Re: DAS M3 Release

Hi All, I have worked on a couple of jiras, and planning to analyze more JIRAs soon.So far the JIRAs I have worked on are as below:- TUSCANY-800 - Ajax DAS - patch available, creating a final patch TUSCANY-841 - Compound Key Relationship Tests - resolved TUSCANY-863 - Auto canned DB creation -

Re: DAS M3 Release

(See Capabilities In Use) Please check and give comments. Regards, Amita On 4/17/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have worked on a couple of jiras, and planning to analyze more JIRAs soon.So far the JIRAs I have worked on are as below:- TUSCANY-800 - Ajax DAS - patch

IRC for DAS release - May15th , 8.00 a.m. PST

Hi, Regarding DAS release , we need to know where we are and what is still left. So it will be really helpful if we can talk in IRC at the proposed time. See you there. Regards, Amita

Re: DAS M3 Release

.html what was this? Regards, Amita On 5/11/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have made a few changes to http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+User+Guide as below:- Capabilities(How To) Added*DAS support for J2SE environment Added*Explicit Create,Update

DAS Release: IRC chat log 15 May 2007

Start of #tuscany buffer: Tue May 15 21:35:03 2007 * Now talking in #tuscany * adrianocrestani has joined #tuscany adrianocrestani hi lresende hi * Venkat has joined #tuscany kgoodson hi lresende Amita wanted to discuss the status of the das release, and i think this would be good exercise to

Re: DAS M3 Release

review.) On 5/21/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adriano, It is still work-in-progress. Main changes I did are 1) use simple connection pool on Test Cases framework 2) use finalize() in RDB DAS code 3) Do cleanup (removing references) as needed 4) Decouple DatabaseSetup

Re: Tuscany DAS Features/Questions

Hi Folks, Can I create JIRAs for these and mark them for DAS Mx, just to have a pointer to come back to these features? Regards, Amita On 5/15/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will be interesting to get these features into DAS using JIRAs. I am just trying to get a clear picture

Re: DAS M3 Release

Hi , FAQs in place, please check and give comments/add to it http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+Java+-+FAQ Regards, Amita On 5/23/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please take a look at the section Ongoing work items on page http://cwiki.apache.org

DAS M3 Release - Documentation

Hi, I have recently added FAQs and also a couple of new sections in http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS. It will be helpful to get some feedback to make it better. Regards, Amita

Re: DAS M3 Release - Documentation

setup pieces in the sample and what the purpose for each step is? Just a thought.. [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Starting+with+DAS On 5/29/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have recently added FAQs and also a couple of new sections in http

Re: DAS M3 Release

, Amita On 5/28/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi , FAQs in place, please check and give comments/add to it http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+Java+-+FAQ Regards, Amita On 5/23/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please take a look

Re: DAS M3 Release

release. - Can we follow the same style as other subprojects. Please take a look at SCA Download page for an example. I can help with this if others are OK. On 6/4/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some more update, -mvn test on DAS is not running all tests, but only

Re: [DAS] Status of DAS Release

-incubating.jar? Regards, Amita On 6/11/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, When tried mvn -Pdistribution on das:- das\distribution\binary\pom.xml - does not list ajax web sample under dependency and thus does not package same As now, non-committer does not have access to edit wiki

Re: [DAS] Status of DAS Release

Small update, tried to build and test with empty repos and it went through with no issues. Regards, Amita On 6/13/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things tested to be working - all UT as part of mvn build all samples in different browsers. Apart from das\distribution\binary

Re: [SDO Java] 1.0 Release Content Review

Hi, I am trying to go through details of JIRA 1317 and will get back here with any questions, doubts. Thanks, Amita On 6/15/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The IRC chat to review the SDO release content didn't work out (I'd be interested in any feedback why that was), so here's a

Re: Why the rootDataObject can't save to a xml file ?

