Hi,
Rob wrote:
OK, lets try and narrow down the dates for this.
Sorry to go the other way but if we want to include our colonial
G friends, maybe we should be looking at July or August.
I am free most weeknds in June except the first. I will try to
fit in with everyone else. If we are going
Mr Chan posted:
A product that was designed and manufactured to be used heavily or
professionally, doesn't mean it must be reliable.
I disagree. If it is designed to be used heavily then that includes performing
reliably under that kind of use.
Luxury german cars are expensive too, but
Hi,
The nearest I can find is a GP60AAHHB, which is a 2/3 AA size,
0.6Ah cell. Max charge 60mA for 14 hours. Manufacturer seems
to be called either Green Charge or Green Power. The writing on
the Ebay ones seems to be far eastern.
mike
Hi,
of course MS does not even adhere to the standards it sets itself
Little Billie's policy towards all standards is the same: 'embrace and
extend'. This means that by definition everything Microsoft does
conforms with all standards at all times. It's everybody else that's
out of step.
---
OK, Well Jos ruled out the first week of June anyway. So I guess if we
want to avoid crowds we are looking at 27-29 June. Otherwise I would
suggest late August when the crowds have died down a bit (Perhaps
15-17th or even 29-31)? I am happy with most other dates too, I merely
limit the
(Let's not get into the what's a professional or professional camera et.
al. again, Please).
Yes, it's a red herring the size of an Orca.
s
--Mike
LX has never been the no.1 choice
for me considered it's relability track record, and ongoing expensive
service bills. It is a lovely camera when it works. Both Super A/Program and
MX are a lot more reliable imho, and I certainly would not recommend to
trade both for a LX.
All this talk
Hi Boris,
I like the picture and the softness into it. I'm myself weak to soft
colors so I like how its being exposed - no need for a polarizer or
nything you haven't used.
What I don't like is that the foreground is cut. I'm disturbed by a
third or half of a tree so in my opinion you could have
Dream on :-(
Lukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30,
Paul wrote:
My single LX has now exposed 1500 rolls of film without a hiccup. It was
well used when I bought it three years ago, and Pentax Colorado serviced
it at that time. Perhaps it's the luck of the draw?
Paul Stenquist
Mine worked for 19 years before it developed its first fault. It
The MX was marketed as a pro system also, and so was the PZ-1.
There is a significant difference: the LX was specified for over 100 000 shutter
cycles and throughly tested under severe conditions. I read an interview with the then
Asahi boss, Minoru Suzuki, who explained in detail the
Peter wrote:
OK so what about this Flagship you have been telling
us about I know it is a rumour, but???
So you think the outcome success (or lack of) of
this new DSLR will make or break the appearance of
this Flagship? I thought this new Pentax boss wanted
to make a camera that
I think it all depends how literally you real what was quoted. What
they ideally want is exactly that, a camera that you CAN all take to
your graves, but also one that they will be able to persuade you not to.
What they need is to then provide you later with a camera that you would
rather take
Mike wrote:
Of course this is not what any company wants...to sell a camera that will
last forever and never need updating. Manufacturers want to sell cameras,
not get into the business of servicing 25-year-old warhorses.
Perhaps if they want to make the definitive and LAST film SLR; it will
Paul Jones wrote:
What features do the Sigma EX lenses not support on the
Nikon AFD and Canon
EF mounts?
Hi Paul,
I understand that the version for Nikon AFD does not support
predictive autofocus, and that the version for Canon may not
be compatible with several features, depending on which
Dan Scott wrote:
Perhaps someone could suggest an
older, manual focus 24mm with a more modest weight and
girth?
24mm f/3.5K. A beauty!
John
The LX was a professional camera because it was part of an entire system
that would enable a photographer, with additional components, to take
just about any type of picture that was done with 35mm. So it includes
things like different backs, drives, finders, screens, etc. Pro cameras
are
Vic wrote:
I have contacted a vet and we are going
to try to tranquilize the animal in the next day or two, remove the arrow and
set it free. There are all kinds of problems we'll have to overcome to make
it a success but the vet thinks it's worth a try
Around here injuried animals,
Hi Otis,
You said: Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with
a lot of sites...
