"AKA" is after all just a fancy way of saying "or."
CM
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:08:32 +1000, Peter Vels wrote:
>"vel" is, amongst other things, Latin for "or".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>"vel" is not Polish. We don't have letter "v". It is latin, so I
>supposed it is wide known.
>And yes, it is "aka".
>BTW: WTF is aka??? :-)
Interesting. I believe ya (not gonna argue with someone about their native
language!) but the usage seems to be Polish, per:
"vel" is, amongst other things, Latin for "or".
Peter *Vel*s
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 at 10:03, Bob Bridges <
0587168ababf-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> "Also Known As...".
>
> ---
> Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
>
> /* I believe what really happens in history
"Also Known As...".
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* I believe what really happens in history is this: The old man is always
wrong, and the young people are always wrong about what is wrong with him. The
practical form it takes is this: that, while the old man may
e at Radoslaw, whose English is better than that of a lot
> of folks on the list who are native speakers!
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Radoslaw Skorupka
> > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 7:22 AM
> &
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024, at 23:07, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
> "vel" is not Polish.
> And yes, it is "aka".
> BTW: WTF is aka??? :-)
"Also Known As", commonly used when listing aliases used by
criminals, eg "Fred Smith aka Fred Jones aka James Jones".
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
Also Known As
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 3:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Netview
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> (off-topic, but on-thread)
&
n the list who are native speakers!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 7:22 AM
To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview
It is not so easy.
Do you know IWS vel TWS vel Workload Scheduler?
It is stil
rame Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 7:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview
It is not so easy.
Do you know IWS vel TWS vel Workload Scheduler?
It is still being sold by IBM, but development is out of IBM.
The same for SDSF (Rocket), PCOMM
product under IBM logo.
>
> Note, JES3 and z/VSE are different - in both cases products are supported and
> marketed by their current producers - that means PSI and 21CS.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
> W dniu 26.04.2024 o 07:38, Bruce Hew
product under IBM logo.
Note, JES3 and z/VSE are different - in both cases products are
supported and marketed by their current producers - that means PSI and 21CS.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 26.04.2024 o 07:38, Bruce Hewson pisze:
Hello Steve,
FUD
"IBM Netview for Z/OS"
Hello Steve,
FUD
"IBM Netview for Z/OS" is still being sold and supported by IBM, and is a
pre-req for IBM System Automation and GDPS. No evidence that this product has
been sold.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:19:17 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>My understanding is that IBM sold off Ne
IBM Z System Automation — IBM’s automation software for z/OS (and more than
z/OS) — requires IBM Z NetView. And IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel
Sysplex (GDPS) solutions require IBM Z System Automation and thus IBM Z
NetView, too.
—
Timothy Sipples
Senior Architect
Digital Assets
UNICOM. In the early 80's I worked at the same place as Corry Hong,
founder. He had his first saleable program running for testing, a CICS
monitor I think, but he was running it all in the main CICS task. He
came over to my desk and I showed him how to use the ATTACH macro. Did I
get any
Also lots of stuff went to UNICOM, like the Optim products (and more).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
ner, Jr. <
05a978a73af8-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> NetView or NetView FTP? NetView FTP was sold off to Log-On Software, Inc.
>
>
> https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/topic/0TO0z006v6NGAQ/netview-ftp?language=en_US
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:19:17 -0500, Ste
NetView or NetView FTP? NetView FTP was sold off to Log-On Software, Inc.
https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/topic/0TO0z006v6NGAQ/netview-ftp?language=en_US
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:19:17 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
>
>Who did
ced it, we (Syzygy Inc.) ended up getting traffic from a
lot of their users because the replacement products were extremely expensive
and our automation package was (and still is) less than 1/10th the price and
even cheaper than Netview at less 1/5th the price they were already paying.
So the s
c-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 6:40:11 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Netview
>
> Radoslaw. That is as good as answer as any Sent from my iPhone No one said I
> could type with one thumb > On Apr 24, 2024, at 17: 36, Radosla
Beaver <050e0c375a14-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 6:40:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview
Radoslaw. That is as good as answer as any Sent from my iPhone No one said I
could type with one thumb > On Apr 24, 2024, at 17: 36, Radoslaw
gt;> My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
>>
>> Who did they sell it to?
