21:05 +, Mick wrote:
> On Monday, 18 February 2019 14:14:41 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, Mick.

> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:23:08 +, Mick wrote:
> > > Hi All,

> > > I've come across this 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)' and don't
> > > know

> > > how to proceed.  I couldn't find a bug report:
> > [  ]

> > For what it's worth, I've just built LO-6.1.5.2, and it built without
> > problems.

> Thank you Alan, I assume you do not have USE="mysql" enabled?  Other systems 
> without this flag compile fine.  

I've just checked.  Indeed, I don't have mysql enabled.

> -- 
> Regards,
> Mick

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-6.1.5.2 compile fails with 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)'

2019-02-18 Thread Mick
On Monday, 18 February 2019 14:14:41 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Mick.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:23:08 +, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I've come across this 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)' and don't
> > know
> 
> > how to proceed.  I couldn't find a bug report:
> [  ]
> 
> For what it's worth, I've just built LO-6.1.5.2, and it built without
> problems.

Thank you Alan, I assume you do not have USE="mysql" enabled?  Other systems 
without this flag compile fine.  
-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-6.1.5.2 compile fails with 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)'

2019-02-18 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hello, Mick.

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:23:08 +, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,

> I've come across this 'MEMORY_ALLOC_OPERATORS(SQLException)' and don't know 
> how to proceed.  I couldn't find a bug report:

[  ]

For what it's worth, I've just built LO-6.1.5.2, and it built without
problems.

> -- 
> Regards,
> Mick

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice 6

2018-09-04 Thread james
On 9/4/18 4:25 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 21:08, james  wrote:
>> So where do I set the default file type (.doc) for save?
> 
> Possibly in
> Tools -> Options -> Load/Save -> General

Yea it's there; but I have not yet found how to make it permanent (default).



> 
>> did I miss a flag or extra module for this traditional behavior
>> to set automatically. ?
> 
> I don't seem to have anything special in my compile settings for
> libreoffice, so I don't think so. Interestingly, I don't have any of
> the three options you list, it's suspicious that all of them are some
> kind of 'drawing' format...
> 

It a pdf government form. Libreoffice has a whole bunch of graphics
boxes along the left hand side, so I guess those defaults are do
to how the (pdf) file creator set defaults. Gotta test on a blank
text from.

Testing a raw (newly created) text file does give a differnet list
of file save options.

(gasp) I guess I just gott bite the bullet and sink a couple hours into
this 6.x libreoffice.  I was back a few version on LO-5.x, just for this
reason.

thx for the help.

James


> Cheers,
> Arve
> 
> 




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice 6

2018-09-04 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 21:08, james  wrote:
> So where do I set the default file type (.doc) for save?

Possibly in
Tools -> Options -> Load/Save -> General

> did I miss a flag or extra module for this traditional behavior
> to set automatically. ?

I don't seem to have anything special in my compile settings for
libreoffice, so I don't think so. Interestingly, I don't have any of
the three options you list, it's suspicious that all of them are some
kind of 'drawing' format...

Cheers,
Arve



Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Andrew Udvare
On 07/25/2018 06:34 AM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 2018-07-25, at 04:41, Neil Bothwick  wrote:
>>
>> Those are all kdepim packages, I run KDE without KMail and the only
>> package that depends on openldap is LO.
> 
> Figured out the patch. I have attached it. It does not fix the ebuild, but it 
> does make LibreOffice build without the LDAP plugin. This makes it possible 
> to have optional LDAP support.
> 
> In the -bin package I think it would be possible to remove this dependency by 
> removing the ldapbe2 files and fixing any generated plugin registry data.
> 
> Andrew
> 

Pull request here: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9351



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Daniel Frey
On 07/25/18 10:22, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that gentoo should behave the same way using the global
> flags,  Isn't that the point of having 4 billion flags, more than any
> human could remember and keep track of.  Are they all documented
> somewhere, anywhere?  i've seen the official list, a bit sparse on just
> what they do and why you would want to use some of them.

I don't know about a global list (and I've found some global flags that
could be used aren't used on some packages, leading to two flags that do
the same thing) but using `equery uses ` is usually detailed
enough to figure out what they do on a per-package basis.

Dan



Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread mad.scientist.at.large
Several years ago i was using opensuse, I really like the way you could block 
dependencies so that in the future it would ask if you wanted to "break" an 
install by not installing the dependencies that you don't want to ever load, 
like zeroconfig/avahi, packages that i didn't need, or want and that are 
dangerous security wise.  

It seems to me that gentoo should behave the same way using the global flags,  
Isn't that the point of having 4 billion flags, more than any human could 
remember and keep track of.  Are they all documented somewhere, anywhere?  i've 
seen the official list, a bit sparse on just what they do and why you would 
want to use some of them.

"We kill when we close our eyes to poverty, affliction or infamy. We kill when, 
because it is easier, we countenance or pretend to approve of atrophied social, 
political, educational and religious institutions instead of resolutely 
combating them."
- Hesse

25. Jul 2018 02:34 by pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk :


> On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 16:15:29 BST Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>  I'm in the process of installing LibreOffice. Doing:
>>
>>  emerge --ask libreoffice
>>
>> gives a big list of dependencies, as I would expect. One of them is
>> openldap. I thought that that was a bit strange, as I am a home user,
>> not corporate so I tried to turn it off. I placed a "-ldap" in
>> make.conf, I don't want it anywhere, but it still appeared in the
>> dependency list. A google search turned up this bug:
>>
>>  >> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 
>> 
>>
>> which says, if I've read it correctly, that LDAP is not in LibreOffice
>> anymore. If this is the case, why is there a dependency,
>>
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/app-office/libreoffice/libreo 
>> 
>> ffice-6.0.5.2-r1.ebuild
>>
>> line 136 - I may have misread this bit, I'm just starting to read the
>> whole ebuild doco.
>>
>>  Anyone got any insight?
>>
>>  Andrew
>
> If you run a KDE desktop it's a lot more than LibreOffice:
>
> $ equery d openldap
>  * These packages depend on openldap:
> --->8
> kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3 (net-nds/openldap)
> --->8
>
> $ equery d kldap
>  * These packages depend on kldap:
> kde-apps/incidenceeditor-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/kdepim-meta-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3)
> kde-apps/kmail-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/kmail-account-wizard-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/korganizer-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/libkdepim-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/messagelib-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
>
> Seems to be no way out of it.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Andrew Udvare


> On 2018-07-25, at 04:41, Neil Bothwick  wrote:
> 
> Those are all kdepim packages, I run KDE without KMail and the only
> package that depends on openldap is LO.

Figured out the patch. I have attached it. It does not fix the ebuild, but it 
does make LibreOffice build without the LDAP plugin. This makes it possible to 
have optional LDAP support.

In the -bin package I think it would be possible to remove this dependency by 
removing the ldapbe2 files and fixing any generated plugin registry data.

Andrew



no-ldapbe2.patch
Description: Binary data


Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Andrew Udvare



> On 2018-07-25, at 04:41, Neil Bothwick  wrote:
> 
> Those are all kdepim packages, I run KDE without KMail and the only
> package that depends on openldap is LO.


Same here. I have global USE "-ldap -openldap" (shouldn't the latter be fixed 
in dev-libs/cyrus-sasl ?). There is no way to avoid OpenLDAP when LibreOffice 
is installed. On my system this is the only package calling for it.

app-office/libreoffice-6.0.5.2-r1 (net-nds/openldap)

I did find that LibreOffice has one file that needs it:

 $ readelf -d /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/libldapbe2lo.so

Dynamic section at offset 0xed10 contains 35 entries:
  TagType Name/Value
 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libldap-2.4.so.2]

This stands for LDAP backend (2), a plugin that does that. Seems to be loaded 
on demand at runtime (using the component registry), and otherwise should be 
removable but that would need a patch. Maybe it's just to remove this line 
prior to building?

https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/blob/5a74884e7da4c497c4ea714bf84d62b55ed82cfe/Repository.mk#L395

Andrew


Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:34:09 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> If you run a KDE desktop it's a lot more than LibreOffice:
> 
> $ equery d openldap
>  * These packages depend on openldap:
> --->8  
> kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3 (net-nds/openldap)
> --->8  
> 
> $ equery d kldap
>  * These packages depend on kldap:
> kde-apps/incidenceeditor-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/kdepim-meta-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3)
> kde-apps/kmail-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/kmail-account-wizard-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/korganizer-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/libkdepim-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> kde-apps/messagelib-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
> 
> Seems to be no way out of it.