It's NOT NetCOMM that's having the problems. Seems the problem lies
with those who design their sites with IE in mind, and don't bother
about NetCOMM at all.
Many sites have this very same problem.
Pål Jensen wrote:
They did say models so I believe its more than a digital slr.
It could be a DSLR and a pointshoot, or maybe a DSLR and two lenses, or any
other plurality of introductions. It could also be an APS-size DSLR
(targeted to 35mm users) and the long awaited 645D (don't forget the
Quickly, to bring you up to speed: the problem is that photos overhang
text. The text does not wrap around photos.
I have no idea whose problem that is, but it's really annoying.
I haven't changed my Netscape Communicator 4.79 software in any way.
Photos used to display properly, but more and more
Thank you
Any comparison with other 200mm macro lenses?
Alek
Uytkownik Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek wrote:
Do you know who uses FA200/4 ED macro?Or you know any tests of the lens or other
macro lenses?
It is great. As good as they come.
Pl
Perhaps if they want to make the definitive and LAST film SLR; it will never
be replaced anyway!
Good point!
--Mike
(Picture Bill Gates sitting in his ultra-secure mansion wearing an
eye-patch, stroking a white Angora cat in his lap...g)
Reminds me of a tag line I saw on Slashdot (http://www.slashdot.com/) a
couple of years ago:
Bill Gates is just a monocle and a Persian cat away
from being a
I hope the his bill is not going to be too high
Jeez, Vic, that's unusual. I hope you're taking a lot of pictures.
Re the vet bill, just make a plea for donations to help pay for an operation
to save the doe! You'll be inundated with more money than you know what to
do with. People love to
Until we
stick a date on it, we cannot work out who is coming. I guess this is
why Duxford was easier because there was a fixed date (not to say that
it was easy, Cotty your work was much appreciated)!
bow
I thank you, I thank you. And for my next trick
I must admit I do like the sound of
I've thought about, but have been hesitant to try it. NiMh, I think, are
similar to NiCad in that they tend to deliver higher current. Plus, you'd
only be getting 5 volts with them instead of the 6 volts that alkalines or
lithiums provide. I've been happy with the results of AA alkalines, but
A coworker has a Canon Canonnet,model unknown at this
time,that has a winder advance problem.I gave him the names
of the two repair shops in the Toronto area but he wants
to know if its servicable and is it worth it.
He is going to bring in the camera Monday so i can see
what model it is.He
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope the his bill is not going to be too high
With all the publicity surrounding this deer, you're not going to have to
pay for the vet bill. Either the vet will waive his fee because of the
free publicity he's getting, or a radio station will
A friend from Pentax who monitors this list read my Just a dream post and
had this comment:
The consumer, while expressing disdain for AF cameras, basically refuses to
purchase manual focusing cameras.
I guess that's pretty much that!
--Mike
Your mom sounds like quite a gal ;-)
You _never_ stop, do you? :)
Just deputising for Lasse !
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
but the vet thinks it's worth a try
I hope the his bill is not going to be too high
If there's any costs involved, you can try asking for a 'facility fee'
from the TV news - they will have contingency budgets for this, and
although not astronomical (say a hundred bucks) they will
Put some beer in the fridge.
Dear me. I can see there is going to have to be some education here.
If there is likely a contingency of Yanks (over paid, over sexed, and
over here) on the move, I'll fit in with whatever weekend is decided.
Cot
Oh, swipe me!
Oh, no in this country, Pål. We pretend they're all the
personification of Bambi and Thumper, and Willie the Orca and we
lovingly ascribe human characteristics to them, etc., ad nauseum.
They're NEVER just animals. Hollywood and the liberal media and the
tree-huggers wouldn't LET them be!