>
> HCL?
>
>
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
W dniu 24.04.2024 o 23:19, Steve Beaver pisze:
My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
Who did they sell it to?
HCL?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
Who did they sell it to?
Sent from my iPhone
No one said I could type with one thumb
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
caught.
I don't know what is triggering it, unless it is the footer.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Willy Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview, REXX and assembler interfaces for variable
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:26:54 -0600, Willy Jensen
wrote:
> IRXSAY returns with return code 28 'A language processor environment could
> not be located'.
You have a coding error. Does R0 point to the ENVBLOCk? IRXSAY works in Netview
otherwise the REXX SAY command would no
Turns out the problem is with IRXSAY, I can read and write variables using
IRXEXCOM. But IRXSAY returns with return code 28 'A language processor
environment could not be located'. Unfortunately I was not checking for IRXSAY
return codes, as IRXSAY just works, well at least in TSO it does. So
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:10:52 -0600, Willy Jensen
wrote:
>When running in Netview it doesn't abend, but it doesn't do anything either,
> except that the return value is valid. It returns 0, which indicates success.
Saying "returns 0" tells us nothing.
>The function in qu
Hi,
I am trying to make a REXX function writen in assembler run in Netview REXX.
The function in question reads. lists and writes variables, it uses IRXEXCOM
for variable access, IRXSTK for stack access and IRXSAY for terminal output.
When running in Netview it doesn't abend, but it doesn't do
The devil is in the details. What sort of security controls will IBM have for
Python scripts in Netview?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Horein
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 5:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Re: scripting: Not yet?
https://ibm-z-software-portal.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZNETVIEW-I-42
I am not the author of the idea, but I will certainly vote for it next time
I'm logged on.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:40 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Doesn't NETVIEW run multiple users in the same addr
Try putting a line like
numeric digits 20
somewhere before your first use of the storage function.
Some of the storage function calculations need more than the default 9 digits'
precision, depending on address values and memory contents.
I've had inconsistent results when I've forgotten to set
Doesn't NETVIEW run multiple users in the same address space? Can you write
NETVIEW scripts in anything other than CLIST and REXX?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hi,
That was on a LINK provided by Sebastian Welton (thank you Sebastian):
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.2.0?topic=overview-netview-restrictions-rexx-functions
Regards,
Jack
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:58, Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:31:37 +, Jack Zukt wrote:
>
>The glitch was the NETVIEW REXXSTRF value thas was set to the default
>DISABLE. While we wait for an IPL, the OVERRIDE solves the issue.
>
Please describe OVERRIDE. Is that a parameter to NETVIEW?
Star Trek trope:
"Comp
9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 3:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:29:37 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>In REXX, a decimal number *IS* a string.
>
Yes. Trying the follo
Hello all,
The glitch was the NETVIEW REXXSTRF value thas was set to the default
DISABLE. While we wait for an IPL, the OVERRIDE solves the issue.
And as Kulosu noted, it is Mark Zelden's IPLINFO rexx that we are using,
not an IBM supplied one.
Thank you all for your time and valuable
Also ensure that it is not being called as a DATA REXX as described here, this
has hit me previously:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.2.0?topic=overview-netview-restrictions-rexx-functions
Sebastian
>This is exactly what I was going to point to:
>REXXSTRF: ENABLE
>
>https:/
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:29:37 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>In REXX, a decimal number *IS* a string.