Hi, I have only a limited understanding about SDO and EMF, but what it looks like is - List custList = root.getList(CUSTOMER); for(int i=0; icustList.size(); i++){ System.out.println(XMLHelper.INSTANCE.save ((DataObject)custList.get(i), whatever, myname)); } will

Re: New version solves Feature 'ConnectionInfo' not found problem

Hi Enric, I just came across some links from PostgreSQL, relevant to the exception mentioned earlier - Exception in thread main *java.lang.RuntimeException*: * org.postgresql.util.PSQLException*: Returning autogenerated keys is not supported.

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java DAS beta1 (RC2)

Hi, Pease visit JIRA-1419 to find the summary of changes done to different readmes based on all the comments obtained so far. It will be very helpful if these can be reviewed from JIRA attachments and further comments given there, so that the finalilized readmes can be used in RC. Regards, Amita

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

on business logic and issue commits/rollbacks. Also, internally, RDB DAS will be responsible to rollback in case of exceptions and in case of Timeouts. Please share your thoughts. Regards, Amita On 6/12/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I just want to clarify if the below is something

[RDB DAS] Consistent use of Parameters in Config

Hi, A few days ago there was a user question about passing name in Parameter:- http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19339.html When checking how Parameters are used in Config, came across the following points. There is a difference in Config (SDO) generated Parameter and

Re: Does DAS could support the blob field read and write ?

, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, There is none at present, am giving it a try, will give you some update in couple of hrs. Regards, Amita On 7/13/07, litaojian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Amita , Thanks , but where is the sample that I could find ? litaojian 2007-07-13

Re: Does DAS could support the blob field read and write ?

Hi, DAS does show support for Blob. I am trying a small sample with MySQL -DAS to verify the same. There is also a DefaultConverter provided in DAS Impl which seems to be there for handling Blobs. Thanks, Amita On 7/13/07, litaojian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All , I need to read or

Re: [DAS] XQuery-DAS

Hi, Yes, Saxon was suggested by Ant also before and it has saxon-b as freeware. Anybody please any comment on any licensing restrictions? Also I was just giving a try to DB2 Express XQuery support. There are a couple of others listed in June 15 mail, in this same thread. Saxon will be a good

Re: How to do if I need the DAS and SDO to support reading and writing the BLOB or CLOB field

Hi Folks, JIRA-1453 opened for this issue is perfectly fixing Blob and ByteArray. Clob and Array, seem to be the only remaining types where TypeHelper.getType(commonj.sdo,...) returns null. Same approach as JIRA-1453 can work the Clob , but for Array? Any hints? Can the same JIRA be used or new

Re: Flexibility in supporting JDBC's Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS in RDB DAS (JIRA-1417)

Message From: Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:56:36 AM Subject: Re: Flexibility in supporting JDBC's Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS in RDB DAS (JIRA-1417) Hi, Below are some details about the solution for JIRA-1353

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java DAS beta1 (RC3)

Downloaded src and bin destro and tried tests, samples, checked javadoc, readmes. Looks fine to me. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Amita On 7/30/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany DAS for Java. All the major issues reported in RC1

Re: [RDB DAS] Need to allow passing ResultDescriptor for dynamic Commands (Ref.JIRA-1355)

it with JDBC metadata. Unfortunately, Oracle JDBC Driver does not provide all necessary metadata that DAS needs : ( Regards, Adriano Crestani On 7/12/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Recently there came up a requirement from user (ref. JIRA-1355), when the user

[DAS] Column Converter - why not to associate with ResultDescriptor?

With JIRA-1465, ResultDescriptor can be set dynamically for DAS Commands which are created with DAS.createCommand(). Further on this, will it be helpful to associate ColumnConverter with ResultDescriptor? So, when there is no Config File, user will have a choice to use ColumnConveter on-the-fly

Re: Flexibility in supporting JDBC's Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS in RDB DAS (JIRA-1417)

out-of-the-box with no special Config attribute. Thanks for persevering with this issue. Also, thanks in advance for your patch. Regards, - Ron --- Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: True, with the approach, DAS can use Metadata API and treat Derby specially (as Derby Embedded

[DAS] Relationship info using DBMS Metadata getCrossReference() - pros and cons?

