and people probably don't just want to seem like they are talking JUST to
hear themselves talk.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM
02:27p 1,518,661 x.log.20041028192727
10/31/2004 09:09p 16,790,875 x.log
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go
then the SMTP service
- I checked my Sniffer win32 folder - the OLD .log file continues to grow
and be updated with new dates. NO new log file was created, no old one was
renamed.
Where do I look for any error messages/indicators/return codes?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:14 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] LogRotate no longer
starts.
Of course, mine is Windows 2000 Server Resource Kit - yours may be
different.
And, I assume you have checked your sniffer folder to confirm a presence of
the persistent.stat file with the very current time-stamp?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1
- then you should be alright!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 03:32 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject
to
find.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 08:54 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Your Sniffer Setup
Andy,
I saw your posting
version, Sniffer would no longer
find its directory when executed as a service, so I had to add the
AppDirectory key to set the working directory.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
Data Type : REG_SZ
String : path\application.ext
e.g.
c:\Imail\Sniffer\Win32\yoursnifferlicense.exe
then where/how did you define your authorization code and the persistent
option?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle
Running without known problems.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
if/that there may
me no LATER .SNF file, I am only downloading when a new file is actually
present!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM
these with examples that implement conditional,
compressed downloading.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message
are a bit more flexible - you can specify WHICH file is
used for comparison.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com
many of them for ... my cheating wife.
Sorry to hear about your marital problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kirk Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 05:56 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] new spam storm?
0.18%
MAILPOLICE-PORN220.17%
SNIFFER-OBFUSC.150.11%
ORDB...100.08%
RDNSBL..50.04%
NJABLRELAYS.50.04%
HIL.40.03%
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600
values.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
enforcement) - so I have been told by someone
in the industry.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message
.
In a protocol sink, the sink can pass the in-memory email directly to the
Sniffer service - no need to write to disk/read from disk and starting
command-prompt tasks etc etc.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message
file.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 08:06 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: Re[2
you want to only search for content when there is NO
dictionary attack - but if you happen to be under dictionary attack you want
to let all the spam go through unchecked? Seems counterintuitive to me.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
- read many times applications, such as
file and database servers.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:26 AM
I guess this is going against what I think should
Uh, sorry, I had thought that discussion was RAID-5 vs. RAID-1?
If someone is running RAID-5, I assume that it's hardware based. If so, then
that person could use the same hardware to configure a RAID-1 array instead
- so why even bother with software RAID then?
If the discussions is software
Wow - inline Virus scanning - and if I read the flow chart correctly, their
heuristic engine actually sounds like a scoring system for DNSBL and various
other indicators and reject a message during connection.
Now that's the kind of SMTP engine I've been wanting all along.
Best Regards
Andy
Yes, these messages were caused by Sunday'sSober.O
and Sober.P remote update of
previouslyinfected PCs, causing them to send out millions of
neo-nazi mail. The next update (likely a new spam-wave) is scheduled in 10 days. Somepublic
mailboxes got as many as 50,000 emails in 48 hours to a
http://www.vamsoft.com/orf/agentdefs.asp
It says to contact
vendor. Here I am G.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
Congratulations!
(Sorry for having wasted band-width, I just saw the contact vendor link -
never clicked on the link that contained the XML definitions G Found it
now...).
Anyway - thanks for the integration.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934
Single CPU or Dual Processor CPU?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 05:28 PM
To: sniffer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AVERT Medium Threat Advisory: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advisory
This is a Medium Threat Advisory for W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been deemed Medium due to prevalence.
Read
So this may be the known Declude problem with 3.x
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 07:13 AM
Hi,
I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back.
Just trying to see if my emails are blocked again.
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10
email was
received. The web site makes it sound as if there's a million reasons why a
false positive might not be accepted - so an automatic confirmation might be
a good self-service tool.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message
address). If I submit a false
positive I can confirm that it made it into your queue by checking the web
page. This way, you don't need to send automated emails.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
Thanks.
