Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF Elections - We need representatives that can represent and respect the diversity of OSM, maintain his dynamism

2015-12-01 Thread Pierre Béland
Sorry about this, I had it right the first time. Translation problems. In 
french, the Foundation comes first.

As you said, I refer to the OSM Foundation, OSMF :)

  
Pierre 

  De : Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>
 À : talk@openstreetmap.org 
 Envoyé le : Mardi 1 décembre 2015 15h44
 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF Elections - We need representatives that can 
represent and respect the diversity of OSM, maintain his dynamism
   
Pierre,

  FOSM is the fork of OSM that was created when we changed the license
and a group of people didn't like it.

What you are talking about is OSMF ;)

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


 ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF Elections - We need representatives that can represent and respect the diversity of OSM, maintain his dynamism

2015-12-01 Thread Frederik Ramm
Pierre,

   FOSM is the fork of OSM that was created when we changed the license
and a group of people didn't like it.

What you are talking about is OSMF ;)

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-27 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:

 Hi,


 On 08/26/11 07:07, Mike Dupont wrote:

 If you want to sponsor me a membership than I am willing to speak.


 I would like to see a rule that says: The yearly membership fee is X. If
 you would like to be a member of OSMF but cannot afford to pay X, and if you
 find Y existing OSMF members who say that your contribution has been
 valuable (with Y somewhere in the area of 3), then you can join free of
 charge.

 Note that this would require you to say I cannot afford X. Saying I have
 already put enough work in this and while I could easily spend X I don't see
 why I should wouldn't cut it.

 On second thought in follow up to my previous mail,
This might be appliciable for some of our new editors from kosovo, many of
them dont have the money for memberships and they dont have access to paypal
etc.
you should consider to sponsor some of them, altin and besfort, ardian,
others could really use some sponsorship.

thanks,
mike

-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
 Hi,

 On 08/26/11 07:07, Mike Dupont wrote:

 If you want to sponsor me a membership than I am willing to speak.

 I don't think it would be received well if either an existing board member
 or the OSMF as a whole were to sponsor membership for selected people ;)

So what?  Who cares if it's not received well?  There's absolutely
nothing wrong with someone sponsoring membership for someone else, be
that someone another member, a board member, a corporation, a
non-profit, or whatever.  Why would there be?

OSMF as a whole sponsoring membership might be a problem if it wasn't
agreed upon by OSMF as a whole (directly or indirectly), and/or
especially if it was done for reasons other than the best interest of
OSMF as a whole.  But board members don't have to act within the best
interest of OSMF as a whole every time they give a gift to anyone!

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 But board members don't have to act within the best
 interest of OSMF as a whole every time they give a gift to anyone!


Anthony, can you expand on this, or was it a typo?

cheers,
Martin

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 But board members don't have to act within the best
 interest of OSMF as a whole every time they give a gift to anyone!

 Anthony, can you expand on this, or was it a typo?

I can't find a typo.  By give a gift I meant give a gift from one's
personal resources.  (I didn't mean that they can spend *OSMF* money
for personal reasons!)  Does that clarify things?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
 dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 But board members don't have to act within the best
 interest of OSMF as a whole every time they give a gift to anyone!
 Anthony, can you expand on this, or was it a typo?
 I can't find a typo.  By give a gift I meant give a gift from one's
 personal resources.  (I didn't mean that they can spend *OSMF* money
 for personal reasons!)  Does that clarify things?


yes, this clarifies the gift, but still I think that board members
indeed do have to act within the best interest of OSMF and OSM as a
whole (whatever this is, asuming good faith). IMHO if you are a board
member you can't act as a private individual when it comes to stuff
concerning the OSMF.

cheers,
Martin

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
 dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 But board members don't have to act within the best
 interest of OSMF as a whole every time they give a gift to anyone!
 Anthony, can you expand on this, or was it a typo?
 I can't find a typo.  By give a gift I meant give a gift from one's
 personal resources.  (I didn't mean that they can spend *OSMF* money
 for personal reasons!)  Does that clarify things?

 yes, this clarifies the gift, but still I think that board members
 indeed do have to act within the best interest of OSMF and OSM as a
 whole (whatever this is, asuming good faith).

All the time?

 IMHO if you are a board
 member you can't act as a private individual when it comes to stuff
 concerning the OSMF.

Do you have a basis for that opinion?

concerning the OSMF is awfully broad, as is act as a private
individual.  Are you really suggesting that a board member is acting
other than as a private individual when s/he does something which
affects the OSMF?  Is a board member acting as an agent of the OSMF
every time s/he edits OSM, or throws a mapping party, or lets someone
borrow his computer in order to edit, or drives someone to SOTM?  Or
is there something else this board member is acting as, other than as
a private individual or as an agent of the OSMF?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 yes, this clarifies the gift, but still I think that board members
 indeed do have to act within the best interest of OSMF and OSM as a
 whole (whatever this is, asuming good faith).
 All the time?


of course, as long as they are a board member and maybe in some
concerns also for the time after.