(Prev mail thread:- http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg20770.html) More on this... Looks like, single table registry approach was taken to dump all rows fetcted from database without linking DataObjects, as there is no relationship information in DAS Config. So, from the above mail

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

be useful to bunch commands, but I didn't get how you are planning to do it : ( What would be the parameter of method getTransaction? Regards, Adriano Crestani On 7/12/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is a simple matrix based on current RDB DAS Config, showing what

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

a reference to the Connection he created. So, if the managedtx=true and the user passed the Connection to DAS, it will make no sense not to expose the Connection to the user, since he already has its reference. Regards, Adriano Crestani On 8/14/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL

Re: Example to define the ResultSet shape Definition for a join in DAS

Hi, DAS Config file does support ResultDescriptor and [2] test case mentioned by Luciano is quite descriptive. This functionality is there in the latest stable release. Recently there is JIRA-1465 fixed with which, Dynamically created Commands (the ones that are not in DAS Config file) also can

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

, Adriano Crestani On 8/16/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Haleh, Please see all the use case details below. There are three user cases going wrong which I am trying to fix. I have created a JIRA-1543 to demonstrate with examples how DAS is failing

Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?

I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961. One observation here - Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty(Type, int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in xsdtojava generator in SDO? Any suggestions?

Re: [RDB DAS] Consistent use of Parameters in Config

xsd:attribute name=sql type=xsd:string/ /xsd:complexType On 8/2/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JPQL, Hibernate ,... have support for named parameters. Why is RDB DAS going in the other way? If there is a reason for switching off named parameters, please elaborate, else

Re: Having problem with null values in my DAS

Will you please share the config file and the data/table info here, so I can simulate the condition. When tried with a simple sample, it seems that - when any other column other that the one mentioned in DAS as PK has null value, DAS is producing correct result. So, your details will help. Also,

Re: [RDB DAS] Consistent use of Parameters in Config

/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is one of the use cases where user will get some benefit:- USE CASE: bigtable{col1, col2,col50} SIMPLEST CLIENT CODE: WITH NAMED PARAM SUPPORT Command insertAdhoc = das.createCommand(insert into bigtable values (?, ?, ?...50

Re: Having problem with null values in my DAS

- From: Amita Vadhavkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:58 AM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Having problem with null values in my DAS Will you please share the config file and the data/table info here, so I can simulate the condition. When tried

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

me spend couple hours on this over the weekend, and send some feedback after that. I'll also write a wiki page with what I think the Transaction support should do/work. On 8/17/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just trying to see what changes will be needed (marked

[DAS] DAS Web Sample with Tomcat and JOTM as Transaction Manager

I am using jotm-2.0.10 and Tomcat 5.5.23. The HowTo from JOTM site has a few problems and the below info worked for me - [1]http://www.nabble.com/UserTransaction,- JOTM-and-Tomcat-5.5.x-t1073172.html [2]http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/howto-tomcat-jotm.html Also, as mentioned in [1] for

Re: Where could I found the source in the package of org.apache.tuscany.das.rdb.config

Hi, When you extract the src and do mvn build, all these files will get generated. There is a sdo-plugin used (see pom.xml) which does xsd2java generation. So in the src zip, the xsds will be there but not the java files. If you take the bin zip , you will get the class files for these. Regards,

Re: How to deal with the DateTime field in DAS ?

Hi, java.sql.Types.DATE, TIME and TIMESTAMP maps to commonj.sdo.Date. Also see, KennelTests.testSimple5() for an example of using Timestamp - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/rdb/src/test/ Regards, Amita On 9/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All

Re: [DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?

make it on time, we could still have a chance to include DAS in the SCA 1.0 release (planned for middle of September). As for naming, I was thinking to make this a beta2 release. Thoughts ? On 8/27/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986

Re: RDB DAS read, then write XML file for data export

Hi , Will you please try the example with latest SDO and DAS code from svn trunk, There are some differences in DAS-beta1 (older releases) and the current one from https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/. These differences are due to some changes in SDO. With the latest one, I am

