Am 04.12.2008 um 15:09 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:39 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives
v
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 04.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula
context document will only flow to the
page which equation 12 is in, but not go to the equation
automatically. But in my LaTeX file, it will if I use hyperref
package.
\placeformula[eq:pythagoras]
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
See \in {Equation}[eq:pythagoras] \unknown.
To refer
to Equation 12, my context document will only flow to the
page which equation 12 is in, but not go to the equation
automatically. But in my LaTeX file, it will if I use hyperref
package.
\placeformula[eq:pythagoras]
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
See \in {Equation}[eq:pythagoras
={{\it et al.}}]
\setupcite[author][left=,right=,otherstext={{\it et al.}}]
\setupheadtext[en][pubs=Referencias]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\definereferenceformat
[eqref]
[left=\normal(,
right=)]
%% para refenrenciar fórmulas
%\placeformula[tag] \startformula
% E = mc^2
%\stopformula
translating Context an excursion (due to a number of problems,
somebody told me to use context+xetex for this purpose but now it
seems that I have to complete the translation with luatex) and as you
probably know luatex has a problem with \placeformula in TRT mode (I
don't know if this problem has
$,
\placeformula[eq:copula-representation]
\startformula
F(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = C(F_1(x_1), \ldots, F_n(x_n)).
\stopformula
If the functions $F_1, \ldots, F_n$ are all continuous, then $C$ is
unique; otherwise, $C$ is uniquely determined on $\Ran F_1 \times
\cdots \times \Ran F_n$.
\stopTHM
\stoptext
, F_2, \ldots, F_n$. Then there exists an
$n$-dimensional copula $C$ such that for all $(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in
\Bbb{R}^n$,
\placeformula[eq:copula-representation]
\startformula
F(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = C(F_1(x_1), \ldots, F_n(x_n)).
\stopformula
If the functions $F_1, \ldots, F_n$ are all
\pardir TRT\textdir TRT}
\definestartstop
[farsidocument]
[commands={\FarsiGlobalDir},before=\page,after=\page]
\starttext
\startfarsidocument
\placeformula[formula1] $$y=123456789x^2$$
hi\footnote{hi}
\page
\stopfarsidocument
Why the formula in the previous page is not shown correct
$ is a function from $\4 {Î }$ to $\FSPACE L^2_t$.
Thus the system equations~\in[eq:transformations] can be written as
\startsubformulas[eq:system equations]
\placeformula \startformula \startalign[m=2, distance=3em]
\NC g^1_t\EQ \1 {Î}_t(\1 {Ï}_t),
\NC \2 {Ï}_t \EQ \1 Q(g^1_t
spacing after the first line (and changed the \cdots in the last
condition to \dots).
\definemathmatrix[rightbrace][left={\left.},right={\,\right\}},n=1,align=left]
\starttext
\placeformula[+] \startformula
\startrightbrace
\NC \min \{c_1 x_1 + c_2 x_2 + \cdots + c_n x_n \} \NR
the \cdots in the last
condition to \dots).
\definemathmatrix[rightbrace][left={\left.},right={\,\right\}},n=1,align=left]
\starttext
\placeformula[+] \startformula
\startrightbrace
\NC \min \{c_1 x_1 + c_2 x_2 + \cdots + c_n x_n \} \NR
\noalign{\vskip 0.2em}
\NC \text{subject
Hi all,
how does one get an indention after a formula? The last paragraph shall
be indented, but it is not. Any idea?
Tobias
\setupindenting[yes,1em,first]
\starttext
We start with a formula,
\placeformula
\startformula
a^2+b^2=c^2,
\stopformula
\noindent which was found by a Greek; it can
with a formula,
\placeformula
\startformula
a^2+b^2=c^2,
\stopformula
\noindent which was found by a Greek; it can also be written as
\placeformula
\startformula
a^2+b^2-c^2 = 0.
\stopformula
\indent Here, a new paragraph shall begin -- indented!
