Re: About TB folders

2005-12-16 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roger! On Friday, December 16, 2005, 1:32 AM, you wrote: ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I ST don't understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work ST for you? MP I haven't followed the discussion at all (and don't use the MP latest beta yet), but

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, Drafts has hourglass icon, finished letters dont have. if they are parked, what do they have? Parked means draft, draft has hourglass. -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 Current beta is

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Charlene, Why would anyone want to send the same mail twice in an automated routine? Hint: Because the recipient did not get the first copy? And why then does one have to automate this? It still is an exception that email doen't work. Ok, I see, why you think I am that hard

Re[3]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Stefan, if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. That is what I am talking about, too. It is PARKED because it is DRAFT. -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. I understand that, but I was hoping that Vili would finally have to admit that it was so and that he understood that as well. I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, We at Ritlabs care for our users and want to protect you ('stupid' user) from inadvertently copying messages to the Outbox and unwillingly sending them out. For this reason we have made a big development effort using state of the art technology and we have included in our latest

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Stefan, Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:22:43 PM, you wrote: ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't ST understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work for you? I haven't followed the discussion at all (and don't use the latest beta yet), but

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, We at Ritlabs care for our users and want to protect you ('stupid' user) from inadvertently copying messages to the Outbox and unwillingly sending them out. For this reason we have made a big development effort using state of the art technology and we have included in our latest

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 3:13:59 AM, Vili wrote: I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails use the same flag. well, finally. I thought the only thing you were going to notice in this whole conversation was the tone you criticized in MAU's note to Stefan -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails use the same flag. well, finally. I never said, that they are marked differently. What I am saying is: WHY IS IT IMPORTANT that only one kind of flagging is used??? What difference two kind of flag would make? You dont want to send

About TB folders : outbox vs draft ...

2005-12-15 Thread Claude Renaud
Hi all, As a supporter of the idea of the implementation of a draft folder, I will add : For me distinguishing parked messages from drafted ones is not so easy because it is a matter of flags and as you remember perhaps I'm blind and my screen reader does not handle graphical symbols easily

Re: About TB folders : outbox vs draft ...

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Claude! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 2:39 PM, you wrote: As a supporter of the idea of the implementation of a draft folder, I will add : For me distinguishing parked messages from drafted ones is not so easy because it is a matter of flags and as you remember perhaps I'm blind

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Mark, On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 11:05:52 AM, among other things, you wrote: MP Hello Stefan, MP Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:22:43 PM, you wrote: ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't ST understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work

Re[4]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/14/2005 6:12 AM Hi Vili, On 12/13/2005 Vili wrote: V Ok, then I should campaign for a Hungarian, Russian, etc folder... V Because I have different emailing habits..(?) Draft messages are a part of everyone's use. Sorry you do not understand that. V Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Miguel A.

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? 100%... I am using 3.62.14. -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2

Re[5]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Paul, V Ok, then I should campaign for a Hungarian, Russian, etc folder... V Because I have different emailing habits..(?) Draft messages are a part of everyone's use. Sorry you do not understand that. No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we have enough

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? 100%... I am using 3.62.14. As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see attached GIF from my Outbox

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:42:00 PM, Vili wrote: Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? The real question is why would anyone have to have a message in preparation IN the outbox when it needed later editing? -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:38:13 AM, Vili wrote: No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we have enough default folders already? the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are in

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Dwight! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 8:02 AM, you wrote: ... Dont we have enough default folders already? the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are in process where they are not mixed up with

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? 100%... I am using 3.62.14. As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see attached GIF from my Outbox

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? The real question is why would anyone have to have a message in preparation IN the outbox when it needed later editing? I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has problem with it... --

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we have enough default folders already? the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are in process where they are not mixed up with

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:11:39 AM, Vili wrote: I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has problem with it... You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program since 1.3 works well are you? -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:12:55 AM, Vili wrote: You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Vili! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:12 AM, you wrote: No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we have enough default folders already? the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing there. there should be a place to put documents

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag... -- Vili

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has problem with it... You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program since 1.3 works well are you? This is what I am trying to say: I dont feel it as an improvement. I feel it like the new GUI:

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Cees
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 16:25 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'About TB folders' : Hoi Mary,   ___\/___ o/\o   MB What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied MB to me by the developers? MB As has been noted by others, I too never use Inbox-Known

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Mary, No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we have enough default folders already? the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are in process where they are not mixed up with

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? 100%... I am using 3.62.14. As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see attached GIF from my Outbox

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Vili! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:29 AM, you wrote: I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has problem with it... You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program since 1.3 works well are you? This is what I am trying to say: I dont feel

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Vili! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34 AM, you wrote: You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same way. Just don't use it. :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight against it. I'm hungry. You're not hungry. So, you oppose my being

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Vili! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34 AM, you wrote: I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior. And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61. What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied to me by the developers?