>
Yes. Trying the following instruction might be informative:
say c2x( 10 ) c2x( '10' ) c2x( "10" )
>... The semantics for the first parameter of STORAGE is the same on every
> REXX
This is exactly what I was going to point to:
REXXSTRF: ENABLE
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.4.0?topic=statements-defaults
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.4.0?topic=descriptions-defaults-nccf
REXXSTRF
Specifies whether the NetView operator can run REXX command lists that use
That's why you will come across truckloads of
/***
* PTR & STG & SWAREQ: *
* *
* Utility procedures to access
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022, 15:16 Paul Gorlinsky, wrote:
> Results from a zos 2.4 system
>
> /* */
> Say c2x(Storage("10",8))
> Say c2x(Storage(10+0,4))
> Say c2x(Storage(10+4,4))
> Z = c2x(Storage(10,4))
> Say c2x(Storage(Z,8))
>
> Results:
>
> 00FD4EA8
> 00FD4EA8
>
> 021800FED054
Hr... There has to be some significance to it only breaking on Netview
on that system. Maybe that Netview proc has something going on weird in a
library concatenation or something?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:32 AM Eric D Rossman wrote:
> That's the expected behavior. STORAGE is documen
A local Rexx function doesn't override a BIF unless it's in the same Rexx
program. At least, not that I've ever seen.
This seems like it should be easy to diagnose: just write a tiny program
that just does that storage() call and trace it.
Gorlinsky
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Yes they all returned the appropriate values ...
But unexpected since 10+0 should have been passed as a decimal number and not a
string ... maybe
Did you check the value of REXXSTRF in the netview defaults???
Try a LIST DEFAULTS command in Netview and be sure that the values for
REXXSTRF is ENABLE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jack Zukt
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 8
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gorlinsky [p...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Yes
...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Say c2x(Storage(16-6,8))
Say c2x(Storage((1+1+1+1+21-15),8))
Say c2x(Storage(10,8))
Say c2x(Storage("10",8))
So here is the prob
Say c2x(Storage(16-6,8))
Say c2x(Storage((1+1+1+1+21-15),8))
Say c2x(Storage(10,8))
Say c2x(Storage("10",8))
So here is the problem I have, the address portion is being computed as decimal
numbers and yet the storage function is treating the final result as a string
of HEX numbers.
Yes they all returned the appropriate values ...
But unexpected since 10+0 should have been passed as a decimal number and not a
string ... maybe this is IBM REXX v ooREXX ... don't know...
10+4 is 14 decimal and storage treated it as 14 hex
just not the behavior I have seen with other REXX
Ooh, that's good! Someone on the erring system wrote a REXX subroutine and
named it STORAGE; I like it.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Setting aside the scandal caused by His Messianic claims and His reputation
as a political firebrand, only two accusations of
:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Should be ...
but look at the results of Storage(10+0,4) which should have treated 10+0 and
10+4 as numeric expressions but it didn't
, 2022 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Results from a zos 2.4 system
/* */
Say c2x(Storage("10",8))
Say c2x(Storage(10+0,4))
Say c2x(Storage(10+4,4))
Z = c2x(Storage(10,4))
Say c2x(Storage(Z,8))
Results:
00FD4E
: Monday, December 19, 2022 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Should be ...
but look at the results of Storage(10+0,4) which should have treated 10+0 and
10+4 as numeric expressions but it didn't
>> This is (I think) an IBM supplied REXX
Not really. I believe that you referring to Mark Zelden's utility IPLINFO. Here
is the link to it
http://www.mzelden.com/mvsfiles/iplinfo.txt
>> except on one system AND when executed by a NETVIEW address space
According to Mark none of hi
]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
I'm not really great with rexx but everything I have, and seen shows all
lower case ?
c2d(storage(d2x( etc
Carmen
On 12/19/2022 7:20 AM, Jack Zukt wrote
Zukt [jzuk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 8:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Hi,
My colleagues come to me with a weird situation for which I cannot find an
explanation.
You are probably familiar with the IPLINFO REXX
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Carmen Vitullo [petevi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
I'm not really great
ecember 19, 2022 9:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
The first argument to STORAGE is a string. 16 would be wrong.
