I wish you were attending, Ron – but as everyone knows:
THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION – attendance is being carefully controlled.
Even strong supporters of BLP have been rejected for invitations, simply
because they are scientists.
Mills does not want to address the problem of
d'you know where it is going to be held?
On 28 January 2016 at 19:20, Ron Kita wrote:
> Hmmm:
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/invitational-public-demonstration/
>
> Ron Kita, Chiralex
> Doylestown, PA 50 miles to Mills
>
--
---
http://twitter.com/esaruoho //
"Invitational public demonstration" is a contradiction of terms. If it is
invitational, it is not public.
- Jed
I hope that Bill Good is still with BLP. Many many years ago...we had a
few telephone conversations..pleasant.
Ad astra,
Ron
the company may have been tied to ThermocoreFranklin and Marshall U.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Craig Haynie
wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 09:30 -0800, Jones Beene wrote:
> Mills does not want to address the problem of having no verifiable
> data to share.
>
As we've seen from previous attempts, there is no such thing as
verifiable data at a public demonstration. Everything will be
questioned, and nothing can
com>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Process in Terraforming Applications
Intensity-normalized, superposition of visible spectra of the SunCell plasma
and Sun’s radiation at the Earth’s surface demonstrating that they both emit
blackbody radiation of about 5800-6000K. From the blackbody
Intensity-normalized, superposition of visible spectra of the SunCell
plasma and Sun’s radiation at the Earth’s surface demonstrating that they
both emit blackbody radiation of about 5800-6000K. From the blackbody
curves, the SunCell plasma has the same temperature as the Sun emitting the
same
I think desalination is the answer. HOWEVER you have remove all of the
salt, or you pollute the soil. This was a concern many years ago. The water
is okay for human consumption but the salt will build up over time in the
soil.
Advanced methods may be okay. See, for example:
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Fri, 08 Jan 2016 01:34:39 +:
Hi,
I don't think this will work. If you apply power to a wind turbine, you will
most likely just create a local vortex that redirects air into itself in a form
of "short circuit". Much as can happen to helicopters when they
OK Axil,
I am glad you see that there is no disservice.
Maybe they do provide theoretical statements that are cockeyed. From
reading Mats Lewan's book one can at least find three reasons why.:
1. There is no patent law that protects anything without a big bag of money
to defend the patent, but a
I do not think Rossi and Mills do a disservice to LENR because they raise
money. They dishonor LENR because of the cockeyed theories that purports
to describe their systems. Science is put off by this theoretical farce and
it has been for 25 years. I hope that DGT will serve the cause of LENR as
BlackLight Power is about to be swept into the dustbin of history. In a
year or less, a workable LENR product will be demonstrated as a
preproduction prototype. This should cut the legs out from under their
investor base who have been so cruelly abused over these many years and
that has propped
1 billion watts for how long? 1 picosecond :P?
2014-04-04 8:16 GMT-03:00 Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com:
Here we go, again:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140403006389/en/BlackLight-Power-Announces-Sustained-Production-Electricity-Photovoltaic
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
Same old incommensurability
noisehttps://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89595.html
.
Gads this stuff is disgusting.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
1 billion watts for how long? 1 picosecond :P?
2014-04-04 8:16 GMT-03:00 Mark Jurich
hello all,
I am posting my comment here but it is several treads, which I am
commenting on.
i think as we all are trying to promote LENR. We are doing a lot of
disservice to or case by being negative to the guys who has raised the
funds,
i have read half the ebook about an Andrea Rossi and i
Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here we go, again:
Well said! It is kind of hilarious.
- Jed
Blacklight lost the limelight to Rossi. Now it remains to be seen if Rossi
deserved the limelight.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here we go, again:
Well said! It is kind of hilarious.
- Jed
LOL. This stuff should have come out on April 1.
A small photovoltaic panel converting millions of watts of light from a seam
welder ? That's hilarious. Whether Rossi has the stolen the limelight or
not, this is about the most absurd BS on the planet. It looks like an act of
total
Jones Beene
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22Jones+Beene%22
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:17:06 -0800
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20140128
/Any News you get will only happen through BLP itself or by way of a preapproved
journalist who
From: a.ashfield
It looks like you were wrong. Here is a report from an
attendee.
