Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that if true, it came from some other mysterious process. It match very well with the theoretical lines. It also looks like these fingerprints have been verified by third parties. But I can't find their reports for this at the website, I'm not English speaking, but I got the impressions that at least three 3'd parties stated that the reaction did show evidences of hydrino. So in a sense we need wait for the reports regarding this to see how well they replicated. I personally can't imagine that Mills is faking all this information, therefore i'm quite positive, BLP should now want the hydrino evidences to be replicated so I guess that we should get more and better verification documents later on.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote: > > spectroscopy at Harvard CfA showed evidence (and several possible >> artifacts) of continuum radiation in the 10-30 nm range from low-energy ... >> > > There is a further lack of clarity as to the employer of the spectropists. > Were they GEN3 subcontractors with no affiliation to Harvard CfA who were > permitted to use its facilities, perhaps by renting a machine for a short > period of time? The careful wording of the preamble to the report leaves > open a range of possibilities. > > Eric > >