Use \indentation instead of \indent.
Aditya
}
\protect
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathlines
\NC f(x) = (a+b)^n \NR
\NC = a^n + n \cdot a^{n-1} b + \cdots + n \cdot a b^{n-1} + b^n \NR
\NC = a^n + n \cdot a^{n-1} b + \cdots + n \cdot a b^{n-1} + b^n \NR
\stopmathlines \stopformula
\stoptext
Taking care of [align=left
{\hfilneg
\crcr
\egroup
\egroup}
\protect
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathlines
\NC f(x) = (a+b)^n \NR
\NC = a^n + n \cdot a^{n-1} b + \cdots + n \cdot a b^{n-1} + b^n \NR
\NC = a^n + n \cdot a^{n-1} b + \cdots + n \cdot a b^{n-1} + b^n \NR
the equation tag itself, I mean the one introduced by
\placeformula, is there a way to have it always typeset in upshape?
Morgan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
to implement?
And concerning the equation tag itself, I mean the one introduced by
\placeformula, is there a way to have it always typeset in upshape?
\setupformulas[numberstyle=normal]
Aditya
___
If your question
floating objects figures, tables,
intermezzos, graphics.
* the bodies of the predefined footnotes endnotes, and floating
marginals
* the contents of float captions
* the paragraph following a \stopformula, if that formula is
not preceded by \placeformula
,
intermezzos, graphics.
* the bodies of the predefined footnotes endnotes, and floating
marginals
* the contents of float captions
* the paragraph following a \stopformula, if that formula is
not preceded by \placeformula, and there is not empty line
inbetween
]
\placecombinedlist[name][settings]
\placecombinedlist[name][settings]
# \placefigure
\placefloat[options][references]{text}{text}
\placefootnotes[settings]
\placeformula[references]{text}$$ $$
# \placelayer
\placelegend{text}{text}
\placelist[names][settings]
\placelistoffloats
\placelistofsorts
)]
\startitemize
\item \HighlightSteps[1,4]{Step 1.}
\item \HighlightSteps[2] {Step 2.}
\item \HighlightSteps[3] {Step 3.}
\item \HighlightSteps[4] {Start over from Step 1.}
\stopitemize
\StopSteps
\StartSteps[Equations]
\placeformula[eq:divu]
\startformula
\vec\nabla\cdot
)]
\startitemize
\item \HighlightSteps[1,4]{Step 1.}
\item \HighlightSteps[2] {Step 2.}
\item \HighlightSteps[3] {Step 3.}
\item \HighlightSteps[4] {Start over from Step 1.}
\stopitemize
\StopSteps
\StartSteps[Equations]
\placeformula[eq:divu]
\startformula
\vec\nabla\cdot
, blah, blah, blah, blah,
I love the following formula:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
6.670 \times 10^{-11} \Newton \Times \Square \Meter \Per \Square
\Kilo
\Gram
\stopformula
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which
, blah, blah, blah, blah,
I love the following formula:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
6.670 \times 10^{-11} \Newton \Times \Square \Meter \Per \Square \Kilo
\Gram
\stopformula
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which is very cool.
which is very cool
]
\starttext
Blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
I love the following formula:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
I love the following formula:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
6.670 \times 10^{-11} \Newton \Times \Square \Meter \Per \Square \Kilo
\Gram
. How can I force the sub formula numbering to be
right aligned ?
Thanks
Wim
\def\ms{\,}
\starttext
\placeformula[calcb-chapter4-eqn2]
\startformula
f(x) = \sum_{n = - \infty}^{+\infty} c_{n} e^{\displaystyle i n \frac{\pi}{L}
x} \quad \text{,} \quad c_{n} = \frac{1}{2L} \int\limits_{-L}^{L} f(x
can I force the sub formula numbering to be right
aligned ?