Re: RDB DAS read, then write XML file for data export

: Amita Vadhavkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:25 PM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: RDB DAS read, then write XML file for data export Hi , Will you please try the example with latest SDO and DAS code from svn trunk, There are some

Re: Das beta2 MySQL Customer Example

Please see with the below steps, if it works for you, I am also modifying the beta2 sample readme to include the same instructions for use with other dbs like MySQL, DB2 etc. On 9/17/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I took the following steps to get the customer sample

Re: generated fields in Static SDO's not getting populated

valid problem. patch is provided for review in TUSCANY-1807. Detailed analysis in same place. Regards, Amita On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I attach a static SDO to a data graph, that has a generated id field, after applyChanges, that field on the static SDO

Re: DAS configuration must specify ResultDescriptors

TUSCANY-1465 is the JIRA which added index to the ResultDescriptor With that the physical order can be anything for ResultDescriptor as long as index is used properly. This JIRA helps in specifying result descriptor programmatically (i.e. not thru config file). See

Re: DAS configuration must specify ResultDescriptors

or copy this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -Original Message- From: Amita Vadhavkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: Different DB Drivers pulling information differently?

What is the column type in database for LAST_NAME? If it is varchar, what is the length if any specified? Regards, Amita On 11/3/07, Jason Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My Config. ConnectionInfo ConnectionProperties

Re: Different DB Drivers pulling information differently?

the problem? I honestly don't know that much about databases but my project doesn't have enough money to hire someone who does. -Jason -Original Message- From: Amita Vadhavkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:15 PM To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject

Re: Another DAS problem/question

DAS is supporting data transfer between SDO and DB. In this, the uniqueness of a DataObject(DO) is ensured by having a PK in it. If this is not done, it will not be possible to get correct query results and also to do CUD on DB based on changes in DO. Due to this the DAS query mandates that the

[DAS] need to correct condition check in UpdateGenerator

Link to JIRA - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1895 RDB DAS - UpdateGenerator performs incorrect check when passing property values from parent DO to child DO. It tries to find the FK property in Parent DO and gives exception. code .UdateGenerator.getChangedFields() - if

[DAS] DAS as web service

There is an old thread - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg01951.html I am just trying to continue the discussion here to come up with requirement, use cases and a basic implementation. Standalone DAS can be used by client by having the required jar in classpath. By

Re: What's mean of the managed column in DAS config ?

Hi, If your question is about managed=true setting in a Table's Column, please see http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/das-java-faq.html#DASJava-FAQ-OptimisticConcurrencyControl for more explanation about managed and collision attributes at Column level and how these can control the Optimistic

Re: An update collision occurred when update the primary key property !

UpdateGenerator forms update statement with where clause like this - iterate over all PKs and include them in where clause. Then iterate over all changed fields and include them in where clause with values set to old values from change summary. In case the PK itself is being changed, this results

Re: [Java SDO] What should we be attacking?

Hi, I would like to do Release Management activities for this SDO release. It will be a good learning for me. Appreciate your help. Regards, Amita On Jan 15, 2008 6:42 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's high time we spun this release. There are various patches still to apply I

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and keeping ref. to the old mail thread - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. I am starting a new

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

Sorry, please see point 1 ) i.e. old page for sdo get involved and not 2). On Jan 18, 2008 5:27 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Regarding website updates, will you please help in 2) where there is a chance that there will be pre-existing page - I gave it an attempt

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

with. Kelvin. On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report Please see Unresolved section in it and give comments about what

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and keeping ref. to the old mail thread - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

Hi, Regarding website updates, will you please help in 2) where there is a chance that there will be pre-existing page - I gave it an attempt but could not locate. Regards, Amita On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

it. Kelvin. On 21/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some more questions about website content changes - Please refer to 1)..9) from http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg02417.html *Q*1) Could not find any other page with SDO Java specific get

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

error report sections from the files in target/surefire-reports Kelvin. On 21/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After building a fresh checkout and using initially empty maven repo, all except testEncoding(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLHelperTestCase) failed

