On 5/3/11 15:39, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
A week or two back several people provided links to their photos that
were not selected for the 2011 PDML Annual. I suggested a special PUG to
display those images together, so that we could all enjoy them.
The PUG Submission form has been
On 4/12/11 3:32 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
In my case, it was a Brownie Hawkeye with flash that used Press 25 bulbs
Mine was a KODAK pocket B-1 camera. - This is exactly what it says on
its label - I have it right in front of me as I type this :-)
- Toralf
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 11/03/2011 00:44, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Toralf Lundtor...@toralf.net wrote:
Hi.
It's been way too long since I posted a picture here, or anything else, for
that matter. Actually, I think I may have said that last time I sent
something, too, but anyway, here
- From: Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net
Subject: PESO: Brygga, no... well I can't remember, really...
Hi.
It's been way too long since I posted a picture here, or anything
else, for that matter. Actually, I think I may have said that last
time I sent something, too, but anyway, here
On 09/03/2011 22:07, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Nice geometry and feel to it... b indeed.
ann
So I did manage to bring back some of the cold with me ;-)
Thanks!
- Toralf
Toralf Lund wrote:
Hi.
It's been way too long since I posted a picture here, or anything
else, for that matter
On 09/03/2011 22:51, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Makes me shiver. Well done.
Thanks!
- Toralf
Paul
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Nice geometry and feel to it... b indeed.
ann
Toralf Lund wrote:
Hi.
It's been way too long since I posted a picture here, or anything else
On 09/03/2011 23:23, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nice exposure light but the composition leaves domething to be desired - I'd
try for a different shooting position to eliminate the stuff in the LRH corner..
That could be accomplished by cropping it,
On 10/03/2011 19:08, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 09/03/2011 23:23, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nice exposure light but the composition leaves domething to be desired - I'd
try for a different shooting
On 11/03/2011 00:22, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Doug Brewerd...@alphoto.com wrote:
My bad. I got things fouled up on my end, but we're back up and running
again.
I have no idea what you're talking about, but I accept your apology anyway.
It wasn't possible to
On 10/03/2011 19:43, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
On 09/03/2011 23:23, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nice exposure light but the composition leaves domething to be
desired - I'd try for a different shooting position to eliminate
the stuff
On 11/03/2011 00:39, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Toralf Lundtor...@toralf.net wrote:
It wasn't possible to post to the list for a bit, I believe...
I figured as much.
Yeah, I suppose it was pretty obvious...
- Toralf
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hi.
It's been way too long since I posted a picture here, or anything else,
for that matter. Actually, I think I may have said that last time I sent
something, too, but anyway, here is an image:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2011-1-11
An attempt to capture the coldness on a very cold
Christine Nielsen wrote:
Greetings, all---
Today, I enabled myself with the Pentax smc FA 100mm 2.8 macro lens.
Funny thing is, it happened kind of by accident... I thought I was
purchasing the DFA 100mm 2.8 macro (the non-WR version), but it turns
out I overlooked the missing D when I placed
Toralf Lund wrote:
Christine Nielsen wrote:
Greetings, all---
Today, I enabled myself with the Pentax smc FA 100mm 2.8 macro lens.
Funny thing is, it happened kind of by accident... I thought I was
purchasing the DFA 100mm 2.8 macro (the non-WR version), but it turns
out I overlooked
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
Lately I've been trying to find a use for that soft focus lens I bought a
few years ago (didn't need it, but it was such a bargain...) Here are a few
shots:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2010
every single time I bough a lens, and how many do you think I've
actually sold? :-)
- Toralf
Boris
On 9/6/2010 12:27 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Lately I've been trying to find a use for that soft focus lens I bought
a few years ago (didn't need it, but it was such a bargain...) Here are
a few shots
or get
very wet. Or both if I'm lucky ;-)
Overall though, pretty nice pictures.
Thanks.
- Toralf
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 4:27 PM
Subject: PESOs: Soft
Lately I've been trying to find a use for that soft focus lens I bought
a few years ago (didn't need it, but it was such a bargain...) Here are
a few shots:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2010-14-30
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2010-14-22
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:30 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28 5:41, Boris Liberman wrote:
I used argument as a synonym to reasoning... In no way did I imply
an argument as in: a reason given in proof or rebuttal or in
discourse
will be crowded with people going for a
swim to cool down a bit, or trying to get a bit of a suntan...