Those are all kdepim packages, I run KDE without KMail and the only
package that depends on openldap is LO.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

And what else floats.?


pgpeQXG7wbI4H.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 16:15:29 BST Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>   I'm in the process of installing LibreOffice. Doing:
> 
>   emerge --ask libreoffice
> 
> gives a big list of dependencies, as I would expect. One of them is
> openldap. I thought that that was a bit strange, as I am a home user,
> not corporate so I tried to turn it off. I placed a "-ldap" in
> make.conf, I don't want it anywhere, but it still appeared in the
> dependency list. A google search turned up this bug:
> 
>   https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57417
> 
> which says, if I've read it correctly, that LDAP is not in LibreOffice
> anymore. If this is the case, why is there a dependency,
> 
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/app-office/libreoffice/libreo
> ffice-6.0.5.2-r1.ebuild
> 
> line 136 - I may have misread this bit, I'm just starting to read the
> whole ebuild doco.
> 
>   Anyone got any insight?
> 
>   Andrew

If you run a KDE desktop it's a lot more than LibreOffice:

$ equery d openldap
 * These packages depend on openldap:
--->8
kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3 (net-nds/openldap)
--->8

$ equery d kldap
 * These packages depend on kldap:
kde-apps/incidenceeditor-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
kde-apps/kdepim-meta-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3)
kde-apps/kmail-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
kde-apps/kmail-account-wizard-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
kde-apps/korganizer-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
kde-apps/libkdepim-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)
kde-apps/messagelib-17.12.3 (>=kde-apps/kldap-17.12.3:5)

Seems to be no way out of it.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.






Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice and openldap

2018-07-24 Thread Francesco Turco
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17.15.29 CEST Andrew Lowe wrote:
>   Anyone got any insight?

Upstream bug: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71538

-- 
https://fturco.gitlab.com/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

2018-01-21 Thread Wols Lists
On 20/01/18 01:11, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 05:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> The strange part is that on the same box I created a new "user" and
>> Libreoffice works just fine.
>> But it will not work when I log in.
>>
>> I've deleted the folder setting. /home/joseph/.config/libreoffice/
>> and copied the same folder from new user directory back to my directory.
>> Libreofice still will not start.
>>
>> Joseph
> 
> Additional information.
> When I try to start soffice help I'm getting this error
> 
> soffice --help
> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
> 
> (process:24269): dconf-CRITICAL **: unable to create file 
> '/var/run/user/1000/dconf/user': Permission denied.  dconf will not work 
> properly.
> LibreOffice 5.4.2.2.0 40m0(Build:2)
> 
> This error does not show up when I run it as new user that I just created.
> 
> 
This is intuition, not knowledge, but /var/run is, I think, stuff that
should appear when you log in, and disappear when you log out.

Log out, log in as root (or su from another user) and see if
/var/run/user/1000 exists. Rename it to something else in case you need
the contents, and then see if libreoffice works.

If everything seems okay, get rid of the old version

(My system has multiple users, I'm the only person logged in, and folder
1000 (my user-id) is the only one there. I guess somehow some old file
has got "stuck" and needs deleting.)

Cheers,
Wol



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

2018-01-19 Thread thelma
On 01/19/2018 05:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
[snip]
> 
> The strange part is that on the same box I created a new "user" and
> Libreoffice works just fine.
> But it will not work when I log in.
> 
> I've deleted the folder setting. /home/joseph/.config/libreoffice/
> and copied the same folder from new user directory back to my directory.
> Libreofice still will not start.
> 
> Joseph

Additional information.
When I try to start soffice help I'm getting this error

soffice --help
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.

(process:24269): dconf-CRITICAL **: unable to create file 
'/var/run/user/1000/dconf/user': Permission denied.  dconf will not work 
properly.
LibreOffice 5.4.2.2.0 40m0(Build:2)

This error does not show up when I run it as new user that I just created.



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

2018-01-19 Thread thelma



Thelma
On 01/17/2018 04:06 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice
> [ebuild   R   ] app-office/libreoffice-5.4.2.2  USE="bluetooth branding cups 
> dbus gnome gtk java mysql (-coinmp) -collada -debug -eds (-firebird) -gltf 
> -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk3 -jemalloc -kde -libressl -odk -pdfimport 
> -postgres -quickstarter {-test} -vlc" LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS="-nlpsolver 
> -scripting-beanshell -scripting-javascript -wiki-publisher" 
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 -python2_7 -python3_4 -python3_6" 
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_5 -python3_4 -python3_6"
> 
> 
> Post wgetpaste link of libreoffice build log
> What does it do?  When I try: 
> wgetpaste 
> /var/log/portage/app-office\:libreoffice-5.4.2.2\:20180116-202656.log
> 
> There is no output. This file is very large.
> 
> When I run:
> strace -o libreoffice.txt -f soffice libreoffice 
> The output "time out on":
> 
> ...
> 2238  connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, 
> sun_path="/tmp/OSL_PIPE_1000_SingleOfficeIPC_db1e7eee18c324ec912d5118a2d21af"},
>  110 
> 2250  <... futex resumed> ) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
> 2250  futex(0x7f77a3827840, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
> 2250  futex(0x7f77a3827ad0, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET_PRIVATE|FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, 
> 0, {tv_sec=1516203792, tv_nsec=525188000}, 0x) = -1 ETIMEDOUT 
> (Connection timed out)
> 
> Joseph
> 
[snip]

The strange part is that on the same box I created a new "user" and
Libreoffice works just fine.
But it will not work when I log in.

I've deleted the folder setting. /home/joseph/.config/libreoffice/
and copied the same folder from new user directory back to my directory.
Libreofice still will not start.

Joseph



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

2018-01-17 Thread thelma
emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/libreoffice-5.4.2.2  USE="bluetooth branding cups 
dbus gnome gtk java mysql (-coinmp) -collada -debug -eds (-firebird) -gltf 
-googledrive -gstreamer -gtk3 -jemalloc -kde -libressl -odk -pdfimport 
-postgres -quickstarter {-test} -vlc" LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS="-nlpsolver 
-scripting-beanshell -scripting-javascript -wiki-publisher" 
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 -python2_7 -python3_4 -python3_6" 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_5 -python3_4 -python3_6"


Post wgetpaste link of libreoffice build log
What does it do?  When I try: 
wgetpaste /var/log/portage/app-office\:libreoffice-5.4.2.2\:20180116-202656.log

There is no output. This file is very large.

When I run:
strace -o libreoffice.txt -f soffice libreoffice 
The output "time out on":

...
2238  connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, 
sun_path="/tmp/OSL_PIPE_1000_SingleOfficeIPC_db1e7eee18c324ec912d5118a2d21af"}, 
110 
2250  <... futex resumed> ) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
2250  futex(0x7f77a3827840, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
2250  futex(0x7f77a3827ad0, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET_PRIVATE|FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, 
{tv_sec=1516203792, tv_nsec=525188000}, 0x) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection 
timed out)