See above: This was due to mistake in my code. This works. (Though it
will be nice if such mistakes do not cause these kinds of errors)
\def\ms{\,}
\starttext
\placeformula[calcb-chapter4-eqn2]
\startformula
f(x) = \sum_{n = - \infty
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The source:
\startproperty
Let $a$ and $b$ be any numbers such that $a=b$. Then, if $c$ is
any number other than zero,
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
ac=bc.\index{equations+multiplication
{\rm
e}}\right)-1\right]+I_{\rm i1}-I_{\rm i2}
\stopalign\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:debye]
\startformula\startalign[n=1]
\lambda_{\rm D} = \sqrt{\epsilon_0 k_{\rm B}T_{\rm
e}\over nq_{\rm e}^2}
\stopalign\stopformula
\stoptext
On 05/06/07, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun
]
\enableregime[utf]
\setupindenting[yes,medium]
\starttext
\startformula\startalign[n=1]
2I_{\rm d} = I_{\rm e}^0
\left[\exp\left({-qU\over k_{\rm B}T_{\rm
e}}\right)-1\right]+I_{\rm i1}-I_{\rm i2}
\stopalign\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:debye]
\startformula\startalign[n=1
\placeformula \startformula
\eqalign{
a + b = c + d\cr
= e + f\cr}
\stopformula
\placeformula \startformula
\startalign
\NC a + b \NC = c + d \NR[+]
\NC \NC = e + f \NR
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
The number of equations in second formula can only be put on the first
following example
can make me clear.
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula
\eqalign{
a + b = c + d\cr
= e + f\cr}
\stopformula
\placeformula \startformula
\startalign
\NC a + b \NC = c + d \NR[+]
\NC \NC = e + f \NR
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
The number
{\rm e}^0
\left[\exp\left({-qU\over k_{\rm B}T_{\rm
e}}\right)-1\right]+I_{\rm i1}-I_{\rm i2}
\stopalign\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:debye]
\startformula\startalign[n=1]
\lambda_{\rm D} = \sqrt{\epsilon_0 k_{\rm B}T_{\rm
e}\over nq_{\rm e}^2}
\stopalign\stopformula
\stoptext
What I
\subject{The paragraph follows the math equations doesn't indent}
\input knuth
\placeformula
\startformula
a + b = c
\stopformula
\input knuth
\stoptext
-
Is this behavior by design?
How can I make all paragraphs to indent?
There is no global mechanism
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
\NC a \NC =b
\NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
\NC c \NC =d
\NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer
I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Wim Neimeijer wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
\NC a \NC =b
\NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
\NC c \NC =d
\NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer
I can
Try:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
\left( {\matrix{
{a_1 } {a_2 } {a_3 } \ldots {a_X } \cr
{b_1 } 0 0 0 0 \cr
0 {b_2 } 0 0 0 \cr
0 0 \ddots 0 0 \cr
0 0 0 {b_{X - 1} } 0 \cr
} } \right),
\stopformula
On Feb 19, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Vyatcheslav
This is almost OK, but has one formula number too much here:
\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
a =b
A =B \\
c =d
C =D \\
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\typebuffer
\getbuffer
This results in a very weird formula
.
Consider the following examples:
\starttext
This is almost OK, but has one formula number too much here:
\startbuffer
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
a =b
A =B \\
c =d
C =D \\
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
{Math}
An equation can be typeset inline like $e^{\pi i}+1=0$, or as a
displayed formula:
\startformula
\int_0^\infty t^4 e^{-t}\,dt = 24.
\stopformula
% don't use $$...$$ (the plain TeX equivalent)
You can also have numbered equations:
\placeformula[eq:factorial-example]\startformula
\int_0^\infty
tables had spacing problems
* Make \placeformula $$ .. $$ work again
Best,
Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hubertus wrote:
Hello again,
I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your
answers!
Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue
about
tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your
posts. But, alas,
Hello again,
I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your
answers!
Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue about
tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your
posts. But, alas, no success.