 IMHO if you are a board
 member you can't act as a private individual when it comes to stuff
 concerning the OSMF.
 concerning the OSMF is awfully broad, as is act as a private
 individual.  Are you really suggesting that a board member is acting
 other than as a private individual when s/he does something which
 affects the OSMF?


how can you state the opposite? Of course they keep beeing individuals
(and btw. are working unpaid in their spare time so maybe some kind of
private could also be interpreted, I am not a native speaker), but
they are at the same time representatives of the OSMF.


 Is a board member acting as an agent of the OSMF
 every time s/he edits OSM,


not sure if this matters, as OSMF declared not to deal with
mapping/tagging besides copyright infringement


 or throws a mapping party
, or lets someone
 borrow his computer in order to edit, or drives someone to SOTM?


I'd say yes, but doesn't matter either


 Or
 is there something else this board member is acting as, other than as
 a private individual or as an agent of the OSMF?


what do you suggest?

Cheers,
Martin

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 yes, this clarifies the gift, but still I think that board members
 indeed do have to act within the best interest of OSMF and OSM as a
 whole (whatever this is, asuming good faith).
 All the time?

 of course, as long as they are a board member and maybe in some
 concerns also for the time after.

I'm not sure why you say of course.  I would have thought the answer
was of course not.

What is your basis for this?

 IMHO if you are a board
 member you can't act as a private individual when it comes to stuff
 concerning the OSMF.
 concerning the OSMF is awfully broad, as is act as a private
 individual.  Are you really suggesting that a board member is acting
 other than as a private individual when s/he does something which
 affects the OSMF?


 how can you state the opposite?

I haven't stated the opposite.

 Is a board member acting as an agent of the OSMF
 every time s/he edits OSM,

 not sure if this matters, as OSMF declared not to deal with
 mapping/tagging besides copyright infringement

It matters because if it is not true, then it disputes your humble
opinion which you gave earlier.

 or throws a mapping party
, or lets someone
 borrow his computer in order to edit, or drives someone to SOTM?

 I'd say yes, but doesn't matter either

It certainly matters.  For one thing, OSMF is liable for the actions
of people who are acting as their agents.  For instance, if, while
acting as an agent of the OSMF while driving someone to SOTM, that
board member got into a car accident, the injured parties could sue
OSMF.

That said

 Or
 is there something else this board member is acting as, other than as
 a private individual or as an agent of the OSMF?

 what do you suggest?

I'm not suggesting anything with regard to that question.

As for the obligations of board members, while they are generally not
allowed to act in a way which harms the organization of which they are
a board member, and are not allowed to *use, for personal purposes,
confidential information* which they obtained via their status as a
board member, they are under absolutely no obligation to act in the
best interests of the board in everything they do!  That would be
absurd.

Furthermore, *even if they were* obligated to act in the best
interests of the board in everything they do, that *still* would not
imply that they aren't allowed to sponsor the membership applications
of selected individuals, i.e. give them money with which to apply for
membership.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
 As for the obligations of board members, while they are generally not
 allowed to act in a way which harms the organization of which they are
 a board member, and are not allowed to *use, for personal purposes,
 confidential information* which they obtained via their status as a
 board member, they are under absolutely no obligation to act in the
 best interests of the [strikethrough]board[/strikethrough] [organization] in 
 everything they do!  That would be
 absurd.

Really, I'm not sure how you can even make that claim, unless you
haven't thought about what it means.  When a board member eats dinner,
should the board member consider whether eating a cheeseburger or
salad is in the best interests of OSMF, given their relative prices
and health effects?  After all, that decision *will* affect OSMF, both
in terms of how much money the board member is able to donate (*), and
in terms of the life expectancy of the board member.

(*) Presumably, if they are obligated to always act in the best
interests of the OSMF, then they should be donating every spare penny
which isn't needed for sustaining their life.

Yes, this is absurd.  But saying that board members must always act in
the best interest of the organization on which they serve, is absurd.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 absurd.
 Really, I'm not sure how you can even make that claim, unless you
 haven't thought about what it means.  When a board member eats dinner,
 should the board member consider whether eating a cheeseburger or
 salad is in the best interests of OSMF, given their relative prices
 and health effects?  After all, that decision *will* affect OSMF, both
 in terms of how much money the board member is able to donate (*), and
 in terms of the life expectancy of the board member.


absurd. you name it.

Martin

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 absurd.
 Really, I'm not sure how you can even make that claim, unless you
 haven't thought about what it means.  When a board member eats dinner,
 should the board member consider whether eating a cheeseburger or
 salad is in the best interests of OSMF, given their relative prices
 and health effects?  After all, that decision *will* affect OSMF, both
 in terms of how much money the board member is able to donate (*), and
 in terms of the life expectancy of the board member.

 absurd. you name it.