Joseph

On 01/17/2018 03:33 PM, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> What is output of `emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice`?
> 
> Post wgetpaste link of libreoffice build log.
> 
> On 01/16/2018 11:44 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> When I try to start "libreoffice" it will not start, not even from
>> command line. No errors, nothing.
>>
>> Portage 2.3.13 (python 3.5.4-final-0, default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop,
>> gcc-6.4.0, glibc-2.25-r9, 4.9.72-gentoo x86_64)
>> =
>> System uname:
>> Linux-4.9.72-gentoo-x86_64-AMD_Ryzen_5_1400_Quad-Core_Processor-with-gentoo-2.4.1
>> KiB Mem:16432224 total,  14618724 free
>> KiB Swap: 524284 total,524284 free
>> Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:30:01 +
>> Head commit of repository gentoo: 2afd3441b99e18681bfeda82185e6abfe59182aa
>> sh bash 4.4_p12
>> ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.29.1 p3) 2.29.1
>> app-shells/bash:  4.4_p12::gentoo
>> dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0-r3::gentoo
>> dev-lang/perl:5.24.3::gentoo
>> dev-lang/python:  2.7.14-r1::gentoo, 3.5.4-r1::gentoo
>> dev-util/cmake:   3.9.6::gentoo
>> dev-util/pkgconfig:   0.29.2::gentoo
>> sys-apps/baselayout:  2.4.1-r2::gentoo
>> sys-apps/openrc:  0.34.11::gentoo
>> sys-apps/sandbox: 2.10-r4::gentoo
>> sys-devel/autoconf:   2.13::gentoo, 2.69-r4::gentoo
>> sys-devel/automake:   1.11.6-r2::gentoo, 1.15.1-r1::gentoo
>> sys-devel/binutils:   2.29.1-r1::gentoo
>> sys-devel/gcc:5.4.0-r4::gentoo, 6.4.0-r1::gentoo
>> sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.8-r1::gentoo
>> sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6-r3::gentoo
>> sys-devel/make:   4.2.1::gentoo
>> sys-kernel/linux-headers: 4.13::gentoo (virtual/os-headers)
>> sys-libs/glibc:   2.25-r9::gentoo
>> Repositories:
>>
>> gentoo
>> location: /usr/portage
>> sync-type: rsync
>> sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
>> priority: -1000
>> sync-rsync-extra-opts:
>>
>> brother-overlay
>> location: /var/lib/layman/brother-overlay
>> masters: gentoo
>> priority: 50
>>
>> Local
>> location: /usr/local/portage
>> masters: gentoo
>> priority: 
>>
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
>> ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA googleearth PUEL dlj-1.1 Oracle-BCLA-JavaSE"
>> CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
>> CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
>> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
>> CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/fax
>> /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc /usr/share/easy-rsa
>> /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/spool/fax/etc"
>> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d
>> /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release
>> /etc/php/apache2-php5.6/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.6/ext-active/
>> /etc/php/cli-php5.6/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d
>> /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d
>> /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c"
>> CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
>> DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
>> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask-write=y --keep-going --with-bdeps=y"
>> FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
>> FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs collision-protect
>> config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync
>> multilib-strict news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox
>> sfperms strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans
>> userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync xattr"
>> FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
>> GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gentoo-distfiles/
>> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/
>> ftp://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gentoo-distfiles/
>> http://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/download/gentoo-mirror/
>> 

Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice-5.4.2.2 fails to start

2018-01-17 Thread Jalus Bilieyich
What is output of `emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice`?

Post wgetpaste link of libreoffice build log.

On 01/16/2018 11:44 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> When I try to start "libreoffice" it will not start, not even from
> command line. No errors, nothing.
> 
> Portage 2.3.13 (python 3.5.4-final-0, default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop,
> gcc-6.4.0, glibc-2.25-r9, 4.9.72-gentoo x86_64)
> =
> System uname:
> Linux-4.9.72-gentoo-x86_64-AMD_Ryzen_5_1400_Quad-Core_Processor-with-gentoo-2.4.1
> KiB Mem:16432224 total,  14618724 free
> KiB Swap: 524284 total,524284 free
> Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:30:01 +
> Head commit of repository gentoo: 2afd3441b99e18681bfeda82185e6abfe59182aa
> sh bash 4.4_p12
> ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.29.1 p3) 2.29.1
> app-shells/bash:  4.4_p12::gentoo
> dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0-r3::gentoo
> dev-lang/perl:5.24.3::gentoo
> dev-lang/python:  2.7.14-r1::gentoo, 3.5.4-r1::gentoo
> dev-util/cmake:   3.9.6::gentoo
> dev-util/pkgconfig:   0.29.2::gentoo
> sys-apps/baselayout:  2.4.1-r2::gentoo
> sys-apps/openrc:  0.34.11::gentoo
> sys-apps/sandbox: 2.10-r4::gentoo
> sys-devel/autoconf:   2.13::gentoo, 2.69-r4::gentoo
> sys-devel/automake:   1.11.6-r2::gentoo, 1.15.1-r1::gentoo
> sys-devel/binutils:   2.29.1-r1::gentoo
> sys-devel/gcc:5.4.0-r4::gentoo, 6.4.0-r1::gentoo
> sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.8-r1::gentoo
> sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6-r3::gentoo
> sys-devel/make:   4.2.1::gentoo
> sys-kernel/linux-headers: 4.13::gentoo (virtual/os-headers)
> sys-libs/glibc:   2.25-r9::gentoo
> Repositories:
> 
> gentoo
> location: /usr/portage
> sync-type: rsync
> sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
> priority: -1000
> sync-rsync-extra-opts:
> 
> brother-overlay
> location: /var/lib/layman/brother-overlay
> masters: gentoo
> priority: 50
> 
> Local
> location: /usr/local/portage
> masters: gentoo
> priority: 
> 
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
> ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA googleearth PUEL dlj-1.1 Oracle-BCLA-JavaSE"
> CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/fax
> /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc /usr/share/easy-rsa
> /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/spool/fax/etc"
> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d
> /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release
> /etc/php/apache2-php5.6/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.6/ext-active/
> /etc/php/cli-php5.6/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d
> /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d
> /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c"
> CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
> DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask-write=y --keep-going --with-bdeps=y"
> FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
> FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs collision-protect
> config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync
> multilib-strict news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox
> sfperms strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans
> userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync xattr"
> FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
> GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gentoo-distfiles/
> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/
> ftp://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/gentoo-distfiles/
> http://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/download/gentoo-mirror/
> ftp://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/gentoo-mirror/
> ftp://ftp.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mirrors/gentoo/
> http://ftp.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mirrors/gentoo/;
> LANG="en_US.utf8"
> LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed"
> LINGUAS="en"
> MAKEOPTS="-j7 -l8"
> PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
> PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/"
> PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times
> --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats
> --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local
> --exclude=/packages --exclude=/.git"
> PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
> USE="X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 apache2 bluetooth branding bzip2 cairo
> cdda cdr cgi cli consolekit crypt cups cxx dbus dri dts dvd dvdr emboss
> encode exif fam firefox flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gimp gimpprint
> glamor gnome gpm gtk iconv ipv6 jpeg kpathsea lcms ldap libnotify mad
> mng modules mp3 mp4 mpeg multilib mysql ncurses nls nptl ogg opengl
> openmp pam pango pcre pdf png policykit ppds qt3support qt5 qtk readline
> scanner sdl seccomp spell ssl startup-notification svg tcpd tetex tiff
> truetype type1 udev udisks unicode upower usb vorbis wxwidgets x264
> xattr xcb xml xv xvid zlib" ABI_X86="64" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000
> atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938
> es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio
> via82xx via82xx-modem 

Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice and java.

2017-05-19 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Bill Kenworthy  wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying use some java based plugins with libreoffice.
>
> libreoffice is compiled with the java use flag, both the oracle JDK and
> JRE are installed and the user and system VM's are set and JAVA_HOME is
> set in the environment.  In the libreoffice jre selection dialog the jre
> is showing an selected but I still get this error:
>
> $ lowriter
> javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
> Warning: failed to read path from javaldx
>
>
> What have I missed?
>
> BillK
>

Saw this post on the Gentoo forum:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1050766.html?sid=a282245dacbe0cf6206a4a452184fd46
Quote:
Open libreoffice Tools-> Options... in side menu go to LibreOffice ->
Advanced and select a virtual machine proposed on list (use flag java
must be enabled).

Haven't verified this myself though.



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice and java.

2017-05-19 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 19/05/17 19:45, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> eselect java-vm

Nope:
wdk@rattus ~ $ eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
  [1]   oracle-jdk-bin-1.8  system-vm
  [2]   oracle-jre-bin-1.8  user-vm

wdk@rattus ~ $

Libreoffice sees the jre (in the internal dialog) and its selected but I
get that error message and the plugins cant see it.

BillK




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice and java.

2017-05-19 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi,

On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:46:56 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Hi,
>   I am trying use some java based plugins with libreoffice.
> 
> libreoffice is compiled with the java use flag, both the oracle JDK and
> JRE are installed and the user and system VM's are set and JAVA_HOME is
> set in the environment.  In the libreoffice jre selection dialog the jre
> is showing an selected but I still get this error:
> 
> $ lowriter
> javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
> Warning: failed to read path from javaldx
> 
> 
> What have I missed?

eselect java-vm?