Is this a
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do it:
\placeformula
$$
f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
$$
It didn't work anymore?!? It doesn't place a number nor does it do the spacing
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do
it:
\placeformula
$$
f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
$$
It didn't work anymore
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
This is a bug in doplaceformula. I do not know how to avoid it, but
the next code illustrates what is happening.
\def\dotest{
\def\nextnext{$}%
\ifx\next\nextnext
Inside dispplaceformula\ldots % This always fails
\else
Inside
\startformula##1\stopformula
{\advance\scratchcounter\plusone}% --- Missing \cr here
\scratchcounter\zerocount #1% preroll
This causes a number to missed in
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformulas
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC
end
%Dprevious_subnumbered = true ;
%D else
%Dprevious_subnumbered = false ;
%D end
% Examples
\starttext
\placelist[formula]
\section{Math Formulas}
\startnamedsubformulas[eq:well_known]{Well Known Equalities}
\placeformula[eq:first] \startformula
1 + 0 = 1
equation, and it shouldn't be removed. If I comment out the
formula, then the paragraph shape is fine.
If I make add a \placeformula before the \startformula, then the
equation number goes where it should (below the right edge of the
figure), but the area below it is still whitespace
, then the paragraph shape is fine.
If I make add a \placeformula before the \startformula, then the
equation number goes where it should (below the right edge of the
figure), but the area below it is still whitespace.
Is it a bug or is there an option to make startformula not interfere
with the paragraph shape
[whatever][number=davidsnumber]
\setupnumber[formula] [number=davidsnumber]
\setupnumber[figure][number=davidsnumber]
%\setupcaption[figure][number=davidsnumber]
\starttext
\placeformula[x]
\startformula x\stopformula
\startwhatever x\stopwhatever
\placeformula[x]
\startformula y\stopformula
; format=flowed
David Arnold wrote:
This is excellent. Now, how can I include this
\placeformula[eq:nine]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
with the same common counter as remark and definition below?
hm, it's incredible what users come up with but this time you're
lucky
.
\starttext
\setupformulas[way=bysection]
\setupcaptions[way=bysection]
\section{One}
This is a test
\placeformula \startformula a \stopformula
\placefigure {test}{}
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setupcaptions[way=bytext]
\section{Two}
This is a test
\placeformula \startformula a \stopformula
!conversion=\v!character,
\c!separator=\@@fmseparator,
\c!indentnext=\@@fmindentnext]
\protect
%D The test cases
\startbuffer
\placeformula \startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\stopbuffer
\startsetups[test]
\dorecurse{3}{\getbuffer}
Lets start subformulas
\startsubformulas
\dorecurse
}
\defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion]
\setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion]
\placeformula[#1]}
\starttext
\placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula
E = mc^2
\stopformula
See \in formula[tag] for a tagged formula
\stoptext
%8
to bytext
\resetnumber[formula]
}
\def\stopsubformulas%
{\setupformulas[conversion=numbers]
% conversion should be inherited from setupformulas
% way should be restored to whatever it was earlier
\restorenumber[formula]}
\startbuffer
\placeformula \startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
Hans, Taco,
I had a \Tindex inside a display math, something like this.
\placeformula
\startformula
x^2 \Tindex{sample}
\stopformula
I think that might have been it, because now I have a compile.
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
David Arnold wrote:
\Tindex #1-\index
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
But if I inline the environment file, to get
\startenvironment ne
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\stopenvironment
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
x = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
then texexec doesn't produce any overfull \hbox.
And also no PDF, because
.