And, to
Mike,
One begins to wonder just how many of Bond's devices would have failed
just in the moment of need if they were powered by Windows CE? Can't
you just see him needing to reboot the device right at that critical
moment? :)
Bruce
Thursday, January 30, 2003, 4:55:54 AM, you wrote:
I'm
Let me get this: A deer with an arrow sticking through its head, is coming
regularly to your backyard, but the first one to photograph it was a
newspaper photographer...?
Man, I sure hope when the aliens arrive they'll choose some other PDMLer's
backyard!
That's a bit harsh, isn't it?
BTW, my
Mark,
My understanding is that it is a no-no. Different voltage level. The
manual is quite clear on alkalines or lithiums. Personally, I've
found the battery consumption quite reasonable so that I don't feel
frustrated by replacing the batteries. I've got lithiums in mine
right now. Not
OTOH, NiMH peak detecting chargers might prematurely terminate the
charge of NiCd packs due to a false peak on voltage during the charge
cycle.
That happens with AAA batteries in a Radio Shack top gun charger...
Now I know why. I use an old slow charger for these.
Peak detecting chargers with
Your mom sounds like quite a gal ;-)
You _never_ stop, do you? :)
Just deputising for Lasse !
Before anyone gets his hopes up, she's married. Forty years this spring. To a
lawyer.
Mike wrote:
MJ A friend from Pentax who monitors this list...
Ooops, so there is a taupe on the list! Now the question is does he
report further or is he reading just for fun... anyway, it's
interesting to read an officious opinion.
MJ The consumer, while expressing disdain for AF
That's what I assumed - I pretty much use AA alkaline batteries and they
last a long time when in use. They do tend to die pretty fast when the
camera is left on though, so I was hoping that it could take the
rechargeables.
Guess I'll stick with the alkalines - thanks again!
- MCC
At 10:43
The 24/2 FA* is one sweet lens.
The money only hurts for a while.
--
Bob Keefer
Keefer Photography
www.bkpix.com
And it's a bargain buy for an FA* lens$350.
And even more so used!!!
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8
Looking into the seals thing, it appears this is more a winter pursuit
(from October on)...
http://www.wildlife-photography.co.uk/wildlocs.htm
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2003 15:43
To: Pentax List
Subject: RE: UKPDML 2003
Until
Mike:
Be sure and order one for me. It's frustrating, isn't it, to love a camera
style that's dying out right before our eyes.
---
Bob Keefer
Keefer Photography
Fine art hand-painted photos
www.bkpix.com
Hi!
I am replying to myself in order to collectively reply to all who
responded.
First of, thanks a lot. Somehow over last night (Israeli time) when I
posted my question this photo amassed huge 850+ views. To my total
amazement this is by now my most unusual shot - it has the lowest
rating among
re: PENTAX 55mm F1.8 Super-Multi-Coated-Takumar for sale,
Would the person selling this please contact me,
I want to buy it. Thanks JCO :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Business references Websites: http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/jco/
Thanks for the input. I tried an early version of 6.x and went back to 4.79, so 7.x it
is for the next attempt.
Otis Wright
Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
At 00:36 30.1.2003 -0500, you wrote:
Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a lot of sites
where Explorer works
Hi!
Thanks a lot. Initially I thought I could grab the lenses and use them
with my camera. However I realize it is a risky business. Also it
seems that these lenses are really nothing special...
Well, you probably saved me some money I could later part with for
sake of buying stuff from fellow
Hi!
BD Thus it is with my daughters taking pictures. With the SLR's (bigger
BD cameras), I would have to take them out to shoot. With the small PS,
BD they would take them on their own to shoot events they were involved
BD with. With the digital PS, they take them to events and play around
BD
An incompetent CLA will kill it as well.
At 12:47 PM 1/30/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Paul wrote:
My single LX has now exposed 1500 rolls of film without a hiccup. It was
well used when I bought it three years ago, and Pentax Colorado serviced
it at that time. Perhaps it's the luck of the draw?