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko


pgpRjkc2TshNj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-04 Thread waltdnes
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:37:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Sunday 03 Jul 2016 22:58:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > localization   (Br. localisation)
> > > > 
> > > >  \/
> > > >  
> > > > 10 letters
> > > 
> > > Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.
> > 
> > It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> > i18n.
> 
> Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

  Another sig for Neil Bothwick's collection.

-- 
Walter Dnes 
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 09:37:12 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> > i18n.  
> 
> Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

It's basically a form of leet speak.


N2l B6k


pgpD4rvyJwSTq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-04 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 03 Jul 2016 22:58:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > localization   (Br. localisation)
> > > 
> > >  \/
> > >  
> > > 10 letters
> > 
> > Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.
> 
> It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
> i18n.

Ah, I see. You learn something every day - if you're not careful!

-- 
Rgds
Peter




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:53:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > localization   (Br. localisation)
> >  \/
> > 10 letters  
> 
> Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.

It's l ten letters n, in the same way that internationalisation became
i18n.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Drop your carrier .. we have you surrounded


pgpAjmkpvJDdO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-03 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 02 Jul 2016 14:56:23 Bertram Scharpf wrote:

> localization   (Br. localisation)
>  \/
> 10 letters

Pardon? In decimal arithmetic I make that 12 letters.

-- 
Rgds
Peter




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-02 Thread Bertram Scharpf
On Saturday, 02. Jul 2016, 08:19:12 +, Franz Fellner wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:17 +0200, Roger Cahn  wrote:
> > 
> > I have in make.conf   LINGUAS="fr fr_FR"   L1ON="fr"
> 
> It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

localization   (Br. localisation)
 \/
10 letters


Bertram

-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-02 Thread Roger Cahn
Yes, now check your make.conf entry, it seems you used the letter 'o' 
there, and not a zero. Fix that, and maybe your libreoffice will be in 
french again :)


It is a zero and not a o
But in make.conf I writed a new L10N
and I compiled app-office/libreoffice-l10n again
There was nomore -fr in it
And now I have libreoffice again in French.
Thank you for your answers :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-02 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 2 July 2016 at 10:44, Roger Cahn  wrote:

>
> It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).
>
> Yes, it's a zero in  L10N !
>
> eix libreoffice  shows
>
> [I] app-office/libreoffice-l10n
>
> Installed versions:  5.1.2.2^s(10:12:41 27/06/2016)(-offlinehelp L10N="-af
> -am  -fr
>
> Yes, now check your make.conf entry, it seems you used the letter 'o'
there, and not a zero. Fix that, and maybe your libreoffice will be in
french again :)

Arve


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-02 Thread Roger Cahn


It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

Yes, it's a zero in  L10N !

eix libreoffice  shows

[I] app-office/libreoffice-l10n

Installed versions:  5.1.2.2^s(10:12:41 27/06/2016)(-offlinehelp 
L10N="-af -am  -fr






Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice

2016-07-02 Thread Franz Fellner
On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:17 +0200, Roger Cahn  wrote:
> hey all,
> 
> 4.4.6-gentoo, amd64, libreoffice-5.1.2.2
> 
> Since I have done what was said,
> I have in make.conf   LINGUAS="fr fr_FR"   L1ON="fr"

It's "L ten N" Instead of "L one o N" (Zero instead of upper letter o).

> 
> Libreoffice is in English. I would like to have it again in French.
> I updated a short time agoapp-office/libreoffice-l10n-5.1.2.2
> with  L10N having -fr instead of +fr
> I think it is the reason of this.
> 
> How could I solve the problem ?
> Thank you for your help
> Roger
> 
> 
-- 



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin with icu confusion

2016-04-24 Thread the
On 24/04/16 10:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Bug 580756. Just sync and update again...
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580756
> 


Thanks much. Somehow the regular bugzilla search
didn't find this bug.



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin with icu confusion

2016-04-24 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2016, 17:56:28 schrieb the:
> Hello.
> 
> Recently I've installed app-office/libreoffice-bin-5.1.2.2
> which depends on dev-libs/icu-57.1
> 
> equery g app-office/libreoffice-bin-5.1.2.2 | grep icu
>  [  1]  dev-libs/icu-57.1
> 
> However when I tried to run libreoffice, the dynamic linker
> couldn't find two libraries: libicui18n.so.55 and
> libicuuc.so.55.
> 

Bug 580756. Just sync and update again...
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580756

-- 

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/




Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice problem importing file

2016-04-16 Thread Mick
On Saturday 16 Apr 2016 16:57:45 Philip Webb wrote:
> I've run into a problem opening a M$ Office spreadsheet using LibreOffice.
> I've put the original file up at
>  http://chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/ttc-rider-85-15.xlsx
> It should show a table of ridership figures for the Toronto transit system.
> 
> When I tried to open it using LO 5.1.0.3 on my Gentoo system,
> the window froze (Fluxbox 1.3.7-r2) & I had to kill it via Htop.
> However, when I tried it with LO 4.4.3.2 on Mint (another partition),
> it opened correctly & I could save it as .ods & .csv : these are at
>  http://chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/ttc-rider-85-15.ods
>  http://chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/ttc-rider-85-15.csv
> However again, when I tried to open these version with my Gentoo LO,
> the .ods froze the window, while the .csv opened with garbage in  1  cell.
> I've updated LO twice to 5.1.1.3 & 5.1.2.2 , but the same happens.
> 
> Can others please test my files with their own Gentoo versions of LO ?
> If they have a problem too, I'll file a bug with LO ;
> if not, can anyone suggest what is causing the problem with my version ?

It opens fine here without any obvious problem, using my LibreOffice 5.0.5.2 
00m0(Build:2).  This is the only message it printed:

$ localc ttc-rider-85-15.xlsx 
W: Unknown node under /registry/extlang: deprecated

-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem : more

2014-12-31 Thread Philip Webb
141229 Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.

I've investigated further  the problem remains.
It occurred to me that it was perhaps being caused by importing a text file
/or that the original import  PDF had been done by OpenOffice  3 ya .
However, apostrophes  extended dashes are mangled as shown above
even when I enter a completely new .odt file.  I've tried changing the font
 using the PDF dialog under 'File', but the bad effect still happens.

This has to be a bug in LO : whatever the characters in the .odt ,
LO sb able to reproduce them correctly in the exported PDF .
It appears that I don't have a bug account with LO, so I've applied for one
 after checking whether anyone else has run into it, will report it.

Any further suggestions by Gentoo users are very welcome.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem : more

2014-12-31 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote:
 141229 Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.
 I've investigated further  the problem remains.
 It occurred to me that it was perhaps being caused by importing a text file
 /or that the original import  PDF had been done by OpenOffice  3 ya .
 However, apostrophes  extended dashes are mangled as shown above
 even when I enter a completely new .odt file.  I've tried changing the font
  using the PDF dialog under 'File', but the bad effect still happens.

 This has to be a bug in LO : whatever the characters in the .odt ,
 LO sb able to reproduce them correctly in the exported PDF .
 It appears that I don't have a bug account with LO, so I've applied for one
  after checking whether anyone else has run into it, will report it.

 Any further suggestions by Gentoo users are very welcome.



I'm clueless but could it be a missing font issue?? 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem : bug report

2014-12-31 Thread Philip Webb
141231 Philip Webb wrote:
 141229 Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
 I've investigated further  the problem remains.
 It occurred to me that it was perhaps being caused by importing a text file
 /or that the original import  PDF had been done by OpenOffice  3 ya .
 However, apostrophes  extended dashes are mangled as shown above
 even when I enter a completely new .odt file.  I've tried changing the font
  using the PDF dialog under 'File', but the bad effect still happens.
 This has to be a bug in LO : whatever the characters in the .odt ,
 LO sb able to reproduce them correctly in the exported PDF .
 It appears that I don't have a bug account with LO, so I've applied for one
  after checking whether anyone else has run into it, will report it.

I've submitted LibreOffice Bug 87903 .

Can anyone else reproduce this ?

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem

2014-12-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 29/12/2014 11:03, Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.
 
 Can anyone offer an explanation or some way to fix the problem ?
 