- Toralf
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Toralf Lund
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July 2010 2:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:34 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I get a RAW file using vuescan on my Epson 3200. Or, I assume, with any other
scanner.
Paul
A VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. It's essentially
a linear gamma RGB
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
...VueScan raw file is different from a DSLR raw file. ...
You can also write in DNG format these days, though, and feed the file into
standard raw converters. I would assume there isn't
/
- Toralf
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Thu, 7/22/10, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
From: Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net
Subject: PESO - Akershus/Magic
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010, 11:10 AM
A snapshot from a local visitors'
parking
How about a winter picture in the middle of summer?
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=kadettangen
Opinions may be freely expressed, as always...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Charles Robinson wrote:
I had a few minutes downtown on Saturday night to watch a little bit of a
fireworks display
I always take a camera to fireworks and I always hate the results.
This time I figured out how to retain the color in the bursts (low ISO, small
aperture) so I got a few
://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
Here is a slightly cropped version of
the one posted yesterday, as suggested by Rick and David:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga9b
- Toralf
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
Folks,
I'm having a slight issue with an old, beat-up MX I bought for next to
nothing a year or two ago (not sure if I told anyone here.) On the last
film I shot with it, a large number of frames only came out as partially
exposed. To show you what I'm talking about, I went ahead and scanned
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
cheaper to just buy another one that still works.
That was sort of what I was thinking.
On the other hand, if I spend the money on a CLA, perhaps it is less
likely that I have a problem again after a little while. But like I
said, the camera does look a bit worn
David J Brooks wrote:
I like it, but agree with Rick on maybe a small sky crop, as opposed
to a small sky cap.
Well as long as it's my crop...
Actually, a cropped version will be coming soon to a screen near you.
Thanks,
- Toralf
Dave
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Toralf Lund tor
Here is a slightly cropped version of the one posted yesterday, as
suggested by Rick and David:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga9b
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
A snapshot from a local visitors' parking space:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=magic1
Boat belongs to Mickey Mouse, apparently...
Mainly a test of scanning a certain type of good-old film, actually. I
hope I've managed to keep the feel of it.
Thanks for looking,
- Toralf
--
PDML
Another one I'm not entirely sure about, but I'll show it to you anyway:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga9
More of that ol'film...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
... but what do they do after they get to the K-1?
K-7, K-5, K-3, K-1, K+1, K+3
I'm holding out for a K3+2i. It may be too complex for the average
photographer, though.
:-)
I'm
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously, the L series, everyone keeps wishing for a new L-x...
Am I really the only one dreaming of a digital MX?
No...
Ralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga1
Comments are welcome...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Michael Hamilton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga1
Comments are welcome...
Toralf,
I like the feeling a lot. The faded, summertime look that you've
created here is quite fitting. I love
Bob W wrote:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga1
Comments are welcome...
nice composition which works well, but I think it needs deeper shadows - it
looks too washed out as it is.
Well, I did try pull up some of the darker parts, I you know what I
mean. This is more like
P. J. Alling wrote:
On 7/17/2010 2:42 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=brygga1
Comments are welcome...
- Toralf
The composition is interesting, the rendering shows the limits of
either the lens or sensor, I think. I'm not really sure which.
Interesting
Hello,
It just occurred to me it's been way too long time since I showed you
any pictures, so here is one:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=sollerud6b
Nothing more than a snapshot, really, but I must say I'm a bit
fascinated by all the cruise ships that visit us every summer. Perhaps
Ira H. Bryant IV wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:09:29 -0800
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I've regularly scanned BW film negatives (scanned using VueScan and a
Nikon LS-40 film scanner) and brought them into LR.
My scan files are either TIFFs or TIFF encapsulated DNG files. I
P. J. Alling wrote:
The winter doldrums are approaching and the fact that Pentax has
finally given us a couple of camera bodies that, (with /appropriately/
lowered expectations), seem to be what most of us want, the of the
discussion of future developments has stopped.
Yeah. How could they? I
Leon Altoff wrote:
Looks like I am buying another lens.
I currently have an FA 100 f2.8 macro because the bokeh is better than
the Sigma and Tamron options (apart from having better build quality
and less flare). I carry it around attached to a K10D in a waterproof
bag to protect it from the
Where did it go?
