On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Figure 10 from the dummy run shows slight evidence of spiral banding
(orange-ish) from top-left to bottom-right in segments 1-2-3 4-5-6 and
7-8-9 : but this looks to be a coarser spiral than than the distinct bands
of fig
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a mountain to climb to convince the world, and they have not
really helped that process.
Agreed. There seems to be consensus that the report is interesting but
flawed. It will convince no one
I wrote:
I assume, then, that magnetic domains and the curie temperature are not
relevant. I'm thinking more along the lines of metal vapor and partially
ionized nickel and iron atoms and particles, which will carry some amount
of electric charge.
Note that as the temperature rises, the
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe the large tubes on the end to be thermally insulating supports
for the hot central 2 cm tube.
A question that came to me was whether the alumina endcaps could be
replaced with metal endcaps of a suitable
See (hear):
http://coldfusionnow.org/andrea-rossi-on-3rd-party-report-industrial-heat-1mw-plant-new-interview/
Courtesy of John Maguire and Ruby Carat. Rossi on the report (to
paraphrase): the calculation of the COP in the report was very
conservative; it's possible that the real COP was
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do we think the 3-phase drive is used?
I'm guessing this has to do with an induction mode, perhaps creating a
condition not unlike a microwave inside the E-Cat, with electric arcing
between the various iron and
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do we think the end caps are so big? Are they part of a lower
temperature insulated mounting system?
The following is a bit speculative, but perhaps someone can correct any
misstatements I make -- if there is a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From David French:
http://coldfusionnow.org/status-report-rossi-pending-us-patent-application/
David French's analyses are great. The clear lesson in this instance: if
you're going to try to patent something, enlist
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
... eg if Ø20mm outer wall is at 1200°C (approx max given revised COP of
around 2 from temp reading that is obviously in error due to non-melting of
inconel, though could be significantly lower)
I've taken a
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:25 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Wikipedians must hoard /. moderation points for just such an occasion
as this when they can vote the following comment down to a -1 rating:
There's an ugly trend in forums with reputation systems of downvoting
answers
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
IThe is no way in nuclear science to convert the reactants seen in the
way seen. T
This is probably true, there might be a dog buried, we need to look in
that direction.
It's not really true. There
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a boatload of assumption being made about this test that is
detrimental to analysis.
Yup.
Eric
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
25Mg + 25Mg = 26Mg + 24Mg + 3.763 MeV
Furthermore the energy is divided over two nuclei of almost equal mass,
hence
each gets about half (1.9 MeV), so this could be a very clean reaction.
Because these are heavy, they will each
I wrote:
Because these are heavy [25Mg], they will each have the full 1.9 MeV
kinetic energy to be thermalized, which is desirable, but very little
velocity, which is also desirable.
But they'll also be a bit of a chore to knock together.
Eric
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If the camera had been calibrated to 1400 C instead of 500 C it would have
shown the same ~3.5 OU on the dummy load as was later seen on the active
load!
If this is true, it should be easy enough for someone to arrange a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is also a mistake in their discussion for these figures, the metal
resistors within the reactor would necessarily have to be hotter than the
reactor itself if they are to be able to output heat into the
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
This reactor is mostly nickel droplets in lithium gas (the hydrogen will
all diffuse away through porous sintered alumina rapidly at such high
temperatures, but perhaps is useful to create reducing conditions
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
Apart from the fact that the 'glue' would have residual porosity that
would probably help vent all hydrogen at high temp that is pretty strong
indicator that there is no refractory metal shell in there to
I wrote:
An observer there for the opening reported no such refractory shell (though
might be under NDA).
Can you elaborate on this detail? Is it a CMNS thing?
I'm strongly inclined to think there's an inner cylinder that slides within
the body of the reactor. Otherwise the diamond saw
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:20 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
The internal oscillating magnetic field may supplying ... arcing
The arcing part -- this is what I'm betting on. That may be all that is
needed to sustain the reaction.
Eric
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The dark wire is thinner than the bright shadows so I think that the wire
is casting the shadow.
Maybe. Do you have a closeup that you're looking at? The details in the
image I see in the writeup are hard to make out. The
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
- The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I may have missed the paragraph that stated the amount of material that was
taken from within the reactor as ash. Did they recover approximately the
same amount as was put in?
Approximately 1 gram of fuel was added at
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Sorry – but this reactor is made of alumina – which is a proton conductor.
Beta alumina is among the best proton conducting ceramics but you would
never use any form of alumina if you wanted to retain a supply of hydrogen
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
more magic involved? fusion + fission transmutations that release copious
neutrinos with no gammas, betas, neutrons or alphas?
Apart from a few suggestions here and there, the main reactions that have
been
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Next let’s say the bulb presented is frosted, and you are naïve and do not
know that it contains a hot filament - but I use the camera to focus on an
area of the bulb’s exterior, where from prior experience, I know that the
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You can see the dark wires as clear as day.
