Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Thanks! Good translating. He seems to be improving his calorimetry. The results are impressive if real. Let me copy them here, for convenience -- Results: * A flow calorimeter was constructed having a computer acquired flow and temperatures at the inlet and outlet. Calibration measurements

[Vo]:Astronomers rediscover UDH and add yet another name to it

http://spaceref.com/jupiter/giant-planets-and-dark-hydrogen.html There is little doubt that this "discovery" is not new and relates to the dense hydrogen species of LENR, whether it is called hydrino, f/H, pychno, UDH, DDL, or other assorted designations. ha! more names than petticoats, eh Boris?

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Nice work, Bob ! on the experiment and the translation. Hat’s off to Parkhomov for an improved experiment. A certain amount of consistency is emerging from this testing. This adds substance to several other findings that there is slight gain – COP of about 1.1 in the Parkhomov type reactor

[Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Good morning Vorts, Here is a link to my Google drive folder having the English translation of A. Parkhomov's latest (6/23) presentation. The link is to the folder containing the translation, and if updates are needed, I will put them in this same folder.

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Thank you Bob for this nice translation. Shame there is no pressure measurements reported hence there was a transducer. Did they have problem with it? From Me356, pressure is a key ppint to control for the road to success in Ni/H LENR experiment. COP 1.1~1.3 is below what Parkhomov had

[Vo]:Article: Layer of strange "dark hydrogen" believed to exist on Jupiter-like planets

Layer of strange "dark hydrogen" believed to exist on Jupiter-like planets http://flip.it/E3JjC

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Can someone post a link to something in the way of earlier work, which might give an overview of this experiment and this approach? I came in late to the show, and I'm confused as to what the reaction is even believed to be here. It's also apparent that some major chemical stuff was going on

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Jones Beene wrote: > This adds substance to several other findings that there is slight gain – > COP of about 1.1 in the Parkhomov type reactor setup. > To be more exact, it says "the excess heat versus the electrical consumption varied between 5% and 20%." So that is a

[Vo]:LENR news coming from Sochi

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-24-2016-lenr-news-from-sochi-coming.html it is a pleasure to see and read again LENR papers.. But legalitis is also here and will stay, no problem- as the BREXIT it will be good on long term . peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

From: Jed Rothwell Slight gain can be a big deal – when it is consistent slight gain. I would not call that a "slight gain." Many important cold fusion experiments have produced much smaller gains than that, and far smaller absolute power. A decent standard for reliable gain would be the

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation From: Jed Rothwell Slight gain can be a big deal – when it is consistent slight gain. I would not call that a "slight gain." Many important cold fusion experiments have produced much smaller gains than that, and far

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

I will look for the older references. Certainly Jed has most of them in the lenr-canr.org database. Parkhomov's work stemmed from the Lugano report on Rossi's hotCat - where Parkhomov, a retired Russian physicist, deduced the fuel as primarily Ni + LAH, and tried it. He saw credible excess

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

First of all, did you notice that Parkhomov doubled his Ni charge from 1g to 2g? So, there is some scaling being tested. We don't really know if this reaction scales linearly with the fuel mass or squared or exponential or what. There was a report by Jones recently of a large scale runaway, so

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

I will look for the older references.  Certainly Jed has most of them in the lenr-canr.org database.  Parkhomov's work stemmed from the Lugano report on Rossi's hotCat - where Parkhomov, a retired Russian physicist, deduced the fuel as primarily Ni + LAH, and tried it.  He saw credible excess

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Unfortunately, all of the nuclear effects that have been detected - whether radiations, isotopic shifts, or transmutations - are unconfirmed. There have been 1-off examples of each, but no confirmation that any is a repeatable part of the process, nor that these were not 1-time side-effects or

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Ah. Thank you. I didn't realize this is based on Rossi's work, though I certainly should have, given the way it's set up. So, /if/ we assume all of Rossi's results were bogus (and I know of no reason not to assume that), /then/ it would be remarkable indeed if this actually was a real,

Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

See below ... On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > Ah. Thank you. I didn't realize this is based on Rossi's work, though I > certainly should have, given the way it's set up. > > So, *if* we assume all of Rossi's results were bogus (and I know of no

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Bob H--- I agree with you. I consider the the term "run-away reaction" is accurate when it comes to nuclear processes. Bob Cook From: rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:53:06 -0600 Subject: Re: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation To:

RE: [Vo]: English translation of Parkhomov's latest presentation

Stephen-- I am a little more positive about the significance of AP's results. I would say that the recent results confirm much of the Lugano test. I think that AP's test did not have the same control Rossi has developed, and , hence the significant over-heating event. Rossi has indicated

Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info

OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of 'communism' was prominent in a LENR article): No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about 'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99% of you are clueless about it. All