Thanks. All my systems have latest IE setup on them. Until now, I've just been more
comfortable using Netscape. I tried early version of 6.x and it was too slow on this
system. I'll probably give 7.x a shot when I set up the new system next week.
Otis
Keith Whaley wrote:
Hi Otis,
You
Direct Cognitive Transfer Technology. You just think really hard about
something and it appears on a 35 mm piece of plastic. After years of
training, Buddhist monks will be able to do this for 6 x 7 .
Very well then. Digital PS it is... For your daughters. I really can
only wonder what kind of
Dan Scott wrote:
Perhaps someone could suggest an
older, manual focus 24mm with a more modest weight
and
girth?
24mm f/3.5K. A beauty!
John
24mm f/2.8K. Also a beauty. It is 2/3 stop faster AND
a little smaller and lighter than the 24/K f3.5 (!)
but w/52mm vs. 58mm filter threads. This can
A friend from Pentax who monitors this list read my Just a dream post and
had this comment:
The consumer, while expressing disdain for AF cameras, basically refuses to
purchase manual focusing cameras.
Mike, if they made a manual focus range that would be a start. I think.
My comment
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LX Questions
Oh. Sorry. By the way I sent my second post on this thread before reading
the
above.
However, it *is* a bit more on-topic than some of the other issues that
are
fought about here -- f*rea*rms and such)
expect
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 11:16 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
Forced?
'e's well known as a horribly incorrigible bully. Just as likely to
give you a wedgie up to your ears as the time o'day. I wouldn't mess
with 'im.
Dan Scott
Yeah I still have fingernail marks
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Ann,
Thanks for mentioning the distraction of the image overlapping the text - I'd
meant to mention that, as it does the same for me, but I forgot.
I've only gone to PhotoSIG a few times, and it's done that every time for me.
I use Netscrape, FWIW. It really
Hi *,
the February PUG is ready to go.
Since the theme was admittedly a fun theme and the funny season has
started, at least here in Germany, I didn't press the rules. So there
_are_ some contributions not made with Pentax gear.
But I am going to adhere to this rule in the future again. So
Otis Wright, Jr. wrote:
Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a lot of sites
where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system next week and will move on to
6.x and if it has problems Netscrape is done at this office.
Otis Wright
I have Netscape 4.6 - my
Why not direct transfer to finished print. After years of training
you could transfer to large size prints (11X14 +). VBG
Bruce
Thursday, January 30, 2003, 10:23:50 AM, you wrote:
SD Direct Cognitive Transfer Technology. You just think really hard about
SD something and it appears on a 35
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/30/03
at 12:36 AM, Otis Wright, Jr. rusty.@worldnet.att.net said:
|Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a
|lot of sites where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system
|next week and will move on to
Adelheid. Another great job.
Frank. I knew you would do that.
Jeff. I forgot about thet picture.
Vic. Great pic.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:07:35 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: February PUG is open
Hi *,
the
One begins to wonder just how many of Bond's devices would have failed
just in the moment of need if they were powered by Windows CE? Can't
you just see him needing to reboot the device right at that critical
moment? :)
It happens on cartoons...technology is always failing Wile E.
Oh No! I can't see PUG. Have we slashdotted it already. :(
Evan
From: Adelheid v. K.
Subject: February PUG is open
Hi *,
the February PUG is ready to go.
Since the theme was admittedly a fun theme and the funny season has
started, at least here in Germany, I didn't press the
Dan Scott wrote:
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 10:12 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Oh, no in this country, Pål. We pretend they're all the
personification of Bambi and Thumper, and Willie the Orca and we
lovingly ascribe human characteristics to them, etc., ad nauseum.
They're NEVER
As her older brother, I feel it's my duty to teach my little sister life lessons
- like don't do stoopid things when I have a camera in my hand! g
You're probably right on both counts, Tom. I won't tell her she's on PUG this
month if you don't...
cheers,
frank
T Rittenhouse wrote:
If she
Don't you already own at least one or two of these?
