gt;
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 2:47:32 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
That’s all true, but the deal used to be no funding and lots of church
autonomy in return., including
PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
So is it correct to conclude that the struggle over LGBT rights explains 100%
of any change in public attitudes -- left and right-- about fun
a.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
When I worked for DOJ in the late 80's and litigated a major Chapter (now I
think Title) 2 funding case in San Francisco, the main plaintiff's lawyer was a
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Douglas Laycock
>>>
>>> Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
>>>
>>> University of Virginia Law School
>>>
>>> 580 Massie Road
>>>
>>> Charlott
3-8546
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Eric J Segall
>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:17 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Eric J Segall
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:17 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - D
...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
on behalf of Marc Stern <ste...@ajc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 2:47:32 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
ge005.jpg@01CFA04D.71B24C30]
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces@
> lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Eric J Segall
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:17 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: Trinity Luthe
mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches
to:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran a
f Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
Yes, but neither bef
, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
Yes, but neither before, nor during, nor after, that 14-year window (1971-1985)
did the Court ev
rsity of Virginia
> 580 Massie Road
> Charlottesville, VA 22903
> 434-243-8546
> --
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-bounces@lists.
> ucla.edu] on behalf of Ira Lupu [icl...@law.gwu.edu]
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:44 AM
&g
_
From: Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c) <hd...@virginia.edu<mailto:hd...@virginia.edu>>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 8:09 AM
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionl
f Law
> _________
> From: Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c) <hd...@virginia.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 8:09 AM
> Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want
> Special Treatment or Not?
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academi
e University School of Law
_
From: Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c) <hd...@virginia.edu<mailto:hd...@virginia.edu>>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 8:09 AM
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
To: Law &
* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-bounces@lists.
> ucla.edu] on behalf of Ira Lupu [icl...@law.gwu.edu]
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 22, 2017 9:42 AM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want
>
_
From: Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c) <hd...@virginia.edu<mailto:hd...@virginia.edu>>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 8:09 AM
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academi
ases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
A few points:
1) Trinity Lutheran has never been asked for or given its "word that the
playground will be used for [exclusively] secular purposes." If it receives a
grant, nothing in Missouri law will stop the church from using
t; Douglas Laycock
>> Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
>> University of Virginia
>> 580 Massie Road
>> Charlottesville, VA 22903
>> 434-243-8546 <(434)%20243-8546>
>> --
>> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucl
] on behalf of Ira Lupu [icl...@law.gwu.edu]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 21, 2017 4:52 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want
> Special Treatment or Not?
>
> I have been struck this week by how a
...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Ira Lupu [icl...@law.gwu.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:52 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
I have been st
ool of Law
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
on behalf of Volokh, Eugene <vol...@law.ucla.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 2:51:11 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases
ases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
I have been struck this week by how almost all of the pro-state discussion of
Trinity Lutheran has focused on the problem of discrimination by state funded
churches (i.e., why should taxpayers fund activities from which some are
invidiously excl
>>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:47:24 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
Thank you. It is helpful and yet I see an ultimate collision between the
dischordant rights to both be free
pulated gamesmanship, support for religious liberty is
> diminished.
>
>
> At least this has been my experience.
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-bounces@lists.
.
Alan
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
on behalf of Michael Peabody <mich...@californialaw.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:47:24 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Trinity
:06 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
This term the Supreme Court is hearing two cases involving whether or not
chu
sts.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Michael Peabody
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:06 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
> *Subject:* Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want
> Special Treatment or Not?
>
>
>
>
Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Trinity Lutheran and the ERISA cases - Do Churches Want Special
Treatment or Not?
This term the Supreme Court is hearing two cases involving whether or not
churches should be treated the same as other non-profit organizations, and I
wa
This term the Supreme Court is hearing two cases involving whether or not
churches should be treated the same as other non-profit organizations, and
I want to make sure I have this straight.
First, in *Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton*, heard March 27,
religious hospitals are claiming
31 matches
Mail list logo