While it's possible that this won't fix it, the correct syntax would be:
CVT = C2d(Stor
decimal numeric values not hex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Should be ...
but look at the results of Storage(10+0,4) which should have treated 10+0 and
10+4 as numeric expressions but it didn't
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Never say never,,, investigate ... We don't know the history of the
installation and ALL possibilities should be examined ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Results from a zos 2.4 system
/* */
Say c2x(Storage("10",8))
Say c2x(Storage(10+0,4))
Say c2x(Storage(10+4,4))
Z = c2x(Storage(10,4))
Say c2x(Storage(Z,8))
Results:
00FD4EA8
00FD4EA8
021800FED054
Any comments?
rlinsky [p...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
As a string "10" or '10' but not 10
Storage("
Gorlinsky [p...@atsmigrations.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
Humm
Is there a possibility of a STORAGE() function in a library on the failing
system that could be called instead
Humm
Is there a possibility of a STORAGE() function in a library on the failing
system that could be called instead of the intended version?
Maybe check the library concatenation sequences for another module ...
including linklst
There might have been another storage function from
As a string "10" or '10' but not 10
Storage("10",4) should be correct
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thank you all for your comments
May be I was not clear before. This is (I think) an IBM supplied REXX. I am
not sure on its origin, but it works fine as is, except on one system AND
when executed by a NETVIEW address space. If executed as a TSO command it
works just fine.
It even works under
e is one system on which, when invoked by NETVIEW, the
>
> CVT = C2d(Storage(10,4))/* point to CVT */
>
> instruction fails by not returning a value:
IPLINFO is probably one of the most tested REXX e
DU
Subject: Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
If you are trying to get the cut the address is x10 not 10 try 16 instead of
10… boundary issue if you use 10…
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
Yep…I guessed that it was a valid numeric address…
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
x function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
If you are trying to get the cut the address is x10 not 10 try 16 instead of
10… boundary issue if you use 10…
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Rexx function STORAGE with weird behavior on Netview
If you are trying to get the cut the address is x10 not 10 try 16 instead of
10… boundary issue if you use 10…
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
If you are trying to get the cut the address is x10 not 10 try 16 instead of
10… boundary issue if you use 10…
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
VT= C2D(Storage(10,4))
Call Trace("O") /* though you won't get here if it fails...*/
Thank you and best regards,
Billy Ashton
-- Original Message --
From "Jack Zukt"
To IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date 12/19/2022 8:20:10 AM
Subject Rexx function STORAGE with weird
with the IPLINFO REXX. It works just fine but
there is one system on which, when invoked by NETVIEW, the
CVT = C2d(Storage(10,4))/* point to CVT */
instruction fails by not returning a value:
IRX0044I Error running ASVTASID, line 42: Function did not return data
As I said
Hi,
My colleagues come to me with a weird situation for which I cannot find an
explanation.
You are probably familiar with the IPLINFO REXX. It works just fine but
there is one system on which, when invoked by NETVIEW, the
CVT = C2d(Storage(10,4))/* point to CVT
Hi Mark,
Thanks a lot that's good to know. In this case I've just discovered it in the
Defining Automation Policy manual. It generates this command by default. I need
to add a parameter to the command and this can be done using the Application
Information screen specifying the string of
John,
In case you're not aware, there is a NetView and a SAusers group on
groups.io where you can post your question to also.
marktre...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:35 John Blythe Reid
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about this NetView screen:
>
> AOFKINFO
Hello,
I have a question about this NetView screen:
AOFKINFO Automation Control - Command Dialogs Line 57of 166
Domain Id . : NETVx DISPINFO Date . . : 01/13/22
Operator Id : xTime . . : 16:15:33
Join https://groups.io/g/SAUsers
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:20 AM Steve Beaver wrote:
> I need to create a job SUBMISSION processor what will be executed by
> NetView SA.as a STC
>
> As part of the process, I need to calculate the date of the input file name
> suffix, then put
I need to create a job SUBMISSION processor what will be executed by
NetView SA.as a STC
As part of the process, I need to calculate the date of the input file name
suffix, then put the job
thru in INTRDR.
Then I have to make it such that no one including me can manually push thru
the STARTED
Dear list:
I'd like to know if someone have migrated the Session Manager from
Netview Access to CL/Supersession.