I may be wrong, but the evidence for that is not apparent yet.
[snip] That validator was from Rowan University so I am sure
that
Jones Beene wrote.
This still looks like a demo set-up purely to milk more funding out of
investors - in response to the reports of Rossi's coup. Those investors in
BLP should be tiring of this kind of staged dog-and-pony show, after all the
years of one disappointment after another.
I think it
The press release number was power, not energy. That's nonsense --
particularly if you are going to demonstrate a pulse.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:16 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
Jones Beene wrote.
This still looks like a demo set-up purely to milk more funding out of
Papp ripped apart a 5/8 inch stainless steel pipe and dug a 3 foot crater
in the desert hardpan with a water based arc initiated power pulse. That is
a powerful world class pulse done about 50 years ago.
IMHO, this is the best reaction out there. But the point is... can Mills
turn a water vapor
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:10 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The press release number was power, not energy. That's nonsense --
particularly if you are going to demonstrate a pulse.
Many a pulse power device has appeared to be an ou energy generator
proving the Feynman Conjecture
When Feynman gave a lecture in Switzerland in 1965 he spotted
Stückelberg after the lecture leaving quietly from the back. Pointing to
Stückelberg, Feynman remarked He did the work and walks alone toward the
sunset; and, here I am, covered in all the glory, which rightfully should
be his!
At
Wrong demo. Papp demonstrated over 100 HP _continuous_ with a dynamometer
when he wanted to demonstrate energy.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Papp ripped apart a 5/8 inch stainless steel pipe and dug a 3 foot crater
in the desert hardpan with a water
This E-cat World report is vague.
Since there was no NDA, why didn't this person write a concrete description
of the equipment and instruments? The only technical specific is that they
used waterbath calorimetry. I don't know what that means. I guess it
means static or bomb calorimetry, rather
If they used bomb calorimetry and had an easily quantifiable energy source,
like a capacitor bank, for their pulse, then their demo might be good.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This E-cat World report is vague.
Since there was no NDA, why didn't
They used as 12,000 amp welder.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
If they used bomb calorimetry and had an easily quantifiable energy
source, like a capacitor bank, for their pulse, then their demo might be
good.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jed
Mills is a long, long way from that capability. He is only at the blast
stage.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:05 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Wrong demo. Papp demonstrated over 100 HP _continuous_ with a dynamometer
when he wanted to demonstrate energy.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
They used as 12,000 amp welder.
You're joking, right? These people who criticized Rossi's crude
measurement techniques resorted to a commercial welder for a current
source.
If you're joking, it's funny.
If not, it's
It's ok that he's not at Papp's stage, but he should act like it when he's
giving a demo, and that means using measurement techniques appropriate to a
single pulse which, as I already pointed out, would be a bomb calorimeter
and capacitor bank.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Axil Axil
http://pesn.com/2014/01/20/9602425_Randell-Mills_explains_upcoming-Blacklight-power-demo/
The 10 MW device they are building is actually smaller than a square foot.
It's just 9 inches on each side. They're buying a 10,000-amp commercial
seam welder to apply to the prototype (where the water is
Let's adorn their incommensurable dimensions with some dimensioend
quantities that bring them a step closer to commensurability. Here are
some dimensioned of a 10,000AMP welding rig:
*Voltage*
If current is the amount of electricity flowing, then Voltage (measured in
Volts) is
the pressure or
They were able to achieve 5 x funding target output. :)
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have any contact, or information, from someone at the
demonstration? If so, is there any news?
Craig
Any News you get will only happen through BLP itself or by way of a preapproved
journalist who got the News direct from BLP and had the story cleared.
All attendees were required to sign an NDA in which they agreed not to mention
anything whatsoever about the proceedings to others, nor even to
SO the 'demo' was really a 'dog-n-pony' show for the investors.
A target output of 'x' was set by the investors, and BLP achieved 5x, so
I guess that means they get the next round of financing! Ahhh, life in
a startup!
I hope the investors made sure that the dog and pony were real, and
Comments from some of those present:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/blacklight-power-jan-28th-demo-thread/
the comments quickly degraded into a climate change debate, however,
there was this one that kind of stuck out above the chatter...