[Java SDO] getEncoding() during load() - issues + TUSCANY-1545

I am making this a separate thread and referring it in http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg02447.html as this can be my local setup issue and so don't want to mix with the release thread. 0] I checked that the EMF version in my classpath is 2.2.3. 1]Eclipse 3.2.1

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

, 2008 4:29 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, its maven build that is giving this failure, am checking more on it. Regards, Amita On Jan 24, 2008 4:25 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, I also just wiped (moved aside) my whole repo, and got a clean build

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

. Regards, Amita On Jan 24, 2008 4:14 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kelvin, What I did was - renamed C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\.m2\repository - C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\.m2\repository_bkp so that I don't have any maven repo and did a fresh svn

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

up. Kelvin. On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the xml files under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. Regards, Amita On Jan 18, 2008 4

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

would be a good time to do this? Kelvin. On 25/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have worked on the comments for RAT report and added the results at the end of - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report. So shall I go ahead and correct the 9

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

Hi, I am going through all the samples to see if there are any areas of improvement, If anybody has spotted some areas or have some suggestions, please explain the details. Regards, Amita On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about having an IRC on 4th Feb

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am going through all the samples to see if there are any areas of improvement, If anybody has spotted some areas or have some suggestions, please explain the details. Regards, Amita On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

And also src/distro and bin/distro license will be addition of the 2 license texts (Apache and OSOA) On Feb 4, 2008 7:40 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologies for a lengthy mail,but trying not to keep any ambiguities. Please see all **Question: Findings for license text

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

on this release for some JIRA. Appreciate all help in getting all important JIRAs in this release Regards, Amita On Feb 4, 2008 8:41 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologies for a lengthy mail,but trying not to keep any

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15317.html On 04/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When confirming for correctness of 3rd party license text, I checked the below thread - 1]http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05115.html and got in summary the below guidelines

[SDO Java] Pluggable SDOPackageRegistryDelegator and Tuscany-1459

Please refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1831 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1459 and share your thoughts about what can be done for Tuscany-1831 Regards, Amita

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

: On 04/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologies for a lengthy mail,but trying not to keep any ambiguities. Please see all **Question: Findings for license text and copyright text - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15317.html

Re: [Java SDO] Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating

it with the Apache license. Kelvin. commit 375756 jboynes 07/02/2006 22:37:37 version of HelperProvider that uses JAR service lookup to find the implementation changed copyright on HelperProvider.java as this is a new implementation On 12/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL

SDO Java 1.1-incubating release candidate 1

I've posted a RC1 of SDO Java 1.1-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] The rat report is at - [4], [5] Please take a look at this release candidate. Also please feed back on the install, build and samples.

Re: SDO Java 1.1-incubating release candidate 1

/tuscany/1.1-RC1/maven and building the sample project in that distro, with no sdo artifacts in my local repo, successfully causes download of the SDO artifacts from your staging repo, and the sample project build is successful On 21/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar

Re: SDO Java 1.1-incubating release candidate 1

of the felix maven-osgi-plugin, could that use a non-snapshot release? 3) Mention of backport util source location in bin/Notice file - confirmation Regards, Amita On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

SDO Java 1.1-incubating release candidate 2

I've posted a RC2 of SDO Java 1.1-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] The rat report is at - [4], [5] Please take a look at this release candidate. Also please feed back on the install, build and samples. [1]

Re: [DAS] Running tomcat samples

The problem is version of derby jar in the samples/testing/tomcat/build.xml - it is asking for 10.1.2.1 Whereas the derby jar asked for in the rdb/pom.xml is 10.2.20. So when the user attempts to run the sample the required version is not found and no derby jar is deployed in tomcat lib and so no

Re: SDO Java 1.1-incubating release candidate 2

:49 AM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've posted a RC2 of SDO Java 1.1-incubating at [1] Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2] I cut a branch for this release at [3] The rat report is at - [4], [5] Please take a look at this release candidate