I will treat result code 63 with a combo filter so that any parallel hit
with a regular RBL won't end up counting twice. That should take care of
it.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Pete,
I have the same concern. I have been submitting the below spam (possible
Words virus) almost daily for more than week - yet, it still is not
discovered.
Am I submitting correctly?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Waller
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 09:42 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Declude header
Hi,
for discussions on Declude, you need to subscribe to
"Declude.Junkmail" or "Declude.Virus" at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's their standard trailer line:
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe
20061228110558 15 16 Match 1235160 63 1 46 73
20061228110558 15 16 Final 1235160 63 0 298073
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
UNREPORTED FPs might be.
Consequently, it may be worthwhile to improve F001 as mentioned before.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
to link to:
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.FAQ.FalsePositives
#RulePanic
- which appears to be a bad link?
(Eventually I found that the CFG file is self-documented.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
Hi Phil,
Yes, it seems as if some Sniffer rules, e.g., 1367683, is broadly targeting
Google's IPs.
I've submitted 3 false positive reports since last night, at least two of
them were Google users, one located in the U.S. and the other in the
Netherlands!
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
Unless I'm mistaken, rule 1370762 was targeting the same address range.
If I may make a suggestion:
Before the spam-trap robots are allowed to block major, well-known and
easily recognizable email providers, how about the robot script pulls a
WHOIS and a Reverse DNS and runs that data
Hi Pete,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
The rule was in place from 20070326. The first reported false positives
arrived today
Except that reports from end users lingered in my email since Friday. Not
your fault - but just to better demonstrate the ultimate effect it had.
To be
I recommend SpamSource, if you are an Outlook user. It's a little toolbar
applet that you can configure any recipient of the forwarded spam and it
will include all the original mail headers - just the way Sniffer, Spamcop
etc. like it. All you do is press the button on the toolbar and the message
Sorry for cross-posting. I'm not sure whether Declude and/or Sniffer still
rely on the Paged Pool - and whether their usage would be reported under the
Imail QueueMgr.exe or under some other .exes? So I have 3 possible culprits.
The symptom started as a Webmail problem because customers noticed
%WORKSPACE_PATH%\UpdateReady.lck
:CLEANUP
if exist %RULEBASE_PATH%\%LICENSE_ID%.new del
%RULEBASE_PATH%\%LICENSE_ID%.new
if exist %WORKSPACE_PATH%\UpdateReady.lck del
%WORKSPACE_PATH%\UpdateReady.lck
:DONE
ENDLOCAL
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
Server runs unattended for weeks until a Windows security update
requires reboot!
Best Regards,
Andy
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 2:13 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer 3.0
Hi Pete,
My best thinking at the moment is to perhaps do something like this
Right, exactly. As long as the parameters are already there to be modified
and the script uses those parameters, then the script is ready to go for any
user (with or without distinct directories).
Of course doing
: Saturday, October 04, 2008 10:07 PM
To: Andy Schmidt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Froze Mail Server
Hello Andy,
Saturday, October 4, 2008, 9:22:39 PM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
Here the log files.
I can't tell you WHEN the problem was triggered. I
to work.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
Hi Pete:
http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/config/node
/network/update-script.jsp
http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/config/node/
network/update-script.jsp%3c%3c
Yep, had read that - but that page just instructs me to use the full
Hi,
1. I read this page:
http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/procedures/falsePositives.jsp
and it seems to be the same.
However, should this chapter be expanded to contain information about what
to do if some of the new technologies are responsible for the false
positive?
Hi Pete,
You can drop the record for the IP from GBUdb with SNFClient -drop IP,
but if the system is not configured properly then the IP will quickly rise
back into the truncate list.
The IP address in question was a third party IP address, not related to us,
not a gateway. It was not in the
Thanks Pete - I'll save that command.