Yes. And now where does it say in the report that the team conducting the
trial determined that current was flowing through them?
Eric
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Page 25:
The resistors appear to glow intensely in the parts lying outside the
caps, whereas inside the reactor body they seem to shade an underlying
emission of light.
What this sentence says to me is that the team assumed
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:48 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Especially if they switch to a pulse mode where they are not really heating
directly anymore, the pulses are working like an induction stovetop where
the quickly changing magnetic fields are inducing arcs/currents in the
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:48 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Especially if they switch to a pulse mode where they are not really heating
directly anymore, the pulses are working like an induction stovetop
On page 6 there's a photo of the power and harmonic analyzer. I don't know
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
29Si+58Ni = 59Ni + 28Si + 0.526 MeV
29Si+59Ni = 60Ni + 28Si + 2.914 MeV
Regarding this and the emails that follow -- very interesting. It seems
that there's a whole slew of possible neutron stripping reactions
available, with
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
no stage magic possible on that.
If it is stage magic, Rossi deserves the Nobel Price in magic.
Eric
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why is the Ni62 nearly pure? The reaction was stopped for reasons which were
pre-planned, and not related to a depletion of reactants. They made this
clear.
There was an earlier thread about the possibility of burn-in,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Li7 + Ni58 = Ni59 + Li6 + 1.75 MeV
Li7 + Ni59 = Ni60 + Li6 + 4.14 MeV
Li7 + Ni60 = Ni61 + Li6 + 0.57 MeV
Li7 + Ni61 = Ni62 + Li6 + 3.34 MeV
Li7 + Ni62 = Ni63 + Li6 - 0.41 MeV (Endothermic!)
This series stops at Ni62, hence all
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I also suspect that he originally used D iso Li, but changed to Li when he
found
that D produces protons that are too energetic and produce too much
secondary
radiation.
Another astute observation. To elaborate on what might have
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you remember all the internet ink was used to debate the copper ash in
the nickel powder; now all that is for naught.
Yes, and thankfully so. Ni(p,ɣ)Cu can go away and die a peaceful death.
(Not to say that it doesn't
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from the source
isotope, so a lot of those 2965 isotopes will be useless, depending on
which
isotope supplies the neutrons.
Yes, this is true. I forgot to mention that the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:58 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
As you allude, gammas were not seen in this test run. That leads me to
adopt Robin's hypothesis,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
At 1400C all atoms are either ionized or in dipole vibrations. There is an
electron plasma formed from which polaritons are then formed from electron
shielded infrared photons,
Sometimes I wonder whether there's a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This analysis is open to interpretation of course, since it is based on
ratios and they state that various particles vary from place to place.
It would be risky to try to compare specific counts of specific isotopes on
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
If it were a clear COP of 3, it should be pretty easy to heat a tub of
water or do some kind of obvious work.
This is the most frustrating part of following the E-Cat story. In several
years of watching, I have yet to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The shadows of the wires in figs 12 are problematic ... but we don't have
enough information to figure out if they are actually the result of light,
or if they represent zones of different thermal conductivity, as in the
first
I wrote:
In recent months my bet has been on transmutation from one isotope of
nickel to another, but I will need to read the report to see how I continue
to feel about that.
I just read over the report, and I feel greatly confirmed in the hypothesis
that neutron stripping of deuterium is
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Lithium is not unique. How does a family of element doing the secret sauce
function fit into your new theories?
Neutron stripping. :)
Eric
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Motl actually said that! Amazing. Quote:
One encouraging thing -- Motl, Yugo, etc., appear to be a little on the
defensive.
Eric
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it could be more than just housing the nanoparticles because of the
very strong electrostatic field created within the zeolite cavities and the
oscillation of the cavity.
I think of Iraj Parchamazad whenever the topic
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is wonderfully simple calorimetry. The easiest I have seen in cold
fusion. If you cannot understand this, you cannot understand any
experiment, and you know nothing about this subject.
To be honest, the calorimetry
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Given that the ash sample was taken at an arbitrarily-defined time point
... then I believe this indicates that the reaction is a cyclic one, which
decays to the measured ash isotope ratios while the reaction is
I wrote:
Apart from noise in measurements, such a discrepancy might be due to
natural variation in the isotopic composition of nickel; to a reaction
eating away some of the 61Ni and 64Ni; or to Rossi's using a preparation
that is somehow depleted in these specific isotopes.
I think the
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This was not leaked. Essen gave a copy to someone who uploaded it with
permission. (I think it was Mats Lewan.) This has been submitted to arXiv
but it has been delayed for unknown reasons.