So that leaves the original problem, which is why the hbox is overfull
in this minimal file (that produces a PDF!):
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
x = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context
The result of
\placeformula
\startformula[lucida]
1 \Gamma \alpha x
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula[lucida]
1 \Gamma {\bfm \alpha x}
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula[lucidaboldmath]
1 \Gamma \alpha x
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula[lucidaboldmath]
1 \Gamma {\bfm \alpha x}
\s
I'm agree to use Demibold ;) (my type-buy is ready)
Can you test:
\placeformula
\startformula[lucida]
1 \Gamma \alpha x
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula[lucida]
1 \Gamma {\bfm \alpha x}
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula[lucidaboldmath]
1 \Gamma \alpha x
\stopformula
://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Notes
Something broke with formula numbering, and it is due to the numbering
changes. \preparethenumber is commented from core-sec.tex,
dododoformulanumber in core-mat.tex still uses it. As a result even
the simple
\placeformula \startformula a = b \stopformula
fails
the simple
\placeformula \startformula a = b \stopformula
fails with
! Undefined control sequence.
\dododoformulanumber [EMAIL PROTECTED] \preparethenumber
\??fm
\composedsectionnumb...
argument \normalreqno {\doformulanumber
anyway, with a bit of delay ... new zips uploaded (unchecked -)
I just tested Aditya's example
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a = b \stopformula
\stoptext
and found that it worked fine (with 2006.08.08 21:51), so I guessed
that some fast updating happened! I've added that example
Not sure what I'm doing wrong here, but this is the minimal example I
could make. The environment file ne.tex contains
\startenvironment ne
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\stopenvironment
And the test file is
\environment ne
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
x = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
).
Then we can have
\placeformula
\startmultilineformula[gap=5pt]
\NC f(x) = ax \NR
\NC + bx + c + \NR
\NC e \NR
\stopformula
This should come out as (assuming formulas are numbered on the right)
5pt gap
|---f(x) = ax| left aligned
| + bx + c
All,
We have:
\placeformula[eq:commonb]
\startformula
(1)^2+(\sqrt{4x+13})^2=(2x)^2,
\stopformula
This gives us a centered equation with an number pushed to the right
edge of the page (I probably should say text area).
What we'd like to do, just in this one example (not globally), is add
\stopremark
\startremark
This is a remark
\stopremark
\starttheorem
This is a theorem.
\stoptheorem
\placeformula[eq:one]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
\startremark
This is a remark
\stopremark
\starttheorem
This is a theorem.
\stoptheorem
\stoptext
=no]
\starttext
\chapter[sec:first]{First}
\section[section:numbers]{Number Systems}
\input tufte
\startdefinition
Now is the time
\stopdefinition
\startdefinition
Now is the time
\stopdefinition
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\starttheorem[thm:one]
A fine
\startdefinition
Now is the time
\stopdefinition
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\starttheorem[thm:one]
A fine time.
\stoptheorem
\placeformula[eq:2]
\startformula
f(x)=x^3
\stopformula
\startexample[exmpl:one]
fine example
\stopexample
\startproperty
A list
\inmargin{some text in margin}
\placeformula
\startformula
a+b=c
\stopformula
How can I get rid of that space?
\stopframedtext
\stoptext
See if margintext suits you better.
\margintext{some text in margin}
\placeformula.
This moves the text into the next paragraph.
Aditya
David Arnold wrote:
This is excellent. Now, how can I include this
\placeformula[eq:nine]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
with the same common counter as remark and definition below?
hm, it's incredible what users come up with but this time you're lucky -)
\defineenumeration
in margin}
\placeformula
\startformula
a+b=c
\stopformula
How can I get rid of that space?
\stopframedtext
\stoptext
when using framed texts you run into problems with flushing, struts and the
nature of boxes (vbox,vtop)
in such cases one can do several things
\starttext
\showframe
\def
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
All, why do we lose our hang in the second question?
computer platforms.
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
An icon is a representation of an action or the name of a computer
Because you begin a new paragraph. Just remove
OK,
Now, how can we get
\placeformula
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
To use the same number scheme.
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
David Arnold wrote:
All,
Let's say I have some enumerations that are numbered, for
definitions, examples, theorems, etc. Let's say I
Hello,
I would like to write a note in the margin next to some framed
formula, but I guess that the formula starts a new paragraph and
there's too much space left on the top of the frame. How can I fix
that?