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Cees
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 16:42 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'About TB folders' : Hoi Mary, You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same way. Just don't use it. :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight against it. MB I'm

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34:12 AM, Vili wrote: You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same way. Just don't use it. :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight against it. If each of us decided to fight against anything we didn't think

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:27:59 AM, Vili wrote: You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Cees! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:58 AM, you wrote: You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same way. Just don't use it. :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight against it. MB I'm hungry. MB You're not hungry. MB So, you oppose

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag... Think about it

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Cees
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 17:16 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'About TB folders' : Hoi MAU, THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag... M Think about it a bit more. The fact that you interpret

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Cees, alright Mau, and I wannit NOW! ;) Drafts folders have been so well accepted by the general public that I have run out of stock, you'll have to wait a few days until I get some more from the factory ;-) Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet ;-) --

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:38 AM, you wrote: alright Mau, and I wannit NOW! ;) Drafts folders have been so well accepted by the general public that I have run out of stock, you'll have to wait a few days until I get some more from the factory ;-) Thanks, St. Nicholas.

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet ;-) Cees put a supporting note there last night--I asked him for it on TBOT. And how in h...eaven you expect me to know that Cees is Arkanoid? -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Gleason Pace
Dwight, If I have a mail I want to send Wednesday, which I finish on Monday, where do you suggest I put it when it is done? And it has to have a flag. How about a color group for pending messages, and a memo telling you when it should be sent? You could put it anywhere, even parked in the

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:53 AM, you wrote: Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet ;-) Cees put a supporting note there last night--I asked him for it on TBOT. And how in h...eaven you expect me to know that Cees is Arkanoid? That's what

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, How I do wish that you had time or inclination to peek in on TBOT from time to time, Miguel. :) I'll propose you a deal. You recruit eleventeen hundred and twenty seven new supporters for Drafts folder and I'll join TBOT. Deal? -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:42 AM, you wrote: How I do wish that you had time or inclination to peek in on TBOT from time to time, Miguel. :) I'll propose you a deal. You recruit eleventeen hundred and twenty seven new supporters for Drafts folder and I'll join TBOT.

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior. And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61. What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied to me by the developers? :)) Simpler is always better... You are right but I

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:54 AM, you wrote: I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior. And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61. What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied to me by the developers?

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:58:22 AM, Gleason Pace wrote: If I have a mail I want to send Wednesday, which I finish on Monday, where do you suggest I put it when it is done? And it has to have a flag. How about a color group for pending messages, and a memo telling you when it

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, In some real-world offices one has an Outbox and an Inbox on one's desk. Only in some? I'd say in most, if not all. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat!

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:37 PM, you wrote: In some real-world offices one has an Outbox and an Inbox on one's desk. Only in some? I'd say in most, if not all. Was hedging my bets, not having been in a real-world office in quite some time. Haven't had one of my own since

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does not...) Are you sure? 100%... I am using 3.62.14. As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see attached GIF from my Outbox

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Mary, You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same way. Just don't use it. :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight against it. I'm hungry. You're not hungry. So, you oppose my being fed because you don't see the significance of my

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, There is no such group that Keep. So, each of it is Draft. Wrong! There is one of each. Come on, take your _guess_! You have a 50% chance of _guessing_ it right ;-) MAU: show me ANY reference in TB! for such a group as Keep... -- Vili

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, If you can articulate a reason why you need an Hungarian folder, and what it needs to do which you can't do with the present configuration and how it would make TB! a better program I would support your advocacy of it. What is that you cannot do NOW without the Drafts folder?

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag... If I have a

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, You have a flag to distinguish between them... please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one flag to mark both THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag. Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag... Think about it

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior. And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61. What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied to me by the developers? :)) Simpler is always better... You are right but I

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi MAU! Q: And where is the Drafts folder, doesn't TB have a Drafts folder? I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work for you? -- Cheers! Stefan

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 3:08:04 PM, Vili wrote: MAU: you are just playing with the words... Parked messages in Outbox means: edit later; Non-parked means: can be sent... Is it that hard to remember I can't tell if you are just being hard headed, aren't listening or are just

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 3:12:53 PM, Vili wrote: Hello Dwight, If you can articulate a reason why you need an Hungarian folder, and what it needs to do which you can't do with the present configuration and how it would make TB! a better program I would support your advocacy of it.

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 4:22:43 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: I don't understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work for you? Can I open a message in a virtual folder and edit it? Will it's being in a virtual folder keep it out of the outbox where it is at risk of getting sent,

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Vili, Wednesday, December 14, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? Why would anyone put a rocket on a launch pad if not for firing it up? I hate the idea of having clones of already sent mails in my outbox,

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Vili, Wednesday, December 14, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing stuff I don't think he does. He possibly just can't tell the difference, because there is no visible difference since all is already mixed up in

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Charlene, Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? Why would anyone put a rocket on a launch pad if not for firing it up? It has nothing to do with the emails... I hate the idea of having clones of already sent mails in my outbox, confusing me and the

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, MAU: you are just playing with the words... Parked messages in Outbox means: edit later; Non-parked means: can be sent... Is it that hard to remember I can't tell if you are just being hard headed, aren't listening or are just enjoying the arguing. I dont see the point of

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, If you can articulate a reason why you need an Hungarian folder, and what it needs to do which you can't do with the present configuration and how it would make TB! a better program I would support your advocacy of it. What is that you cannot do NOW without the Drafts folder?