Thought I might ask, in case it's missing due to simple forgetfulness...
- T
This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain
proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It
is for the intended recipient only. If you
Bruce Walker wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
http://pug.komkon.org/
Submit photos for October here: http://pdmlpug.org/?page_id=56
[ ... ]
Great timing in Toralf's office view. I'd have noted one more mode of
transportation: foot.
Thanks.
Yeah, I ought to have included foot or feet in the
Luiz Felipe wrote:
Very interesting stuff indeed. I take we're in schedule from now... [
... ]
Toralf, very interesting moment. My view is rather cluttered - but
maybe I get a so-so nocturn skyline. Only suggestion I can think of is
hacking off that yellow sign... but I don't think you
P. J. Alling wrote:
Christine, you shouldn't beat yourself up. heck, the only reason I
submitted my entry is because it's what I had available.
Did I mention that I like it? I think someone else said it already: It
looks like something Ralf might have submitted - and that can't be bad!
-
Luiz Felipe wrote:
First, thanks Scott!
Yet another WOW gallery. These words should be taken in context - PUG
is usually composed of VERY GOOD stuff, wich leaves some words lacking
to describe the stronger ones. [ ... ]
Toralf's very, very interesting view.
Thanks.
I could think of a
Scott Loveless wrote:
August PUG is online at http://pug.komkon.org/
Did I mention that I liked them all, by the way?
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Christine Aguila wrote:
I regret posting the picture I did. It was a bit jarring for me as a
viewer of the gallery to go from the lovely nightscape and starscape
pictures to the edgy picture I submitted--so sorry about that guys and
gals.
No need to apologise. Like the others said, it's a
Just had to ask...
- T
This e-mail, any attachments and response string may contain proprietary
information, which are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for
the intended recipient only and if you are not the intended recipient or
transmission error has misdirected this
Thibouille wrote:
Well, nobody forces you to read anything.
If you read, you wanted it.
So, he should have known what the post was about before he actually read
it. Do you care to explain how? Are you perhaps saying that everything
you are going to contribute here will be meaningless and
else has volunteered to preparing the gallery, if you know what I mean...
- T
It's online
now. http://pug.komkon.org
We could use a few more photos for May.
On 4/28/09, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
Question is in the subject, really. I mean, will there be one?
Just had to ask
Question is in the subject, really. I mean, will there be one?
Just had to ask...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:29:18PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely hybrid screen:
A split screen centre
Christian wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in
David J Brooks wrote:
Great, now i need weight training :-)
I'd say that if you make a habit of trying to hand-hold lenses like
that, you're never going to need any other training again...
- T
Dave
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
funny pic:
Bob W wrote:
Haven't marked this OT as it is perhaps more of interest to
listers than not.
Written by a cameraman I met who does lots of reviews and testing kit,
and is no stranger to the written word. Here, Phil Bloom sets out a
basic guide for photographing and filming in public spaces in
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
I really don't think you can equate occasional picture-talking at arbitrary
locations with systematic filming of large areas. Those acts are really very
different in nature.
How so?
I
Daniel J. Matyola, Esq wrote:
I enjoy looking at abstract images, and there are a number of fine
ones in the March PUG. Two of them mystify me, and I would like a
little more information on what they show and how the images were made.
Fontene by Toralf: I love the graininess of the image,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Cotty wrote:
The very first time I ever used a legacy K mount manual focus lens on a
modern Pentax DSLR, it worked perfectly.
The lens had no aperture lever.
Simplicity is best.
Your modified K mount lens works as if it were an M42
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The issue could [ ... ]
Lenses like the FA77/1.8 work fine in manual metering mode when used
normally (lens locked on the A setting, aperture set by the body
controls) but show the same metering issues as K and M series lenses
when the aperture ring is used to set the
Luiz Felipe wrote:
Well, just bought a *ist DS with the 18~55, and one of these days I'll
get to receive it... the price we pay for that lovely and cheap address
not too close to the sea ;-) [ ... ]
I'm watching BR ebay-like sites, and right now is the wrong time to sell
anything 35mm around
David J Brooks wrote:
Really like the first one.
Thanks.