I also suggest that some of your instructions might be helpful to see in the
documentation in the chapters on how to deal with false positives.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008
-passwd=ki11sp8m
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:41 AM
To: 'Message Sniffer Community'
Subject: Update Script - Choice of WGET Parameter Prevents TimeStamping
Hi,
I've spent some time over the last few days trying to integrate the new
Hi Pete,
Thanks for giving it your consideration. If you decide to revise these
parameteres, then it will require an extra command in your script (because
the WGET command will output the compressed file as .SNF).
If you don't insist on using WGET, then CURL (also free/open software)
actually
Hi Pete,
Agreed, with WGET it gets quite a bit complicated (because it really doesn't
understand the GZ format). That's why you currently have to override the
filename, call it GZ, then call GZIP to unzip it. I've come to the
conclusion that it's not worth the trouble with WGET (as you surmised,
Hi Pete,
I'm running a Sniffer service on a secondary system so that I can test my
rulebase update script. After I changed to curl (to maintain the server
timestamps), I'm now seeing the following in the status.minute.log:
rulebase utc=20081008183610 /
active utc=20081008183610 /
Hi,
Yes, recent Windows curl builds will convert between UTC and local time.
I was just caught off-guard, that Sniffer is using an external datum which
is subject for wanted or unwanted manipulation for something as crucial as
determining the file version of the rule base? If (due to copying
Hi,
Hopefully, you'll be able to convince Alligate and ORF next to use your new
DLL API to scan the content during the SMTP connection without needing the
command line environment...
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi Pete,
SNF code spam threshold (ASSP_SNF_Threshold)
The SNF result code threshold that is considered spam. SNF result codes
at
this level or above will be considered spam for the purposes of ASSP
scoring. The default value of 20 is good in most cases.
Are the result codes
Hi:
The design of the plugin at the moment is a binary decision-- either
the message is spam, or not.
I understand - but currently the plugin has a config option that performs a
Resultcode = Threshold test. I think it would be more appropriate to have
a Resultcode in (n, n, n...) test. It
Hi Pete,
Then let me approach it from a different angle: Is there a way in the
Sniffer config files to silence certain groups?
This way, if someone doesn't want to outright block email based on certain
groups, they could just exclude those groups from triggering at all.
Best Regards,
Andy
Hi Pete,
Very cool. I just went through this a few weeks ago.
Here's the issues I encountered:
- The engine for official Windows build I found (http://w32.clamav.net/)
was out of date (but still usable) and had problems with trailing
backslashes the way that Declude was passing them.
- The
-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 6:39 PM
Hi,
The official Win32 build seems to work just fine, ClamD service and all?
a) I downloaded and installed the MSI file
b) I downloaded the pthread DLL that it required
c) I confirmed that clamscan
They offer a ClamAV tie-in:
http://sssolutions.net/ew/tutor.php?topic=setup
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Announcing ClamAID - Clam AV
Hi Andrew:
The ClamAID installer does handle the pthreads requirement for you.
Understood, that's convenient.
It does wrap ClamD as a service, (from the w32.clamav.net port ) , as
well as wrapping freshclam.exe as a reoccurring service
Yep, same thing can be accomplished with the SRVANY
post two days ago does
the following:
a) trim the trailing backslash from the path if any is found
b) read and parse the ClamAV report.txt file and outputs a new Report.txt
file that uses a format that's parsable by Declude.
Best Regards,
Andy Schmidt
Hi Andrew:
I agree, offering a functioning Win32 port that doesn't rely on Cygwin might
give your firm additional exposure. Heck, I would gladly pay an annual fee
for ClamAID if it included a current, native Win32 port of ClamD and would
make my go-between script obsolete.
PS: I would have
Dear Matt:
Things for pointing out http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/.