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, MAU, I am ready to support it in the moment when you show me a USEFUL feature of the Draft folder. All I see is only eye-candy kind of features of the Draft folder... Forget it. If you haven't understood yet the reasons for the proposal, you never will. -- Best regards, Please

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, MAU: you are just playing with the words... Parked messages in Outbox means: edit later; Non-parked means: can be sent... Is it that hard to remember As I have said in another message, you haven't understood a bit about what all of this is about. Forget it. -- Best

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, MAU: show me ANY reference in TB! for such a group as Keep... Forget it, you'll never understand what this is all about. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi Dwight! Can I open a message in a virtual folder and edit it? Yes. Will it's being in a virtual folder keep it out of the outbox where it is at risk of getting sent, Yes. As long as the Draft flag is used, messages cannot be sent. where Mary's signatures get messed up, etc. I has

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, MAU: show me ANY reference in TB! for such a group as Keep... Forget it, you'll never understand what this is all about. No, I wont, you are right. You, and noone here in the list showed me any _usefulness_ of the Drafts folder. You use magic words like Keep messages, but when

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:32:53 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Yes. As long as the Draft flag is used, messages cannot be sent. If no one at ritlabs is willing to read any of the discussion about this subject, then we are just pi$$ing into the wind asking for consideration of any change.

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 5:44:51 PM, Vili wrote: Drafts has hourglass icon, finished letters dont have. if they are parked, what do they have? -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.63.12

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi Dwight! If no one at ritlabs is willing to read any of the discussion about this subject, then we are just pi$$ing into the wind asking for consideration of any change. Could you please be more concrete? I've read all messages in the About TB folders thread and I could not find anything

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi Dwight! if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. -- Cheers! Stefan Current beta is 3.63.09 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Stefan! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:32 PM, you wrote: where Mary's signatures get messed up, etc. I has nothing to do with physical Outbox/Drafts separation - the problem is that PGP-specific flags are not stored in draft messages, i.e. it's just missing functionality. I made

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hi Mary! where Mary's signatures get messed up, etc. I has nothing to do with physical Outbox/Drafts separation - the problem is that PGP-specific flags are not stored in draft messages, i.e. it's just missing functionality. I made a BT issue report about this, and Roelof posted to me

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Stefan! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:55 PM, you wrote: ... I've read all messages in the About TB folders thread and I could not find anything against virtual folder. Perhaps, I'm missing something? If I've understood Miguel A. Urech correctly, his chief reason for proposing

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Stefan! On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 7:10 PM, you wrote: where Mary's signatures get messed up, etc. I has nothing to do with physical Outbox/Drafts separation - the problem is that PGP-specific flags are not stored in draft messages, i.e. it's just missing functionality. I

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread MAU
Hello Stefan, Q: And where is the Drafts folder, doesn't TB have a Drafts folder? I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work for you? Yes, I can understand you don't have time when you have to release 2 betas

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
messages in the About TB folders thread and I could not find anything against virtual folder. Perhaps, I'm missing something? In your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you said you didn't have time to read the messages about tb folders. Then in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote Will it's being

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:59:40 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. I understand that, but I was hoping that Vili would finally have to admit that it was so and that he understood that as

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-14 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Vili, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : I hate the idea of having clones of already sent mails in my outbox, confusing me and the recipients with duplicates. Then why do you copy the copies to the Outboy again? I don't, but the new feature does, as

About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread MAU
Hello all, Let's see, TB creates Inbox, Inbox-Known, Outbox, Sent Mail and Trash folders, all of them with an specific purpose and quite intuitive. If needed TB will also create Junk and Quarantine folders, also intuitive. You, as a user, can then create an unlimited amount of Account and Common

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, Q: And where is the Drafts folder, doesn't TB have a Drafts folder? A: Nah! You don't need one. Your drafts are saved in Outbox, mixed with other messages waiting to be sent but with a special park flag which will prevent them from being unintentionally sent. Of course, if you

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Vili, Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 12:42:00 AM, Vili wrotened: Q: And where is the Drafts folder, doesn't TB have a Drafts folder? A: Nah! You don't need one. Your drafts are saved in Outbox, mixed with other messages waiting to be sent but with a special park flag which will prevent

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/13/2005 8:08 PM Hi Vili, On 12/13/2005 Vili wrote: V Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? V We lived w/o Draft, we get used to it, dont change it... I am glad you are not speaking for me. I often compile a message for future sending and 'park' it in the

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, We lived w/o Draft, we get used to it, dont change it... Can't argue such profound thoughts. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.63.09 (Beta) on

Re[3]: About TB folders

2005-12-13 Thread Vili
Hello Paul, V Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later editing??? V We lived w/o Draft, we get used to it, dont change it... I am glad you are not speaking for me. I often compile a message for future sending and 'park' it in the Outbox for a day or two. If I had a Drafts