Those links do not work

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem

2014-12-29 Thread Philip Webb
141229 Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On 29/12/2014 11:03, Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.
 Can anyone offer an explanation or some way to fix the problem ?
 Those links do not work.

Thanks : corrected above (red face).  Also Libreoffice 4.3.4.1 .

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem

2014-12-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 29/12/2014 14:16, Philip Webb wrote:
 141229 Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On 29/12/2014 11:03, Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.
 Can anyone offer an explanation or some way to fix the problem ?
 Those links do not work.
 
 Thanks : corrected above (red face).  Also Libreoffice 4.3.4.1 .
 



At first glance I'd say you enabled Smart quotes in libreoffice
sometime in the last 3 years, and it's now mangling apostrophes and
dashes into something clever.

Tools - AutoCorrect Options - Options



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice PDF conversion problem

2014-12-29 Thread Philip Webb
141229 Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On 29/12/2014 14:16, Philip Webb wrote:
 I want to revise the 1st page of a PDF on my Internet site.
 The original was created by Libreoffice c 3 years ago
  cb found at  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/nt/mark-notes.pdf .
 The revision I created today has mangled some of the punctuation :
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/mark-notes.pdf .
 I used the same .odt file in both cases, with small revisions in the 2nd,
 but few, if any, of them affecting the punctuation which has been damaged.
 I'd say you enabled Smart quotes in Libreoffice sometime since 2011
 and it's now mangling apostrophes and dashes into something clever :
 try  Tools - AutoCorrect Options - Options .

Thanks for the pointer.  Wasn't it still Open Office back then ?
Perhaps when it changed to LibreOffice, default settings were altered.

There were basically  3  problems : (1) the elided dash was mangled,
so I told it not to elide  replaced all instances with '--' ;
(2) it was using some bizarre  ' , which was also getting mangled,
so I manually (with some search/replace) replaced all instances
with something which avoided the symbol, while expanding abbreviations.
After some work, I believe I've found them all,
but will wait till tomorrow before uploading it to the I/net.

The problem isn't a simple general setting, so it mb a LO bug,
but I don't have the time to take it up there.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice uses openssl?

2014-04-19 Thread Mick
On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 02:29:35 walt wrote:
 Not long ago I started building my own libreoffice from their git repo
 because I wanted to bisect a recent libreoffice bug in localc.
 
 In the process of finding the bug I discovered that libreoffice ships its
 own copy of openssl along with many other common opensource libraries.
 
 The libreoffice team committed the heartbleed fix to their git repo a few
 days ago, which got me thinking about why libreoffice needs ssl.
 
 I'm thinking maybe for odbc, maybe webdav?  I dunno because all I really
 use is localc and I don't know anything about the other stuff.
 
 Are the users of libreoffice-stable at risk from heartbleed?  I don't
 know enough to judge, but I worry about it.

I thought that they used NSS for digital signing of documents, but in any case 
it seems that LO is also impacted by the Heartbleed bug of openssl:

  http://secunia.com/community/advisories/57881

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice uses openssl?

2014-04-19 Thread Mick
On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 18:18:39 Mick wrote:
 On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 02:29:35 walt wrote:
  Not long ago I started building my own libreoffice from their git repo
  because I wanted to bisect a recent libreoffice bug in localc.
  
  In the process of finding the bug I discovered that libreoffice ships its
  own copy of openssl along with many other common opensource libraries.
  
  The libreoffice team committed the heartbleed fix to their git repo a few
  days ago, which got me thinking about why libreoffice needs ssl.
  
  I'm thinking maybe for odbc, maybe webdav?  I dunno because all I really
  use is localc and I don't know anything about the other stuff.
  
  Are the users of libreoffice-stable at risk from heartbleed?  I don't
  know enough to judge, but I worry about it.
 
 I thought that they used NSS for digital signing of documents, but in any
 case it seems that LO is also impacted by the Heartbleed bug of openssl:
 
   http://secunia.com/community/advisories/57881

and here:  

  http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2014-0160/

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice uses openssl?

2014-04-19 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 19. April 2014, 19:19:41 schrieb Mick:
 On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 18:18:39 Mick wrote:
  On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 02:29:35 walt wrote:
   Not long ago I started building my own libreoffice from their git repo
   because I wanted to bisect a recent libreoffice bug in localc.
   
   In the process of finding the bug I discovered that libreoffice ships
   its own copy of openssl along with many other common opensource
   libraries.
   
   The libreoffice team committed the heartbleed fix to their git repo a
   few days ago, which got me thinking about why libreoffice needs ssl.
   
   I'm thinking maybe for odbc, maybe webdav?  I dunno because all I
   really use is localc and I don't know anything about the other stuff.
   
   Are the users of libreoffice-stable at risk from heartbleed?  I don't
   know enough to judge, but I worry about it.
  
  I thought that they used NSS for digital signing of documents, but in any
  
  case it seems that LO is also impacted by the Heartbleed bug of openssl:
http://secunia.com/community/advisories/57881
 
 and here:
 
   http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/cve-2014-0160/

Users are recommended to upgrade to 4.2.3 to avoid this flaw when using the 
packages provided from www.libreoffice.org which include a bundled copy of 
openssl.

However, we build from sources and use the system libraries.

huettel@porto ~ $ lsof|grep soffice|grep libssl
soffice.b 31006  huettel  mem   REG8,1 423840   
795269 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0


-- 
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde)
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/08/2013 06:52, Wang Xuerui wrote:
 2013/8/19 东方巽雷 dongfangxun...@gmail.com:
 libreoffice-bin needs older icu version,libreoffice need so much time to
 compile
 
 libreoffice-bin (at this time only 4.0.4.2 is present) requests
 icu/51.1, while the latest is slotted 51.2. I don't know of any
 package that specifically asks for such a new version of icu; a quick
 equery on my system shows this:
 
 equery depends icu
  * These packages depend on icu:
 app-i18n/fcitx-4.2.8.1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 app-office/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 (=dev-libs/icu-4.8.1.1)
 app-text/libmspub-0.0.6 (dev-libs/icu)
 app-text/texlive-core-2013 (xetex ? =dev-libs/icu-50)
 dev-db/sqlite-3.7.17 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 dev-lang/php-5.4.18 (intl ? dev-libs/icu)
 dev-lang/php-5.5.1-r1 (intl ? dev-libs/icu)
 dev-libs/boost-1.53.0 (icu ? =dev-libs/icu-3.6)
 dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.1-r1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5 (icu ? =dev-libs/icu-49)
 dev-qt/qtwebkit-4.8.5 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20130530 (=dev-libs/icu-4.4)
 media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.18-r1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 media-libs/libcdr-0.0.14 (dev-libs/icu)
 media-libs/libvisio-0.0.30 (dev-libs/icu)
 media-libs/raptor-2.0.9 (unicode ? dev-libs/icu)
 net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.8.3-r201 (=dev-libs/icu-3.8.1-r1)
 net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.0.4 (=dev-libs/icu-3.8.1-r1)
 net-nds/openldap-2.4.35 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.6 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
 (icu ? dev-libs/icu[static-libs(+)])
 www-client/chromium-29.0.1547.41 (=dev-libs/icu-49.1.1-r1)
 
 So at least nothing installed on my system requires a recent icu to
 run. Thus, you shouldn't have problems setting up libreoffice-bin; if
 you indeed have to stick with the latest icu, share with us your
 specific setup and we'll be glad to help.
 


NOT upgrading icu on a whim also comes with massive user benefits:

such as, for example, NOT having to rebuild every damn huge piece of
software on the box every other week just coz icu decided to change how
something is done and shove it into a point release. Again.

/rant over


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-19 Thread Wang Xuerui
2013/8/19 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
 NOT upgrading icu on a whim also comes with massive user benefits:

 such as, for example, NOT having to rebuild every damn huge piece of
 software on the box every other week just coz icu decided to change how
 something is done and shove it into a point release. Again.

 /rant over

Sure...

And if you choose to not rebuild things you end up putting a whole lot
of packages into @preserved-rebuild, which shows up *every* time
emerge completes. Well, I basically get over this by simply ignoring
them, but the length of @preserved-rebuild output usually forces me
into emerging it every 2 weeks or so.

And just consider how much CPU cycles are lost in frequent qtwebkit,
webkit-gtk and chromium rebuilds...