Physics has fallen into a low
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have been working with. The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Its entirely conceivable that if the nickel micro particles are spaced far
enough apart, then no transmutation from nickel to copper will be seen.
Personally, I haven't found transmutation from nickel to copper credible
for
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/docs/20121204Kullander-Ni-Isotopes-LIG1204121.pdf
It is not the one from Kullander that I am looking for but it mentions
some of the same details.
I see that this analysis was
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Zirconia would not, itself, be a catalyst. I specifically mentioned
zirconium - the metal.
I thought your description of how you're using zirconium was interesting.
My comments related to the way George Miley is using
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:21 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
See item 36 for the comments.
Akso note earlier comments of both Nichols and Rossi.
Hi Bob -- is there a link you can share to the specific comments?
Eric
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Miley's zirconia reactor came to mind since Bob mentioned zirconia at the
same time I was writing a piece on perovskites.
Does anyone know where George Miley's recent engine project is at? I
noticed a patent in the article
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Actually – if you remember from TP1, the Swedes did test the powder with
XRF. ... They did not report any UV signature. They should have if Mills
reaction is involved as you seem to be suggesting.
Personally, I would not
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The ironic thing about the Rossi effect ... is that the radiation
band which is apparently absent for Rossi is ultraviolet - UV and EUV.
X-rays below ~ 10 keV will be stopped by a simple metal casing. EUV will
be stopped
I wrote:
There was this relevant detail in an NYT story about the man with Ebola who
flew into Dallas: ...
To update the number of people who may have come into contact with the
fellow from West Africa with Ebola who flew into Dallas, it appears we're
talking about ~ 100 people rather than
I wrote:
Apparently the apartment has not yet been disinfected, because Texas is
having trouble finding a contractor to do the work. ...
Some more interesting details from the article I forgot to link to [1]:
- The number of ~ 100 people who may have come into contact with the
fellow
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:28, hohlr...@gmail.com hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't that the same as fully ionized H?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Fartphone
- Reply message -
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi Report
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:28, hohlr...@gmail.com hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't that the same as fully ionized H?
The ionized electrons have to go somewhere when they're stripped from the H.
Eric
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:17 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I like the idea of excited He as an intermediate.
I recall reading that 4He does not have a bound excited nuclear state,
although it may have a resonance for a very brief period of time.
Eric
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
John – if COP of 6-10 is seen over an extended time period, much of the
mainstream physics community will go into full apoplectic and anaphylactic
shock. It may never recover from the embarrassment.
Personally, I doubt
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I predict a CoP of 2.6 and that the reactor accumulates a high
positive charge even to the point of occasionally arcing to it's
frame. (Actually, the arc path is from the frame to the reactor.)
Just curious -- why the
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hydrinos would probably need 50eV in an inelastic collision to re-inflate,
and Df/H would need something like 500keV.
Yes, this occurred to me, too. It will no doubt depend upon the population
of hydrinos and how far
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/world/africa/ebola-spreading-in-west-africa.html
There was this relevant detail in an NYT story about the man with Ebola who
flew into Dallas:
Officials said Wednesday that they believed
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:46 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The problem is not what happens to an infected person once they go to
hospital. ...
I see two additional potential problems:
- A strain eventually develops that becomes airborne. Perhaps not with
this outbreak, but in the next
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You might compare Df/H to a gas of stable neutrons. If stable neutrons
could exist, they would cause spontaneous isotopic shifts from thermal
collisions with atoms.
In thought experiments, this is how I think of f/H
I wrote:
This possibility of a large interaction cross section ...
It occurs to me that f/H will necessarily undergo collisions just like any
other species (including neutrons). Presumably that kinetic energy will
occasionally be passed on in inelastic collisions and reinflate the
erstwhile
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The electrons of f/H are tightly bound, but effectively shield the strong
force so it does not come into play.
I believe leptons are transparent to the strong interaction and so will
provide precious little shielding
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:25 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
When the deuterium nucleus gets close enough to connect with the second
Nickel nucleus it gives up its neutron to that nickel nucleus.
I think you're going to need a powerful force to make this part happen.
Think of the
I wrote:
Think of the proton that is part of the deuteron and the nickel nucleus as
extremely powerful, oppositely magnetized metal spheres.
I didn't say that very well. They're like two magnets with the same poles
facing each other (these magnets are monopoles, so there's no other pole to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I have previously suggested that a dense cluster might also absorb the
energy in
the form of kinetic energy distributed among thousands of densely clustered
atoms.
I see that Robin and Jones were talking about hydrino reinflation
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would Rossi enclose his reactor in LEAD if no gamma's were ever seen?
In Rossi's own 2010 patent, he states that the lead (and boron) shield is
there to protect from harmful radiation: In particular, the inventive
I wrote:
In Rossi's own 2010 patent, he states that the lead (and boron) shield is
there to protect from harmful radiation: In particular, the inventive
apparatus is coated by boron layers and lead plates both for restraining
noxious radiations and transforming them into energy, without
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
If it happened nobody would notice.