So you agree with me?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 As for the obligations of board members, while they are generally not
 allowed to act in a way which harms the organization of which they are
 a board member, and are not allowed to *use, for personal purposes,
 confidential information* which they obtained via their status as a
 board member


happy to see that we agree to this. This was actually about board
members paying membership fees to others as private individuals, not
about them drinking a beer in the pub or driving to SOTM.


 Furthermore, *even if they were* obligated to act in the best
 interests of the board in everything they do, that *still* would not
 imply that they aren't allowed to sponsor the membership applications
 of selected individuals, i.e. give them money with which to apply for
 membership.


I think this really depends on the case. If a board member paid as a
private individual membership fees for lots people, and those people
voted then in his sense in OSMF votings this would clearly be a breach
(at least of good faith).

cheers,
Martin

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
 2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
 As for the obligations of board members, while they are generally not
 allowed to act in a way which harms the organization of which they are
 a board member, and are not allowed to *use, for personal purposes,
 confidential information* which they obtained via their status as a
 board member

 happy to see that we agree to this. This was actually about board
 members paying membership fees to others as private individuals, not
 about them drinking a beer in the pub or driving to SOTM.

I assume you mean paying membership fees *for* others.

I see that as quite analogous to driving others to SOTM.  Maybe paying
for someone else's bus ticket to get to SOTM would be more analogous?

 Furthermore, *even if they were* obligated to act in the best
 interests of the board in everything they do, that *still* would not
 imply that they aren't allowed to sponsor the membership applications
 of selected individuals, i.e. give them money with which to apply for
 membership.

 I think this really depends on the case. If a board member paid as a
 private individual membership fees for lots people, and those people
 voted then in his sense in OSMF votings this would clearly be a breach
 (at least of good faith).

How so?

It suggests that there *may* have been an act of vote-buying, but it's
not *clear* that there was one.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
 dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
  2011/8/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
  As for the obligations of board members, while they are generally not
  allowed to act in a way which harms the organization of which they are
  a board member, and are not allowed to *use, for personal purposes,
  confidential information* which they obtained via their status as a
  board member
 
  happy to see that we agree to this. This was actually about board
  members paying membership fees to others as private individuals, not
  about them drinking a beer in the pub or driving to SOTM.

 I assume you mean paying membership fees *for* others.

 I see that as quite analogous to driving others to SOTM.  Maybe paying
 for someone else's bus ticket to get to SOTM would be more analogous?


I am able to pay for my membership, but I normally dont spend money on
membership because I spend so much time on things. I am willing to serve on
the board if we find a way to pay for my membership, and if we are in that
mood, we can also ask for membership for my kosovo team, if someone wants to
donate some money.

Anyway, maybe what we need is some push for a communal seat that has one
vote and represents all of the people who are contributors. that would be my
suggestion.

mike


-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-26 Thread Michael Kugelmann

Am 26.08.2011 10:59, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
I would like to see a rule that says: 

[...]
in my first thoughts this sounds as a good idea in my point of view.


Best regards,
Michael.


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-25 Thread Mike Dupont
Well, I cannot run for election because I am not a paying member. I have
spend a lot of time and money working on osm kosovo and I dont see why I
should sink more money into this. If my contributions do not warrant a
membership then I see this as not for me. We organized three conferences and
charged no entry fee, flossk.org charges no membership fees. I guess I see
things totally different than you do. If you want to sponsor me a membership
than I am willing to speak.
Otherwise, what I really want Is a server account to use some CPU for my
programs, I have enjoy being given some server resources on the osm servers.


mike

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Henk Hoff toffeh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just so you all know:
 - You can expect an announcement for the AGM this weekend (or sooner)
 - If you are / have been OSMF member you will get a mail with details
 whether you're eligible to vote. Also this weekend.
 - If you haven't had a mail by Sunday evening, and you think you are member
 of OSMF, please send a mail to membership at osmfoundation dot org

 Cheers,
 Henk

  acting Secretary OSMF


 On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:

 On Monday 15 August 2011 15:31:54 Tom Hughes wrote:
  On 14/08/11 15:30, Richard Weait wrote:
   So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
   board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
   candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
   now is a good time to start putting things in order.
 
  It is also a good time for anybody wishing to be able to participate in
  the election to ensure that their membership is paid up.
 
  DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE OSMF WILL REMIND YOU TO PAY
 
  I speak from bitter experience having had my vote invalidated last year
  as it turned out my membership had expired and I had not been invited to
  pay for another year. I know I wasn't the only one who suffered from
  that problem last year, and it seems destined to be repeated this year
  as my membership lapsed again about three weeks ago without any reminder
  being issued.
 