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/08/2013 10:10, Wang Xuerui wrote:
 2013/8/19 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
 NOT upgrading icu on a whim also comes with massive user benefits:

 such as, for example, NOT having to rebuild every damn huge piece of
 software on the box every other week just coz icu decided to change how
 something is done and shove it into a point release. Again.

 /rant over
 
 Sure...
 
 And if you choose to not rebuild things you end up putting a whole lot
 of packages into @preserved-rebuild, which shows up *every* time
 emerge completes. Well, I basically get over this by simply ignoring
 them, but the length of @preserved-rebuild output usually forces me
 into emerging it every 2 weeks or so.
 
 And just consider how much CPU cycles are lost in frequent qtwebkit,
 webkit-gtk and chromium rebuilds...
 

webkit* updates have slowed down recently so I'm not too bothered about
that. But chromium, that thing drive me to tears, now I just use
google-chrome.

I don't always need the latest icu - 7-bit ASCII satisfies all my daily
needs :-) So I can afford to mask anything after the current version and
just leave it as-is until it suits me to rebuild things.



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-19 Thread Wang Xuerui
2013/8/19 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
 webkit* updates have slowed down recently so I'm not too bothered about
 that. But chromium, that thing drive me to tears, now I just use
 google-chrome.

Well, I choose to temporarily mask chromium if I don't have the time.
I have a /etc/portage/package.mask/11temp for (mainly) that (-:

I've switched yesterday from firefox to firefox-bin after some
mysterious crashes in the graphic backend (with HW acceleration force
enabled), only to find my compiler is not at fault... But the binary
version indeed fixed another bug, that's the page loading spinner
not animating, so I'd stick with that.

I don't have to use google-chrome because chromium is usually *still*
masked when I feel like upgrading, so it actually doesn't cost me much
time. In fact, I usually go to sleep right after starting emerge (-:

 I don't always need the latest icu - 7-bit ASCII satisfies all my daily
 needs :-) So I can afford to mask anything after the current version and
 just leave it as-is until it suits me to rebuild things.

As a Chinese, living with Unicode support is a must. But since CJK
codepoints are well supported for ages, and most of Chinese users are
not researchers who need access to the latest glyphs or complex-layout
writing systems, we don't have to upgrade icu that often either.

Actually, AFAICT all my icu upgrades are forced on me by the version
bump of big things like chromium or libreoffice.



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-19 Thread Wang Xuerui
2013/8/18 东方巽雷 dongfangxun...@gmail.com:
 I download LibreOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz from
 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ and extract all the deb files.My
 desktop is KDE,but libreoffice only uses gtk+ theme.
 How should I find out the problem?

Oh... upon further reading of your question it seems we're all misled
by your description.

Your real question is Why a GTK application won't pick up KDE's theme
settings, and the answer is it simply doesn't know about Qt in the
first place. I downloaded the archive you used and ldd'd all the
libraries, none seems to depend on Qt. Gentoo's libreoffice-bin
packages are build by Gentoo developers (I remember a blog post
explaining this), so they're different from the upstream provided
ones. I haven't used them, so I can't say if they would help, but it's
certain that the official builds does NOT support Qt widgets.

Solution: Install oxygen-gtk for Oxygen-looking GTK2 widgets.



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 18/08/2013 17:16, 东方巽雷 wrote:
 I download LibreOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz
 from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ and extract all the deb
 files.My desktop is KDE,but libreoffice only uses gtk+ theme.
 How should I find out the problem?



Why are you downloading LibreOffice and extracting it manually?

There are 2 ebuilds for it in the tree: libreoffice and libreoffice-bin.

Use those instead, they work properly.


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-18 Thread 东方巽雷
libreoffice-bin needs older icu version,libreoffice need so much time to
compile


2013/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

 On 18/08/2013 17:16, 东方巽雷 wrote:
  I download LibreOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz
  from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ and extract all the deb
  files.My desktop is KDE,but libreoffice only uses gtk+ theme.
  How should I find out the problem?



 Why are you downloading LibreOffice and extracting it manually?

 There are 2 ebuilds for it in the tree: libreoffice and libreoffice-bin.

 Use those instead, they work properly.


 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com





Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice cannot use oxygen theme

2013-08-18 Thread Wang Xuerui
2013/8/19 东方巽雷 dongfangxun...@gmail.com:
 libreoffice-bin needs older icu version,libreoffice need so much time to
 compile

libreoffice-bin (at this time only 4.0.4.2 is present) requests
icu/51.1, while the latest is slotted 51.2. I don't know of any
package that specifically asks for such a new version of icu; a quick
equery on my system shows this:

equery depends icu
 * These packages depend on icu:
app-i18n/fcitx-4.2.8.1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
app-office/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 (=dev-libs/icu-4.8.1.1)
app-text/libmspub-0.0.6 (dev-libs/icu)
app-text/texlive-core-2013 (xetex ? =dev-libs/icu-50)
dev-db/sqlite-3.7.17 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
dev-lang/php-5.4.18 (intl ? dev-libs/icu)
dev-lang/php-5.5.1-r1 (intl ? dev-libs/icu)
dev-libs/boost-1.53.0 (icu ? =dev-libs/icu-3.6)
dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.1-r1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5 (icu ? =dev-libs/icu-49)
dev-qt/qtwebkit-4.8.5 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20130530 (=dev-libs/icu-4.4)
media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.18-r1 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
media-libs/libcdr-0.0.14 (dev-libs/icu)
media-libs/libvisio-0.0.30 (dev-libs/icu)
media-libs/raptor-2.0.9 (unicode ? dev-libs/icu)
net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.8.3-r201 (=dev-libs/icu-3.8.1-r1)
net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.0.4 (=dev-libs/icu-3.8.1-r1)
net-nds/openldap-2.4.35 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.6 (icu ? dev-libs/icu)
(icu ? dev-libs/icu[static-libs(+)])
www-client/chromium-29.0.1547.41 (=dev-libs/icu-49.1.1-r1)

So at least nothing installed on my system requires a recent icu to
run. Thus, you shouldn't have problems setting up libreoffice-bin; if
you indeed have to stick with the latest icu, share with us your
specific setup and we'll be glad to help.



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-13 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello,

On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:35:06 +0200 Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thus, I recommended you simply install libreoffice-bin

thats not simply, he downgrade much packages and give 
conflict msg without end. When Libreoffice 4 as bin 
is present ok, but actually is older version.

At moment compile libreoffice is running, i hope it
will be run without errors. At moment the Process run
14 hr and 40 minuts.  Power Book :)


Greetings and Thank you.

Silvio



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/05/2013 19:53, Silvio Siefke wrote:
 Hello,
 
 is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and 
 copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile 
 libreoffice,
 and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice Package on 
 Desktop and copy to the netbook?
 
 The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is a Fujitsu 
 P4.
 
 
 
 Thank you  Greetings
 Silvio
 

Your desktop is a P4
Your netbook is an Atom

Others have noted how CHOST and CFLAGS must match on both machines,
otherwise the Atom will probably not run P4 code. This will probably be
a huge issue in your life and quite honestly, totally not worth it for
just one package.

Just install app-office/libreoffice-bin on the netbook instead

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-12 Thread William Tomlinson
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is possible from what I've read to cross
compile using distcc.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cross-compiling-distcc.xml seems to describe
this in detail, though the article is nearly 7 years old. I would prefer
this over a one shot package install since you could offload ALL of your
compiles. I have no personal experience with distcc and it may be more of a
headache than it is worth. I just know it was one of the options I looked
at for a similar issue.
On May 12, 2013 5:36 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/05/2013 19:53, Silvio Siefke wrote:
  Hello,
 
  is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and
  copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile
 libreoffice,
  and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice Package on
  Desktop and copy to the netbook?
 
  The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is a
 Fujitsu P4.
 
 
 
  Thank you  Greetings
  Silvio
 

 Your desktop is a P4
 Your netbook is an Atom

 Others have noted how CHOST and CFLAGS must match on both machines,
 otherwise the Atom will probably not run P4 code. This will probably be
 a huge issue in your life and quite honestly, totally not worth it for
 just one package.