\starttext
\startframedtext
\inmargin{some text in margin}
\placeformula
\startformula
This is excellent. Now, how can I include this
\placeformula[eq:nine]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
with the same common counter as remark and definition below?
just clone the definition one:
\defineenumeration
[remark]
[location=serried,
width=broad,
text=Remark
of a computer
program. Icons are frequently used in operating systems on several
computer platforms.
\stopquestion
\startquestion
An icon is a representation of an action or the name of a computer
program. Icons are frequently used in operating systems on several
computer platforms.
\placeformula
,
before=\blank,
after=\blank,
way=bysection,
number=nctr]
\starttext
\startremark
Foo
\stopremark
\placeformula[eqa;one]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
\startdefinition
Foo
\stopdefinition
\stoptext
The goal
{First Section}
\placeformula
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
\startquestion
Is it easy to do that?
\stopquestion
\chapter{About Something Else}
should give
C1 About Something
C1.1First section
f(x)=x^2 (C1.1)
question C1Q.1
C2 About Something Else
Mojca
PS: To David (and Aditya): why
That means:
\defineenumeration
[question]
[text=Question,
way=bychapter,
sectionnumber=yes,
separator={Q.}]
\chapter{About Something}
\section{First Section}
\placeformula
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
\startquestion
Is it easy to do
,
after=\blank,
way=bysection,
number=nctr]
\starttext
\startremark
Foo
\stopremark
\placeformula[eqa;one]
\startformula
f(x)=x^2
\stopformula
\startdefinition
Foo
\stopdefinition
\stoptext
The goal is to have these come out:
Remark 1.
f(x)=x^2 (2
]
% or \setupfloat[figure][...]
\setupfloats
[way=bysection,
location=top,
align=right]
\setupformulas
[way=bysection]
% after={\setupheadnumber[subsection][+1]},
\starttext
\section{First section}
\definition{}
\placeformula
\startformula
f(x)=3x+2
\stopformula
bar a bit more.
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2
+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
a bit more.
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2
+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
-12}\,}
You may want to add a \vphantom command as well to separate the
fractions from the main bar a bit more.
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2
+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12
}\,}
{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}\,}
You may want to add a \vphantom command as well to separate the
fractions from the main bar a bit more.
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2
+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3
+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
David Arnold wrote:
Sanjoy,
Of course. Thanks.
But how about an example in latex or tex where a function eats a
brace and crashes, as what happens with this context code:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
[9,\infty)=\{x:\,x\ge 9\}
\stopformula
I know I've seen this in Latex
command as well to separate the
fractions from the main bar a bit more.
\dfrac{\,\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}\,}{\,\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}\,}.
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
On 7/2/06, David Arnold wrote:
All,
How can I extend the main fraction bar in the following expression,
making it a tad longer?
\placeformula
\startformula
\dfrac{\dfrac{9+3x-2x^2}{x^2-16}}{\dfrac{4x^3-9x}{2x^2+5x-12}}.
\stopformula
I don't know what \dfrac should be (I assumed \let
David Arnold wrote:
All,
Came across this again.
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
[9,\infty)=\{x:\,x\ge 9\}
\stopformula
Got it to compile with:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula\relax
[9,\infty)=\{x:\,x\ge 9\}
\stopformula
indeed, that's the price to pay for optional arguments
Sanjoy,
Of course. Thanks.
But how about an example in latex or tex where a function eats a
brace and crashes, as what happens with this context code:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
[9,\infty)=\{x:\,x\ge 9\}
\stopformula
I know I've seen this in Latex before, but I can't remember
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, David Arnold wrote:
Sanjoy,
Of course. Thanks.
But how about an example in latex or tex where a function eats a
brace and crashes, as what happens with this context code:
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
[9,\infty)=\{x:\,x\ge 9\}
\stopformula
I know I've seen
401 - 500 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