At 12:19 PM 1/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
re: PENTAX 55mm F1.8 Super-Multi-Coated-Takumar for sale,
Would the person selling this please contact me,
I want to buy it. Thanks JCO :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My
- Original Message -
From: Pat White
Subject: Re: Just a dream
A stainless steel SLR
would probably be too heavy, so magnesium is a good alternative.
Buddy of mine just bought an Olympus 5500 (?). Magnesium shell. Looks kinda
like a quality rangefinder camera, and feels quite nice.
yes, but I need another one, I have many
bodies.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: PENTAX 55mm F1.8 Super-Multi-Coated-Takumar for sale
Don't you already own at least
But it's very very bad technology. (Which is obvious to the viewer but not
to Wile, which is half the fun).
At 02:13 PM 1/30/2003 -0600, you wrote:
One begins to wonder just how many of Bond's devices would have failed
just in the moment of need if they were powered by Windows CE? Can't
you
If that's the 14mm f/2.8 rectilinear, it sells for about $1000.
Shutterbug had a test report on it some time back that praised it highly
and the photos they made with it were impressive (for magazine
photos)but knowing how critical you are, perhaps someone else that has
actually spent that much
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:33:35 -0500, Andre Langevin wrote:
The Radio Shack charger has a trickle function but stops once it
thinks it has given enough charge [...]
Hmmm. I haven't used one of those except special purpose devices, like
the base of the cordless phone that also charges the
Well, in truth, I haven't had time to really look at them all yet, but
Frank Theriault's made me laugh out loud.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Alright already. What it about this month and cameras. I started
out with a minor LX problem which escalated to major anxiety when
the camera store I was using for repairs went out of business. Well
I've broken another camera. Every week I cock and fire the shutters
on every old camera I have
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I have left are books. Fortunately, books endure: one
lifetime is not long enough to see them eclipsed. However, if the situation
with books goes like cars, stereos, movies, and cameras, pretty soon all new
books will be paperbacks and most
Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that's the 14mm f/2.8 rectilinear, it sells for about $1000.
Shutterbug had a test report on it some time back that praised it highly
and the photos they made with it were impressive (for magazine
photos)but knowing how critical you are, perhaps someone else
You're assuming that Microsoft is smart enough to do strategic planning.
At 06:55 AM 1/30/2003 -0600, you wrote:
I'm putting in a new system next week and will move on to
6.x and if it has problems Netscrape is done at this office.
Gee, Microsoft wins again.
(Picture Bill Gates sitting in
From Peter:
Worth mentioning:
28mm F3.5 M - not seen one of these before.
Not nearly as common as the 2.8...
24mm F2.8 M - tidy but I still prefer the 24-35.
Yeah, more versatile and it's sharp from 5.6 on, but check out its
distorsion at 24mm. Allegedly, it doesn't matter if you're in
Hi,
The nearest I can find is a GP60AAHHB, which is a 2/3 AA size,
0.6Ah cell. Max charge 60mA for 14 hours. Manufacturer seems
to be called either Green Charge or Green Power. The writing on
the Ebay ones seems to be far eastern.
mike
2/3AA won't fit. Well, are we still talking about
This link was posted in rec.photo.digital. Unfortunately I did not see the
original post, but the photos are revealing.
http://www.panix.com/~donwiss/pictures/BrooklynStores/
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
I have no idea. I found AFAIK last week on Google, I guessed about
grin and HAR! (nor sure yet), but Vs:? Does it mean you are giving
your opinin after a delay? (But it would be true for many others.)
It might be important for you to do it this way but your messages are
always (in Eudora)
Isnt it the equivelent of Re: in finnish, well thats what i always assumed
Paul
(- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: Raimo, what Vs: means?