 Just install app-office/libreoffice-bin on the netbook instead

 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com





Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 12/05/2013 15:48, William Tomlinson wrote:
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is possible from what I've read to cross
 compile using distcc.
 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cross-compiling-distcc.xml seems to
 describe this in detail, though the article is nearly 7 years old. I
 would prefer this over a one shot package install since you could
 offload ALL of your compiles. I have no personal experience with distcc
 and it may be more of a headache than it is worth. I just know it was
 one of the options I looked at for a similar issue.

First, before I respond, please do not top-post. If Gmail's web-based
client makes not top-posting hard then please rather use a different client.

distcc is designed to do the same compile over many machines. By design,
they all run on the same compiler settings. You do not have this
scenario. You need to build on a P4 for Atom. That is not distcc, it is
cross-compile - which is a mission to set up properly. If you are
building for ARM then it is worth it. But for one package, and only
because the Atom builds slow? I doubt it's worth it.

Thus, I recommended you simply install libreoffice-bin


 
 On May 12, 2013 5:36 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
 mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 11/05/2013 19:53, Silvio Siefke wrote:
  Hello,
 
  is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and
  copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile
 libreoffice,
  and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice
 Package on
  Desktop and copy to the netbook?
 
  The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is
 a Fujitsu P4.
 
 
 
  Thank you  Greetings
  Silvio
 
 
 Your desktop is a P4
 Your netbook is an Atom
 
 Others have noted how CHOST and CFLAGS must match on both machines,
 otherwise the Atom will probably not run P4 code. This will probably be
 a huge issue in your life and quite honestly, totally not worth it for
 just one package.
 
 Just install app-office/libreoffice-bin on the netbook instead
 
 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com
 
 


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-11 Thread William Tomlinson
Why not use libreoffice-bin? Or if you really want to compile from source,
look at distcc, as long as the processor is in the same family it should be
a straightforward configuration.
On May 11, 2013 1:54 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:

 Hello,

 is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and
 copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile
 libreoffice,
 and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice Package on
 Desktop and copy to the netbook?

 The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is a
 Fujitsu P4.



 Thank you  Greetings
 Silvio




Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-11 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:

 Hello,

 is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and
 copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile 
 libreoffice,
 and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice Package on
 Desktop and copy to the netbook?

 The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is a Fujitsu 
 P4.

emerge --buildpkg libreoffice
scp /usr/portage/packages/app-office/libreoffice*
netbook:/usr/portage/packages/app-office
ssh netbook
emerge -k libreoffice

Just make sure the CHOST and CFLAGS on both machines are the same.

Regards.

--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-11 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:

 Hello,

 is there a way that i can compile Libreoffice on my Desktop System and
 copy to the Netbook? Because the netbook need long time to compile 
 libreoffice,
 and the Desktop is little faster. Or can i build a libreoffice Package on
 Desktop and copy to the netbook?

 The Netbook is a Samsung NC 10, Atom Processor and the Desktop is a Fujitsu 
 P4.

 emerge --buildpkg libreoffice
 scp /usr/portage/packages/app-office/libreoffice*
 netbook:/usr/portage/packages/app-office
 ssh netbook
 emerge -k libreoffice

 Just make sure the CHOST and CFLAGS on both machines are the same.

Oh, and also the USE flags.

If you have enough diskspace, you can  have a chroot'd copy of the
netbook in your desktop, and emerge everything with --buildpkg and
copy the binaries to your netbook. I did that with a very old K6 that
I used as firewall, DHCP server, torrent server, NTP server, etc.,
before wireless modems were powerful enough, like twelve years ago.

Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México



Re: [gentoo-user] Libreoffice Compile

2013-05-11 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello,

On Sat, 11 May 2013 13:57:30 -0400 William Tomlinson
watomlin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why not use libreoffice-bin? Or if you really want to compile from
 source, look at distcc, as long as the processor is in the same
 family it should be a straightforward configuration.
 On May 11, 2013 1:54 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:

its older version, and the Princip of Rolling Releases is normal new 
Version of Software. Okay that's not really my argument, but libreoffice-bin
has older regirements and that msg make sometimes crazy in emerge -uDN @world,
special when you have upgrade problems. Or give other package with libreoffice 
4?


Thank you for help  Greetings
Silvio



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice: don't know how to handle video

2012-09-24 Thread Yohan Pereira
On 23/09/12 at 09:20pm, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 Has anyone been able to insert and play movies in libreoffice?

Hi,

I have libreoffice-bin installed and I can insert video files into
presentations. I tried a few random files that were lying arround (mp4,
flv etc) and they all work. 

Do you have the appropriate gstreamer plugins installed ? 
have a look at the media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta package.

-- 

- Yohan Pereira

The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference
between a mermaid and a seal.
-- Mark Twain



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice: don't know how to handle video

2012-09-24 Thread Valmor de Almeida

On 9/24/12 3:17 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote:

On 23/09/12 at 09:20pm, Valmor de Almeida wrote:

Has anyone been able to insert and play movies in libreoffice?


Hi,

I have libreoffice-bin installed and I can insert video files into
presentations. I tried a few random files that were lying arround (mp4,
flv etc) and they all work.

Do you have the appropriate gstreamer plugins installed ?
have a look at the media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta package.



No I don't have that installed. I thought that the gstreamer USE flag in 
libreoffice would take care of all gstreamer dependencies. Also I don't 
use libreoffice-bin. I have been emerging libreoffice. Will emerge the 
plugins. Do you think I need to reemerge libreoffice after emerging 
gst-plugins-meta?


Thanks,

--
Valmor



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice: don't know how to handle video

2012-09-24 Thread Yohan Pereira
On 24/09/12 at 11:24am, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 Do you think I need to reemerge libreoffice after emerging 
 gst-plugins-meta?

Nope. Gstreamer detects plug-ins on the fly. You can run revdep-rebuild
to make sure.
 
-- 
- Yohan Pereira

The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference
between a mermaid and a seal.
-- Mark Twain



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice: don't know how to handle video

2012-09-24 Thread Valmor de Almeida

On 9/24/12 3:40 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:

On 24/09/12 at 11:24am, Valmor de Almeida wrote:

Do you think I need to reemerge libreoffice after emerging
gst-plugins-meta?


Nope. Gstreamer detects plug-ins on the fly. You can run revdep-rebuild
to make sure.


I emerged gst-plugins-meta with various USE flags and movie insertion in 
libreoffice works now.


Thank you.

--
Valmor



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice 3.5.2.2 paste special fails

2012-05-02 Thread Adam Carter
 Any idea how to troubleshoot this? Any sense in trying rm -fr ~/.libreoffice?

 ...

 always worth a try - but just rename the old directory first and then
 move it back if thats not the problem.

mv ~/.libreoffice ~/.libreoffice-orig didnt help. Any other ideas?



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice 3.5.2.2 paste special fails

2012-05-02 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:40 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
  Any idea how to troubleshoot this? Any sense in trying rm -fr 
  ~/.libreoffice?
 
  ...
 
  always worth a try - but just rename the old directory first and then
  move it back if thats not the problem.
 
 mv ~/.libreoffice ~/.libreoffice-orig didnt help. Any other ideas?
 

Add a brand new user and try in the new environment in case its a
problem with the existing desktop environment.

There are just too many variables in this sort of vague doesn't work
scenario so all you can do is start eliminating outside
influences/suspects.  Seems no one else has jumped in saying they suffer
from this too so its something unique to you - I am using 3.5.2 (just
upgraded) and its fine.

Also, just in case you used an existing document, try with something new
and created by yourself just to test this.

BillK


32bit system on a core2 using a gnome2 desktop
[ebuild   R] app-office/libreoffice-3.5.2.2  USE=binfilter branding
cups dbus eds gnome graphite gstreamer gtk java kde mysql nsplugin
opengl svg vba webdav xmlsec (-aqua) -jemalloc -nlpsolver -odk
-pdfimport -postgres -test 0 kB




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice 3.5.2.2 paste special fails

2012-05-01 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:52 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
 This issue seems to have come up with the latest update to 3.5.2.2. I
...
 
 Any idea how to troubleshoot this? Any sense in trying rm -fr ~/.libreoffice?
 
...

always worth a try - but just rename the old directory first and then
move it back if thats not the problem.

