Wednesday, 5 April 2017 2:07:59 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Ozdotnet list
Been on this list for as long as I can remember (2002?), I don’t add much to
the conversation but I do still listen and try to pipe in when I have value.
I’m still a massive fan of the list format as I’m on a lot of them
they remained on the list. Great tie back to home, as you say! That's great
> to hear. [image: ]
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of Matthew Lam <lammp...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 Apr
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:07 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the list
as it benefit
say! That's great to hear.
[]
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of Matthew Lam <lammp...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:37:30 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Hi all, Been follo
t;ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of Adrian Halid <adr...@halid.com.au>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM
> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
> *Subject:* RE: Ozdotnet list
>
>
> Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format.
>
>
>
>
>
> Re
id <adr...@halid.com.au>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM
> *To:* 'ozDotNet'
> *Subject:* RE: Ozdotnet list
>
>
> Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Adrian Halid
>
>
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-
are awesome, this list has helped me heaps over those 15ish years.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of Adrian Halid <adr...@halid.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: O
Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format.
Regards
Adrian Halid
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of noonie
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:24 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Happy to move and follow the crowd. I really do like the list format
though.
Gmail does a really good job with it and I'm afraid that I might just slide
away if I had to visit yet another website :-p
Lists are old fashioned but, like bow ties, they're still cool after all
these years.
--
@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
I still read occasionally, if only to see what Greg K is trying to tame next ;)
Looking through my emails, I joined Stanski's list in 2002 (15 years!?
eeep!) and moved across when the sever was in death-throes and Connors stepped
up. I see a few people
dotnet.com>
<ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>> on behalf of David Connors
<da...@connors.com <mailto:da...@connors.com>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet lis
; *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the
>> list as it benefit
net-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of Stuff Box <st...@codeant.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:27:33 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Ive been a lurker here for a long time (around 2003). I enjoy the banter and
conversations. Moving to another platform probably would
's not applicable to them anymore and they
> forgot they were on it... whatever the reason).
>
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
> of David Connors <da...@connors.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
> To: ozDotNet
>
...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of David Connors <da...@connors.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright
<tonyw...@gmail.com<mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
That
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright wrote:
> That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the
> list as it benefits from being niche. Secondly, moving to a new
> environment, while exciting, could spell the end of the list as many
> spectators
>
> All welcome, I say.
>
I'm not racist, but, what about JavaScript developers?
;-) *GK*
net-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 9:52:52 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we
> can have lots of easily ide
com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 9:52:52 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we can
have lots of easily identifiable sub-topics like .NET, C#, F#, Xamarin,
Android, WPF, VB Sucks, OT, etc.
There are a hell of a l
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of Preet Sangha <preetsan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:28:49 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
As a non Oz developer (I'm in Auckland) I suppose I don't have much say. So
I'll just add t
lp cover the costs of hosting, and maybe even go towards promotion to
>> other Aussie devs onboard.
>>
>>
>> This is exciting!
>> --
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
>> behalf of
-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of David Richards <ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list
>
> I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list sinc
vs onboard.
This is exciting!
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf
of David Richards <ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
I have no problem wit
I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list since sometime
around 2003/4. It's probably a bit ironic that a tech focused list is a
bit behind in the tech department.
Suggestions from me:
1. Open it up a bit rather than be focused on .net but make sure its made
clear what category
I don't contribute here much either, but still read it whenever there's
some interesting discussion.
I welcome the move. However, I think most people would jump straight to
their favourite search engines/StackOverflow when they have an issue. So I
think that's part of why this last has become so
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 09:56 Stephen Price wrote:
> So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure
> Discourse is all it says.
>
I've been needing to rebuild the current server anyway as its Linux Kernel
is too old for Azure + MailMan 3 is out now.
So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure Discourse is
all it says.
We do need to decide as a group of we wish to continue the focus on Aussie
dotnet Devs, or expand it to include other Aussie developers. Is there a
difference these days? Naming is important and
I know I don't contribute much but I do support the move although the
move will likely not increase participation in itself.
If you want to increase participation then we will need to promote the
echoes and if at all possible gain some support from generous
benefactors. Getting a web site
ntain yourself
> and will contribute to the codebase on Sunday mornings, right?
>
>
> cheers
>
> Stephen
> --
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com>
&g
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list
Steve, a brave suggestion. This group's traffic has decreased dramatically in
recent years. I presume we're all world-class experts now and don't need to ask
questions that often! A fresh forum with a modern UI and features sounds quite
attractive, as opposed to an old
Steve, a brave suggestion. This group's traffic has decreased dramatically
in recent years. I presume we're all world-class experts now and don't need
to ask questions that often! A fresh forum with a modern UI and features
sounds quite attractive, as opposed to an old fashioned e-mailing list,
31 matches
Mail list logo