--
O' dear have our poor scientists got it all wrong AGAIN.
Hot Fusion, billions spent = turns out to be rubbish.
Global warming, billions spent = turns out to
Wait till the people figure out they are also destroying all of nature with
microwave doppler radars. Pretty f}%^^ up. I say hang them all! :)
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014, MarkI-Zeropoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
the comments quickly degraded into a climate change debate, however, there
by
these rapid changes in dilation factor]
Regards
Fran
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight...
In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21
, December 11, 2012 3:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight...
In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:10 +0100:
Hi,
IMO, Mills is not LENR. It is what he says it is. Hydrinos. However I suspect
that most of LENR is mediated by Hydrinos too ;)
Hi
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills:
We will announce some substantial developments at some point.
How informative!
Things would be so different, if they were not as they are.
- Jed
Hi, I hijack a little that thread to ask you all, what are your various
opinion on their claimed technology of LENR to electricity direct
conversion (CIHT).
I don't see any other paper or lab results that are similar.
Anomalous heat, transmutation, and radiations are quite validated , but
device
In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:10 +0100:
Hi,
IMO, Mills is not LENR. It is what he says it is. Hydrinos. However I suspect
that most of LENR is mediated by Hydrinos too ;)
Hi, I hijack a little that thread to ask you all, what are your various
opinion on their
below is a partial transcript of Shelby Brewer speaking at some presentation:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/27312-commodore-applied-technologies-red-chip-conference-presentation-transcript
The technology side, we have a process called Solvated
They are starting to play in the big leagues. Quoting the press release:
Cranbury, NJ (March 23, 2010)BlackLight Power,
Inc. (BLP) today announced its seventh commercial
license agreement, and first in Europe with
GEOENERGIE SpA, Energy Subsidiary of
Geogreen. In a non-exclusive
Any hints as to what, if anything, the license cost?
So far there's been no clear indication that any power company has
actually *bought* a license from BLP, as far as I know. (I'll be happy
to be corrected on this.)
On 04/01/2010 10:54 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
They are starting to play in the
Agreements like these (unproved technology) generally involve a low up
front licensing fee with a significant per unit royalty. I would
guess it to be something like Tesla's agreement with Westinghouse.
If it was truly free and you can sell a 10 kilowatt hours for a buck,
it would not be
At 10:49 AM 4/1/2010, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
FYI:
I'm surprised Mr. Carrell has not yet alerted us to a recent
BlackLight Power announcement:
BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First [seventh over-all] Commercial
License in Europe with GEOENERGIE SpA, Energy Subsidiary of Geogreen
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug 2009
20:14:29 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
My guess is that if you click on the dot out of curiosity you get infected.
Just a curiosity.
I have one of my google news alerts set for Blacklight Power. Several days
ago I started
Infected by the virus of the mind that makes you press the button again and
again...
Except for blowing the world up it's harmless...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug
2009
20:14:29 -0500:
Hi,
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug 2009
20:14:29 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
My guess is that if you click on the dot out of curiosity you get infected.
Doubt it (but I'm not going to try it!). Rather, it looks like it plays
a
I've never heard of an infectious Flash file so I don't think it's
actually dangerous.
I clicked the dot about 1000 times. It's a funny little program. If my
computer became infected, it's not obvious.
FYI,
I think most who have commented on this issue have missed a specific point,
no pun intended. Why are there different URL sites all sporting the same red
dot function? None of my other google alerts appear infected.
This is specific. Only in regards to Google news alerts concerning
I googled press the red button.
All sorts of hits came up - most pointing to the same annoying red button
app.
It appears to be a harmless app.
Here are some Googled searched comments:
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=9644
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:26 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Does anyone else have a google alert for Blacklight Power? What have they
gotten for the past several days concerning BLP?
I assume they have not gotten it... or have they gotten it as well?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Terry Blantonhohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent
Johnsonorionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Just a curiosity.
Reminds me of this MP3 psychiatric answering machine.
Terry
THIS one:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent
Johnsonorionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Just a curiosity.
Reminds me of this MP3 psychiatric answering machine.