We are starting to do it and I could not find if there is a process to
migrate in order to keep the groups defined in RACF for Access to be used in
CL/Supersession
Are you wanting to convert security options? If so, take a look at the
SECMIGR command.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.2.1?topic=descriptions-secmigr-nccf-cnme8004
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 7:25 AM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Does anyone in the group have NetView® under full RACF cont
Does anyone in the group have NetView® under full RACF control and would
you be willing to share your
CNMSTYLE out of your DSIPARM?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
I don't have a direct answer to your question, but here's some degree of
reassurance. z/OS 2.3 became generally available on September 29, 2017.
Tivoli NetView 5.4 for z/OS reached its End of Support date on October 31,
2017. Thus it appears this particular release combination was briefly
Is NV 5.4 even supported at this time? I am running NV 6.2 on z/OS 2.2. and 2.4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview 5.4
[CAUTION: This Email is from
When Yahoo Groups was no longer an option, the NetView and System
Automation folks moved here:
https://groups.io/g/NetView
https://groups.io/g/SAUsers
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:38 PM William Widmayer
wrote:
> Apologies if I posted in the wrong forum. If there is a better one for
> N
I don't know of a Netview listserv, but even if there is one this is a
legitimate place to post Netview questions. You'll probably get more eyeballs
here than one a more specialized list.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From
Apologies if I posted in the wrong forum. If there is a better one for
Netview, please let me know.
I am in the middle of z/OS upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 .
Is anyone running Netview 5.4 on a z/OS 2.3 system?
Bill Widmayer
(c) 2020 Ensono, LP. All rights reserved. Ensono is a trademark of Ensono
FWIW This is a Netview Clist I wrote for IBM in the early 90's. It won't
tell you how to issue a Netview %STARTUP command, but it will show you
*how* to code Netview commands for whatever anything else using Netview
Clist. (BTW Its syntax is not like that of TSO Clist.) HTH.
Cheers, Chris
> The main Netview "parm" member is CNMSTYLE (Netview Style sheet)
> and it is located in a dataset in the DSIPARM concatenation.
>
> Sorry about the "fat fingers"!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
&
Correction:
The main Netview "parm" member is CNMSTYLE (Netview Style sheet) and it
is located in a dataset in the DSIPARM concatenation.
Sorry about the "fat fingers"!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
The main Netview "parm" member is CNMSTYLE (Netview Style sheet) and it
is located in a dataset in the DSIARPM concatenation. The standard user
configurable member is CNMSTUSR. In this member you could code AuxInitCmd
commands that Netview will execute at initialization time:
I developed some REXX'es to do auto startup and shutdown using Netview back in
the late 90's. If I recall correctly, there was a config member to have a
REXX kicked off at Netview startup. It would then check to see if it was
really IPL time, (not just a Netview recycle) then cycle through
Upfront I will admit that I know very little about all the capabilities of
NetView.
Given that, is there a way to have NetView automation auto-magically execute
A %STARTUP command without the console prompting the %STARTUP.
Thanks in Advance
Steve
Yes - Under USER ADMIN - copy profile function
Marshall
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 2:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXT] NetView session manager - Session Clone
Hi
I have never used NetView session manager and my experience is just with
TPX and Supersession.
Under NetView do we have an option to clone an existing user sessions to a
new NetView user ?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
If the MPFLST is setup correctly, you should see a CNM493I message in
you Netview logs. This message indicates a match in Netview Message automation
Table .
Depending upon whether the dataset you want to trap on the FROM dataset
or the TO dataset will dictate which line you
Hello Tony,
Thanks for reply. I have don’t have programming knowledge to code member
in SDGASAMP for
DGA.SDGASAMP(DGADTFY2).
Also, my netview knowledge is limited to code trap command as you mentioned
previously.
SVTM052I STEP1COPY FKFD022( 704) SNODE=SEB.SND.TCS 280
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of saurabh khandelwal
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 7:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview Automation Table Code
Hello Steve,
I
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