What's with all the bikes in snow this year.:-0
Dave
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
A couple of winter snapshots:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=vinter1b
http://www.toralf.net
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
A couple of winter snapshots:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=vinter1b
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=vinter2b
What say you?
I like 'em both. Thankfully spring seems quite near
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like the first image. That being said, the presentation is
certainly not what we are used to. There is a washed out look along
with very grainy, dirty looking snow. I don't know if this is
inherent in the negative or is more an issue with
scanning/processing. I'd play
frank theriault wrote:
I've seen him and taken his photo before (I showed him with a friend
in Six a couple of weeks back), but yesterday he was alone and asked
me to take his photo. He's 81, and need $20 to buy him a bed in a
shelter for the night. He also wanted to talk. I helped him out
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
snip
I don't really mind the snow, myself. In fact, I find that I'm OK with more
or less any kind of weather as long as it's being serious about it, if you
know what I'm saying. The only thing
Bruce Walker wrote:
Clay Shirky on why there's no future for newspapers but a bright one
for journalism.
http://is.gd/nhW0
I rarely read newspapers any more myself, but it has little to do with
the internet or any other sources of information. The reason is simply
that I found at some point
A couple of winter snapshots:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=vinter1b
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=vinter2b
What say you?
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Bob W wrote:
A couple of winter snapshots: [ ... ]
Sure looks like winter to me.
Do you shoot those on film?
Yep.
Cheap, and rather grainy, East European film, too ;-) Fortepan 400.
- T
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
Bob W wrote:
A couple of winter snapshots: [ ... ]
Sure looks like winter to me.
Do you shoot those on film?
Yep.
Cheap, and rather grainy, East European film, too ;-) Fortepan 400.
I had a couple of rolls developed and scanned this week - 1
John Celio wrote:
Plus-X and D-76, loved Agfa APX-100 but sadly they don't make it anymore...
Not only do they not make it, Agfa has not even been in business since
late 2006. I miss a lot of their products.
Actually, Agfa is alive and well, and I think they may even still be
making
Jos from Holland wrote:
Thanks Scott, for the work done!
All are nice, but the four that work best for me are: [ ... ]
-- Høst (= Autumn I guess?) by Toralf
Thanks. Glad you like it.
The title is slightly off on the web page, of course, most likely due to
an encoding issue; it's supposed
Cory Waters wrote:
[ ... ]
if he's human, that means he's just that good and it's not the result
of some sort of Skynet robotic photography machine. Crap.
Never mind.
Cory
likes Ralph,s work a lot.
I agree 100%.
- T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
John Celio wrote:
- Cotty won't have to eat his hat and the rest of us won't have to
re-invest in new 35mm lenses.
Most of mine are 35mm.
Er, I meant digital-optimized 35mm lenses (like the D-FA macros).
All I know is, the DA lenses I own or have used perform immensely
better than older
Thibouille wrote:
A *lot* of people should read what you wrote John. Those still thnk
that old lenses are at least as good if not better than recent lenses
As someone else has indicated, it might be interesting to know exactly
which old lenses you think are much poorer than the DA range.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 25, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Digital cameras are not really medium format cameras, however,
The term medium format is quite arbitrary in any case, isn't it? I
believe the distinction between medium and small format has been kept
at least
Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Sight and price unseen, they've got 10-15 firm pre-orders for the
Leica S2 already. So ... anyone cogitating that this is too
expensive for pro photographers and would not sell, think again.
Evidently, a lot of commercial photographers have been
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
From where I'm standing, Leica looks like much less of a name in
the MF market than in 35mm, comparatively speaking. Meaning that
Hasselblad seems at least as big.
Leica never made a medium format film camera. So
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy.
Anyone having problems seeing the PUG? Or have you noticed any issues
with particular browsers?
[ ... ]and Mac users in general.
I've generally viewed the PUG via Firefox (various different versions)
on the Mac lately, and have never had any problems. I
John Celio wrote:
I think nice really hits the nail on the head with regards to this new
camera. It's going to be perfect for people who want simplicity and
nice photos.
Quite possibly.
There are still a couple of lines in the spec I don't like in that
respect, though:
Preview
Thibouille wrote:
Of course we know what you mean, but this is rather typical from
higher end bodies to habe loads of button for specific functions...
K10D/K20D or excellent examples of just that (even if they are not
perfect of course).