Terry
More likely they have hacked into GoDaddy:
myftpsite.net = [ 63.64.164.96 ]
(Asked whois.godaddy.com:43 about myftpsite.net)
Registrant:
Deerfield.com
Registered through: GoDaddy.com Inc. http://www.godaddy.com
Domain Name: MYFTPSITE.NET
Domain servers in listed order:
I've gotten the same bogus Blacklight Power emails from three separate
independent Email accounts. All the same bogus URLs. Apparently,
others have gotten the same bogus email alerts as well.
Most of the analysis expressed so far seems to describe various symptoms.
What is causing the symptoms?
The power gain is very real but the theory is very wrong and people
are looking at the gas atoms when they should be looking at the
catalyst. Fractional states do not exist in 4D and the hydrino is
unphysical but in the same way as the Twin Paradox from physics 101 is
unphysical! The
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
If you haven't already done so, check out BlackLight Power's web site.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Besides a new face, new stuff reported on.
I notice they've got another replication from the Rowan team. No links
to published articles on
Yes,
the big announcement came out yesterday. Validation using off the shelf
materials by Rowan.
Sorted by relevance
Sort by date
http://news.google.com/news/search?um=1ned=ushl=enq=black+light+powercf=allscoring=n
Sort by date with duplicates included
From the recent BLP press release at:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/BlackLightPowerPhysicsGrandSlamFINAL081209.htm
http://tinyurl.com/q2dxos
--
Excerpt:
“The advanced version of the solid fuel is very efficient at
liberating energy from forming
-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site
From the recent BLP press release at:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/BlackLightPowerPhysicsGrandSlamFINAL081209.htm
http://tinyurl.com/q2dxos
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 13 Aug 2009
12:00:12 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From http://www.blacklightpower.com/introguide.shtml#2
The solid-fuel chemistry has the important feature that it's regenerable using
methods such as molten-salt electrolysis. An advanced version
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so.
It is probable that as BLP progesses on their current path, a
firestorm of criticism and opposition may emerge, and BLP must be
prepared for it. Remember the story of the
, August 02, 2009 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July
30, 2009
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so. It is
probable that as BLP progesses on their current path
But, Steven, all that is decidedly ON TOPIC:
http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html
The Vortex-L list was originally created for discussions of
professional research into fluid vortex/cavitation devices which
exhibit anomalous energy effects (ie: the inventions of Schaeffer,
Huffman, Griggs, and
Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July
30, 2009
I chased the link and didn't get anywhere; it would not open for me.
Could you summarize
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July
30, 2009
MC: You won't get much satisfaction from the press release itself. As a BLP
watcher, I can offer some unofficial background.
The positinve part is that there are now six corporate entities who have
Downloaded fine here. It's a 130-page PDF document (80 blank pages).
Do you want me to send you the PDF?
Mark Jordan
On 16 Aug 2008 at 19:41, Jones Beene wrote:
--- Hi Robin,
Going by the old paper I have (Anomalous
Argon-Hydrogen-Strontium Discharge) we are
-- Robin
Assuming 10%, then the light output would be 2.46 W
for pure H2 (taken from the table). To get a flux of
2 microwatt/cm^2, one would have to measure at a
distance of about 3 m from the reaction.
Not at all.
You are apparently assuming the full cm^2 of the chip
is being
After reading the decision of the patent examiner, my impression is that
the patent was rejected for good reason. The rejection argument is not
that the theory is wrong but that Mills is trying to patent a theory and
its application to calculating electron states. This would be like
having a
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:40 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
snip
What I'd like to know is whether UK IPO's final decision was due to a
difference in
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
calculation of electron states via software simulations.
Is this latest battle related to Randy's Millsian Molecular Modeling
endeavors, or is this a follow-up to recent
Can theories be copyrighted?
Harry
On 12/5/2008 4:37 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
calculation of electron states via software simulations.
Is this latest battle related
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent
Howdy Mike,
And thus we gain another glimpse of the new century strategies being used to
capture revenue streams derived from intellectual property... or should I
say properties. Actually the field remains open to a new legimate form of
pirating ownership before discovery. hmmm
Google
80 matches
Mail list logo