BillK






Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice color

2012-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:36:54 +0200, Stephane Guedon wrote:

 In libreoffice, which I have had compiled several months ago, the small
 help text is not readable. It appears in grey, as you can see in the
 caption.

Are you using KDE?
 
 I don't know how to solve it !

There's a tweak in KDE's systemsettings, although I can't remember what I
had to do now.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Drive not ready: (R)etry (G)o to Impulse (C)all Engineering


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice color

2012-04-30 Thread Stephane Guedon
Le lundi 30 avril 2012 12:50:48 Neil Bothwick a écrit :
 On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:36:54 +0200, Stephane Guedon wrote:
  In libreoffice, which I have had compiled several months ago, the small
  help text is not readable. It appears in grey, as you can see in the
  caption.

 Are you using KDE?

  I don't know how to solve it !

 There's a tweak in KDE's systemsettings, although I can't remember what I
 had to do now.

Yes, i am in kde. And libreoffice have the useflag.
--
Stéphane Guedon  |  www.22decembre.eu

Protegez vos courriers sur internet aussi, utilisez gpg !
http://www.22decembre.eu/2012/02/27/proteger-vos-courriels-avec-gpg/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice color

2012-04-30 Thread Joshua Murphy
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:06, Stephane Guedon steph...@22decembre.eu wrote:
 Le lundi 30 avril 2012 12:50:48 Neil Bothwick a écrit :
 On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:36:54 +0200, Stephane Guedon wrote:
  In libreoffice, which I have had compiled several months ago, the small
  help text is not readable. It appears in grey, as you can see in the
  caption.

 Are you using KDE?

  I don't know how to solve it !

 There's a tweak in KDE's systemsettings, although I can't remember what I
 had to do now.

 Yes, i am in kde. And libreoffice have the useflag.
 --
 Stéphane Guedon  |  www.22decembre.eu

 Protegez vos courriers sur internet aussi, utilisez gpg !
 http://www.22decembre.eu/2012/02/27/proteger-vos-courriels-avec-gpg/

Well, for a shot in the dark, lacking both kde and libreoffice on this
system to check,

System Settings.
Application Appearance - Colours - Colours - Colour set:Tooltip -
Normal Background 

source: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123684

-- 
Poison [BLX]
Joshua M. Murphy



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice color

2012-04-30 Thread 张春江
At 2012-04-30 20:55:47,Joshua Murphy poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:06, Stephane Guedon steph...@22decembre.eu wrote:
 Le lundi 30 avril 2012 12:50:48 Neil Bothwick a écrit :
 On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:36:54 +0200, Stephane Guedon wrote:
  In libreoffice, which I have had compiled several months ago, the small
  help text is not readable. It appears in grey, as you can see in the
  caption.

 Are you using KDE?

  I don't know how to solve it !

 There's a tweak in KDE's systemsettings, although I can't remember what I
 had to do now.

 Yes, i am in kde. And libreoffice have the useflag.

I use KDE and I faced the same problem few months ago, I solved it by add
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=gnome
in my .bashrc. 



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice color

2012-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:55:47 -0400, Joshua Murphy wrote:

 Well, for a shot in the dark, lacking both kde and libreoffice on this
 system to check,
 
 System Settings.
 Application Appearance - Colours - Colours - Colour set:Tooltip -
 Normal Background 

That's the one.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make
it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way
is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
The first method is far more difficult -C.A.R. Hoare


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-20 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 18.02.2012 17:57, schrieb Neil Bothwick:

 [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
  * app-office/libreoffice
 
  Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.
 
 Incidentally, the full output from genlop -t shows a steady decrease in
 build times as version numbers increase. It looks like optimisation of
 the old OOo code is ongoing.


for reference:

vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 42
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz

# genlop -t libreoffice
 * app-office/libreoffice

 Mon Feb 20 12:20:57 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
   merge time: 44 minutes and 54 seconds.

It was my first build of libreoffice, I used the binary version before.
8 gigs of RAM dedicated to PORTAGE_TMPDIR, mounted as tmpfs.

Stefan



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Thanasis
on 02/18/2012 06:57 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:

 [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
  * app-office/libreoffice
 
  Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.

Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:

  [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
   * app-office/libreoffice
  
   Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.  
 
 Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I heard someone tried the monkeys-on-typewriters bit trying for the plays
of W. Shakespeare but all they got was the collected works of Francis
Bacon


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Mick
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
   [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
   
* app-office/libreoffice

Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3

  merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.
  
  Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
 
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.

Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that 
fast.  :-(

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   Q 720  @ 1.60GHz  with 4G RAM.


 Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
   merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.

Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo-
charged fs?
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:26:57 +, Mick wrote:

 * app-office/libreoffice
 
 Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
 
   merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.  
   
   Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?  
  
  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.  
 
 Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where
 near that fast.  :-(
 
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   Q 720  @ 1.60GHz  with 4G RAM.
 
 
  Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.
 
 Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some
 turbo- charged fs?

Just plain old ext2. Laptops tend to have slower IO whereas I'm using
RAID1 on SATA3 hardware. Plus it is a newer CPU.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Windows '96 artificial intelligence: Unable to FORMAT A: Having a go at C:


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Meik Frischke
Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick:
 On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
  On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
[root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice

 * app-office/libreoffice
 
 Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
 
   merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.
   
   Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
  
  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.
 
 Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near
 that fast.  :-(
 
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   Q 720  @ 1.60GHz  with 4G RAM.
 
 
  Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.
 
 Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some
 turbo- charged fs?

IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having PORTAGE_TMPDIR 
on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on a 7200rpm disk) for 
me :
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920  @ 2.67GHz
Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
 merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds.

With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though...

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Mick
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 12:57:51 Meik Frischke wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick:
  On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
   On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
 [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
 
  * app-office/libreoffice
  
  Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
  
merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.

Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
   
   Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.
  
  Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near
  that fast.  :-(
  
  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   Q 720  @ 1.60GHz  with 4G RAM.
  
   Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
   
 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.
  
  Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some
  turbo- charged fs?
 
 IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having
 PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on
 a 7200rpm disk) for me :
 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920  @ 2.67GHz
   Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
  merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds.
 
 With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though...

My /var partition is on ext4.

My CPU is admittedly slower, but even so I wouldn't think that it would take 
more than _twice_ as long as Neil's.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-19 Thread Alecks Gates
I would be curious to see the results of compiling libreoffice with
PORTAGE_TMPDIR on btrfs with compress=lzo.
On Feb 19, 2012 9:37 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 12:57:51 Meik Frischke wrote:
  Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick:
   On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
  [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
 
   * app-office/libreoffice
 
   Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
 
 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.

 Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
   
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.
  
   Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where
 near
   that fast.  :-(
  
   Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU   Q 720  @ 1.60GHz  with 4G RAM.
  
Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
  
  merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.
  
   Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some
   turbo- charged fs?
 
  IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having
  PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on
  a 7200rpm disk) for me :
  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920  @ 2.67GHz
Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012  app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
   merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds.
 
  With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though...

 My /var partition is on ext4.

 My CPU is admittedly slower, but even so I wouldn't think that it would
 take
 more than _twice_ as long as Neil's.
 --
 Regards,
 Mick



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-3.4.5.2: getting LibreOffice Help fails

2012-02-19 Thread Philip Webb
120219 Hartmut Figge wrote:
 after emerging libreoffice-3.4.5.2 i tried getting help by pressing F1.
 No luck, something flashed shortly on the xterm
 resulting in several blank lines.  i was told to use the useflag java
 Grudgingly, because that would install another 44 packages,
 i have reemerged libreoffice, but pressing F1 still doesn't call 'Help'.

I removed Java from my machine a few months ago
 lack of internal help for LO was the only thing which disappeared.
My solution was to download the LO help files from their site (PDFs),
which are actually easier to read + search than the internal help.

HTH

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-18 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jacques Montier jmont...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
 does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
 I get instruction not permitted.
 So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.

 Any idea ?

 Thank you,

 Cheers,

 --
 Jacques


It didn't work for me as well :|
I ended up compiling libreoffice-3.5 (took about 4h).

-- 
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com



Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

2012-02-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:

 I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
 does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
 I get instruction not permitted.
 So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.

It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.

Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you
can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Your lack of organisation does not represent an
emergency in my world.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


  1   2   >