RE: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-08 Thread Matt McNeill
as bought by Microsoft in 1998/9). I also use it via Outlook 2003, but didn't know it was WebDAV because it's all hidden away. -Original Message- From: Kervin L. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 February 2006 20:57 To: Matt McNeill Cc: 'otlkcon-devel' Subject:

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Hello, It's great hearing everyone's opinion on the proposed calendar access protocols. I think Helge is pretty much correct on the state of the technology. CalDAV will most likely be completed within months, maybe a lot sooner. We are already communicating with servers in test since the past

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Helge Hess
On Feb 7, 2006, at 20:40, Charles Wyble wrote: FUD, its seems more like CalDAV is close to a release, I would expect it in 2006. AFAIK all major issues are sorted out. But the CalDAV mailing list is the appropriate place to sort this out. I am curious why you call FUD? He is not saying it is so

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Charles Wyble
Helge Hess wrote: Hi, I must say I'm rather shocked by this mail. On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:27, Matt McNeill wrote: If CalDAV is so far away from being an agreed standard, perhaps several years away, FUD, its seems more like CalDAV is close to a release, I would expect it in 2006. AFAIK all maj

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Helge Hess
Hi, I must say I'm rather shocked by this mail. On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:27, Matt McNeill wrote: If CalDAV is so far away from being an agreed standard, perhaps several years away, FUD, its seems more like CalDAV is close to a release, I would expect it in 2006. AFAIK all major issues are sorte

RE: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Matt McNeill
tt McNeill; otlkcon-devel Subject: Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces Hello Matt, Matt McNeill wrote: > being able to synchronise/view my personal diary in outlook, very much > what is being suggested by CalDAV interface. The only probem is, apart > from apache, there aren't many web servers

RE: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-07 Thread Matt McNeill
n be seen: http://www.copperbeech.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/html/network.htm Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wyble Sent: 06 February 2006 16:30 To: Matt McNeill Cc: 'otlkcon-devel' Subject: Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-06 Thread Charles Wyble
Matt McNeill wrote: I know this project has been working incredibly hard to bring this product to Beta, and although I am a lurker, I do follow progress very closely. As do a very wide variety of people I believe :) This library could become critical to opening out the development possibiliti

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-06 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Hello Matt, Matt McNeill wrote: being able to synchronise/view my personal diary in outlook, very much what is being suggested by CalDAV interface. The only probem is, apart from apache, there aren't many web servers which support webdav. I run an embeded linux server and apache is too heavy. I'

Re: [otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-06 Thread Olafur Arason
You can try cosmo: http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/CosmoHome or adadav: http://akadav.sourceforge.net/ or anyone of these server products: http://www.webdav.org/projects/ Olafur Arason 2006/2/6, Matt McNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I know this project has been working incredibly ha

[otlkcon-devel] Interfaces

2006-02-06 Thread Matt McNeill
I know this project has been working incredibly hard to bring this product to Beta, and although I am a lurker, I do follow progress very closely. This library could become critical to opening out the development possibilities behind outlook and alowing the synchronisation of data widely across man