The photon exchange seen in spectra of hydrinos comes from modifications of properties in hydrinos without changing the type of hydrino. You probably need a special QM theory for hydrinos to see them. But Mill can calculate those spectra quite well, more on this in another email.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > there is critiques stemming from not believing in hydrinos >> because the feel they must give up on QM, which perhaps is not true. >> > > Perhaps hydrinos and QM are not incompatible; for example, maybe they're > dual, as you have suggested previously. If so, could you help me to > understand where the "prediction" of a broadband spectrum comes from? This > is the explanation as I have seen in promotional literature: as the > electron goes to deeper redundant levels, first it yields a kick to the > Mills catalyst via Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET), and then it > "spirals down," giving off broadband emission. QED says that electrons > radiate emissions in sharp peaks as they relax (or excite) from one > quantized energy level to another. In effect, they tunnel from one level > to another, and the *single* photon that is given off has an energy that > is the delta of the two levels. In QED, there is an explicit understanding > that there is no classical spiraling down. The spectra bear this out, as > there are lines for the hydrogen atom at the non-redundant levels rather > than broadband emissions. Broadband emissions suggest multiple photons, or > another particle that is involved, or something else I haven't been > acquainted with. > > My questions: > > - Is QED's claim about sharp lines and instantaneous transitions wrong > for the non-redundant electron levels? > - If it is not wrong, why are there sharp lines for the non-redundant > levels and then broadband emissions for the redundant levels? Where does > the discontinuity arise from? > > This kind of detail may seem like a trifling point to worry about; but > it's actually very important. People have spent their whole lives looking > at this type of question. One should not just wave it away. > > Eric > >