That is ONE build I had not yet run across (actually, I recognize the page,
but somehow never bookmarked it). I had been unable to get
http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav to run as a service - but the netfarm one
explicitly states that
Hi,
http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav seems to be ideal. I just installed it.
a) runs as a Windows Service (using clamd --install)
b) has registry settings to point to db and conf subfolders
c) accepts trailing backslash
The only remaining issue with Declude is the Declude's inability of
extracting
Serge:
if errorlevel 0 means if errorlevel = 0. You are NOT comparing to
equal - it will return TRUE if the error level is AT LEAST the number 0 -
which is true for any positive value.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf
Serge:
if errorlevel 0 means if errorlevel = 0. You are NOT comparing to
equal - it will return TRUE if the error level is AT LEAST the number 0 -
which is true for any positive value.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf
than C:\ClamAV\ We thought that was a good
upgrade just in itself. Let us know how it responds under fire.
Thanks,
Andrew Wallo
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt andy_schm...@hm-software.com
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1
Yes, with the OLD version (before the upgrade) I used to run my own script -
and it successfully used:
curl http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/MyRuleBase.snf -o
MyRuleBase.snf.gz -s -S -R -z MyRuleBase.snf -H Accept-Encoding:gzip -u
sniffer-userid:sniffer-pwd
if exist nwb655oh.snf.gz
Hm - seems that I may have commented out WGET and have been using CURL even
with the new version (because of date mismatches).
So - maybe the enclosed will help.
It SEEMS as if my /rulebase/ folder has been updated at least twice since
8:30 AM this morning...
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
That's why the enhanced version of your script (which properly supports
Sniffer's ability to keep the rulebase and the workspace in subfolders!)
that I sent you checks for CURL success AND for an existing file.
curl http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/%LICENSE_ID%.snf -s -R -f
[mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:20 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: DST update problem - server changes
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
That's why the enhanced version of your script (which properly supports
Dito here - already reported it as a False Positive:
s u='20090908183815' m='D:\IMail\spool\proc\work\Dd948c4c42c68.smd'
s='54' r='2654821'
m s='54' r='2654821' i='1905' e='1952' f='m'/
p s='0' t='15' l='4270' d='38'/
g o='0'
Hi Pete,
I saw their announcement.
Dave says they are using THEIR rule base (not the one specific to the
Sniffer customer).
Any hints what I have to do (on the Sniffer side) to move over to their
service? Which part of my current stand-alone installation do I have to
undo (e.g., the Sniffer
Hi Pete,
I'm look over Declude's recommended Sniffer configuration and trying to
understand how much (if any) overlap there is between these options they
implemented and recommend:
IPREPUTATIONSNFIPREPx 0 10 -5
SNFIPCAUTIONSNFIP x
Hi,
In case anyone wants to use it in ORF, attached the updated definition file.
(Pete, I didn't post it on their newsgroup because I didn't know if you
wanted the word out).
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
: GBUdb.com Web Site is Up - truncate.gbudb.net text
records updated
On 5/29/2010 4:01 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
In case anyone wants to use it in ORF, attached the updated definition
file.
(Pete, I didn't post it on their newsgroup because I didn't know if you
wanted the word out).
I
Now that Declude forces us to use the stand-alone version again - time for
me to upgrade the old stuff I had laying around.
Currently I'm running (with SrvAny):
SNFMulti Engine Version 3.0.11 Build: Aug 21 2009 18:42:53
SNF Server Version 3.0.2 Build: Jul 28 2009 14:48:00
and
Hi,
I suppose I should have paid attention in the past 12 months.
Is there a GBUdb IP based lookup that is recommended to get the benefit of
all Sniffer customers' experiences?
Or is it not worth the effort?
Best Regards,
Andy
#
Dell PE 2950
Intel Xeon CPU 5050
Type 0 Family F Model 6 Stepping 4 Revision 2
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:44 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] What is
Actually - this one is older:
Dell PE 1600SC (x86)
Intel XEON
Family F (15) Model 2 Stepping 9
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:44 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject:
86 matches
Mail list logo