David Miller wrote:
Does Chris or anybody else in the world think
highly of him? I really wonder about these
things. Daniel must be getting very lonely.
In many ways, I pity him.
Daniel wrote:
Why not ask Brother Chris, Miller? I am not
holding my breath expecting you to contact
In a message dated 5/3/2004 12:40:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel wrote:
Why not ask Brother Chris, Miller? I am not
holding my breath expecting you to contact him.
Personally, I have decided to not argue with Daniel's theology since he is not a part of this list
In a message dated 5/1/2004 6:46:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Do cats EVER worry about what others think?
The man has done his homework -- and a good post it is.
John
In a message dated 5/1/2004 6:46:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That fearsome punishment allows them (to their way of thinking) that anything short of being that inhumane allows them enough latitude to go to extreme measures almost as bad in order to persuade somebody not
David Miller wrote:
:-) If you think about it, in some ways, Daniel has afforded us some
humor and entertainment, a relief from some of our own tensions over
other issues.
---
David, you have gone off your rocker.
David,
It seems that Daniel, and those like him, show the danger
of men trying to keep the Law apart from the Holy Spirit. My husband last
night was marveling that such men think that their scriptural authority as men
is license for them to bludgeon womenquite unlike Jesus. Isnt
it
In a message dated 5/1/2004 4:21:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel is new this time around, so I afford him some patience.
But, of course, he is not new at all. "This time around " is just an excuse. Paul was not :longsuffering: as you apply the concept in regard to
By the way, David, do you remember
asking me once if I would be a moderator on TT? The reason I did not want to do
that is that I do not believe that women should be put in the position of having
to assert authority over men. It goes against our nature. It is only when
men fail to use
Izzy: There's never a cop around when you need one.
I concur with your assessment. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 01, 2004 08:37
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Longsuffering is
a fruit of the Spirit
David,
Izzy wrote:
I think the men on TT are like spiritual big brothers
to the women here. I think I should not have been put
in the role of defending the women on this list, but at
some point it had to be done, or TT is not worth my company.
When sweet little Laura started barking back at
David Miller wrote:
David Miller wrote:
If you think about it, in some ways, Daniel has
afforded us some humor and entertainment, a relief
from some of our own tensions over other issues.
Terry wrote:
David, you have gone off your rocker. This
Miller said:
Does
Chris or anybody else in the world think highly of him? I really wonder
about these things. Daniel must be getting very lonely. In many ways,
I pity him.
Daniel responds:
Why not ask Brother Chris, Miller? I am not holding my breath expecting you to
contact him.
John said:
But, of course, he is not new at all. This time around is just an
excuse. Paul was not :longsuffering: as you apply the concept in regard to the
imoral young man who was sleeping with his mother. Jesus would not wait ten
seconds with this guy -- not ten seconds. His language is
Whore --
Your attempt at false humility does not work.
You make not be the moderator but you sure do act like it with all your huffing and
puffing.
Yes, Perry is right -- I have much golden Truth to share with this forum -- but you
will see none of the gold until the dung of female
Terry said:
My advice, based on what I know from studying the Word is, deliver him
to Satan. He should have been stoned when he was a youth. The Pagan
Wolf is a gentleman compared to this clown. The door is always open if
he sees fit to repent, but I do not think we will see that happen
In a message dated 5/1/2004 2:10:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Johnny boy -- no one in their right mind would ever take you seriously. You need a diaper change -- your shit (dung that violates Yah's word) is seeping out down your legs.
Yes. I see it now. There is hope
David Miller wrote:
I think the rule applies to Daniel, and I have said such several times.
I have not changed my position on that. Perry has been away,
but he is
moderator and may do what he thinks is best. Maybe he has already
added
Daniel to the kill list. Maybe he is trying to figure out
John S. wrote:
It should be a simple thing to eliminate
this loser from the list.
Take strength from the Word of God, John. :-)
Gal 5:22, But the fruit of the Spirit is ... longsuffering
But in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of God, in much
patience, in afflictions, in
I consider this an inappropriate response to the problem at hand. Christ was not "longsuffering" at the temple. The kind of filth put out by Daniel to Izzy is never to be tolerated by other Christians. Why even have rules, David, if you have no intention of applying them? You have a cancer
John, Dont let the turkeys get you
down. Daniel is a flyspeck and doesnt bother me in the
teeniest. Folks who dont deserve any respect are totally impotent;
they just dont know it. (Although I must admit I dont mind
causing him to gnash his teeth a bit, while spitting venom.) And every
20 matches
Mail list logo