Companies spoke highly of the beam steering products, too.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:04 AM Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As much as Chris Johnson brags about his alpha LTU deployment, you would
> think it would be in production already.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Kurt Fankhauser <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:48 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP Airfiber or LTU
>
> *forums and * fail for the previous post
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:46 PM Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Josh,
>>
>> UBNT is saying in the forms that the problem with ethernet jacks has been
>> taken care of.
>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-LTU/AF5XHD-ethernet-port-vs-AF5X-ethernet-port/td-p/2562992
>>
>> I know its still loose on the HD but have you had any links fair in
>> production on the HD because of those problem?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I can't see any difference in the ethernet ports, so I assumed
>>> they'll still have the same problems. I haven't actually seen any problems
>>> with the ethernet on an AF5XHD yet... but it doesn't always happen on the
>>> old radios either, so that doesn't prove much. They also have the advantage
>>> that of a usable second ethernet port, so you can hook up both and hope at
>>> least one keeps working.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didn't have any problem installing the boots or plugging or
>>>> unplugging a cable with the boot installed.
>>>> The AF5XHD is good for the money.  I can't complain.  The only thing
>>>> I'd be ware of is you really want a super hot CINR to hit the high data
>>>> rates that they advertise.
>>>>
>>>> We just used an AF5XHD with 34dbi dishes to replace an ePMP with their
>>>> 25dbi dishes.  On the exact same channel the ePMP was on, the AF5XHD didn't
>>>> actually give us better throughput.  We did end up getting more than double
>>>> the speed after shuffling channels around to reduce interference.  It's
>>>> unfortunately still only getting 64QAM (4x) in one direction due to
>>>> interference, but it's 1024QAM (10x) in the other direction.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/16/2018 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Who said that?  It's the exact same problem, it's so damn loose.  Yes,
>>>> you still have to force that cable up there for it to work.
>>>>
>>>> They did include a rubber IP67 boot.  If you put this inside and try to
>>>> put a cat5/rj45 in there you'll destroy the female jack of the radio.  I
>>>> would guess if you slid the rubber thing over the cat5, plugged it in, and
>>>> kept that boot in there it would help it from coming down at all but the
>>>> trade there is a new tech will destroy the radio more often than what the
>>>> boot would help...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought they fixed the Ethernet jack on the AF5XHD? That is what
>>>>> UBNT is telling me they said they found a problem vendor. Are you still
>>>>> having issues where you have to push the RJ45 up into the AF to get the
>>>>> ethernet link to come back?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> AF5Xhd is pretty sweet.  I'm happier radio wise than the AF5X.  It's
>>>>>> still a shit ethernet jack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As to ptmp, the snmp seems to be built with that in mind.  As to when
>>>>>> it'll come, all I can say is I've heard questions with no answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have been using the AF5XHD as well. I'm happy with it as a PTP
>>>>>>> platform, but in a lot of our areas we are running 2 foot dishes for 
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> the shorter hops to achieve the SNR for 1024QAM. It's kicking ass 
>>>>>>> though,
>>>>>>> and these links probably should have been bigger dishes to begin with 
>>>>>>> so it
>>>>>>> is what it is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Highlights are mostly that now 256Q(8x) has a effective output power
>>>>>>> of 21db-22db, compared to the 18db on a good day of the original 5X. I
>>>>>>> think 1024Q (10x) is now more like 18db-19db now which is a huge
>>>>>>> improvement compared to the original 5X. It has helped quite a few of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> links we have replaced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:19 PM Timothy Steele <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AirFiberxHD (PTP LTU) has been working awesome at least 2 times the
>>>>>>>> throughput and uses a lot less power then AirfiberX
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> grate for solar sites
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who cares, Ubiquiti likes to sue their customers so why would
>>>>>>>>> anyone wanna buy their crap?!?!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paul McCall <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone heard any update on when the PTMP Airfiber or other
>>>>>>>>>> UBNT LTU gear is coming?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It seems like the fodder / vaporware cycle on this has been
>>>>>>>>>> running long then normal
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to