Yes. I think it would be indistinguishable from an elastic collision (if
the two situations are different).
Eric
From the perspective of IP strategy, Rossi was in a catch-22 in 2010. If
he fully disclosed in a patent application, he risked having the
application denied while simultaneously letting his trade secrets out into
the wild, where others could copy him without his having legal protection.
In light
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
And Mills may be correct when it comes to his belief in determinism. QM
could have been wrong for 100 years. The pilot wave theory might have been
dropped way too quickly.
I've always had feeling that the Copenhagen
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.cobraf.com/forum/immagini/R_123564999_3.pdf
In this document an intellectual property law firm requests on Rossi's
behalf reconsideration of his September 2010 US patent application, making
several
This looks like it was an effort to establish priority over the discovery.
The matter of priority regarding cold fusion was a big concern in 1989 and
1990. It is interesting that what Steven Jones and what Pons and
Fleischmann believed they were seeing and reported in their measurements
were
I wrote:
Even if a scientist erroneously disavows discovering a specific phenomenon
like LENR, I suppose, this is not necessarily to say that history books
won't recognize whatever role he played later on.
Just to clarify -- the above is a hypothetical. Even if what Steven Jones
was seeing
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at the ICCF-18 transmutation study of nickel and palladium
study by Cook, you will see that Mizuno shows the same isotopic shifts in
nickel that DGT shows. Ni61 does not participate in the reaction but all
other
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:01 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I would still be inclined to consider reactions that produce heavy charged
particles. The heavier and slower, the better. E.g. fusion/fission
reactions.
The reactions I've been looking at recently have charged particles as
daughters
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:33 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...but wouldn't you expect 1/2 to fly away from the surface, and half to fly
into it?
I would expect there to be an anisotropy. As I envision it, there's an
electric arc pulling a mass of protons into a recess. For a fraction of a
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Secondly, and most importantly - the neutron of the deuteron offers Coulomb
shielding.
Can you elaborate on this? I would have expected the neutron to be more or
less invisible, as far as the Coulomb field is concerned.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The strong force is so much stronger than electrical repulsion, that any
small effect can make a difference at close range.
If the possible Coulomb shielding effect from the neutron works at the same
range as the strong
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If you look in the archives, “stripping” was favored by me for many years,
and I first introduced it here - but opinions change.
The first reference I saw to the OP process was from a thread between you
and Abd Lomax, in
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
However, all reactions of nickel with a proton result in a
radioactive isotope with a half-life which is long enough for it to have
been seen. This kind of hot isotope is not reported in any study of the
Rossi reactor -
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This elegant possibility of a gainful reaction in which stable nickel
converts to stable nickel, giving up energy, is why my prediction for the
Mizuno presentation in November is to suggest that they will see a relative
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Hopefully economies of scale will eventually lower the entry level price
to around $10k. That would give the Smart Car a run for its money.
Even 10k dollars feels steep for a car that was
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This hang-up on neutrons and 4He is due to this irresistible indoctrination
from old time nuclear physics. Rossi states that he has never seen a
neutron. 4He is just as likely to transmute as any other element. 4He has
no
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones is now just trying to save face (pointlessly so) ...
This would be quite difficult to do at this point.
Eric
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question. We put boron just for safety, as Prof. Focardi teached to
me. Kind of just in case…
I'm going to guess that they have boron to shield from spallation neutrons
resulting from this reaction:
p + d → 2p + n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
However, they also saw what they called cold fusion--LENR--reactions that
produced no gammas and apparently fused D-D to helium with a 24 Mev
distribution of energy.
The discussion of a possible dd reaction (reaction 5,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
... whatever is producing the tritium has got to be a strange reaction
pathway as well, because its certainly not commensurate with the excess
heat either.
I'm wondering whether tritium might occur through reactions such as
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
... These heat-helium correlations do not come from only one person. To
deny the correlation of heat-helium is essentially saying that not only is
Melvin Miles incompetent, but so are the researchers from the numerous
(16?) other
Speaking of grasping for every little straw, there was an interesting post
at E-Cat World:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/09/17/e-cat-rumor-from-a/
Congratulations go to Frank Acland for making this an indispensable site
for news.
Eric
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
In other words excess heat produces significantly more than the background
from diffusion, but much less than the atmospheric background.
For sure. It is not the absolute magnitude of the signal that matters (in
this
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Has he looked for helium? That would be evidence for cold fusion. If he has
not detected any because he refused to look, that proves nothing.
I'm pretty sure Mills isn't using a PdD system. That is the only system of
801 - 900 of 2365 matches
Mail list logo