  Tom

 I got got a reminder this week that it lapsed a year ago. You're just
 asking
 too speedy a service ;)

 --
 m.v.g.,
 Cartinus

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-15 Thread Kate Chapman
Hi Richard,

Is how many positions are open and which positions available?

Thanks,

Kate

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
 In prior years the elections were held at an AGM with proxy votes by
 email for those not able to attend.  Last year, the OSMF board
 election was held at SotM - Girona, with the same proxy votes by
 email. this was seen as an improvement and will be the method used
 this year as well.  We're coming up on SotM Denver. It's less than a
 month away now.  Which means that the official notification of the AGM
 and board election will be coming up soon.

 If I remember correctly the AGM was held at lunch in Girona.  That may
 well be the case in Denver, too.

 So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
 board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
 candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
 now is a good time to start putting things in order.

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-15 Thread Richard Weait
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
 Hi Richard,

 Is how many positions are open and which positions available?

I've not seen any information on that yet.  Based on the 1/3 per year,
I expect 2 or three spots to be up for election.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-15 Thread Tom Hughes

On 14/08/11 15:30, Richard Weait wrote:


So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
now is a good time to start putting things in order.


It is also a good time for anybody wishing to be able to participate in 
the election to ensure that their membership is paid up.


DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE OSMF WILL REMIND YOU TO PAY

I speak from bitter experience having had my vote invalidated last year 
as it turned out my membership had expired and I had not been invited to 
pay for another year. I know I wasn't the only one who suffered from 
that problem last year, and it seems destined to be repeated this year 
as my membership lapsed again about three weeks ago without any reminder 
being issued.


Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-15 Thread Cartinus
On Monday 15 August 2011 15:31:54 Tom Hughes wrote:
 On 14/08/11 15:30, Richard Weait wrote:
  So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
  board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
  candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
  now is a good time to start putting things in order.

 It is also a good time for anybody wishing to be able to participate in
 the election to ensure that their membership is paid up.

 DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE OSMF WILL REMIND YOU TO PAY

 I speak from bitter experience having had my vote invalidated last year
 as it turned out my membership had expired and I had not been invited to
 pay for another year. I know I wasn't the only one who suffered from
 that problem last year, and it seems destined to be repeated this year
 as my membership lapsed again about three weeks ago without any reminder
 being issued.

 Tom

I got got a reminder this week that it lapsed a year ago. You're just asking 
too speedy a service ;)

-- 
m.v.g.,
Cartinus

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-15 Thread SteveC
I would encourage everyone to have a think about running for the board 
and look to what you can contribute. Be aware when thinking about it 
that we have a lot of work to do and meet frequently. That might impact 
your work and social life, it's not a ceremonial role, just ask Henk :-)


The upside is that you're deeply involved with one aspect of helping 
things move along in the project, but you don't get a window seat.


Steve


On 8/15/2011 3:27 AM, Kate Chapman wrote:

Hi Richard,

Is how many positions are open and which positions available?

Thanks,

Kate

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Richard Weaitrich...@weait.com  wrote:

In prior years the elections were held at an AGM with proxy votes by
email for those not able to attend.  Last year, the OSMF board
election was held at SotM - Girona, with the same proxy votes by
email. this was seen as an improvement and will be the method used
this year as well.  We're coming up on SotM Denver. It's less than a
month away now.  Which means that the official notification of the AGM
and board election will be coming up soon.

If I remember correctly the AGM was held at lunch in Girona.  That may
well be the case in Denver, too.

So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
now is a good time to start putting things in order.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-14 Thread Richard Weait
In prior years the elections were held at an AGM with proxy votes by
email for those not able to attend.  Last year, the OSMF board
election was held at SotM - Girona, with the same proxy votes by
email. this was seen as an improvement and will be the method used
this year as well.  We're coming up on SotM Denver. It's less than a
month away now.  Which means that the official notification of the AGM
and board election will be coming up soon.

If I remember correctly the AGM was held at lunch in Girona.  That may
well be the case in Denver, too.

So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
now is a good time to start putting things in order.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF elections

2011-08-14 Thread Mike Dupont
I would like to run, on the platform of decentralizing the infrastructure
and opening things up a bit.
mike

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:

 In prior years the elections were held at an AGM with proxy votes by
 email for those not able to attend.  Last year, the OSMF board
 election was held at SotM - Girona, with the same proxy votes by
 email. this was seen as an improvement and will be the method used
 this year as well.  We're coming up on SotM Denver. It's less than a
 month away now.  Which means that the official notification of the AGM
 and board election will be coming up soon.

 If I remember correctly the AGM was held at lunch in Girona.  That may
 well be the case in Denver, too.

 So if you have been thinking about standing for election to the OSMF
 board, if you have issues that you would like to see discussed by
 candidates, if you have suggestions and requests for those involved,
 now is a good time to start putting things in order.

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk