Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-05 Thread Stephen Price
Wednesday, 5 April 2017 2:07:59 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: RE: Ozdotnet list Been on this list for as long as I can remember (2002?), I don’t add much to the conversation but I do still listen and try to pipe in when I have value. I’m still a massive fan of the list format as I’m on a lot of them

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-05 Thread Mark Hurd
they remained on the list. Great tie back to home, as you say! That's great > to hear. [image: ] > -- > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of Matthew Lam <lammp...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 Apr

RE: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-05 Thread David Kean
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Tony Wright Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:07 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the list as it benefit

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Stephen Price
say! That's great to hear. [] From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of Matthew Lam <lammp...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:37:30 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list Hi all, Been follo

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Emily Waghorne
t;ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of Adrian Halid <adr...@halid.com.au> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM > *To:* 'ozDotNet' > *Subject:* RE: Ozdotnet list > > > Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format. > > > > > > Re

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Matthew Lam
id <adr...@halid.com.au> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM > *To:* 'ozDotNet' > *Subject:* RE: Ozdotnet list > > > Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Adrian Halid > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Stephen Price
are awesome, this list has helped me heaps over those 15ish years. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of Adrian Halid <adr...@halid.com.au> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:29:33 PM To: 'ozDotNet' Subject: RE: O

RE: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Adrian Halid
Will follow the crowd. +1 for the email list format. Regards Adrian Halid From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of noonie Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:24 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread noonie
Happy to move and follow the crowd. I really do like the list format though. Gmail does a really good job with it and I'm afraid that I might just slide away if I had to visit yet another website :-p Lists are old fashioned but, like bow ties, they're still cool after all these years. --

RE: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread 罗格雷格博士
@ozdotnet.com Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list I still read occasionally, if only to see what Greg K is trying to tame next ;) Looking through my emails, I joined Stanski's list in 2002 (15 years!? eeep!) and moved across when the sever was in death-throes and Connors stepped up. I see a few people

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-04 Thread Les Hughes
dotnet.com> <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>> on behalf of David Connors <da...@connors.com <mailto:da...@connors.com>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM *To:* ozDotNet *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet lis

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Tony Wright
; *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the >> list as it benefit

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
net-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of Stuff Box <st...@codeant.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:27:33 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list Ive been a lurker here for a long time (around 2003). I enjoy the banter and conversations. Moving to another platform probably would

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stuff Box
's not applicable to them anymore and they > forgot they were on it... whatever the reason). > > From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf > of David Connors <da...@connors.com> > Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM > To: ozDotNet >

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of David Connors <da...@connors.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 11:08:03 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright <tonyw...@gmail.com<mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com>> wrote: That

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread David Connors
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 13:06 Tony Wright wrote: > That does worry me. First, I don't agree with broadening the scope of the > list as it benefits from being niche. Secondly, moving to a new > environment, while exciting, could spell the end of the list as many > spectators

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Greg Keogh
> > All welcome, I say. > I'm not racist, but, what about JavaScript developers? ;-) *GK*

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Tony Wright
net-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 9:52:52 AM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list > > If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we > can have lots of easily ide

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 9:52:52 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list If Discourse tags conversations like other typical modern forums, then we can have lots of easily identifiable sub-topics like .NET, C#, F#, Xamarin, Android, WPF, VB Sucks, OT, etc. There are a hell of a l

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of Preet Sangha <preetsan...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 10:28:49 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list As a non Oz developer (I'm in Auckland) I suppose I don't have much say. So I'll just add t

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Preet Sangha
lp cover the costs of hosting, and maybe even go towards promotion to >> other Aussie devs onboard. >> >> >> This is exciting! >> -- >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on >> behalf of

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Greg Keogh
-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of David Richards <ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: Ozdotnet list > > I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list sinc

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
vs onboard. This is exciting! From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on behalf of David Richards <ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017 8:55:27 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list I have no problem wit

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread David Richards
I have no problem with the move. I've been on this list since sometime around 2003/4. It's probably a bit ironic that a tech focused list is a bit behind in the tech department. Suggestions from me: 1. Open it up a bit rather than be focused on .net but make sure its made clear what category

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread William Luu
I don't contribute here much either, but still read it whenever there's some interesting discussion. I welcome the move. However, I think most people would jump straight to their favourite search engines/StackOverflow when they have an issue. So I think that's part of why this last has become so

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread David Connors
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 09:56 Stephen Price wrote: > So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure > Discourse is all it says. > I've been needing to rebuild the current server anyway as its Linux Kernel is too old for Azure + MailMan 3 is out now.

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
So far no negative responses. We'll do some trialing to make sure Discourse is all it says. We do need to decide as a group of we wish to continue the focus on Aussie dotnet Devs, or expand it to include other Aussie developers. Is there a difference these days? Naming is important and

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Glen Harvy
I know I don't contribute much but I do support the move although the move will likely not increase participation in itself. If you want to increase participation then we will need to promote the echoes and if at all possible gain some support from generous benefactors. Getting a web site

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Wallace Turner
ntain yourself > and will contribute to the codebase on Sunday mornings, right? > > > cheers > > Stephen > -- > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on > behalf of Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> &g

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Price
Subject: Re: Ozdotnet list Steve, a brave suggestion. This group's traffic has decreased dramatically in recent years. I presume we're all world-class experts now and don't need to ask questions that often! A fresh forum with a modern UI and features sounds quite attractive, as opposed to an old

Re: Ozdotnet list

2017-04-03 Thread Greg Keogh
Steve, a brave suggestion. This group's traffic has decreased dramatically in recent years. I presume we're all world-class experts now and don't need to ask questions that often! A fresh forum with a modern UI and features sounds quite attractive, as opposed to an old fashioned e-mailing list,