K-m/K2000 is targeted to a vastly different market
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Well let's see. The M8 costs about $5.5K for a camera with roughly the
same image capture specifications of an *ist-D, and the same resolution
and sensor size of a Canon 1D Mark III. which you can get for around
$3K. Based on this I'd put the
P. J. Alling wrote:
Ok, I just looked at the Pentax web site, they say it supports K and m43
lenses but with restrictions, so unless they did a quick cut and paste
from a different camera I guess at least the shutter will fire with one
mounted, however I didn't see a menu item to enable use
P. J. Alling wrote:
Looks like no more Made in Japan lenses. The end of an era.
Actually, the article says no more Made in Japan *cameras*. It doesn't
mention lenses at all.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101sid=aobIn0QQFaA4refer=japan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thibouille wrote:
It IS indeed a FA35/2 with Samsung badge on it and manufactured by
Pentax (both Samsung lenses ans bodies are still manufactured by
Pentax).
Hmmm. The Schneider-Kreuznach (a.k.a. Jos. Schneider Optische Werke)
website seems to indicate that the Samsung cameras have actual
Thibouille wrote:
Indeed the Schneider lenses with K-mount only have Schneider name (for
which Samsung proably has to pay a licence).
Quite likely.
Samsung will deny it of course.
Obviously...
I'm willing to take Scheider's word for it when they claim to have done
more than just licensing
Walter Hamler wrote:
OK, I am not the brightest bulb in the pack. I just found out that
there is such a thing as Vuescan. Does anyone out there use it and
will it improve output from flatbed and film scanners? I have an old
HP Photosmart S20 and an old Canon 660 flatbed. Both work fine but if
Bob Sullivan wrote:
I've dealt with BH with excellent results at good prices.
I bought my *ist DS at www.buydig.com at a good price when new,
also several Pentax point shoot models. I'd recommend them.
KEH is a good source of used stuff, but not cheap.
It's been mentioned here before,
John Celio wrote:
I'm working on photographing some artwork for my boss, and could use a
little advice. What's the best lens (or focal length) for shooting flat
art?
I notice others have suggested a 50 mm macro, but how about a plain
M/A/F/FA 50mm 1.7? This is supposed to have better
shorter. Which might have meant loosing the weird lines in the foreground...
Dan M
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This, on the other hand, is something I would normally classify as an
accident:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=pub1
- but maybe it's
Adam Maas wrote:
But it does sell several Pentax designs. Sadly without the SMC coating
(the Tokina 16-50 is flare-riffic).
Hmm... I've always assumed it was more a case of Pentax selling Tokina
designs. With special glass/coating (i.e. SMC), that is...
- T
-Adam
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at
Brian Walters wrote:
Once again some fine work here:
Favourites? Lots, and mentioning just a few is unfair but these are the
ones that particularly caught my attention.
Tumulus by Filip Nicolai - nicely minimalist
Some architecture and its two architects by Toralf - an unexpected
You're welcome with equal obesity, Scott!
[ ... ]
Toralf's really takes me back, because I loved building things when I
was a kid (Legos weren't available, but Tinker Toys and Erector Sets
were).
Glad to take you there... I think I had the same feeling at the time - I
used Lego a lot myself
The August PUG is up. http://pug.komkon.org/
Like others have said, that's another very nice gallery.
I was going to mention one or two favourites, here, but found that it was
just too hard to pick this time; I pretty much like all the pictures.
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This is just a quick shot taken while I tested a ring flash I got hold
of recently, but I sort of like it:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=plante2
Comments?
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
This, on the other hand, is something I would normally classify as an
accident:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=pub1
- but maybe it's interesting in a way?
--
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Ken Waller wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Very nice.
I've been trying to find something a bit more constructive to say, but I
really can't think of anything that might be improved...
--
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
Does this work? [ ... ]
So, I want to know: Does this work for you?
I agree with you when you say that it would be really nice to see more
of the guitar. It was still immediately obvious to me that he's playing
it, though.
- Toralf
http://tinyurl.com/5t736k
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Got an off list request to show the uncropped file.
To crop or not to crop, that's the question. Could be interesting to
hear what others have to say. .
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=244437
I think I prefer the uncropped version. Yes, the
201 - 300 of 994 matches
Mail list logo