I have no idea. I found AFAIK last week on
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In short, it was found to be very good for the money (about $650.00) but
not as sharp as the Canon and *very* lacking in the corners (no problem
for DSLRs that are less than full-frame).
--
Mark Roberts
who sells it for that little? BH, not the
On 30 Jan 2003 at 10:43, Bill Owens wrote:
I've thought about, but have been hesitant to try it. NiMh, I think, are
similar to NiCad in that they tend to deliver higher current. Plus, you'd
only be getting 5 volts with them instead of the 6 volts that alkalines or
lithiums provide. I've
Wow! The Feb. PUG is already up and there is a lot of
really nice work this time. Great job to all you who
submitted this month.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Just makes you want to whip your credit card out and call into some of
these places, doesn't it. Too bad they didn't give the name of the
places that were just blank store fronts. I happen to live 2 blocks away
from one of them (unmarked store front) and have never bothered going in
or called.
Possibly at the same time.
At 06:16 PM 1/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If she sees that on the internet, one of two things are going to happen. She
is going to kill you, or she is not going to do anything as potentially
embarrassing in frount of a camera again. On the other hand, come to think
of
Jeez, Mike they built the LX for 20 years, isn't that enough?
At 05:30 AM 1/30/2003 -0600, you wrote:
LX has never been the no.1 choice
for me considered it's relability track record, and ongoing expensive
service bills. It is a lovely camera when it works. Both Super
A/Program and
MX are
Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does have a few problems with sites designed to
be visited just by Explorer, but if you want to use any browser except
Explorer you're likely to run into that same problem.
If any of this matters to anyone (and I hope it does), see
If Pentax built an FM3n like camera in K mount I'd buy one. If they
announced your
electro-mechanical dream I'd pre-order. The Idea that it should look like
an ESII,
well I'd really prefer that it look like a LX, but either would be
classic. I don't
own an autofocus camera although I do own
They're probably doing their development with a Microsoft tool.
At 01:53 PM 1/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Ann,
Thanks for mentioning the distraction of the image overlapping the text
- I'd
meant to mention that, as it does the same for me, but I forgot.
I've only
Test
Gary
Battery dependance is especially bad when you're two days on foot away from
the nearest
store and find out that the batteries you had for backup died of
disuse. You don't have
to be a survivalist to appreciate a mechanical backup. (Stainless Steal?
Magnesium? what
the hell happened to Brass,
Hi;
A friend just bought his son a digital camcorder from e-bay and the software
to acquire digital stills won't load into his computer. Does anyone know of
any freeware, shareware, or inexpensive software available to let him
acquire still images?
Butch
Hi, Mark,
Made you laugh out loud, eh? I sometimes have that effect on people
(usually women, though g)...
Seriously, mine was a joke, but there are some amazing interpretations of
the theme this month. I think right off the top, Facit's struck me as
quite incredible, and is my early fave of
Given the theme for the month I figured that someone would have to make that
kind of submission. I'm just glad it was you, not me (of course now I don't
even know your sister( VBG
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Joking aside -- PCs, Macs, WAS OT Refurbished Dells
Your mom sounds like quite a gal ;-)
You _never_ stop, do you? :)
Just deputising for Lasse !
Thanks Cotty, for keeping the flame
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi;
A friend just bought his son a digital camcorder from e-bay and the
software
to acquire digital stills won't load into his computer. Does anyone know of
any freeware, shareware, or inexpensive software available to let him
acquire still
I finally got my act together. Here is the rest of the stuff:
The pricing is simple. $4 each. Any qty. First come, first served.
Or -- I could use a nice Pentax MX with winder in trade for everything.
Shipping: $5 for the first 5 items + $1 for each addt'l 4 items.
PP == ProPack == 5
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
Hollywood and the liberal media and the tree-huggers wouldn't LET them
be!
If you can't make a point here without resorting to political posturing,
then don't make it. Please. I'm sure many of us would love to discuss
this ad nausea with you, but
100 matches
Mail list logo
