Josh,

UBNT is saying in the forms that the problem with ethernet jacks has been
taken care of.
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-LTU/AF5XHD-ethernet-port-vs-AF5X-ethernet-port/td-p/2562992

I know its still loose on the HD but have you had any links fair in
production on the HD because of those problem?

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, I can't see any difference in the ethernet ports, so I assumed
> they'll still have the same problems. I haven't actually seen any problems
> with the ethernet on an AF5XHD yet... but it doesn't always happen on the
> old radios either, so that doesn't prove much. They also have the advantage
> that of a usable second ethernet port, so you can hook up both and hope at
> least one keeps working.
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I didn't have any problem installing the boots or plugging or unplugging
>> a cable with the boot installed.
>> The AF5XHD is good for the money.  I can't complain.  The only thing I'd
>> be ware of is you really want a super hot CINR to hit the high data rates
>> that they advertise.
>>
>> We just used an AF5XHD with 34dbi dishes to replace an ePMP with their
>> 25dbi dishes.  On the exact same channel the ePMP was on, the AF5XHD didn't
>> actually give us better throughput.  We did end up getting more than double
>> the speed after shuffling channels around to reduce interference.  It's
>> unfortunately still only getting 64QAM (4x) in one direction due to
>> interference, but it's 1024QAM (10x) in the other direction.
>>
>> On 11/16/2018 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Who said that?  It's the exact same problem, it's so damn loose.  Yes,
>> you still have to force that cable up there for it to work.
>>
>> They did include a rubber IP67 boot.  If you put this inside and try to
>> put a cat5/rj45 in there you'll destroy the female jack of the radio.  I
>> would guess if you slid the rubber thing over the cat5, plugged it in, and
>> kept that boot in there it would help it from coming down at all but the
>> trade there is a new tech will destroy the radio more often than what the
>> boot would help...
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>> I thought they fixed the Ethernet jack on the AF5XHD? That is what UBNT
>>> is telling me they said they found a problem vendor. Are you still having
>>> issues where you have to push the RJ45 up into the AF to get the ethernet
>>> link to come back?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> AF5Xhd is pretty sweet.  I'm happier radio wise than the AF5X.  It's
>>>> still a shit ethernet jack.
>>>>
>>>> As to ptmp, the snmp seems to be built with that in mind.  As to when
>>>> it'll come, all I can say is I've heard questions with no answer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We have been using the AF5XHD as well. I'm happy with it as a PTP
>>>>> platform, but in a lot of our areas we are running 2 foot dishes for even
>>>>> the shorter hops to achieve the SNR for 1024QAM. It's kicking ass though,
>>>>> and these links probably should have been bigger dishes to begin with so 
>>>>> it
>>>>> is what it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Highlights are mostly that now 256Q(8x) has a effective output power
>>>>> of 21db-22db, compared to the 18db on a good day of the original 5X. I
>>>>> think 1024Q (10x) is now more like 18db-19db now which is a huge
>>>>> improvement compared to the original 5X. It has helped quite a few of the
>>>>> links we have replaced.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:19 PM Timothy Steele <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> AirFiberxHD (PTP LTU) has been working awesome at least 2 times the
>>>>>> throughput and uses a lot less power then AirfiberX
>>>>>>
>>>>>> grate for solar sites
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who cares, Ubiquiti likes to sue their customers so why would anyone
>>>>>>> wanna buy their crap?!?!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paul McCall <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has anyone heard any update on when the PTMP Airfiber or other UBNT
>>>>>>>> LTU gear is coming?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems like the fodder / vaporware cycle on this has been running
>>>>>>>> long then normal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to